Warner Bros. Interactive is releasing a brand new Batman collection called Batman: Return to Arkham. This new collection will feature remastered version of the first two Batman games.
Im starting to think people are just porting these games then stick it with a Remastered label. Its not like it costs much to port to current Gen consoles for all we know.
Because you forgot to put on your glasses... Jokes apart, all the UE3 scenes shown are pre rendered cutscenes... UE4 version may be realtime... Not sure though...
I really dont like hownArkham games feel and look at 60fps, they were made to play at 30fps and thats how I like them, but well, thats just my opinion.
Already got the remastered version twice. WB gave it to me a second time with the Arkham knight fiasco It's call the pc version already 1080P 60 frames sec, etc.
it is fixed ... well i got no problem playing it ... the only people that had problems to being with was the one with low end graphic cards with low memory.
I don't think so, look at the added detail to the textures on Mr Freeze, he clearly has more detail in the Unreal Engine 4 picture, overall, though, the game looks worse because it doesn't all mesh together the best. I'll reserve judgement until we see the game in motion, but so far this is ramping up to be one of the most disappointing remasters ever.
So the U3 engine baste game can magically turn into a U4 engine one who knew, pity about their not being a pc version, would have like to do some data mining and called them out on their BS.
So a U3 engine based game can magically turn into a U4 engine based one, who knew, pity about their not being a pc version, would have like to do some data mining and called them out on their BS.
Uh oh. Looks like they're trying to go the resolution route versus refresh rate. If it was 60 frames per second they would've already announced it. But I guess if you cared about that sort of thing you'd be on PC anyway.
Wow... As much as I love these games, and I really love them, I will definitely skip out on this if these screenshots are accurate. Everything looks muddy and unfinished, like they took the shots during the loading gap or something. Really WB, you should have thrown money at Rocksteady to do this. They could have kept it looking amazing and probably done the work in half the time...
Why does UE3 look better on most of the pics..?
If it isn't 60 then there really isn't a point to release it.Last gen versions are 30,unless it looks as good as arkham knight there is no excuse.
Already got the remastered version twice.
WB gave it to me a second time with the Arkham knight fiasco
It's call the pc version
already 1080P 60 frames sec, etc.
I hope there are also 60 fps improvements
This looks terrible!
if you can't do a proper upgrade for the visuals then leave it alone and don't make it uglier like this.