220°

Xbox Live Changed the Industry & A Lot of That Wouldn't Have Happened Without Xbox360 - Bach & Moore

Industry veterans Robbie Bach and Peter Moore look back to the importance of Xbox360 and Xbox Live for the gaming industry as a whole.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Phil322924d ago (Edited 2924d ago )

It's a really fantastic online system, but I don't like how it made players and influenced Sony to have to pay for online multiplayer.

Alexious2924d ago

It was amazing at the very beginning and truly revolutionary. Since then, though, it has stagnated a lot and as a PC gamer I cannot but frown at the fact that there's still a paywall.

naruga2924d ago

yes....it changed the industry to the worse...

donwel2924d ago

Don't forget that MS tried a PC paywall with games for windows live and so few people used it they had to drop the charge.

Aloy-Boyfriend2924d ago

To me that was the best thing to happen to PSN. it is much better now because of it

Alexious2924d ago

That's definitely true, Sony borrowed some things from Live.

magiciandude2924d ago

Lol no. XBL is still superior to PSN.

Christopher2924d ago

@magiciandude: don't see where XiKurapikaKurta said one was better than another. Merely that PSN was better because of XBL...

_-EDMIX-_2923d ago

Agreed. MS format very much showed that you need some basic things to have online work correctly and be able to build on that.

A store, friends list, messaging etc. I remember when PS3 first launched and those functions were so bare, but now they grew into something more solid. Now both XB and PS have many of the basic features one looks for, messaging, friends list, a store etc.

Though Dreamcast had it first, MS made the blueprint to how console online could work.

This is one of the best examples of how competition can help the industry. Sony being more so hardware then software, MS being more so software then hardware. Sony needed to see that such features could help its consumers, publishers and even Sony themselves.

Publishers got a place to put their games, content and functions for MP games.

Gamers got more options for games, more options for post launch content through digital distribution and got to play MP games with their friends with ease.

Everyone won from such a thing. In order to compete, you must KNOW you're enemy. In business, what you're enemy is doing that works, means its something that is valued by consumers and can work for you. Ignoring that is a grave mistake.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2923d ago
jb2272924d ago

I don't mind the paying for mp part (probably because I'm not a big mp guy), but the fact that streaming services like Netflix used to be behind that paywall for MS during that entire generation & the beginning of this one was pretty ludicrous.

LavaLampGoo2924d ago

The 360 was a very big console and it did everything. I think the digital console market and console menus would be very different without it

Garethvk2924d ago

It also brought Red Ring Of Death to the lexicon.

darthv722924d ago

Two acronyms became apparent that gen. RRoD and YLoD.

jb2272924d ago

I'm pretty sure we heard the RRoD roughly 99% more often than YLoD. My 1st slim PS3 from 09 is still kicking today, never had a single issue. RRoD was obviously a much more widespread issue.

Null19802924d ago (Edited 2924d ago )

I worked at Gamestop for 3 years in an Assistant Manager position during the PS3/XBox 360/ Wii launches. The XBox 360 was the only time we had an internal email notifying us of a system failure epidemic how to handle the influx of customer returns with abnormally high failure rates. Around 30% of total systems at that particular time. We had tons of people coming into my store's location with Red Ringed 360s. Every week. You'd see the occasional PS3 YLOD, but it was far less common. A few every now and then, well within the norm of most new console. No internal email from Gamestop about an epidemic with the PS3.

Me personally, I went through 3 XBox 360's between 2006 and 2009. It's the reason I gave up on Microsoft as a hardware developer. They rushed the system out before it was ready, despite prerelease reports of mass failures even before the first launch! They were so desperate to be first to market, despite knowing they were faulty. I loved the system in the beginning, software support wise... but I got fed up with the faultiness of the hardware and have still sworn off the brand for this reason. I'll be more likely to support their games on PC when they make that move, because that is what they excel at... software.

Edit- My first Xbox 360, which I got at launch, was dead within the first 8 months. In comparison, it took my Fat 60gb PS3 4 1/2 years before it fell victim to the YLOD.

darthv722924d ago

Cool story Otter. My Nov 05 launch 360 got the RRoD in 2007 so I got about 2 years worth of gaming out of it before it died. Luckily it died right when MS was offering free repairs so i did not have to worry about returning it to the store.

ArmrdChaos2924d ago

You mean you just didn't buy a new one like many others claim? /s
I had mine dump on me twice. Sent it back twice no charge, no shipping charge. Fixed and still running.
Where as my PS2 that took a dump because of the DVD drive I had to buy another because Sony chose to pretend like there wasn't a problem.

_-EDMIX-_2923d ago

RROD was like console AIDS!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2923d ago
Garethvk2924d ago

How can anyone dispute this as before it nobody had ever heard of that phrase. The closest we had was ironically another Microsoft creation called the Blue Screen of Death.

darthv722924d ago

If you are referring to the disagrees as being related to disputing the claim then you would be incorrect. Nobody is disputing the RRoD. It happened to many (myself included). MS fixed their problem (for the most part) unlike Sony and the issues that plagued the original PS1 as well as the PS2. In both cases the problems of overheating and laser failure happened to quite a bit. Maybe not to the full extent as RRoD but you had to either pay Sony to fix the problem (which I did on the original PS1) or buy another unit (which many probably did).

Bottom line is these were issues and each company handled the situations differently. Personally I prefer the option that doesn't cost the consumer anything out of pocket but to each their own. Coincidentally I have not had any system failures with a Nintendo or Sega product like I have with Sony and MS being part of the industry.

2924d ago Replies(2)
98xpresent2924d ago

The 360 was the best system last gen.

Goldby2924d ago

most popular in NA yes, as for use and accessibility, PS3 had that covered with internal Wifi, and HDMI, as well as early firmwares allowed Linux installation on the PS3. they each had their merits that helped create the industry we are in today. for better or worse

2923d ago
CaptainObvious8782923d ago

You mean the console MS purposefully rushed to market knowing full well of how faulty it was? That console?

The console that basically had it's first party support dropped only half way through the generation? That console?

The console that paved the way for pay online? That console?

I could go on.

Show all comments (55)
70°

Embracer CEO Lars Wingefors: "I deserve a lot of criticism."

Embracer CEO demonstrates a masterclass in mental gymnastics in latest interview.
"I'm sure I deserve a lot of criticism, but I don't think my team or companies deserve all the criticism. I could take a lot of that blame myself. But ultimately I need to believe in the mission," he said.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
on_line_forever5d ago

OK give us Kingdoms of Amalur 2 with AAA budget and we will accept your excuse

kaos895d ago (Edited 5d ago )

The king of the studio asset flip scheme that failed.

60°

Chatting Shadows of the Damned: Hella Remastered with Suda51

CGM Writes: While we were over at PAX East, we were able to sit down with Goichi Suda (Suda51) and talk about the upcoming remaster of Shadows of the Damned

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
60°

Sega Franchises That Deserve a Comeback

We explore the Sega classics that are ripe for revival! From Panzer Dragoon Saga to Virtua Fighter, discover why these legendary games deserve a comeback on next-gen consoles. Dive into a nostalgic journey and see which Sega titles are set to captivate a new generation of gamers in 2024.

Read Full Story >>
finalboss.io
ZeekQuattro10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Turned based Phantasy Star and Shinning Force remain at the top of my list of Sega IPs that need to return. At the very least I'd take a Shining Force collection that has 1,2,3, CD and the Game Gear entries.

FinalBoss10d ago

I was hesitant to put these two on. I've personally played more PSO than the RPG version. And shame on me, I don't remember much about Shining Force to talk about it properly.

That said, so many Sega licences deserve their place in this list.

jznrpg7d ago

A new Phantasy Star in the numbered series would be amazing. Shining Force too. But I’d settle on some collections as that’s probably the best we will get

anast9d ago

I don't trust Sega to do a proper comeback. The games will be just remastered and/or monetized to death.

gold_drake9d ago

shining force.

but indont see that happening unfortunately.