340°

DualShock 4 Was Tested With Xbox 360's Controller's Analog Sticks Layout

DualShock 4 is different from its previous iterations in terms of design. Sporting a touchpad, a complete design overhaul and the much needed change in the triggers that now go up to avoid the slip of the finger from them. Sony's Toshimasa Aoki in an interview with Gamebeat stated that Sony tried each and every possible combination with the DualShock 4 controller before settling on the final design.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
Lalanana4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

"Imitation is the best form of flattery"

seems sony learn to make its controller from the best one, the xbox 360.

Edit: I read the article..for sony to even consider the 360 controller says alot. :-p too bad they went with the pad.

I am not saying the ps4 controller is bad. Not at all. I just say we all have our preferences.

Thatguy-3104271d ago

Ummm didn't you read the article? They didn't because the core user base is already use to having it the way it is.

killcycle4271d ago

My personal annoyance of the Xbox pad has always been the sticks.
The left stick is higher then the right stick where the Ps3 pads are dead center beside each other. It's been scientifically proven that concentrating on 2 objects with similarities makes it easier because of your brains hand-Eye coordination functioning faster.

darthv724271d ago

hand dominance plays a part in comfort and control. Just because we each have symmetrical hands does not mean each one rests at the same natural position.

your dominant hand is more forward where as the non dominant hand is not. The comfort of the button layout and control layout are key to prolonged use of the controller. I can switch seamlessly between the styles of the xbox to the playstation to even the wii-u.

My dominant hand is the right but my eye to hand coordination is in my left. It comes from all those years of gaming and the different control schemes used. From the single button 2600 joystick to current, all of that controller experience has made me adaptable to changing controller conditions.

Bathyj4271d ago

Darth by your rational Microsoft must think most people are left handed.

MASTER_RAIDEN4271d ago

i think that even though the core userbase is used to the way it is now, a change in stick placement wouldnt have been anything anyone needs to get used to. the xbox controllers placement is very natural, but i could honestly go either way on stick placement. i trust sony to make a great controller just as they have for many years now. the fact that they actually passed up on a design similar to the 360s means that at least they believe in their current design choices.

darthv724271d ago

@bathy...yeah it does seem that way. However the eye to hand coordination (as far as control in a game goes) is the left which has been the dominant hand since the game pad first came out.

there were a few controllers that had it where you controlled the action with the right. The 2600 stick is one, the sega master system stick is another and then you had the colecovision and intelivision controllers as well.

when the game pad came out, it changed the whole dominant hand around. Now we were using our left hand to control the movement and the right controlled the action (jump, fire...). People who predominantly right handed for everything else (eating, writing...) use their left hand for directional control in a game.

Id say if i werent ambidextrous, south paws would have an edge because they are left hand dominant in everything including gaming.

AlexanderNevermind4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

I'm good with both controller designs as I play with Razer Sabertooth on PC. My only issue is getting used to L2/R2 for aiming/shooting I am stuck on stupid with L1/R1 (I play shooters on the PlayStation). Hope it does take to long.

Pintheshadows4271d ago

You'll be using L2 and R2 on the DS4 as the triggers feel great.

ShinMaster4271d ago

It's not the left stick that is important. It's actually the right stick with which we do all the aiming that is more important.

Hand-eye coordination is faster with a parallel design.

scott1824271d ago

I'm so glad they used the usual design. I love the thumbsticks positions, not a big fan of the xbox controllers.

The_Con-Sept4271d ago

Seriously.... If they went with 360 style pads I would switch to WiiU gaming just to stay away from it. But I am SO GLAD they kept the controller Symmetrical instead of stupid and uncomfortable like the 360 controller. Sorry but it isn't good for shooters, or fighters, or puzzlers, or anything that requires the d-pad for any purpose during a game.

Oner4271d ago

Sorry, but I don't care for using L2 & R2 as the PRIMARY model for aiming/shooting (the same with an asymmetrical stick layout). I don't see how this will end up good for users (such as myself) who have become completely accustomed to the standard L1/R1 for nearly 2 decades....I really hope Sony does the right thing and make sure all games have the OPTION to choose L1/R1 or L2/R2.

Brix904270d ago

@Oner

Not up to Sony it up to the developer to give you a choice to change the scheme of the controls in game.

Oner4270d ago

Sony can demand it as an OPTION for 10's of millions of dedicated PlayStation users who have used that configuration. It seriously can't be that difficult to code as it was the standard for sooooo long on PlayStation devices.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4270d ago
majiebeast4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

Except they kept their own superior design.

B-radical4271d ago

Superior? Don't get to ahead of yourself son

IcicleTrepan4271d ago

ergonomically, you put the most often used things right where the natural resting place for the thumbs would be. Microsoft took that approach. Maybe you don't like it but that is the truth.

When you grab something your thumb goes forward not out to the side. The dualshock controller's sticks are not at the natural resting place for the thumb.

To call one superior over the other.. it's kind of silly. Ergonomic design has a lot of science behind it, yet you dismiss it out of hand.

GrandpaSnake4271d ago

@b radical, the one that sales more and last longer... yes the dualshock is superior

XB1_PS44271d ago

Whichever one you use most, you most likely like most. It's obvious. Neither controller is technically better, because it is up to opinion to determine that. Everyone is entitled to said opinion.

Snookies124271d ago

@IcicleTrepan - If that's the case, why doesn't the 360 controller have both analog sticks at the top of the controller? Both the 360's controller and the DS3 have good points, but neither are perfect. I gotta say though, I'm extremely looking forward to using a DS4. More so than the X1's controller. From what has been described, it feels amazing.

kickerz4271d ago

Well said IcicleT
Never really thought about that way but yeah if you put your hands out in front to grab something thumbs naturally point upwards. If you put your elbows out wards like your gonna do the chicken dance then dualshock is better.lol

BattleTorn4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

That's why sooo many 3rd-party controller imitate the Dualshock's joystick positioning.....

Google "custom Xbox controller"

(you'll only find cool colored Xbox controllers)

Google "custom Playstion controller"

(you'll find controllers modded to the Xbox's joystick layout)

black0o4271d ago

DS is so original .. i grow up with it feels natural to me

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4271d ago
SaffronCurse4271d ago

They enlarged the controller, that was the biggest complain from what I've got.

boeso4271d ago

Its a troll. Leave it alone

FlameHawk4271d ago

Yup, shes the MariaHelFutura of Xbox fangirls.

itBourne4271d ago

I can see an argument for both sticks on top, especially for shooters, but why have a-symmetrical sticks, my hands are symmetrical and thus the controller should be. Works the same for fighting games too, the d-pad and face buttons should be symmetrical.

darthv724271d ago

symmetrical hands do not automatically denote symmetrical comfort. Each person has a dominant hand (right or left) as well as a non-dominant hand.

BattleTorn4271d ago

Your hands may be symeetrical.

But how we use the joysticks is rarely, if ever, symmetrical.

The ergonomics behind the Dualshocks centered joysticks literally stops there: "my hands are symmetrical"

But, our use of them is not.
Don't you think that the very different application of the two joysticks matters more?

itBourne4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

Lol I knew someone would bring that up = P

Maybe I am just different because I am kinda both handed. But I bet you just typed what you said with both hands in the same spot, your keyboard is not split so your right hand can be different then your left.

Also if you are saying that hand plays a role then the 360 controller is backwards for 90% of the world, as it is left handed. Lefty grip is always left hand above right hand. But I dont think that matters here, jst saying by your argument.

itBourne4271d ago

@Battle Torn

Very different applications of the two analog sticks? They are both used in unison to control your character, how is that very different uses?

The Great Melon4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

@itBourne

Actually the keyboard layout is asymmetric in the placement of the keys. The top row is offset by a quarter from the home row. This results in your fingers reaching always slightly to the left for keys. Stupid typewriters. *grumble*

itBourne4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

Lol damn u got me there, but for hand to hand it is symmetrical, they are not in two different locations. I think its all personal preference btw for controllers, I jst like debating = P and I am actually getting intelligent people <3

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4271d ago
Brazz4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

to me both are good controls. what make diference in this PS360 generatio was:

1º) grip > this go to 360, think they have a grip a little bit better, 1 point for than.

2º) triggers > 360 have better triggers, the diference isn't that amazing, but it exist... 1 more point.

3º) concave analogic> this, alson, go to 360.. 0,5 points, the diference is very small...

4º) D-pad > This go hands down to ps3, 360 D-pad is a pile of !@#$!@#!/ 2 points for ps3, because the diference is realy big!

5º) symetrical vs asymmetrical > i go well whit both, but a realy think the symetrical is a bit better, no points here, it's a personal point.

Ps3 2 X xbox 2,5 > xbox have a better controller, but...

6º) energy > batteries are ass to use... i will give 0,5 to ps3, and call this a draw.

Dualshock 4 vs X1 controller:
only times know, but right now i'm puting 0,5 in favor of Sony, because X1 still use "f#E#@$" batteries in 2013!!!

MysticStrummer4271d ago (Edited 4271d ago )

"seems sony learn to make its controller from the best one, the xbox 360."

Thank Zod Sony didn't copy the XBox controller's analogs, successful marketing gimmick though they may be. I'm still waiting for the announcement that humans have evolved asymmetrical thumbs.

The triggers and tips of the analogs were better on the 360 controller. The placement of the analogs is nothing but a marketing ploy that apparently many people still fall for.

Symmetrical thumbs FTW

sic_chops4271d ago

My symmetrical thumbs are gonna fit nicely on those symmetrical sticks.

Dante814271d ago

If they're imitating then why is d-pad so good?

PlayStation_44271d ago

Do you have some sort of retarded, asymmetrical thumb?

4271d ago
JackStraw4270d ago

another tard who didn't bother reading the article.

Chevalier4270d ago

Yeah and you've used the new remodelled PS4 controller so you can actually compare?

koolaid2514270d ago

Xbox 360 controller is the best for shooting games.

Animal Mutha 764270d ago

Agree. Lol at the number of disagrees. I guess the majority here like the Sony layout.

Like you say it's about preferences. I've used both controllers already and there is no reason not to like either. DS4 is a big improvement as are the changes to the Xbox pad. The rumble triggers on the X1 pad are really good imo.

It's sensible that Sony considered all options. Personally I still prefer the Xbox pad layout but choice is good :)

Volkama4270d ago (Edited 4270d ago )

Symmetrical or asymmetrical isn't what made the 360 pad better than the PS3 pad. Comfortable positioning of the sticks made it better. The DS3 positioning just required a horrible angle on the thumbs relative to the natural grip on the pad. If the left stick was swapped with the d-pad it would have been more comfortable, but the right hand still would have sucked.

Ignoring the differences in input method, were your hands more comfortable DS3:
d-pad + stick (asymmetrical)
d-pad + buttons (symmetrical, higher)
stick + stick (symmetrical, lower)

For me d-pad + buttons is by far the most comfortable grip on that pad. Symmetrical, just moved.

The DS4 is probably going to feel great to me because they've addressed this problem. It also stands to reason that people who were genuinely more comfortable using the DS3 may not like the changes.

Droid Control4270d ago

I prefer the 360 setup with the offset analoge sticks. Question: Why can't Sony sell an official 360-like pad separately?

That way everyone stays happy/

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4270d ago
Thatguy-3104271d ago

Thank god they didn't. Each to their own but my preference is the way the controller is currently layed out.

MultiConsoleGamer4271d ago

Tradition is a terrible excuse to keep an outdated design.

Kalebninja4271d ago

360 and gamecube controllers are way better than ps controllers and im not hating i've played with them and those triggers are just terrible i always hated them nintendo was smart and copied with the pro controller and if ps4 had one it would be perfect

XB1_PS44271d ago

Hahaha, you guys crack me up..

neoMAXMLC4271d ago

Gamecube?!

That controller was terrible!

Hicken4271d ago

And with so much knowledge at your fingertips, such ignorance should be a crime.

iamnsuperman4271d ago

And how is it outdated? There is no difference between the analog layouts. I can pick up a 360 controller and it feels fine even when I predominately play on my PS3 as the layout is a minor point people blow out of proportion. There is no benefit one way or the other except for brand identity

PSN-JeRzYzFyNeSt4271d ago

true but if it was to be like the 360 i can hear there fanboys saying Sony copied Microsoft!

Snookies124271d ago

I love how people will say things like "this design is inferior, or this one is superior". Lol, it comes down to personal preference. There is no right and wrong way to go with how you like to control your games. If you want your analog up top, go 360. If you want them both on level, go PS3. If you want to wave a remote, go Wii. If you want a tablet control style, go Wii U.

It's not hard to grasp. These are opinions. Opinions cannot be weighed in value. So words like inferior or superior don't apply to them.

KwietStorm_BLM4271d ago

Which is probably why it's a new design......?

Dante814271d ago

That's awesome, bro. Have you ever that opinions are like ass-- well I did.

Brix904270d ago

Outdated more like classic. I rather they keep it the same way it is rather then copying.

WeedyOne4270d ago

I always thought the 360 sticks are not symmetrical because they didn't want to completely copy Sony or break any patents...

I mean look at a 360 controller and then look at a ps3 controller they are almost the same as far as button placement goes, the Dpad and analog stick just switched places!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4270d ago
GentlemenRUs4271d ago

I don't understand why they did, Strange...

hellzsupernova4271d ago

I'm fine with the design. My biggest problem was the grips were not ergonomic they have fixed that, stick position does not matter

Show all comments (106)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted7d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast7d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay7d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted7d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34857d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK7d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor48d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7248d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7248d ago (Edited 48d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

48d ago
S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7247d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit46d ago (Edited 46d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 46d ago
drivxr48d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation48d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

48d ago
DarXyde47d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50147d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer45d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 45d ago
48d ago
48d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6948d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave48d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit48d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno48d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit48d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay48d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7247d ago (Edited 47d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos48d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania48d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox48d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

48d ago
Bathyj48d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

48d ago
BeHunted48d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit48d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

48d ago
drivxr48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow148d ago (Edited 48d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania48d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox48d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

48d ago
S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 47d ago
Lightning7748d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts48d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango48d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7748d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts48d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit47d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7747d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 47d ago
Show all comments (46)