‘Battlefield 3: Armored Kill’ Hands-On Preview [Game Rant]

BiggCMan4773d ago

I think the size of the 5 expansions they announced on Monday, that span across the next 12 months, shows they really want this game to live for a long time, and I love that. While Close Quarters is really the only one that doesn't particularly appeal to me (I much prefer the huge games), they all provide something for everyone, and will keep people playing for a long time instead of buying a new game next year.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

dazzrazz4773d ago (Edited 4773d ago )

You mean 3 not 5, technically 2 are already out.Question is how long do the players want this game to be alive ? Especially with tons of unfixed bugs and Dice introducing new ones with each patch/dlc bundle. Personally I won't be purchasing any dlc content until audio issues are gonna be solved, just can't imagine how people are willing to spend extra 50 bucks on a title that has serious sound issues for past 7 months aka since game was released 0_o

Also looks like 1st map pack for people who pre-ordered is just a giant scam .. if they purchase premium they paying for it and it was suppose to be free, but now EA charges even those people as a part of Bundle

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 3

venom064773d ago

PREMIUM IS DEFINITELY WORTH THE COST..... and all these expansions will keep this game going for a long time... now hurry up and get CQ to us on the XBOX..

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 2

Hufandpuf4773d ago

I wonder how it will translate to console.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

80°

Battlefield 3 Cut Missions From Campaign Detailed by Former DICE Dev

excaliburps|174d ago |News|3|

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign

Battlefield 3 PC PS3 Xbox 360 mp1st.com

Read Full Story >>

mp1st.com

- Comments (3)

XiNatsuDragnel174d ago

I wish someone can get those EA game leaks to see all the cut content ngl

anast174d ago

Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 7

Johnh5223174d ago (Edited 174d ago )

Bf4 was fun hope the new bf is just as good.

Battlefield 3 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 PC PS3 Xbox 360 gamerant.com

100°

Battlefield Needs the Glory Days of BF3 and Bad Company 2 Back

FallenAngel1984|959d ago |Opinion piece|22|

Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.

Read Full Story >>

gamerant.com

- Comments (22)

Expand all

masterfox959d ago

hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

Knightofelemia959d ago

You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

MadLad959d ago

We'll see what happens now that Zampella is overlooking the series.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 2

959d ago

Replies(1)

Father__Merrin959d ago

Anyone that wants to plat bf3 you can still go ahead and play it

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 5

Psychotica959d ago

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

INMATEofARKHAM959d ago

Single player campaigns take time and effort... EA ain't got time for that.

Fluke_Skywalker959d ago

DICE have already stated that they actually don't know how to. They literally have no idea what made BC2 so good and clearly have no idea how to repeat it.

Yui_Suzumiya959d ago

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

ChubbyBlade959d ago

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 0

CorndogBurglar958d ago

Which is so ignorant it almost physically hurts.

They have the damn templates lol. Everyone LOVED Battlefield all the way up through BF4. Everything after BF4 is where fans started getting divided because they started dumbing down the gameplay.

So they need to go back to the favorites. Bad Company 2. BF3 and BF4.

Take those games. Take the exact same gameplay. Update the graphics. Add some different game modes. Make new maps. Add new guns. Choose two armies. And make a single player campaign.

That's seriously it. They need to quit trying to make BF something it isn't. They have everything they need. Why they can't figure this out just hurts my brain trying to understand.

Orchard959d ago

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

CorndogBurglar958d ago

Anything from BF2 - BF4 would work fine. Those were all great games.

MadLad958d ago

I thought BF3 and 4 were great, and I've been playing since 1942.

Demetrius959d ago (Edited 959d ago )

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

TheColbertinator959d ago

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

Profchaos958d ago

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable