280°

Vita TV; A painting of the future of console gaming

Digitally Downloaded writes: "I see this as being a brave first step into the idea that the handheld console can also be the TV console. This is the kind of product that a company like Sony needed to help boost its Vita."

Read Full Story >>
digitallydownloaded.net
sobotz3901d ago

Technology these days never cease to amaze me, This device it's so small yet it can play a decent graphic games.

I hope the next, next-generation of gaming will be much more like this, or even better. (PS4 already doing it with its small size yet powerful)

black0o3901d ago

and with gaikai I think we may not need another ps again

abzdine3901d ago

Vita TV seems so promising.
being able to remote play PS4 on big screen is completely insane. now if that little box is compatible with at least 2 controllers then it's a game changer for good.
Sony ftw.

snitch_puck3901d ago (Edited 3901d ago )

I accidentally 'agreed' to bullymanLer's comment. lol I'm ashamed. @bullymangLer really dude? you come here to profess your fanboyism? I don't think THIS kind of tech is 'sniffing' Nintendo's failing ass. Better yet, why don't you go back to 'daddy' and never come back to this section again.

FamilyGuy3901d ago (Edited 3901d ago )

@ abzdine
Vita tv supports 2 controllers, the promo video at the end of the conference showed two guy playing the PS1 version of tekken on the Vita Tv

@bully, in what way is this similar to anything Nintendo is doing? :/

abzdine3901d ago

@FamilyGuy:
you made my day thank you..
I haven't seen any videos yet i'll do it when i get back home.

WhiskyWhiskers3901d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

@bullymangLer

Can you at least speak coherently when you try troll you moron..

The history of the entire portable gaming system that could interact and be played away from consoles didn't start with Nintendo you buffoon.

It started with the Dreamcast's VMU and Sony's Pocketstation which were released back in 1999.

The N64 could be connected to a Gameboy but it was only to transfer information. It was never used to play games, like you could in Sonic Adventure or Toro for the Dreamcast and PS1.

It wasn't until the Gameboy Advance which wasn't made until 2001, that Nintendo did it with Wind Waker.

Pull your head out of Nintendo's ass already. They didn't invent gaming or start everything on their own.

No idea how the fuck you even have any bubbles left.. Those submissions must be paying off eh.

cleft53900d ago

This is definitely something I want. Being able to play Vita games on my TV would be amazing.

Otoshigamisama3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

I guess @bullumangLer is the new @slasher Troll around these parts ehh, Better troll harder because Sony is about to burst your bubble you fantard, SMH

solidjun53900d ago

"and with Nintendo sony will never again thing for themselves ?
"

BullmangLer, if you're going troll, at least speak English!

"freaking shame sony always sniffing nintendos Kingdom . . . . Nintendo is their daddy . .simple as that ."

Did you check that on Ancestry.com?

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3900d ago
Yep3901d ago

I'm a Nintendo/PC guy (I have to state this because I know how Sony fanboys are on here), but how does this effect Xbox One in any way at all?

In fact, why would anyone want play, say, Borderlands 2 on the big screen with PS Vita when they can play it with better graphics on a PS3, 360, or PC?

gaelic_laoch3901d ago (Edited 3901d ago )

Its all about options and the choice to choose between those options!

I'm afraid the Wiiu has very little options and the xbone has but took away the choice to choose and stuck a dollar/euro sign on what was left!

Although I concede the PC is the KING of the Free Gaming World!

snitch_puck3901d ago

Ugh, another narrow fanboy again. Uhm, don't you get the point? Borderlands 2 portable? want me to emphasize? POR-TA-BLE.

NateCole3901d ago

Why would you want less options?.

FamilyGuy3900d ago

Well this thing is $100, add that to the Price of a PS4 as a bundle of sorts and compare it to what you're getting from MS for that same $500 total.

As far as your second question. Once Gaikai is running full steam ahead it'll let you play PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, Psp and PS Vita games on this thing. All for only $100 (if you've got a PS3 controller lying about already). That's a big deal on its own but as far as playing one a system with better graphics: This thing is made for convenient portability, you use it if you're going somewhere or if someone is already using the tv your PS4 is hooked up to. It's not really for playing PS Vitas ports of PS3/PS4 titles though if you can't afford a PS3/PS4 it's a nice option to play Vita games, including those ports, on a big screen.

WhiskyWhiskers3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

I can bet that doesn't stop you from using Off TV play but you will sure talk shit about the Vita when its completely portable remote play is more practical.

Better question, why would you want to only stream something to a game pad that can't even be outside the range given by the Wii U? Other than the TV being hogged, there is no real reason that is any better than the Vita's.

The Vita makes much more sense as remote play is portable and can be used anywhere. Not just your home.

If I am at home chances are I would rather use the big screen, not the game pad, unless someone is just using the TV. Other than that not much reason to use it.

Yep3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

Lmao. Wow, I ask a simple question that just about anyone in real life would ask and I get called a fanboy of all kinds. It's the only word in people's vocabulary around here.

It's not about options as you actually have to buy the thing. PS Vita TV is pretty much a watered down PS3 in almost every way, which you can already get for $199 at least.

@snitch Can you read? I'm talking about PS Vita TV. PS Vita TV is not portable as it needs to be hooked up to a TV. You might as well bring your entire PS4 with you (which people like myself do anyway if we're going on extended vacations).

@Family_Guy The price of this hasn't been announced yet, but some have been suggesting around $150. Thanks for actually answering my question though.

@Whisky What the hell does Off-TV play have to do with PSV TV? I was just asking a simple question, but fine, I'll take you on if you're that butthurt. Off-TV play is a feature for the GamePad which is a controller for the Wii U. It's purpose is to be used when you want to use the bathroom or if someone else is using the TV (OR if there is no TV!). Also, you're not paying extra for the GamePad like you are with PS Vita TV so no, it's not the same. Between the Wii U and the 3DS, I'm only paying $468. Between PS Vita TV and PS4, you're paying $500-$550 (If PSV TV ends up costing $100 - $150).

It might look like I'm shitting on the system (even though I'm planning on getting one with Freedom Wars 2014), but I was simply asking how PS Vita TV effected the potential sales of Xbox One. Nobody answered that question (Except for FamilyGuy as he doesn't seem to be a fanboy).

stuff3900d ago

I'll attempt to answer your question. It's simple. This may have a dramatic effect on those who are still on-the-fence about whether to get Xbone or PS4. I doubt it will cause any major waves, but it does provide great benefits to those with big families, multiple entertainment rooms, or who travel often (or for long periods).

Yep3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

@stuff But are big families going to be playing Killzone Shadow Fall or even want a PS4? PS4 doesn't seem to be the type of console for families.

I see the points being made here and they are valid, but it's very hard to point out a clear and available market for this new device.

stuff3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

Only time will tell. I think you are being too specific and narrow by stating only BL2 or Killzone as examples. Other than Knack we certainly have to look beyond the launch window as I'm sure Sony is doing. If this is truly to be the rebirth of the PS2 era, then there will be many more family oriented titles to come. That was just one example. There are lots of big families out there who's kids are allowed to play more mature games as well. Imo, it seems Sony is on a mission to be sure every type of gamer can find something he wants on a Sony platform.

Yep3900d ago

I sure hope Sony can nail this generation. Perhaps they do have more in store that will include family oriented games.

FamilyGuy3900d ago

"I see the points being made here and they are valid, but it's very hard to point out a clear and available market for this new device. "

"It might look like I'm shitting on the system (even though I'm planning on getting one with Freedom Wars 2014)"

You, me and many others are the market for this device. Not just as a remote play device either. It does much more and with Gaikai it'll be invaluable (priceless).
I personally have no interest in playing a portable, handheld gaming device. I was intending to wait for a PS Vita with TV output functionality so that I could play the Vitas exclusives. Games like Soul Sacrifice look really good to me but I don't want to play on a small screen.
This device 100% caters to what I wanted and still has those extra vita functions that make it even better. All this while only being $100 compared to the price of a Vita. $100 is an extremely enticing buy-in price and we're getting that $100 number from converting the announced price in Japan.
It's actually less than $100 but $100 is a nice round number and Sony likes giving americans round numbers. $99 is the most likely sale price, no where near $150.

People, LOTS of people, were asking Sony for a PS4 bundled with a PS Vita at the price range of $500. In a way this device is directly meant to cater to them. It's not a portable in the sense that the real Vita would be but it's portable in the sense of being easily taken with you anywhere, fitting in your pocket like a phone.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3900d ago
ceedubya93901d ago

I'll be sure to buy one of these! All of these consoles makers are making this an exciting time.

r213901d ago

Same here, its dang cheap. Was actually going to buy a 2DS, but this vita device is considerably cheaper than it.

sincitysir13900d ago

I think thats what sony is going for

NateCole3900d ago

Complete came out of nowhere. Amazing it was not leaked.

No question i am buying this.

Sony have been really smart with this. Console holders get money from software so this will help the sales of Vita games which in turns helps Vita as well with more support from devs.

boybato3900d ago

A Stand alone device although it greatly benefits from having other ps devices specialy a ps4.

buynit3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

I'm not going to need it to play ps4 games on the vita right! I fvcking swear I will be pissed and selll the damn vita!

boybato3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

@buynit

Dude relax. Lol

You do not need this to remote play ps4 games to your Vita. Matter of fact, what the ps vita tv's reveal translate to me is how connfident Sony is with their psv/ps4 remote play feature. -therefore keep the much superior SKU. :-)

Show all comments (36)
140°

Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night DLC Adds Free Gameplay Modes

Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night has received a bunch of new DLC, including two new gameplay modes, for free.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal

210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel5d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow5d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1824d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie3d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

3d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Notellin3d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

3d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere3d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX4d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney2d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno4d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno4d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

3d ago
fsfsxii3d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno3d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)