As some of you may know, I posted a blog a few days ago that spoke about feminism and pop culture, specifically centered on gaming. You can find it here for reference. I'm not trying to promote myself, just trying to provide context to this blog.
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
There were some positive responses to the blog, some good discussion was born of it and I was; at that point, content to let it go at that. But some other responses have made me decide to write this "continuation" as it were to the original blog. This one will discuss some of the "problems" brought to my attention by what I would assume (and hope) are female gamers who seem to have a problem with sexism in gaming. Be warned, if you're the type of person offended by sexism in gaming such that you believe it's an actual problem, you'll likely be offended by my blog and should stop reading right now.
The general problems that feminists have with sexism in gaming are the following. Unrealistic portrayals of the female form, "fairer sex syndrome" (I'll elaborate later), lack of variety of female character amidst a huge variety of different male characters, and supposed gender stereotypes. It would be a very long blog if I went into real detail for each problem, so I'll try to be as brief as I can.
I'm going to start by saying that ABSOLUTELY NONE OF THESE ISSUES ARE A REAL PROBLEM! To be upset by any of these things in a video game is to state with absolution that you are offended by fiction. That you are granting a fictional work power over your real world life and self-image. This is a characteristic of weakness on YOUR END and is NOT an actual burden of society and should not be treated as such. It is akin to blaming television for your bratty child being violent, it is that absurd. I'll also state that I have been surrounded by many strong women in my life, and have the utmost respect and empathy for the particular hardships women have to endure and overcome. This isn't a hater blog.
Ok, so back to the problems. Unrealistic portrayals of the female form. I take this to mean that these women don't appreciate seeing women with thin waists, large breasts that defy gravity, blemish free skin, and the "perfect" butt. Ignoring the fact that offense to this is a symptom of an already pre-existing self-esteem issue, none of these traits are unrealistic. There are plenty of women in the real world born with these traits (with help from a push up bra you can simulate gravity defying breasts) and plenty who work to get them because that's what they want. I could link you to pictures, but that would be inappropriate. Unrealistic means something that is unlikely to be achieved. Well, these traits can be achieved. The problem isn't unrealistic portrayal, it's unfair portrayal.
Fairer sex syndrome: This is the "why do the women have to be rescued? why do the women have to be so weak" issue. Again, this is a problem only when people ignore basic facts. A) A game isn't real. B) History has been more patriarchal and less matriarchal because of C) Men are biologically stronger than women which leads to D) A long history of reused themes in story telling. It also is an insult to all the strong female characters in gaming, of which the list would be too long to post here. Offense to this is another sign of personal problems, not societal problems. Taking offense to something that isn't real is foolish.
Lack of variety of different types of woman: This one is the most glaring mistake feminists use when they complain about sexism in gaming. The argument is that there are all kinds of male characters. From Mario being a fat plumber, to Nathan Drake being a fit, yet not overly so, adventurer, to body building Marcus Fenix types, to the fat lard E. Honda types. The narrow minded views of the offended feminists can only seem to see the Rachels (from Ninja Gaiden) or the Katsumis (DoA) or the Ivys (Soul Calibur) or else the rest are all like Princess Peach. This is a huge insult to all the developers out there who have made a wide range of female characters, many of these developers being actual women themselves. Sure you have your borderline porn stars like the aforementioned, and you have your damsels in distress as well. But you also have your strong willed, fight against the world types like Yuna from FFX (no one can call her weak) or how about Rikku who's the chipper one of the group and nothing like the "stereotypes?" And then you have your athletic warrior princess types like Nariko, or Chun Li, or Talim. You have your soldier types like Meryl from MGS. You have your average everyday reporter like Madison from Heavy Rain. You even have everyone's favorite princess, the Fat Princess. So where is this lack of variety?
I mentioned in that last paragraph that was far too long; female developers. That's a rather large, and convenient, aspect of the industry that feminists ignore. There are female developers making games. Hell, Jade Raymond was the Producer of Assassin's Creed and the Executive Producer of Assassin's Creed 2. That means she was the boss. You have women participating in the creation of these games. Giving input making stories and character designs. Don't you think that if this was a REAL problem, you'd see them speaking up first?
What this issue has become is a launching pad for various agendas and political correctness that all stems from the same 2 areas that all problems stem. A huge lack of self-esteem and a desire to make someone pay for how miserable you feel about yourself. When there are REAL gender equality issues in the world to deal with, why bother focusing on non-issues that can only have an impact on your life if YOU LET THEM?! GAMES ARE NOT REAL LIFE! No one treats a woman, or even a man, differently based on some women or men they saw in a video game. No one perceives virtual people to be realistic representations of actual human beings. Not even little children do that and they would be the most likely to. The only people with a problem are literally those people who have their own problems to deal with first. You can't have someone speaking for all women by saying "games are too sexist against women." You don't know that even your own sibling feels that way, let alone complete strangers.
Get over yourselves, fix your own emotional problems, and focus on the good of gaming. Gaming is the most interactive entertainment out in the world, showing us worlds we can never see or imagine in this world. Shouldn't that deserve our attention more than the non-issues and launching pads for unnecessary whining campaigns?
I have made another unnecessarily long blog because this issue is just too frustrating. It's to the point where if I had the focus to do so, I'd make 2 projects in opposition to Anita Sarkeesian's very flawed "Tropes vs. Women in Video games" project. Something as negative as her project deserves opposition. Only when we stop talking about these non-issues and stop giving them power will they ever cease to exist. Peace, and happy gaming to all. I'm out.
The developer of Garry's Mod has announced it is in the process of removing all Nintendo-related content from Steam Workshop after receiving a takedown request from Nintendo.
Love and Deepspace aims to replicate real-life romantic tropes where players engage in a romantic journey, plus with an RPG combat elements.
In the next adventure from Ion Fury; We get Phantom Fury and here is the opening level in action.
I've noticed that, in the main, the only female lead character options you have are the big attitude Lara Croft types or the nearly naked types. The gaming industry doesn't seem to want to break too far away from those models. Perhaps this is because there are far more guys in the game industry than girls, and they can't seem to grasp the depth of just what a woman can really do. It's as if the true nature of a woman is impossible to put into digital media. In the time I take to write this, my wife can make me coffee, take care of a diaper, make my boys breakfast, swat me in the head for being a dumbass, formulate a complex piece of art to draw and set up a doctor's appointment for my annual physical. All in about 5 minutes. Comparatively, I can write a comment in 5 minutes. The sheer self motivation of a woman is amazing in and of itself, but add to that her ability to complete many tasks at once and you have the model for a real time superhero. Maybe it would take too many tetrabytes to get a real woman into a video game, but I do find it pretty sad that unless the characters want to be background noise in a game she either has to have boobs or attitude. Or both.
Perhaps it is that men are, by general design, rather simple things. And because they are simple it is easier to build them up into something more. Women are far more complex, and so the industry dumbs then down. Eventually women will take a deeper root in the gaming industry and from there we will begin to see in the games everything that is truly beautiful about a woman. Because, honestly, only women really understand just how awesome women are. And I think they will eventually catch the industry up to speed.
The reason I applauded the now Part 1 of this feminism rant is how I construed the crux of your complaint against Sarkeesian: you mention your sisters and compare and contrast the feminist movement of old to now, which in turn produces a chance for a rousing discussion regarding that with other posters. Perhaps this kickstarter project could act as some sort of poison for "new-feminists" using political correctness, among other complaints, in the gaming-sphere for their own personal gain. In moments, that enjoyable blog could produce layers of discussion on that alone. Note: I'm not intentionally withholding compliments until complaints arise intentionally. I didn't start anything like that on Part 1 b/c I have to cry ignorance on women's lib/past feminism atm.
That's great and something that can be discussed BEFORE her 'Tropes' videos hit youtube. But to say "I'd make 2 projects in opposition to Anita Sarkeesian's very flawed 'Tropes vs. Women in Video games' project" before anything has been released? You unintentionally disproved your own earlier statement about gamers being able to handle criticism very well (<- not verbatim) with this example of drowning out the opposition before the argument has even begun.
My initial problems with this sequel:
- You assume (and hope) any sort of previous criticisms about this topic that go against your opinion were made by female gamers? I'm not sure where to start on this one.
- You contend that supposed stereotypes can't even be considered a real problem.
- The two reasons you see why anyone would complain about the possibility of sexism in videogames are myopic.
Although I feel like I'm going to retreading a bunch of ground (from past forum talk), I have to bring up a point or two.
You really can't fall back on the "it's just fiction" attitude for these cases. Whether we like it or not, videogames don't exist in a vacuum. Like any other popular medium, they are a part of our society and the circumstances that surround them. The complaint behind the typical videogame female body type that only a small number can achieve is because those standards are still used against women today. The active pay/hiring discrepancy towards women is still in motion today and being constantly analyzed to this day (wikipedia link in comment section of Part 1).
Edit: Forgive any issues with grammar or my points made. It's 1am right now and would like to go to sleep. I'll be sure to clarify possible incongruities in later posts.
Some Christians believe that Yoga is not Hindu but just generic exercises which is absolute BS. Yoga is both physical and spiritual and comes from Hinduism.
http://www.zimbio.com/Anti-...
I can't decide if I care or not that there are actually men on this blog pretended to give a shit about how woman look in games. No wait...I find it stupid. AND..If there is any chick out there that HONESTLY believes that a man seriously is playing a game and says to himself `oh i am so offended by this big breasted, small waist, tight ass character, I just wish they made her more flat chested and a slightly cellulited ass and no muscle in her body, it would really make me appreciate the game play more and I too would be more attracted to the character.` WTF...no..that doesnt happen ladies| Men seriously, are you getting paid to give a shit?
Im a woman, a gamer, I dont look like those characters, and regardless of what I look like, I dont compare my body to a video game character. Why? Uh cause she isnt real! IF these woman have anything to be threatened about, they should take a look at the fashion industry who promotes anorexia, who makes all the best looking clothes only in size 0. Personally I would rather be brainwashed to look like chun li than whats her face coke addict supper model kate moss. Isnt there any other causes you can find time to resolve other than whining about things that don't exist? "oh wah wah they dont look like real woman wah wah" Ok well just stop reading fictional books too while youre at it because um none of its real and therefore it shouldnt be written about.
Its seriously sad that after all that fuss about equal rights and voting that this is where we have ended up. Bitching about fake hot woman characters rather than fighting for REAL CAUSES, like african woman in small villages unable to go to school because they are woman. Like hello? First world problems I tell ya.
So awesome post, you got it all right. Woman: please speak for your damn self, you are not a true gamer and have low self confidence enough that you need to waste all our time in whining about fictional characters. and men who think they are doing us a favour by encouraging these half wits: please take of your skirt and lets end this little tea party. Save your activism for your own sex.
Now Im going to play some dead or alive volleyball :D