.

Brownghost

Contributor
CRank: 7Score: 33540

Whats better disc or digital

Digital is beginning to dominate the gaming and other media formats today thanks to methods such as streaming from Netflix®, music from iTunes® marketplace, the popular e-books and kindle® and Steam store®. This has changed peoples opinions over the physical product and those with great internet are taking advantage of this life change.

First I will start with the pros of the digital format. First off now there's no need for going to the store for your products since there directly downloaded to there computer or streaming to there computer or game console. Another great feature that many favor is safety of scratches to the products since its downloaded it cant crack, break, or stop working from spill of water or a moved console. A great fact is how it affects mother nature since there's less plastic from discs and paper from books wasted and this will have a positive impact on the environment.

Now with the cons, digital may have made life easy for consumers but not for media store like video stores(Hollywood and blockbuster® movie stores, bookstores(Borders® and B&N®) and many local music stores. Many have gonna bankrupt and lost their stores and chains of business's others have modernized with the B&N nook. Also people are paying more for what there getting. First of all your not getting the disc, the box, or all the paper and ink from the book, does this still change to price? No it doesn't your still paying the physical price and that isn't right. Now my last and most hateful con is nothing to do with it in the future, how would you feel if all that digital media has no resell value or no being able to share or trade it with friend so every purchase is a permanent purchase

Now I'm still not all the way with digital media but this is just the beginning and some of those cons may be fixed in the future but the permanent damage will not be. Are you with or against digital media please comment below

Rrobba4672d ago

Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer discs. I like to be able to physically touch and hold what I buy. Also, if they have nice boxart, they can make the best of a shelf :)

Kee4672d ago

Yeah, you just need something tangible. Otherwise you don't feel as though you really have anything. It's hard to explain... But I'd rather have something in the physical plane than virtually having it.

ABizzel14670d ago

I like both. I prefer digital for my handhelds, because I don't like packing a bunch of games around with me when I'm on the go. Imagine is apps were physical, would you like having that many.

For my console it doesn't bother me which I have. I would say I prefer disc for my console, since I'm home to play it. I like digital downloads for my console, but I must say they take up a lot of space on your HDD quicker than you think. My 320GB is practically full, and I need to buy a new one to store all the stuff I have on my PS3.

news4geeks4672d ago (Edited 4672d ago )

I made a comment about this the other day, but worded it slightly wrong.

I personally prefer digital and am almost all digital in movies/books/music/games. It's more convenient for me since I move house a lot and it keeps me mentally sound. I like the idea of not having anything physical, but I'm not sure why.

People enjoy physical media because it's something tangible and that comforts them. A video games collection or a book/cd shelf is almost like a trophy collection. It's a display of yourself, your interests and what you have achieved.

I agree with what Rrobba and Kee have said, but that doesn't cut it for me. Maybe I just don't like the fact some people may use it to show off.

LightofDarkness4672d ago (Edited 4672d ago )

Agreed, it seems to me that the people who generally purport their unwillingness to move to digital content are also the most materialistic among us. To them, the appearance of their collection is more important than what's in the collection.

To me, all that really matters is the content. The game, the words, the music, the video itself. This is what is of real value. It is, unfortunately for the collectors, ethereal and intangible. It's 1s and 0s, analogue waves and phosphors igniting in sequence. The rest is just worthless packaging that serves no real purpose, other than for one to display it to all others, so as to say "look what I have!"

Tachyon_Nova4671d ago (Edited 4671d ago )

At the moment I buy about 50% of my PC games in physical form and 50% in digital form. I must admit to being somewhat materialistic in that I like to be able to look at my collection sitting on the shelf, it brings up good memories. However, I tend to only buy the best games (or at least the ones that I feel proud to own) in physical form, as digital is definetly more convenient, and it avoids the problem I now have with my PS3 collection (I'm close to running out of shelf space).

CD's I feel a bit differently about, indeed I have only ever bought 1 music CD. I only listen to music on my iPod or my phone (Xperia Play baby!), so why would I go to the trouble of buying a CD only to then have to rip the music off into digital form? I do agree however that your entertainment collection really is a display of who you are, I guess music just doesn't mean that much to me.

ian724671d ago

What Rrobba said,
"Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer discs. I like to be able to physically touch and hold what I buy. Also, if they have nice boxart, they can make the best of a shelf :)"

Brownghost4671d ago

the only thing that is making me stick to disc is the faster the value goes down, ability to trade, and sell

seinfan4671d ago

A physical medium is the best way to ensure that the product that you payed for will remain your's. I recently lost a a few songs that I bought on iTunes because my hard drive went to shit a few months ago; if I want that content back, I have to buy it again from the iTunes store, which I will not do. Discs, if taken care of, give me the luxury of a reliable back up in case information in computer land gets damaged/lost. This is why I still buy CDs. And, like you said, the art makes for a nice keepsake.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4670d ago
The Matrix4672d ago (Edited 4672d ago )

I will always buy disc because I am as much a collector as a video game player, movie watching or music listener. If sales eventually go totally digital there's a chance I may just give up many of these hobbies.

Sprudling4671d ago

You can't collect digitally?

Tachyon_Nova4671d ago (Edited 4671d ago )

Not in the traditional sense you can't. I suppose the reason people collect things is that it gives them a great deal of satisfaction. It's hard to get the same sense of satisfaction from a few icons on your screen as can be found from actually possessing something.

Sprudling4671d ago

Collecting boxes in a drawer or icons on the desktop. Both are equally silly to me :) Besides, a digital game is an actual possession. Perhaps you mean tangible?

DragonKnight4672d ago

Disc. If you take care of your discs they'll last forever and you never have to worry about it. But hard drives crash, bugs happen that make digital content unplayable, hackers can potentially ruin things for you. Digital may be convenient, but it brings all sorts of issues along with it. Not to mention bandwidth costs. The big telecom companies are really trying to crackdown on bandwidth caps and bringing them way down.

thorstein4672d ago

It is all about to be moot anyway as we "return" to solid state storage. No more moving parts.

Nitrox4672d ago

For consoles I prefer the hard copy, not only for the sense of ownership, but because I can always trade the game in later on. For PC though, I go digital all the way.

From the crazy deals Steam runs periodically, to not having to have a disk in the drive, digital seems the way to go for PC games. After all the biggest plus (imo) for disc based console games is the ability to trade it in, which just isn't possible for PC games (outside of ebay, and even then publishers are beginning to require linking the license key to a specific account... like that bunch of Nazis over at EA.)

Show all comments (34)
50°

Marvel Rivals closed alpha contract stops from criticizing the game

The Marvel Rivals closed alpha test has begun. On the surface, things seem to be fine, but creators who are joined into their creator program are signing a contract that forbids them from saying negative things about the game.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
-Foxtrot1d 8h ago

How can you trust people when you have shit like this going on

Honestly I think the game looks average first impressions wise and will probably die off within a year or so.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 2h ago

Jeez man we want games to grow and develop and if we're prevented from that this is how games dying amidst other complications.

Kaii1d ago

Strike one: Netease
Strike two: Not allowing criticism

lol

20°

Helldivers 2 CEO reveals who restricted the latest countries in the PSN controversy

The Arrowhead Game Studios CEO has shed some new light on the mass restrictions of Helldivers 2 in 180 countries.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
40°

Microsoft's Studio closures signal shift in gaming industry priorities

Microsoft's recent decision to shutter several studios under the Bethesda/ZeniMax umbrella.

Read Full Story >>
apptrigger.com
ApocalypseShadow8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Nothing but a shilling, apologist article....

*While these closures may come as a blow to the affected teams and the wider gaming community, they reflect Microsoft's commitment to fostering growth and innovation within its gaming ecosystem. By consolidating resources and doubling down on key franchises, Microsoft aims to strengthen its position in an increasingly competitive market.*

*These actions underscore Microsoft's proactive approach to navigating the complexities of the gaming industry and positioning itself for long-term success.*

*As the gaming landscape continues to evolve, fueled by technological advancements and shifting consumer trends, adaptability becomes paramount. Microsoft's decision to prioritize high-impact games signals a recognition of the need to innovate and evolve in response to changing market dynamics.*

*Looking ahead, Microsoft remains committed to delivering compelling gaming experiences, with an impressive lineup of titles on the horizon. From the highly anticipated Starfield Shattered Space to the immersive worlds of Fallout 76 Skyline Valley and The Elder Scrolls Online's Golden Road, the future promises exciting opportunities for gamers worldwide.*

*While the studio closures may represent a challenging moment for those affected, they also herald a new chapter of growth and exploration within the gaming industry. As Microsoft continues to invest in its portfolio of games and expand its reach, the stage is set for a future defined by creativity, innovation, and unforgettable gaming experiences.*

Consolidation isn't innovative. It stifles creativity. Killing jobs is not growth. Concentrating only on the big titles against the smaller titles is the opposite of innovative. Firing individuals who were creative in their craft isn't innovative. Even the smaller indie developers will find it harder to be picked up for game pass because their original IPs aren't well known. Which some of use said for years . Either that or less money offered to the developer as the gold rush of monetary handouts decrease. Any talk about how buying up the industry and restructuring is positive while ignoring that Microsoft could have used those billions to restructure their internal teams without the acquisition, is just ridiculous talk.