450°

UltimateGameGorilla: Why The Xbox 360 Does Not Need Exclusives

Richard of UltimateGameGorilla writes: The year is 2007, barely a year has passed since the Xbox 360 and PS3 rolled of the production lines. Everyone wants one of the “next generation consoles”. Some gamers just purchased both consoles but for many consumers buying both was out of the question and the deciding factor between the consoles boiled down to the game line-up. At launch the Xbox 360 had an entire year of a head start with which to build a library of launch titles. The PS3 on the other hand had no such benefit and stuttered along with very few “exclusive” titles. The PS3's strange architecture had proven to difficult a task to program and most developers opted for multiplatform games. This resulted in the majority of multiplatform games looking and performing better on the Xbox 360. Things were indeed looking up for Microsoft's console, even with the bad reputation surrounding the console as the notorious “RROD” surfaced, the console continued to dominate the PS3 by a huge...

Read Full Story >>
ultimategamegorilla.com
asphogears4877d ago

Well written, unbiased article. I agree that fanboys overlook multiplatform titles.

Qwert1174877d ago

Why is this guy getting disagrees?

Active Reload4877d ago

Me personally, I only like a few exclusives on any platform. With that said, exclusives do give a platform an identity, so in general they are needed. I understand what the article is saying and it holds it's own truths.

Biggest4877d ago

Richard should also write an article saying "Why People Should Not Buy L.A. Noire From K-Mart." I mean, who cares that they have the most extras thrown in? People should be happy with the same game that every other outlet is selling. There is no reason to expect or look for the better package deal. Never look for more. Always settle for the median.

captain-obvious4877d ago

as an owner of all consoles
i say BS
because im more interested in Exclusives of each console
since i can play a multi plat on ANY system i have

so yah
bullshit

Istanbull4877d ago

why are you getting ignored?

rockleex4877d ago Show
bakasora4877d ago

When they have a lot of exclusives they say they have the best exclusives. Then when they don't have much exclusive, they say they don't need them. I just saying.

EVILDEAD3604876d ago (Edited 4876d ago )

Let's keep it 100% real..

It would be silly to pretend that Exclusives don't matter at all for ANY console generation..

Since November of last year there have been a dozen articles bashing the 360 for 2011's exclusives list vs. PS3.

And now as we are less than a month from E3 and the fact is the system continues to sell and without any exclusives 360 gamers played great games this year and the year is not over

After what happened to last year's Alan Wake getting trounced by Red Dead..Microsoft wisened up..

Bottomline..the top 4 exclusives on the 360 are Halo, Gears, Fable and Forza (in that order)

They successfully released Halo and Fable in 2010..and this fall they will release Gears and Forza..it's that simple

Sony definately clearly has the biggest number of 'announced' exclusives..but at the end of the day 2011's top 2 exclusives for the PS3 this year are K3 and the fall's Uncharted 3.

If you look at the first half of this year and you will see that multi-plats dominated the gaming world from the fans to the press with the releases of Dead Space 2, Crysis 2, Portal 2, and now the upcoming MONSTER LA. Noire.

So what could Micrasoft have released that would have mattered?

A Shooter?

COD: BO & Halo Reach still dominate Xbox Live w/ DLC updates and ridiculously huge online community and content..why release something to compete against Bulletstorm which tied to the Gears Beta..plus PS3 released the high profile Killzone 3

At the end of the day, for the first half of 2012..it turned out to be a wise decision.

On the 6th of June we will finally see if the rest of 2011 bodes well for Micrsoft as well.

I just say..own em' all..and game till you drop

Just my take

Evil

iamnsuperman4876d ago

Exclusives sell system. £60 sells because of the Halo effect. The PS3 sells because of Uncharted, GT, and other exclusives. Lets make it simple. Why should I buy a 360 if the 360 has not exclusive games (same goes to any gaming platform just easier to name one). Multiplat games are good but system sellers they are not. Of course other features have an impact but in the context of games exclusives sell system. So the 360 does need exclusives like all platform because then there is little reason to buy one console over another if there are no exclusives

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4876d ago
news4geeks4877d ago

There is no bias here but just wait for the sony fanboys, they'll find bias like a needle in a hay stack. Good article.

UltimateGameGorilla4877d ago

I think Richard is going to really appreciate your comment. Thanks!

awiseman4877d ago

I agree :D thanks for positiver insight guys!

DelbertGrady4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

I appreciate games regardless of exclusivity although it could be a factor when choosing what platform to buy (if only buying one). For me there are more factors than games though. Such as online, chat features etc.

I also think it would feel sh*tty if one side got to play games like L.A. Noire and Portal 2 and the others were left out.

Just 5 more days til L.A. Noire...!

NateCole4877d ago

Why should you feel shitty?. If anyone wants to play every game then they should fork out for every platform there is. Thats the way it should be. This is important to having variety and competition and having an innovative gaming industry.

Some of you kids really need to look at the bigger picture here.

Rynx4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

This generation has been a joke

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4876d ago
LOGICWINS4877d ago

The 360 doesn't need exclusives because the majority of its audience doesn't play exclusive games. Its really just that simple.

sack_boi4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

If that was the case Halo, Gears, Forza, Fable... would tank completely. Not so logical this time around.

EDIT : Or, were you being sarcastic?

Blaze9294877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

http://majornelson.com/2011...

Xbox 360 Top LIVE Titles (based on UU’s)
1 Call of Duty: Black Ops
2 Modern Warfare 2
3 Halo: Reach
4 FIFA Soccer 11
5 NBA 2K11
6 GTA IV
7 Mortal Kombat
8 Battlefield: Bad Co. 2
9 Call of Duty 4
10 Red Dead Redemption
11 Halo 3
12 Gears of War 2
13 Portal 2
14 Call of Duty: WaW
15 NHL 11
16 Forza Motorsport 3
17 Madden NFL 11
18 Bulletstorm
19 Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood
20 Fallout: New Vegas

Top Arcade Titles (Full Versions purchased)

1 Outland
2 Castlevania Harmony of Despair
3 Portal: Still Alive
4 Pinball FX2
5 Castlevania: Symphony of the Night
6 Full House Poker
7 Section 8: Prejudice
8 DEAD RISING 2: CASE WEST
9 The Fancy Pants Adventures
10 Bangai-O HD: Missile Fury
11 DEAD RISING 2: CASE ZERO
12 MOON DIVER
13 Castle Crashers
14 The Dishwasher: Vampire Smile
15 Might & Magic Clash of Heroes
16 Trials HD
17 Game Room
18 Torchlight
19 TROUBLE WITCHES NEO!
20 Street Fighter II’ HF
The above arcade list is based on full versions purchased.

These lists are based on global unique users connected to Xbox Live

----------

Like he said, the majority of its audience do not play exclusive games. Microsoft sees that and if their audience is happy with multiplatform games, why should they feel the need to pump out 20 plus exclusives every year like Sony and pretend like their audience is going to buy all of those games plus multiplatform games in one year.

ProA0074877d ago

when served with statistics, pwnage is so sweet. as Blaze just did sack_boi

van-essa4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

@Blaze929
They don't play exclusive games because there are no (exageration off course) exclusive games to be played.
I don't see Uncharted on that list. Does that mean their audience doesn't want Uncharted?
I bet it would be right next to Gears on that list if it was on the X360.

Point being, your list only proves that there aren't many exclusives on the X360, not that they don't want exclusives.

captain-obvious4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

@ Blaze929
acually

you listed all the worthwhile Xbox Exclusives in that list (2 halos a gears game and a forza game )
loooooooooooooooooooooooooool

no wonder you wont find anymore on that list

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4877d ago
LOGICWINS4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

@sack_boi- No, people buy Halo, Gears, Forza, and Fable because they WANT to buy them. What I'm saying is that MORE people on the 360 spend MORE of their time on multiplatform games like COD.

Exclusive games like Halo and Gears HELP the 360 do well...but they are not NECESSARY for the 360 to do well since MOST 360 owners only buy two MULTIPLATFORM games a year(Madden and COD).

Check the statistics...numbers don't lie.

Qwert1174877d ago

I agree with the first part of your comment but I disagree with you when you write that Xbox 360 gamers only buy Madden and COD. I for one buy a shitload of games each year.

LOGICWINS4877d ago

"I agree with the first part of your comment but I disagree with you when you write that Xbox 360 gamers only buy Madden and COD. I for one buy a shitload of games each year."

YOU buy a shitload of games each year...MOST 360 owners only buy two games a year: COD and one sports game.

asphogears4877d ago

I also buy a lot of games each year and so does almost every Xbox 360 owner I know.

Oldsnake0074877d ago

than why does the 360 have the same / higher attach rate than the ps3 ?

Echo3074877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

"MOST 360 owners only buy two MULTIPLATFORM games a year(Madden and COD)."

I would love to know where you're getting the info to state this as fact. I have a friend's list of 80+ people and not a single one of them only play one game a year. They might not buy every game that comes out, and most of them do buy the yearly CoD title, but each of them buy and play at least a handful of games every year.

And BTW, just so we're clear, the most popular game/series on both platforms is a multiplatform title. Guess that means PS3 owners only want to play CoD, huh?

Edit - Oldsnake007 hit the nail on the head. Most multiplatform games sell better on the 360... a lot better. AND the few exclusives the Xbox has sell better than PS3 exclusives, and the install base for both consoles is about the same. In fact, if we're to listen to all the PS3 fanboys out there, about half of all 360's are dead from RROD, meaning there should be a lot more PS3's than 360's out there.

LOGICWINS4877d ago

"Guess that means PS3 owners only want to play CoD, huh?"

No, MOST PS3 owners only want to play COD.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4877d ago
2fk4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

I WANT EXCLUSIVES...that's why i got the ps3, 360, and wii.....the exclusives identify the platform....when i think of ps3 i think of Uncharted, Killzone, MGS, GOW, infamous...and when i think of 360 i think of halo, gears, fable, forza, alan wake...WE NEED EXCLUSIVES.

Kurt Russell4876d ago

Not if those games were available at the same quality multiplat you wouldn't ^^

2fk4876d ago

then what would be the point of having a ps3 and 360 if their multiplat....EXCLUSIVES IDENTIFY THE CONSOLE....u obviously dont understand

Kurt Russell4876d ago

What great vivid and exciting use of capitalisation!

I do understand, but my point was we wouldn't need a PS3, 360, Wii and god knows what else under our TV's to play everything in the world ever... Because I can play them all on one. Exclusives do identify a console in the current situation of competing companies.

HOWEVER! <--- vivid and exciting yes?.. I think so.

You made no mention of this in your first post which said "WE NEED EXCLUSIVES" in a rather crass manor (of which I read in the style of how I talk on the phone whilst poo'ing)... and is the statement I was disagreeing with.

WE don't need exclusives at all, they benefit YOU and I none what-so-ever. However competing COMPANIES need exclusives to make their product stand out amongst the rest... So you and I shall part with our hard earned pennies in their favour.

I hope there is no more confusion, as I have no more bubbles to explain this further to you. I tried to copy your eclectic typing style so we're on the same page.

upturned24877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

Agreeed. Plus, exclusives are usually geared towards hardcore gamers. With the exception of games like LittleBigPlanet and Viva Pinata lol.

Morbius4204876d ago

Maybe we don't play exclusives because thier aren't any.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4876d ago
NukaCola4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

This article just said that it doesn't matter how weak the line up is and how much MS is moving toward Kinect instead of core game, you will all still buy the Xbox anyway. Is it me or is this madness? I get the 360 audience loves multiplats just as much as the rest but exclusive stand a console apart. 360 had plenty of great titles. And the States and UK are the only countries that this article really applies too.

asphogears4877d ago

This article says how the multiplatform games these days are really good so exclusives right now are not that necessary.

NukaCola4877d ago

Well why does PS3 outsell 360 everywhere other than the UK and USA? I would think it is because Sony provides something MS doesn't. And Kinect is a huge boost to the 360 which is an exclusive camera with exclusive games. I think this article holds minimal ground.

LOGICWINS4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

"Well why does PS3 outsell 360 everywhere other than the UK and USA?"

^^Because the online is free and it has more value(Blu-ray player, gaming machine etc.) and its the same price as its counterpart 360 SKU.

Also, the 360 came out in 05', a shitload of people who are buying PS3s NOW, probably ALREADY have a 360.

If exclusives were the reason that the PS3 is outselling the 360, then why is Black Ops(a multiplatform game) the best selling Playstation 3 game in history?

jacksonmichael4877d ago

Oh, and Japan hates Microsoft.

MysticStrummer4877d ago

@Logic - PS3 has outsold 360 fairly consistently since launch, and it had a substantially higher price back then. Black Ops, like all CoDs, is an accessible FPS that anyone can pick up and do well at. Some would call that casual, some wouldn't, but the Wii has proven the power of the casual gamer's dollar. It's arguable whether that's good for gamers overall. I would say it isn't, but "accessible" has become the goal this generation and it's not surprising that CoD games sell well on any system. Regardless, if two systems play a bunch of the same games and only one of them has exclusives... real exclusives not on PC also... which would you say is the better system to buy? I'm not saying 360 has no exclusives by the way, I'm just saying to discount exclusives is silly. I know I bought a PS3 because I enjoyed the exclusives Sony brought to the PS2 more than what Microsoft brought to XBox. This generation has only enhanced that, so I'll be buying a PS4 as soon as it launches.

Biggest4877d ago

Multiplatform games have always been really good. Only a few exclusives made a difference. If you wanted Mario, you got Nintendo. If you wanted Sonic, you got Sega. If you wanted Bonk, you got TGFX16. The big thing with the Xbox in general is that most of the people playing it are people that weren't "gamers" before. They aren't concerned with games. They play what the cool kids play: Call of Duty and Madden.

sergiospain4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

Well I disagree. While most of my games are multiplatform, I don't know what would I do without my Uncharted 2, Metal gear solid 4, killzone 3 and demon's souls.

Those are the games I have played the most in this generation. Honestly, you can say whatever about multiplatforms, but having exclusives always adds variety.

inb4 a massive amount of xbox360 fanboys downvotes me for no good reason.

NateCole4877d ago

@asphogears. Truth is. MS dosent have the talent to produce exclusive content the same quantity as their rivals in any case.

@LOGICWINS. COD is the GTA of this gen in terms of accessibility and casual appeal. Regardless of platform it sells.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4877d ago
asphogears4877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

This article is not dissing any other consoles. It is just stating that multiplatform titles are really good these days. The author of the article also wrote at the beginning of the article a bit of history about the Xbox 360. There is nothing wrong with that.

upturned24877d ago (Edited 4877d ago )

He's trying to downplay the 360's lack of new exclusives. Only recently have people been bringing up that problem. Whether it be in an article or in the comments. So it makes perfect sense to come out with a cleverly comprised unbiased article that gives the 360 room to breathe with its poor Kinect.

I'm pointing out the obvious. Doesn't make me a fanboy, and I hate how that word gets thrown around all the time now. Instead of intelligence in a discussion, people call "fanboy". Makes them seem moronic.

In 2007, the PS3 barely had any exclusives. In 2007, 360 had plenty. Now look what's happened.

Morbius4204876d ago

I thought Grand Turisimo was.

Otheros004877d ago

Then what's the point of buying one if you already own a pc or ps3?

asphogears4877d ago

I think that the main point of this article was to praise multiplatform games.

Qwert1174877d ago Show
Show all comments (136)
220°

Microsoft Reportedly Spends $1 Billion Annually To Get Third-Party Games On Game Pass

Uncover the spending behind Xbox's Game Pass subscription. Discover how Microsoft invests a billion dollars annually in securing third-party games for the service.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Obscure_Observer6h ago

Good.

Now that you´re releasing games and making big money from every gaming platform, you should double that amount and give us even more day one third party games!

Jin_Sakai5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

You’re delusional beyond belief. Businesses wise it doesn’t make sense and sooner or later they’ll be raising prices again to cover that billion they’re blowing every year.

purple1015h ago(Edited 5h ago)

As someone else said earlier today, they are past the growth stage, it’s been stagnent for last 3 years, they are now in the money making stage, prepare to be goosed for as many dollars as possible for the least amount of content. It may not be bad now, (actually it is) but it will be soon (even worse) this year you got hellblade and starfirld and a load of other games that could be bought in bargain bins for about $5-30 and for that you pay them monthly

To add I honestly don’t know how you put up with the barrage of Xbox negativity (which is deserved). I put it down to:

A) you are being paid
B) you may have a problem thinking clearly
C) prefer rooting for the underdog, that’s a legit thing too. English people do it by default

Profchaos37m ago(Edited 36m ago)

Yeah Aussies also love an underdog as long as that underdog isn't Xbox as they were too of the game with the 360 then lost their minds

Chevalier17m ago

3 straight years of missing Gamepass targets. Some people are just blinded by their own idiocy. Will be interesting to see if COD does anything this fall

CosmicTurtle1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.

It’s quite funny.

Sonic18811h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money 🤔

Hofstaderman38m ago

Correction....XBOX is already dead.

fr0sty1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

They'll do that, after creating 4 more higher-priced tiers and making the one that currently includes everything only contain games that have been on the market for 4 years.

"Gamepass Ultra to the MAX: Now only $299 per year!"

Profchaos38m ago(Edited 38m ago)

They are trying to get a return on abk and Bethesda they won't double day one we're lucky we are still getting them now that day one has been removed from base tiers

They want to make money not give it away

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 17m ago
MrDead6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I like how they twist cannibalising game sales into "invests".

No lifetime sales with MS, they'll F-up gaming the same as streaming services have done to the movie industry and it's workforce.

Fishy Fingers3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?

Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games.

shadowT4h agoShowReplies(2)
CrimsonGuardVII2h ago

@badz148 its not, it just straight lied.

gold_drake1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

we know this, we have known this since last year.

this is not new or news.

Show all comments (24)
440°

Report: Microsoft Cutting 650 More Jobs From Gaming Division Per Phil Spencer's Letter to Employees

Phil Spencer has sent a letter out to employees informing them that 650 jobs would be cut from Microsoft's gaming division.

VenomUK8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

‘Good guy Phil’?

The truth likely is that the decision was not his to make and is possibly a direct consequence of cutting costs following the ABK deal.

DodoDojo8d ago

Would be nice if he'd mail one of those letters to himself.

RhinoGamer888d ago

Cut costs -> no bonus, stock options, raises for Phil and his leadership team.

Lightning778d ago

"Good guy Phil" is comical. You have to bleed green to see that. I'm only a matter of time until MS, that's right MS even in ages themselves from the industry.

Sad, people and even sadder and pathetic company.

fr0sty8d ago

If they keep this up, they won't even be able to go third party anymore after they stop making Xbox hardware.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
bionicstar8d ago

game devs aren't being let go.

“As part of aligning our post-acquisition team structure and managing our business, we have made the decision to eliminate approximately 650 roles across Microsoft Gaming—mostly corporate and supporting functions—to organize our business for long term success.”

darthv728d ago

getting rid of some suits... now this news isnt so bad. Too many suits makes all the wrong decisions, esp the top dogs.

Michiel19898d ago

@darth they arent suits, they are people that work in administration, customer support and that kinda stuff

ZacultronTheFirst8d ago

Probably people from much needed Marketing department.

Nacho_Z8d ago

It doesn't make it any better if they aren't devs being fired.

8d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
Petebloodyonion8d ago

The original story is from IGN as they are the ones who got the memo.
https://www.ign.com/article...

Still sucks!

badboyz098d ago

The day we hear that Xbox is no more is vastly approaching.

8d ago Replies(2)
Obscure_Observer8d ago

"The day we hear that Xbox is no more is vastly approaching."

Not sure Sony is doing any better with all that money lost on GaaS and all that worldwide backlash regarding the Pro.

1Victor8d ago

@obscured: “ Not sure Sony is doing any better with all that money lost on GaaS and all that worldwide backlash regarding the Pro.”
.
Welcome back we missed you said no one 🤣

.
I don’t remember Sony cutting over 1900 employees then Less than 7 months later get a leak for another 600 to be on the chopping board but hey let’s equate that to a few people not been happy about a mid gen system refresh price 🤦🏿.

8d ago
1Victor8d ago

@obscured: “
They also casually forget that Sony have been laying off thousands of people too”
Yeeesh I got a better help discount code for you

BehindTheRows8d ago

Uh, thr Pro "backlash" is hardly something that's going to tank their business. Unless you've been living under a rock, there's no question that Xbox is in the gutter.

Quit pivoting to Sony because you don't like the subject matter. Their game division isn't in the toilet.

DodoDojo8d ago

Well Sony isn't selling more copies of their games on a rival system yet so they must be doing alright.

8d ago
Mr_cheese7d ago

@obscure

Saves some straws for the rest of us will you

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
343_Guilty_Spark7d ago

Vastly approaching is a weird phrase… vastly is typically used to convey the degree of some size or length or time.

Vastly approaching makes no sense.

You mean rapidly approaching.

MrDead8d ago

A combined $80 billion spent on consolidating a massive part of the industry, thousands fired all to line the pockets of the already wealthy and turn the gaming industry into a rental service.

FU MS.

crazyCoconuts8d ago

MS is a publicly traded company. If you have a 401K you yourself might own MS stocks.
I'm definitely not a MS fan, but CEOs need to keep returns high to keep their jobs if nothing else. They don't get to transfer the salaries to their accounts.
I blame MS for failed strategies, poor execution, lack of vision, etc.
These layoffs are just the result of those things.

MrDead8d ago

That's the weakest excuse for a giant monopoly I've ever seen... also companies like MS are more likely to damage people's 401k through monopolistic practices.

Obscure_Observer8d ago

"FU MS."

I love how you act all enraged and bully when it´s MS firing people.

"It´s all about the workers" at least they´re Sony´s employees, right? If they´re Sony they can go f* themselves right? It´s all justified and the blame lies elsewhere on some widespread industry problem, right? Right?

We been seeing some of Sony recent bs moves and you know what´s coming, right?

I´m expecting you to disappear the same way you do every time Sony layoff hundreds of people or get a whole studio shut down.

You´ll do anything to avoid and hold them accountable. But that's OK. You´are not biased, right?

1Victor8d ago

@obscured: “ "It´s all about the workers" at least they´re Sony´s employees, right? If they´re Sony they can go f* themselves right? It´s all justified and the blame lies elsewhere on some widespread industry problem, right? Right?”

.
Well Sony didn’t overreached and spend over 80 BILLION$ to acquire mayor 3rd party game developers and one MAYOR publisher the owner of the BIGGEST FPS just hoping to keeping it exclusive to their system and now having to fire thousands of employees to valance their books one more quarter.
Now Microsoft is beginning and going to kiss Sony dark ring and publish their “first party games “ on PlayStation. Regardless of who it is it’s wrong to do an acquisition and then fire people.
I applaud Microsoft for at least giving them a severance package and assistance getting a new job 👍👍.

MrDead8d ago

Chill out kid... also why bring up Sony, have they just spent 80 billion to consolidate a massive part of the industry to the detriment of thousands of workers?

MS lines their pockets whilst firing thousands, such a shame you support this.

Chevalier8d ago

Gee someone here said Xbox would NEVER release 1st party games on Playstation or competing platforms again?! Never tired to see you eat crow again.

8d ago
OlderGamer177d ago

But but Sony bad...thats the normal damagecontroll from O_O. Dude its time to sing another song, this one is sounding like a broken record......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
LG_Fox_Brazil8d ago

Not sure about the rest of the world, but here in Brazil we have a say that goes like this:

'May the last one to leave please turn off the lights'

What the heck is MS even doing right now?

Show all comments (74)
210°

Something Feels Off About Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Shaz from GL: “Amidst recent concerns surrounding Xbox, Phil and Co. need a win. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if Indiana Jones and the Great Circle will be it.”

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
TwoPicklesGood13d ago

Looks good to me and I’m glad it’s coming to ps5

VenomUK11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

When it comes to video game previews I’m of the opinion that journalists should maintain a position of CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM. Yes, note and share concerns about the game with readers but maintain a restrained optimistic stance until actually having reviewed it so that any negativity is based on the game’s quality and not the author’s prejudices.

Here the author writes “ I’m going to continue to keep my cynicisms intact, less so because of my trust in MachineGames and more so due to the dumpster fire that continues to be modern-day Xbox.” This example illustrates the need to follow this guidance.

DefenderOfDoom212d ago

Not worried about facial animations , but I do hope the gameplay is fun . Most definitely I will purchase this on PS5, if the gameplay is fun .

BaughJaughs12d ago

nice hit piece. I notice the writer didn't mention any of the journalists / creators who had good things to say. From what i hear, it has riddick: escape from butcher bay in its DNA. To me that sounds like something to be Optimistic about rather than pessimistic.

ChasterMies12d ago

It’s odd to have a first person perspective for an adventure game with stealth and brawling. But’s not without precedent. Wolfenstein: New Order and Wolfenstein: New Colossus had a lot of adventure game elements. They were in the league of the greatest games ever, but they were both fun games. Indy looks fun too.

YourMommySpoils12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Yes, Indy looks like Todd Howard. Something feels way too off.

Show all comments (25)