630°

Xbox One: 5 Reasons Microsoft’s Reveal Was Total Failure

"So, today witnessed another console unveil this time from Microsoft. After Sony unveiled their new console features earlier in the year and with Nintendo already putting the Wii U on store shelves, this was the next anticipated release. " | Explosion.com

Read Full Story >>
explosion.com
aceitman4025d ago

I like to know who these people where that clapped at every and anything.

Moonman4025d ago

They are all $100 richer. :)

Black-Helghast4025d ago

They weren't real people? lol...

Reverent4025d ago

I keep hearing from people that all the clapping was from just Microsoft employees. I guess they were all sitting right next to the cameras.

Enemy4025d ago

I think Jeff Gerstmann already confirmed they seemed to be working for Microsoft.

nix4025d ago

i have ONE reason:

Cable Box.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4024d ago

@Moonman

"They are all $100 richer. :)"

I am one of the employees who clapped and I am using my $100 towards ps4!! Thanks M$!!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4024d ago
Rusty5154025d ago

Probably Sony executives encouraging Microsoft's idiocy.

shoddy4025d ago

Sony stock actually jump 9% after the announcement.

Double_O_Revan4025d ago

No shareholders would most certainly would not have been cheering during that presentation.

If I had any Microsoft shares, I would've dumped them after that fiasco.

SonyAddict4025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

I think it was a room full of Activision,treyarch and infinityward employees!.

TwistedMetal4025d ago

nobody it was like those fake sitcoms that has fake audience laugh and clap through the speakers. pre recorder cheers.

forcefullpower4025d ago

I noticed that too. I could only see a couple of dudes clapping but not to the extent that they were broadcasting.

Syntax-Error4024d ago

I love the voice command and cable box, but the console is HUUUUGE! That sh!t looks like room deodorizer. Most people say VCR, but those vents all over it are ugly. It looks bigger than Xbox v1. Wanna see what the PS4 looks like before I cast a stone.

4024d ago
Parasyte4024d ago

They were Microsoft employees. People that were at the reveal, like Adam Sessler, tweeted that the applause wasn't coming from the press/media.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4024d ago
HyperBear4025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

Here it is:
#5) Xbox One is a Stupid name
#4) Kinect 2.0 Forced Onto Gamers
#3) Xbox One is a Massive Device...& Ugly
#2) No Backwards Compatibility & Pre-Owned Fees
#1) Gaming is Secondary, Not Primary Concern For Xbox One

I'd say those are some valid reasons. #2 might change every 30 minutes until it's confirmed by Don Mattrick. And we'll have to wait until E3 to say if Gaming truly is secondary to the platform (behind TV/App integration).

@aceitman: They were Microsoft Employees....

HammadTheBeast4025d ago

You forgot second hand fee, and online connection startup.

NameRemoved00174025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

Don't forget non removable hard drive only 500gb (next gen games will be like 20GB+ each), who the hell was the idiot who decided to use 3 operating systems and you have to install games to play them.

HyperBear4025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

Well I just copied what the reasons where from the article. There's probably about 20 reasons that, all of us on N4G, can come up with on why it's a total failure.

I just simply copied what the author of the article said where the 5.

aconnellan4024d ago

@hdshatter
Didn't they say in the reveal that the installed games will be uploaded to Cloud Storage? They said that way you can sign in to another xbox and have all your games ready

Reverent4025d ago

I'd hardly even call gaming secondary for it. Gaming was more like a tacked on, obscure side-feature.

maxgamehard4025d ago

@hdshatter

Also of the ram for Xbox only 5 GB is usable for games

This was stated by gameinformer

Thefreeman0124024d ago

I don't think 3 is a valid point. Personally I think it looks fine looks better than the first 360 did or the ps3 for that matter. The controller looks great

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4024d ago
004025d ago

all the stuff that came after just made is worse.

iamtehpwn4025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

5 Reasons:
1) No games
2) TV is not games
3) games pls
4) You know for a video game console, this thing could use some games
5) And the games that were shown will also be available for PS4.

Jek_Porkins4025d ago

Forza 5 and Quantum Break are exclusives, they didn't show a ton of games, but they declared that earlier in the week.

Microsoft-"We plan to show the hardware, we'll save tons of exclusive game announcements for E3"

After the Xbox One reveal- "What!? How dare they not show games that they stated earlier they wouldn't show?"

They did however state that 15 exclusives would be shown off at E3, 8 new IP's and Rare is said to be bringing an iconic franchise back...so....yea...

Crazay4025d ago

well said Porkins. 15 exclusives is HUGE freaking news - now let's wait and see what happens with E3.

Boody-Bandit4025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

Jek the problem I have is they didn't show any actual gameplay footage with ANY game. I mean seriously, WTF? Not ONE game had in game graphics from the gamers perspective. Infinity said the premier was in game graphics engine but we gamers know that the cut scenes, regardless if it's the actual graphics engine or not, is always more polished than the actual game play graphics. And to be honest, it didn't look at that great.

That presentation was rancid. EA didn't go into any in depth detail of what they were claiming actually meant in terms of implementation. The whole presentation was fluff. Very disappointing.

Even though their presentation was boring as hell. I will hold off judgment until E3. MS really needs to bring the heat June 10th.

UnHoly_One4025d ago

Save your energy, Jek, you are wasting your time trying to talk sense into the PS fanboys.

I'm looking forward to seeing what they have to show us at E3.

I have a sneaking feeling the comments around here are going to look a little different that week. lol

warewolfSS4025d ago (Edited 4025d ago )

better not make sense on here.everyones gonna start to yell about how sony is better and give you disagrees. everyones so upset about TOYS. these are TOYS.

your not elite for buying them. anyone can do it.

and sony didnt even show a system. whats the big deal. your all ridiculous.

NarooN4025d ago

Yeah, 15 exclusives, wooo!! 13 Kinect games and two games that no one will care about except diehard M$ fans, haha.

MoonWheel4025d ago

I bet 5 or 6 of those games will be mediocore kinect games and others will be timed exclusives or bought third party games.

Pillsbury14024d ago (Edited 4024d ago )

How can you seriously still defend a company that is trying to force kinect on you and wants to charge you more fees? For many people having a game tied to ur account making the game worthless to resell is reason enough to hate xb1. On top of that they want to charge you the full amount to put it on another console.

Edit: I bet most of those exclusives are kinect focused

Jek_Porkins4024d ago

You guys can try to spin it how you want, but a launch lineup of solid first party games like Ryse, Forza 5, Killer Instinct, Black Tusk's game, Battlefield 4,Assassins Creed 4, Watch Dogs, Destiny, COD Ghosts, Madden 25 and whatever else they have would be pretty damn good.

I expect good things, and I expect some Kinect integration, but I'm not sweating that, because I loved Kinect integration with Skyrim, Mass Effect 3, Halo CEA and Forza 4.

KarrBOMB4024d ago

@Pillsbury...

They're retarded or just fanboys, that's how they can defend it. Yes Jekyll, Kinect is so cool that 1 out of my 50 Xbox 360 friends has one. It's stupid. I work out every day, the last thing I want to do is flail around like a special needs kid to play games. I want to sit and relax.

Also, Microsoft is blocking used games, borrowing games, Redbox games and trading games with friends. Regardless of what you wish or think, Microsoft is catering to housewives and casual gamers, not real gamers who don't feel like dancing in front of a camera.

InSpectre4024d ago

It's okay Jek, it's a free country and you can do what you want.

However, announcing a games console with no games isn't what most people wanted to see no matter how you spin it. There was simply no reason for this conference at all. They should have done it all at E3.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4024d ago
SegaSaturn6694025d ago

# 6 No Mark Cerny -- the mark cerny lookalike was a scumbag, too.

RandomDude6554025d ago

Even the great Cerny couldn't save this debacle.

sinjonezp4025d ago

I felt the same way. Lol like why this guy has this fake smile and keeps bobbling his head...smh..could not trust this guy at all.

Show all comments (104)
150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies3d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX4d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody4d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_4d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga3d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie2d ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly3d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga3d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit3d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_4d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21833d ago (Edited 3d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies3d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (30)
150°

Microsoft to Add Copilot AI to Video Games

Microsoft recently revealed its plans to incorporate Copilot directly into video games, with Minecraft being the first showcased example.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Fishy Fingers8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

F*** AI

"Hey Copilot, what's a good meme to prove I dislike AI".... https://giphy.com/clips/sou...

Einhander19728d ago

Two trillion dollar company that just can't wait to put as many people possible out of work as fast as possible.

It feels like every single thing they do is making gaming worse and destroying the industry.

8d ago
8d ago
8d ago
darthv727d ago

....you know it takes people to program the AI.... right? It isnt like it is sentient. We haven't reach skynet level of situation or anywhere close to the matrix just yet.

That's next Thursday.

Einhander19727d ago (Edited 7d ago )

It takes a people to program the AI then that AI is used for who knows how many games eliminating countless jobs which only grows as AI is used for more and more game creation functions.

What you're saying is so ridiculously short sighted and truly larking any kind of understanding and foresight.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
CaptainFaisal8d ago

Why all the hate? Im actually excited about this! Always wanted this kind of immersion, and an AI companion with me all the time helping me out knowing the status of my skills/inventory/progress and giving me tips on the best approach or how to craft something specific is game changing for the industry.

Hate all you want about AI, but this is just the start and I can see the potential already. You wont be complaining in the next 5-10 years about this, but rather complain if a game hasn’t implemented it.

MrDead8d ago

Yes we can't wait for the work of others to be used without the need to pay them so that MS can profit even more from the people they fire.

I_am_Batman8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

There is no chance I'd ever use something like this, especially if it's not part of the core game design, but a layer on top of it. It's way too much handholding. Many games already feel like busy work, because they don't let the player figure things out on their own. Having a real-time interactive guide defeats the purpose of playing the game in the first place in my opinion.

If this were to become the standard like you predict, we'll see more and more video games get away with bad design, because people will just be used to ask for help from the AI companion anyway.

Number1TailzFan8d ago

Well Nintendo don't need this with some of their games these days, with invincible characters, items, easy bosses etc.. they do the hand holding built in

helicoptergirl8d ago

Takes "hand holding" in games to a whole new level.

BlackDoomAx6d ago

Because human nature xD Almost every new technology had these kind of comments.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
Show all comments (19)
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Psychonaut8511d ago

They’re not working on Call of Duty? Give it time.