430°

Video compares Wii U and PS3 load times

GE: "Nintendo will be improving the Wii U’s load times in April, including the time it takes to boot out of a game and return to the home menu. The company recently released a video highlighting the improvement, so one Japanese gamer decided to create a video and see how it stacks up to the PlayStation 3."

Read Full Story >>
gamingeverything.com
NastyLeftHook04058d ago

pretty close, but thats not saying much.

Black-Rock-Shooter4058d ago

Yea seeing as the ps3 is over 6 years older.

But if Nintendo keep updating it will get better.

iGAM3R-VIII4058d ago

Yea agreed, also some of the processing power in the PS3 is larger than the WiiU so you cannot really compare the two. Comparing the load times in the WiiU and he Wii seem a bit fair but I really do not know about the PS3 vs. WiiU. Also the fact that the PS3 drive is faster and spins faster than the Wii U. You could compare the load times PS3 vs. 360 but I do not know about PS3 vs WiiU or 360 vs. Wii U. It is still nice to see that Nintendo are making an effort with their system, keep it up Nintendo

SilentNegotiator4057d ago

They also should have gone with faster RAM.

guitarded774057d ago

Most importantly... THEY'RE USING DIFFERENT SOFTWARE!!! That's kinda important for comparisons and benchmarks.

lilbroRx4057d ago

You do know that much older, 20 year old tech swapped much faster than any of this right?

OS load times tend to increase as technology expands, not decrease.

Blackdeath_6634057d ago

there only so much you updating you can do on the same hardware.

TheXonySbox4057d ago

If you buy a wiiu and compare it to anything you are clearly 'slow' or retarded.

Wii U is rubbish casual crap.

herbs4057d ago

iGAM3R you have no idea what your talking about. Wii U disc read speeds are 22mb/s vs PS3 9mb/s and Nintendo uses proprietary Blu-ray Discs. I'm not a fan of people just spreading fanboy Bullshit like butter get your facts straight before posting thanks.

DeadlyFire4057d ago

Well WiiU looks to have 480 Gigaflops + CPU Gigaflops. Maybe 500ish. That's a 25x improvement from the Wii right there. Now they just need to make a 10x improvement next generation after this one for 5 Tflops and they will be set. Top cards coming out this year might be in the WiiU2 in 2020.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4057d ago
xHeavYx4058d ago

And to think that the PS4 will barely have any load times...

Autodidactdystopia4058d ago

Think again man.

Unless they include an ssd out of the box, its still gonna take a very long time to pull 8gb off the hdd every time. even if the game is installed.

very basic logic there, (in order to fill system ram, one must pull the data from somewhere;the harddisk being both the location of that data and the slowest part on the system short of optical.)

Autodidactdystopia4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

One must never state the truth, cause that is upsetting to people who cant handle it.

JEEZ.

someone explain to me how to fill system ram in a fraction of a second when loading a game besides getting it either off the game disk or harddisk.

no cause it takes time right or have i missed something?

EXPLAIN YOURSELVES.

ok well lotta disagrees, dont expect that to change so

"Gamedata coming from a AAA game disc or a harddrive that utilizes 8gbs of system ram, can indeed be loaded in .032 milliseconds because.... Magic.
- Everyone"

I get it. point taken

Thirty3Three4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

@Autodidactdystopia,

They've confirmed it will literally "appear" on. Like, if that makes sense. It won't need to 'load' when being booted up. Really odd, I know, watch the stream though :)

Why am I getting disagrees?! This was confirmed.

This community really does suck sometimes.

flyingmunky4057d ago

I don't think you will have to load a full 8 gb into ram to get the program up and running. Programs these days have a sense of modularity that allows it to load what it needs into ram a piece at a time. For example continuing to load while the screen pops up havok, the gamedev, and the start screen.

Also I do think the next gen consoles should be able to take advantage of ssd's extra speed if someone is willing to burn that much cash, but it shouldn't be a standard.

BitbyDeath4057d ago

Thirty3Three is right.

Here's the quote and link.

"The Sony PS4 will have no boot-up time according to system architect Mark Cerny. Pressing “on” will bring you directly to the home screen."

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

DeadlyFire4057d ago

All games will have load times until Cloud tech appears. I expect more Hard Drive installs for PS4/X720 to fix loading times to be a little faster.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4057d ago
jcnba284058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

This video is pathetic because tokyo jungle is a psn game. They should have been comparing it to an actual ps3 game which take longer to load back to home screen.

AngelicIceDiamond4057d ago

Sorry but the Xbox is faster then both of those.

Drekken4057d ago

And then it burnt down your house.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4057d ago
Godmars2904058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

So...um, err...

At a total loss why before its update the WiiU loaded slower than the PS3.

I mean, is it really something to crow about when talking up how the WiiU is 3X more powerful than the PS3 when you've just now matched its loading speed?

And again; the PS3 is not the WiiU's generational equal. Its like comparing the N64 to the SNES.

@DarkHeroZX:
Who honestly really cares? Right now my front running next gen system is the WiiU for the Project X title. I will buy a WiiU when that game comes out.

Meanwhile with the PS4 I'm concerned where the focus on social features and functions will take games on it.

DarkHeroZX4058d ago

the wii U isn't 3x more powerful. it's about 50% or 1.5x more powerful.

thezeldadoth4058d ago

love these so obviously factual numbers.

lilbroRx4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

Actually, altogether is around twice as powerful.

On top of the 50% increase in raw gpu horsepower, it also has much more advanced tech in it such as moving from DX9 eqiuvelent graphics to DX10.1 or 11(still not confirmed which is uses) and from Shader Modal 3 to 5.

Its also has over twice as much game usable RAM(the PS3 and 360 dedicated some of their RAM to sound, the os and other system functions. The Wii U gave those things their own RAM pool) and the CPU in the Wii U has 3 cores purely dedicated to gaming that do 3 processes per cycle(the Cell is only single core with 8 SPUs and two of those were used for the OS and Security. The 360's CPU is 3 cores hyped-thread so but 1.5 of its cores are dedicated to the OS, music and sound. Both the Cell and Xenos them only do 1 instruction per cycle as well). Contarary to early reports based on raw clock frequency, the Wii U RAM actually faster than the 360/PS3 in real world performance. All signs point to it being dual channel, meaning its performance is twice what its clock speed suggests.

90% of the technical problems observed on the Wii U right now are "software" issues, not hardware issues.

If the hardware capabilities caused the problem, then there would be nothing that could fix it. This update is only the first for improving system performance. They have another one coming out in the Summer that will improve it even more.

SUKMELONGTIME4056d ago

It's 2x as powerful. It also uses 1/3 of the power.

Imagine having a car that has 2x the power of your old car but also getting 3x better gas mileage.

Welcome to the Wii U.

Everyone who compares PS4 to Wii U needs to get their brain checked.

PS4 is a $599 console that consumes 150W-200W

Wii U is a $250 console that consumes 35W

Comparing the Wii U and the PS4 with each other is like comparing a Toyota FRS to a Nissan GTR

jcnba284057d ago

This video isn't even fair, they were comparing a PSN game to a Wii U disc game. I did a real loading time myself here with an actual PS3 game Uncharted 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Godmars2904057d ago

And that is the total opposite of what I said.

PopRocks3594058d ago

Hmm. PS3 is still a little faster by a couple of seconds. Nice upgrade, but I think Nintendo should take it further in a future update.

ChickeyCantor4057d ago (Edited 4057d ago )

As much as I want a fast and seamless transitions... Why are we even comparing it to other consoles? It could be very well be that in a year or 2 Nintendo overhauls the interface completely. And even if it doesn't go faster than this, it won't be a factor for purchasing decisions.

As for the video, I don't see the same amount running on the background. So the comparison is flawed. And rather pointless.

lilbroRx4057d ago

Look at the video the person made right above the you using an actual retail game, and not a PSN title.

Krew_924057d ago

The person took their time pressing the buttons though, as the Wii U demonstration too. So in reality in real time play both of these would exit much faster.

Also exiting a game on PS3 by going to the home menu is just adding more time. As holding the PS button and exiting from that menu is so much faster. As the home menu takes a while to load while in game.

abzdine4058d ago

man some people really dont know what to do in their spare time..

4058d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (73)
190°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel1d 21h ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow1d 9h ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo18214h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie4h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

Notellin53m ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

OtterX17h ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Tody_za17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno16h ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno14h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

fsfsxii43m ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Show all comments (16)
60°

Interview on Fallout 4 with the Actor for Nick Valentine, Codsworth & Mr Handy (Stephen Russell)

Interview with Stephen Russell, Actor for (Nick Valentine, Codsworth, My Handy) in Fallout 4 which is a vast open world role playing game set in the apocalyptic wastes of Boston, the Commonwealth. The career goes further with other Bethesda games from Starfield to Prey to The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
120°

Rocksmith+ Comes To PS And Steam In June

This looks like a great way to play.
Rocksmith+, the award winning music-learning app that teaches you guitar and piano with thousands of hit songs, is coming to PlayStation and Steam on June 6, and is available to wishlist now on both platforms.