I disagree, I'm excited to see Craig.
Penello is correct, but the Series S will have less detail, such as texture and shadows, due to the lesser GPU performance.
Who cares if it's coming to PS4. If you want the better experience, you'll want the PS5 version. People are so stupid, getting upset about decisions that have absolutely no effect on them, and in this case, it's a very pro-consumer move, but people are so obsess about nonsense, that they think being pro-consumer is bad now....
Yeah, one of the most popular kids games.... that's what I said.
A reveal in a kids game?
The Series S would be awesome if it weren't for the small 512 GB SSD. When you throw in a 1TB external SSD for what is rumored to be $219.99 USD, you're $20.00 more than the cost of the Series X. At this point it doesn't make any sense. The Series X on the other hand, is going to be an absolute beast of a console. Series S is for casuals only, or people who don't understand what they're buying.
Competing consoles don't have experiences like this that last for years.
And if the PS5 loads 6 seconds faster, in the real world, would that even be a big deal?
I will check this out when it comes to Steam. As many people are saying, it looks a lot better now than in previous showings.
If they're going to re-make a game, it would seem that Battllefield 2 would be the one work on, since that was primarily just for PC gamers back in the day.
I think a great package to remaster, would be the BF:BC 1&2 campaigns, along with the multiplayer from BC2 with the odd BC1 map thrown in. Not to mention, that you can't buy BC1 anywhere, except if you manage to get it on disc for PS3/360, or have purchased the 360 version digitally, which thankfully, is bac...
The only problem with BF3 single player, is that it was too short. Other than that, it was quite good at giving the feel of tense and real warfare situations.
BF3 is still alive and well on PC, and it looks phenomenal on Ultra settings.
It is a virtual monopoly. It's similar to the mobile phone providers in Canada, where we get a choice between Bell, Rogers, Telus and Shaw. These companies also own some smaller providers like Fido and Koodo, but they all keep their prices at the same level, so there really isn't any real choice.
Same thing with internet providers. here in British Columbia, we have a choice between Rogers and Telus, making it a duopoly. Choosing between Windows, Linux and Apple OS ...
Why don't we call you Craig instead?
I went with an RTX 2080 Super, but upgraded from a GTX 780.
This makes no sense. These developers develop games for PC with a myriad of different hardware configurations, and we don't hear complaints from developers how the GTX 1050 is going to hold back multi-platform titles. If you have less GPU power, then you'll have lower quality textures, shadow and lighting effects, which you can adjust in the graphics settings.
Played this game for the first 3 months and then was bored with it. The Vegas series was way more fun, and is still a series I go back to from time to time.
Looks like development studios are running out of ideas. You have to wonder where all the creative talent has gone, who originally came up with all of these games, like Prince of Persia, Assassins Creed, Rainbow Six Vegas, Ghost Recon, The Darkness, FEAR, Left 4 Dead, Tomb Raider, Halo, Gears, and on and on. It's very rare to get new big franchises anymore these days, unless it's a Battle Royal game, or some competitive twitch shooter like Overwatch.
I think they should have gone with at least 750GB.
This is the same kind of nonsense that happens with concert tickets, and it's got to stop.