that sh!t is crazy, i no its a cultural thing but still, can't imagine working even the shitiest job and allowing that to happen for 6 months
Marvel have tons of characters but for you its the x-men or nothing? what a waste, i want them to use the lack of x-men as an advantage, bring a bunch of never before seen characters
Yes, and get rid of zero, anyone interested in competitive MvC will no why
True, that does hurt but it also means that marvel can bring in a bunch of new characters
People are becoming more busy, family, school, work etc add decent to good games coming back to back each month and it becomes apparent why backlogs occur
SFV got released far to early so capcom and to a lesser extent sony paid that price. If either have any common sense that wont happen again
Damn, when was the last time nintendo cared about specs? feels like that would be the gamecube. my point is the switch appeals to....whoever is in to nintendo gimmicks but with decent specs it could capture core gamers to but.....no
I would have though Audio/Videophiles would already have an UHD bluray player anyway
There are only two things i think about when MS talks like this, will the scorpio have any compelling games that will just force me to buy it? and how much will it cost?
both answers might not matter, if MS stays true to their word and pretty much have parity between PC and xbox games that just pushes me toward PC, if the scorpio cost more then a GTX 1070 then it personally makes no sense for ME to buy one, i could even sell my 970 to get it cheaper.
So i...
innovative as i expected from nintendo but i can't imagine its very powerful, being portable
This is one of the few times i'd glady take a remaster, if i want to play read dead i need a xbone/PS360, i have none and really dont want to buy either for one game, plus RDR is old enough to actually see real benifits
I keep hearing people cry about 4K ultra HD bluray support but i wonder how many would really use it, i know i wouldn't.
the latest demo is the only footage i have seen of star citizen, looks pretty good compared to NMS, ironically NMS is the only reason i became aware of star citizen
Right? as if pointing out faults that have been listed elsewhere means you have to find your own because......reaons
I wasn't really hyped for this game so when i saw this review it was pretty insightful, the way the sean kept up the lies about features, often with a smile on his face, i can only assume he thought they would be in the game, or he knew he was BS-ing everyone and couldn't help himself, disappointing either way.
I think the initial price of the PS3 did more damage then anything
Good point, also i'll add to that because why not.
Forced side missions to progress main story
"Extreme" difficulty for specific missions rather then selecting a difficulty from the start of the game (a first for the series)
Fake important side missions, some are just mandatory to progress the game like huey's
Want to listen to tapes while doing missions? go ahead but prepare for kaz/ocelot and random soldiers to interrupt often...
@-Foxtrot
Perhaps but then then you need to have a reason for meryl to be there, just retconning her for rose wouldn't work
Maybe he would open up to the AI meryl and not notice its not her but the colonel who he has known for over a decade? i doubt it
Basically MGS2 portrays raiden as the VR noob with no real experience, snake is the Highly experience super soldier, chances of him being duped by AI are pretty low
MGS2 gets unnecessary hate just because of raiden who isn't even a bad protagonist, the codec calls you get with him and rose just wouldn't happen with snake.
The story is so interesting and is still relevant over a decade later.
It looks better then MGS3 (graphics) even though 3 came after it.
I wont go on but i suggest the haters watch someone who knows the game in and out play it and expose everything it has to offer
Great score but my backlog is so real, it's never been this bad, quality games coming every month + my last year at uni = 5 to 10 games i cant touch