You're right Aenea. Maybe companies should take features out that the minority only use, because not many people use them. That's the logic, if only a few people use it, then why bother aye?
Because business innit.
The only ones that seem to really care and make a fuss are the ones that say they don't care. I haven't got an xbox, but I'd love to have the option. Lots of products have features that hardly anyone uses, but it's nice to know it's there when you do want that feature.
It's a good thing to have, no matter how many people actually use it. Better to have a feature you can use than not having the feature at all.
That's just common...
Too realistic.
It would be nice to have a path of completion that still sees new things added to the end. I like the format the Far Cry games have to a certain extent, but I'd like to see something out of the ordinary, instead of having systems in place and that's it.
There needs to be a fluidity to it. Where you don't see everything the game has to offer after you've finished 90% of it. I want them to take risks.
The puzzles might be a bit too difficult for you. You can't get a headshot out of a puzzle, best to leave this one alone.
All these Christian Extremists are getting a bit much nowadays. And the Buddhists? Absolute psychos.
All religion sucks. Some more than others, and some are easier targets. Especially the ones that don't have people blowing themselves and others up every month.
But yeah, let's kill some extremist christians, they cause so much trouble!
They have to pay more to Sony and MS for the privilege of selling their games on those systems.
'Or if sales convince SEGA it's worth it to buy the rights to Bayonetta 2 back from Nintendo.'
How will sales of Bayonetta on pc convince Sega to pay Nintendo to take a gamble on what Bayonetta 2 could sell? How much would that cost them to do, do you know?
It's pie in the sky thinking.
Remote Play is shit. It's a big piece of laggy crap. It's like PS Now, nice idea in theory but in execution it's awful. Nothing beats technology that gives perfect response.
Capcom made Onimusha.
Why do you feel the need to jump into the comment sections and defend your article? Let the article speak for itself.
Just seems very unprofessional if you want yourself to be taken seriously.
Lets assume people like having extra features in their products as apposed to having less features. Where does that leave us?