Judging how technically competent they've been on the Xbox One version I'm happy they will be doing the PC version too.
Honestly this is a terrible idea for Crytek. They are supposedly in financial trouble but they start throwing money at a demo for a niche product.
More often than not its actually the publishers fault for poor PC ports. They are wanting to maximize profits and cut corners on an expensive PC port under the assumption that it will sell regardless of how mediocre the port is.
If you think thats why you are so so wrong.
As I mentioned on another thread Phil said he'd try back in 2013. I bet that Suzuki didn't want anything to do with big American Microsoft when he could get more freedom and control over the project if he got the game Kickstarted. The fact he paired with Sony is probably because PS4 is the lead home console in Japan.
Killer Instinct, budget fighting done well. Hopefully MS will give the project a little more money for season 3. One of my most played games on XBO.
Earthworm Jim?
They didn't announce it like it was the whole library at all. They said there will be over 100 titles for its launch later this year.
If you were under the impression otherwise it will be journalists skewing their words.
You're forgetting what N4G has taught us over the past week. No one wants it, its somehow a ripoff, its a bad idea, again no one wants it, Playstation Now is better because it has more games than a preview and that Microsoft are awful people for trying to do something nice. I think I covered all the recent articles points.
I've been saying all year Warner Bros are trying for worst publisher of the year. Bad PC port of MK X. Lots of expensive dlc and microtransactions before it even launched. Similar thing goes for Arkham Knight with the dodgy 'buy the season pass but we're not telling you whats in it' approach.
I thought people didn't like Punchline. All the previews I read for it said it wasn't great.
They released on all platforms? Should we really encourage a great developer like Rocksteady to remaster a games that are max 6 years old? I don't want them to remaster them but instead get someone like WB Montreal to do it. Leave Rocksteady to make great games.
Nothing like it. Warner Bros have constantly cut corners regarding PC ports of their games. Look at MK X. Gearbox just flatout misrepresented their product and reportedly embezzled money from Sega. If you want a fairer comparison looks at Other Ocean and Street Fighter IV. They either didn't get enough budget, time or just aren't technically skilled enough to do a perfect port.
Theres a difference between weaker and being replaced by worse content. I think this is the latter.
A smaller studio headed by the great Dave Lang. They are brilliant when it comes to fighting games and ports but step outside that into other genre and the ports become mediocre.
Since November Microsoft published Screamride, Ori and the Blind Forest, State of Decay YOSE and Happy Wars on the Xbox One. The free Fast and Furious expansion for FH2. Another 6 characters in Killer Instinct and Halo 3 ODST added to MCC. Not really nothing...
My first Devil came was DmC definitive which I loved but it was always the black sheep. I got Devil May Cry 4 Special Edition yesterday and its great. Not yet as complex as DmC but still great.
You completely contradicted yourself there. All those games in your list are 3rd party Microsoft Studios published titles. I would love to see if Halo Wars gets an fps boost from this though.
He is sort of telling the truth. PAL versions of PDZ and Banjo N'n'B currently don't work. I haven't been able to get either to work since launch whereas PAL Viva Pinata games works fine.
After watching Daigo bully someone into the corner at the Capcom Cup I would forgive people for thinking SF4 is a high damage game. Then again in the CEO finals for KI I'm pretty sure PaulB did 69% of Bass' bar in one combo.