true that. You can find all of them are more through a quick google search.
That would be sooo cool. 0.0
And then this abomination was born! http://youtu.be/8ozE8n0JHJ4...
Now imagine what Sony would have done with a franchise like Zelda. 0.0
a lot of its games are expensive as *** (like Suikoden II or MegaMan Legends) but the console itself is really cheap.
these are huge news for JRPG fans but since the name of the game is not Final Fantasy then no one cares. ;(
Story-telling. And is not just N4G who holds the game too high but the industry too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
look at their other reviews:
Uncharted 3 = 7.9
Skyrim = 8.9
Zelda SS = 8.4
and
Amy = 9.2
Trollololol
http://www.platinum-hits.co...
Look at their other reviews:
Uncharted 3 = 7.9
Skyrim = 8.9
Zelda SS = 8.4
and
Amy = 9.2
http://www.platinum-hits.co...
I think is time to down-vote this crappy site guys! Just press the "+" symbol that is beside the weblink (and below the "Read full review >>") and click on "WTF?" and "...
the thing is that the game runs at native 60frames but youtube videos are capped at 30frames so, if you see any tear there's a high chance that it was caused by the down-conversion of the video player itself and not the game.
The Zelda demo was being rendered at 720p and running at 30 frames with no AA. With this in mind I don't think the specs are gonna be all that great anyway. Even the lighting effects that they were trying to show off weren't as impressive as the one on Uncharted 3.
The demo looked great but it was because of the art style.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Nami-swan, Robin-chwan!! XD
they are talking about story telling though, not gameplay.
Grandia is an Enix franchise BTW.
The comment section was more fun to read than the main article because the author is just saying what people have said a thousand times already. But the truth is that FFXIII has more flaws than just the restricted linearity....
Anyway, it seems these FFXIII debates are taking place everywhere and not just in N4G. Even on gamefaqs there are a couple of threads with people talking about why FFXIII sucks while others are defending it. This is the first time I've seen the FF...
PS3 looks cleaner too, is not just the contrast.
I loved Lightning too. In fact, she was the sole reason of why I even finish FFXIII, her design and clothes and everything about her was so well done but they had to ruin her with that horrible valkyrie armor. And then the time travel plot, Noel, Serah... The game looks even worse than the first one and the demo was freaking terrible. Same crap but worse.
VI, IX and X is all you have to play to understand why this series was so popular. Or just wait for the FFX HD re-release that is coming soon.
VII is my favorite but the graphics makes it so hard to play it that for a newcomer is better to simply avoid it. And 8 is good too but the battle system is too complicated and you're just going to spam the summons and get bored of it really fast.
If FFXIII is evolution then I don't want that! Crappy story, annoying characters, almost no customization, uninteresting setting, Jpop music, only being able to control 1 character during battles even when the battle system is still turn based, etc. And now its sequel is full of mazes to explore with a bunch of dead ends and fake towns.... >_>
What happened to the deep stories of the old FF games and other elements like Vivi being an artificial form of life created ...
Bad or not the truth is that FFXIII sold considerably well and it was supposedly "the fastest selling FF game ever". I bet that's why they made this sequel(in less than 2 years BTW) that no one asked for.
In fewer words, the game has all the characteristics of a cash-in.
This game is not that good really. In fact all of the Arc the Lad games are pretty boring and the battle system is nothing more than a downgraded FF Tactics. To enjoy this series you need to be a huge fan of Strategy JRPG's and even then you could be playing better games like Valkyria Chronicles or Disgaea. ;)