@JasonKCK
Yes, I agree there are some better features in XBL than in PSN but the fact that PSN doesn't have cross-game chat is due to the memory limitations on the PS3.
I partially agree with you. It's great that Achievements are of some use now but I think that Sony's Plus is still better than Live Gold (Keep in mind that I'm no fanboy of any company/console or whatever). I think it's pretty stupid to pay 50 euros a year (Yeah it ain't THAT much but still I hate doing it as I could buy one game more a year with that price) just to play online and browse the internet (which I can do on my computer just fine.
And nothing b...
I'm not sure if this site is that trustworthy as it has given pretty much anything between 9 and 10 for all the game the reviewer has reviewed.
Lol you actually tried to watch videos on the site? ;D
Oh, come on. Just because this game is PUBLISHED by Bethesda, note: not developed, does not mean the PS3 version is going to have tons of bugs. Skyrim was developed by Bethesda but this is developed by Arkane Studios.
Why the disagrees? Is Bethesda not the publisher after all? Have I missed something?
What I've gathered from watching the walkthrough videos the stealth mechanic seems to be working really well. I see no problems with it.
Not every developer wants to invest a whole lot into the graphics department to max out the current consoles.
Yeap, when I tried played the demo if seriously felt and played bad. I didn't get a good impression. I played through Leon's demo and about a minute of Chris'.
I'd rather buy the complete edition with all the DLC a year later than pay a hundred euros to get the full game.
I thought the game was awesome. Sure, the ending wasn't what I was hoping for but it certainly didn't make the WHOLE game bad. Just the ending was a little disappointing. There have been far more disappointing games. Keep in mind that this is only MY opinion.
How many times do I have to tell people that Bethesda is only PUBLISHING the game. Arkane Studios is the developer.
The developers said that the fastest player who opts for the kill everyone -play style will finish the game in about 12-15 hours but those who take their time will finish it in about 20-25.
Wow I agree! I thought the old Final Fantasies without any voice acting whatsoever were much more charming. In my opinion voice acting just doesn't suit those games.
@Irishguy95
I thought it was the other way around. I thought UC3 first half was awesome but the second was way too action oriented.
@Godmars290
You should play it yourself. IF you're into JRPGS that is. Lost Odyssey's music is absolutely amazing. The soundtrack is one of Uematsu's best in my opinion. The battle system is the traditional turn-based system; Some people like it, some don't. I fall into the former category.
The main story of the game is nothing revolutionary but great nonetheless. What makes the story/world so amazing are the little short stories that the protagonist K...
I wouldn't consider RDR as an RPG at all. It's a great game but it is not a role-playing game per say but just an open world action game.
I have to say that in all honesty Lost Odyssey is one of the best RPGs of all time. I can't point my finger at one thing that makes it so great but it just so heavily reminds me of the old good RPGs from the nineties.
FYI ram is cheap as hell. Not expensive at all.
I wouldn't consider Blue Dragon to be all that awesome. It's a good game and a great RPG for sure but there has been better this generation. Imo FF6 is on hell of a game also and would replace Blue Dragon with Tales of Vesperia.
Agreed. I just love something new and fresh amid all the military shooters and prequels of sequels of prequels of sequels. I hope that last part wasn't confusing at all, nope.