It is kind of hard to claim that not having Call of Duty on your platform will hurt your business when Nintendo in outselling the competition and hasn't had Call of Duty on it in a decade. If a FPS game is critical to your player base like Sony claims, how can you have 19 studios and none of them developing a FPS?
Meanwhile, PS4 users get another meaningless update that also has the side effect of forcing players to redownload Destiny 2. I suppose Sony considers this a win since last September's update was bricking consoles.
Good job Sony on screwing up your games.
Who?
I see reading comprehension is difficult for some. What you quoted was written by the author of the article, not by Devolver Digital. All Devolver Digital said in contacting the website spreading this was that the story “is absolutely untrue”.
Considering that Bungie doesn't offer Customer Support for Destiny and their only real communications to players are essentially just commercials to push the next product, it will be interesting to see what changes. Bungie completely abuses social media and it seems like everything they do in Destiny is simply designed to generate the most clicks.
Since Sony paid for Final Fantasy 7 remake timed exclusivity, I'm going to go with the crazy idea that Sony is interested in Final Fantasy.
I'll definitely be picking this up to support the game. While Rimworld can be played on just about any PC (my old laptop plays it just fine), the more platforms the game is on the better. Every gamer should at least once craft a masterwork human leather armchair out of a raider and then give it as gift to the faction that attacked you.
793d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment
Such a panic buy. I guess having your stock value drop 13% after the Microsoft/Activision deal will do that to a company. It is amusing to see some out there now think Destiny 2 and Bungie are some of the greatest things in the industry.
Nobody should be surprised by this though. ESO has been dumbing down combat since launch. From the changing of set bonuses from percentages to flat stats to the downgraded CP system, every change has been to reward people who can't be bothered to learn the game. Hell, they don't even call Bosmer by their name anymore because that is too much for some to figure out.
"There is one on my official Switch pro controller."
At least you agree with me. As you pointed out, in order to get a D-pad for your Switch you needed to buy an accessory.
Nintendo didn't invent most of the things you listed.
While Nintendo did invent the D-pad, it is amusing to see you brag about something that the Nintendo Switch doesn't even have.
Why does everything have to be preserved? This reminds me of tourists who go places and record everything they see so they "can remember" and their entire trip ends up being an experience behind a lens instead of enjoying the place that they are in. Impermanence does not make something bad. Plays and concerts are impermanent - does the author think they should be done away with because future generations are deprived of their experience? Are they hurting the preservation of mov...
Jordan Middler gave Horizon: Forbidden West a 10/10, Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves a 10/10, God of War for PC a 10/10, and Demon's Souls a 10/10. When does this supposed XBox bias come into the picture? I noticed that you weren't posting any complaints about those Sony games receiving a higher-than-average score from VGC.
The same reviewer also gave Horizon: Forbidden West a 10/10. How exactly does "Sony haters" and "bombed by idiotic morons fanboys" apply here? Seems like it is the fanboys that are upset when a game isn't being universally praised by every single reviewer.
https://n4g.com/news/246601...
@lodossrage
"But each of those companies have LONG track records of success and have built the industry. Go ahead and tell me you can say the same thing for Google, Facebook, Amazon, Applet, etc." How exactly are companies supposed to get "LONG track records of success" if you think every newcomer has no place in the business? Atari, Nintendo, and Sega built the industry. Sony saw that there was money to be made there and joined in later. Same with M...
It is amazing how Bungie, a C-tier studio with predatory microtransactions, is being hailed here like they are the next coming just because that fits the fanboy narrative. People are actually excited that the company behind Eververse, sunsetting, and a transmog system that originally took 150 hours of total playtime just to max level it for a season are the ones that will be teaching Sony how to do live-service games.
You are supporting monopolistic and anti-consumer behavior because you have some misplaced notion about who is and isn't "good." They are all companies out to make money and it is through marketing that they have led some to believe that they are the good guys that know what is best for the industry.
"look at what has happened to the game companies that Amazon, Facebook, or Google have purchased so far compared to the rest of the industry" You mean...
A few decades ago the same thing could of been said about Sony and Microsoft getting into the videogame business. Would you have been so supportive of Nintendo buying up publishers to keep rival companies out?
Destiny just made Bungie $3.6 billion, why would they want to make something different? Insomniac Games makes better rated games than Bungie but since they are single-player games not filled with predatory microtransactions they only got $229 million from Sony.
Sony has clearly spoken with their checkbook about how they feel about live-service games filled with microtransactions.
Who the hell wrote that title? Is basic understanding of grammar and sentence structure too much to expect in N4G submissions?