good move. I just like competition to keep the tech moving forward and prices within check....
400 bucks for a 40" LCD. you will get what you pay for... a slow LCD panel...whereas the tech is clearly LED, 240Hz and widets which you wont get on a 400 buck LCD
I think we should have another article like this repeating the stupid comment about the game change vs one intelligent article which talks about the performance of the monitor... not the stupid game change...
what does it make it... 5 in 2 days...
author never played a game on a pad before....or wouldnt have blogged out with this junk...
look at the choice of games..
some company has to make a add on frame with controllers so the ipdad will insert into it and you have real controls...
than they need games...
silly move by Sony..
what is even more silly is how many are not thinking of performance of this monitor vs what game is bundled ed with it..
until I see the set with my own eyes, no way am I going to buy any monitor
MrDead... well said....and its the word... sad thing is so many gamers are just blind to console loyalty they are missing out on so many games.
this entire year will have me buying 3 360 games... couldnt get past March without buying 3 for the 360....since multiplat titles are now pretty much the same... I will buy the 3 360 exclusives and the rest on the PS3.
and BR movies are just great...
complaining about the LED... priceless.. just shows stupidity to the max.....
you negative nellys forget the new models features and whine about LEDs... cant make this stuff up..
they are gonna sell a bunch of these thangs..
so if someone has $$ to burn, they can buy stuff and they will have a leg up on someone who just plays the game ????
and the 3rd party transaction company, who is gonna pay for their service ?
totally against this sort of stuff if it gives rich players and edge
I agree with the first part.
but anyone who owns a PC which can handle BF3 and buys the console version...dont understand the major diffs in the game...
when you play them both the feeling is totally diff... the PC is the way to go, unles you dont have aPC which can run it
the sheer stupidity of these articles just blows you mind.
comparing a PC to a console is like me comparing a BMW to a Honda.... one costs more for a reason.
ALSO, my consoles are like 5 years old.
someone please post what PC made 5 yrs ago will compare to a current PC rig running BF2
twice as stupid and stuck on dumb....
I stopped reading all articles like this which start with a question... 90% of them are blogs and opinions with no substance and many of us here have good is not better opinons of the authors...
These types of articles separate websites with 1st hand info. vs opinions
been playing quite abit and impressed for what the beta has to offer... very addicting.. some of the 5v5 games take up to 30 mins for a match....
^ Flare... spot on... comparing these 2 games is a waste of time..... 64 online vs whatever COD is gonna give.. cant even compare the 2..
best thing for me still playing BF2, is the maturity of the gamers playing the PC version.... I play the last version on Live and its a joke compared to BF2 on the PC... I never hear singing and whinny kidz..thats the fact jack...
^ LOL... hit a nerve.. name calling...a kiddie thang... just clearly proves my point...dont wanna play games with name calling, singing and screaming kidz
if you played the BF series,,, you would clearly know it dont bring out 9 yr olds....as COD and Halo does
sad, sorry its not sad... keep the kiddies away from a real game..
dont anyone think that reading something like this wanna make you puke.. here we are gamers who are scrimping to save to buy a 60 buck game in this woefull economy and they treat millions like we treat a dollar.
I dont feel bad at all for him.. he still can take his Bentley to the bank and lol all the way
ne1 know when the socy code will work ?
^ not within the next 7 yrs.. not even on a roadmap
LOL.. like Cliff plays Kinect for fun... please, is there anyone over 18 playing Kinect..lol