I hope the punishment is swift and severe.
I already have it preordered. I really wish they would have used the EU boxart for NA though.
a : relating to or existing as an object of thought without consideration of independent existence —used chiefly in medieval philosophy
b : of, relating to, or being an object, phenomenon, or condition in the realm of sensible experience independent of individual thought and perceptible by all observers : having reality independent of the mind <objective reality> <our reveries … are significantly and repeatedly shaped by our transactions with the objective world — Marvin Rezn...
Banning him from the forums would have been perfectly fine. Issuing an EA community ban for that basically proves him right.
Because they own the software. The only thing you own is the physical disc.
It should be noted that there is nothing preventing him from just making another EA account and registering it under that one.
Freedom of speech has never existed on private forums.
I can tell you where freedom of expression isn't. It isn't on the internet.
Of course I did not take your statement to mean that you agree with everything Edge has ever said. That would be completely illogical. I am not known for being illogical. I find it a contradiction however that you agree with their review of DA2, yet believe that DAO is far superior. How could you agree with the higher review score for DA2 if you believe that DAO is better?
A review is not supposed to be some guy's opinion. A review is supposed to be an objective overview (or review) of a product. An opinion piece is supposed to be some guy's opinion.
Well there is a nice little contradiction. You agree with Edge, yet you also believe that Dragon Age 2 is a "sad shadow of the awesome DAO".
Edge scored DAO 5/10.
Edge scored DA2 6/10.
Edge is basically saying that DA2 is better than DAO, and that DAO was not "awesome" in the first place.
So which is it? Do you agree with Edge, or do you think that DA2 is a shadow of the "awesome" DAO?
It won't cost me $200.
Of course they have more exclusives to announce. They have over 20 first party development studios.
Why exactly? The people who purchased the horse armor simply exercised their right as consumers to decide whether or not a product was worth the asking price. Either something is worth the money to you or it is not. If it is not you simply do not purchase it. What other people do with their money is really no concern of yours.
What logical process are you using to determine that probability? I would argue that it is in fact more likely that someone who is accustomed to purchasing games used would buy the next game used as well. If they are trying to save money on one game then why would they choose to spend more money on a new game the next time?
I hope everyone who used the code gets banned.
Then the article about which we are commenting is inaccurate.
All power to them huh? I wonder what your position would be if the article were about a male only studio?
Women are allowed in the military, but women are presently not allowed in ground combat positions. I am not saying I agree with it, as there are just as many arguments that support placing women in combat as there are arguments that are opposed to it, but that is the current reality.
Using tampons involves hands, so you must be thinking about Kinect.
I don't think they should be expected to cater to SDTV owners. HDTVs are very affordable. If you can afford a current gen game console and current gen games then you can afford a low end HDTV. If you insist on staying in the SD era then maybe you should just keep playing on a SD console.