380°

Fresh Halo 4 Information: Mutiplayer Bots

Nixelpixel 'From what we have sourced it could be the presence of multiplayer bots which might be used to simulate maps before jumping onto the vicious playground that often devour new entrants.'

Read Full Story >>
nixelpixel.com
281219864613d ago

Their AI script is pretty good in the single player..Legendary mode might just be awesome for the bots...

h311rais3r4613d ago

I have been wanting multiplayer AI for multiplayer

ApplEaglElephant4613d ago

you have not played games with actually good AI. lol

kaveti66164613d ago

Their AI script is good in the sense that they often do hilarious things.

Eiffel4613d ago

Yeah for the enemies, the friendlies are borderline retarded.

m234612d ago

LOL, don't let Kat drive in Reach, matter of fact, don't let any AI drive in any Halo game.

lorianguy4613d ago

Something like Black Op's combat training would be very much welcome by a large number of people.

lugia 40004613d ago

"Mutiplayer" ? Lol

Yeah let me believe a website I have never seen before in my life.

Britainz-Fin3st4613d ago

Bots would be good.
i dont think i would play vs the bots because i prefer real people but this would definatly be handy online if a bot jumps in if someone quits.

Hopefully they wouldnt be as stupid as the Gears of War 3 bots that are so dumb its embarrasing its one of my favourite games.

SockeyBoy4613d ago

Gears 3 bots are dumb in MP, but god its embarrassing when you get killed by one. haha

Britainz-Fin3st4612d ago

Oh yes.
Surprisingly they get more kills then you think some games.

admiralthrawn874613d ago

while i don't believe this site is credible i'm talking about the topic of bots in halo.

if halo4 did have bots, it needs to be for offline practice mode only or for some firefight/horde type mode. i hate it when online matches are half filled with bots, it ruins the integrity of the match and game.

Nick284613d ago

Check the story out, its not thin air speculation, they have made bots to test the multiplyer portions of the game...If only people would read...

Nick284613d ago (Edited 4613d ago )

I agree on having multiplayer bots in the game...

Nick284613d ago

Check the story out, its not thin air speculation, they have made bots to test the multiplyer portions of the game...If only people would read...

honkyjesus4612d ago

Are you on speed? You just replied four times without a break.

Kalowest4613d ago

"i hate it when online matches are half filled with bots, it ruins the integrity of the match and game"
True, but it can help balance out teams when its 4v1
(D@mn quitters)

m234612d ago

You know what though, at times you get stuck with such horrible players you just wish they'd quit sometimes. I usually play with friends only since its much more fun and I hate getting paired up with players who act stupid, I could handle myself better at handicaps sometimes.

Dovahkiin4613d ago

It ruined Brink, if it were full of players it would have been a great game.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4612d ago
Show all comments (30)
50°

Master Chief Became More Than A Machine In 343's Halo

In Halo 4, 5, and Infinite, Master Chief became a more nuanced, human character.

In spite of the Halo series’ struggles, 343 deserves praise for adding nuance and characterisation to the ever-beating heart of Halo - The Master Chief. Playing through Infinite, it's abundantly clear that the events of the current and previous trilogies have irrevocably changed the iconic hero. He’s no longer the ‘blank slate’ that was previously presented by Bungie. He’s a fatigued, damaged and fallible protagonist, and one who is meandering through currents of grief, while reveling in his newfound agency. Giving the Chief a compelling and meaningful voice was no small feat, and 343 should be proud of that victory.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
kingnick557d ago

This article completely misses part of the appeal of the original iteration of character in the original game trilogy. It was the Chief and Cortana vs an entire alien collective. The blank slate Bungie displayed in their games was genius, he was an mysterious hero a wide audience could identify with because he wasn't as clearly defined as most characters.

The books added a lot of lore and backstory but most Halo players just want a fun game with exposition that doesn't get in the way of gameplay, it's why the Cortana level in Halo 3 was derided.

Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty.

BandarHub556d ago

A lot of people give the 343 version of Master Chief a lot of slack.
But Fundamentally he is still the same character, he just has a couple more dialogues. He has not changed in terms of attitude.
"Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty."
And that's what he has done at the end of the day, he did his duty. Watch his partner die, and was ready to destroy the weapon in Halo infinite....he is still the same soilder that everyone remembers

Halo Infintes one was a nice balance between both.

slate91556d ago

Chief and the halo franchise became a joke under 343

Sciurus_vulgaris556d ago

The 343i Master Chief has is based on the books. However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion.

Obscure_Observer556d ago

"However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion."

Which is awesome! I love how Master Chief become more John and less soldier.

Sciurus_vulgaris556d ago

I didn’t even notice my typos,lol

50°

Halo's Identity Problem Began With an Admirable Mess

It’s a law of nature that eventually, every long-running game franchise will have a particular entry that gets dinged for straying too far from what made it so fun in the first place. Your Super Mario Sunshine, your Dragon Age II, Assassin’s Creed III, and so on. Whether or not that opinion changes more favorably over time, the initial specter of negativity will forever hover it. Microsoft’s Halo is no exception, except that negative specter hasn’t hovered over one particular game, but one whole studio.

The3faces677d ago

True Halo 4 was a sign of 343i's incompetence and the decline of Halo.

180°

10 Years Later, Halo 4 Proves Itself a Disappointing Omen for Halo Infinite

Halo 4 released 10 years ago today, and its disappointing reception was just an omen of things to come with 343 Industries at the helm.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Sonyslave3685d ago (Edited 685d ago )

Halo 4 and infinite have a 87 on metacritic and five a 84🤣. 343i need contents and everything else will play it self out.

ChasterMies685d ago

Halo 4, 5, and Infinite reviews are good examples of the pressure on review sites to score everything between 8-10 out of 10.

ChubbyBlade685d ago

As if reviews scores are any indication of a franchises health.

Halo has been in shambles for YEARS

-Foxtrot685d ago

Halo 4-6 are like the Star Wars sequel trilogy

They all just seem like a brand new games with small connections to the last one but no solid arc connecting them, you’re just told stuff that happened off screen in between the games and nothing makes sense

It’s like they didn’t plan a new trilogy out

CoNn3rB685d ago

That's actually a pretty good way to sum it up

LucasRuinedChildhood685d ago (Edited 685d ago )

I would argue that the new Star Wars trilogy is still better. lol

Most Halo fans would kill for the equivalent of The Force Awakens at this stage (a competent rehash of what came before it). Halo Infinite tried to be that but was undercooked and failed. Halo 4 wasn't that either - they started messing with the formula straight away although the story was okay.

There was nothing particularly compelling about Halo 5's story besides the fake plot they advertised. The Last Jedi is a divisive movie but as RedLetterMedia would say, it was "sporadically interesting" because it tried some new things and set up things that could have been great (like Kylo teaming up with Rey after backstabbing Snoke). That conversation with Yoda is great and it felt like the real Yoda, not that CGI thing in the prequels.
- "Skywalker, still looking to the horizon. Never here, now, hmm? The need in front of your nose."
- "The greatest teacher, failure is ... Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters."
- "That library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already possess." (because she already took them, haha).

The Rise Of Skywalker is the only one where loads of stuff happens off screen ("Palpatine has returned") in between and nothing makes sense because ... they just needed a main villain and 100 star destroyers to blow up. They could have done something much better.

MrChow666685d ago

no, all disney star wars sucks also disney marvel and everything godamn disney touches

685d ago Replies(3)
Yui_Suzumiya685d ago

Um, didn't Halo 4 have the best campaign out of the new Trilogy? Lol

ChubbyBlade685d ago

Yep and even then it wasn’t very good.

Levii_92685d ago

I'm getting a good gaming laptop soon and i'm finally going to play through the Halo franchise again plus Infinite but i never played Halo 4 before .. can anyone tell me how's the campaign in comparison to the games before it and compared to Halo 5 ?

Stanjara685d ago

Halo 4 campaign great, multi bad.
Halo 5 campaign trash, multi good.

Best Cortana halo 4.

ChubbyBlade685d ago (Edited 685d ago )

Halo 4 was when they started turning it into a “modern” game. Aka taking tips from CoD.

The older titles were sandbox based with weapons that all filled a niche and vehicles that did the same. Open levels with multiple ways to approach in different spots with different weapons etc.

Halo 4/5 doesn’t have that. It’s a linear shooter and nothing else. The story is alright but that’s about it. If it wasn’t a halo game, it would be ok but because it is a halo game, it’s outshone by the previous games.

It’s a hell of a lot better than 5 though. I found infinite pretty meh

Show all comments (25)