190°

Gran Turismo 5: Prologue previewed by PSU

Gran Turismo. These two words are enough to light the gaming community on fire. The popular racing series has been a staple for both hardcore and casual racing fans alike for over ten years. While the series has always managed to impress gamers in all areas such as graphics, realism, and computer AI, the series has been long overdue for a next generation sequel to match the pace of modern racing titles. Thankfully, we won't have to wait for much longer.

Most appropriately titled Gran Turismo 5: Prologue, Polyphony's latest game may appear at first to have a deceiving title. However, further playtime quickly proved to solidify the game's release as more than a trivial tech demonstration.

SmokeyMcBear6347d ago

did I just read this right??

"You'll also be able to tell if you have any mods installed in your car by simply listening. That super charger you just installed sounds just like its real life counterpart. Many fans of the series may also be pleased to learn that damage modelling has finally been implemented with Prologue. On the whole, the damage effects are quite realistic and we can safely say that the days of the Gran Turismo series being called a 'bumper car simulator' are over."

uhhh... wasnt expecting prolouge to have damage.. and didnt even care about it, but if it has it.. one less thing to harp about i guess. I just hope the windshield doesnt shatter when i dent my bumper, or paint looking like it got hit by a sand blaster when i crash.

power0919996347d ago

I mean I knew dmg was going to be added, but I thought it was only supposed to be on the "racing" models. Not all of them.

Awesome.

Maddens Raiders6347d ago

You read that right. The best gets better and the anticipation, even stronger. What a game this will be and it's only a demo -- but a whale of a "demo" indeed.

<Off topic> -

Has anyone had any trouble viewing the new GTTV material lately? I downloaded the new R34 video, but after watching it a few times, I can't get it to open anymore. If you know something let me know! Take care.

sonarus6347d ago (Edited 6347d ago )

gonna wait for official confirmation this isnt the first time damage modelling has been claimed however there has never been any proof or anything conclusive. Considering how good GT looks the damage modelling would have to match up if not it will take away from the general quality of the game and to be quite frank i dnt knw if they can pull it off...Then again i never thought they could pull of screen shots that look realer than real life either lol. But overall if they can't get it to match the quality of the game they might as well not add it

info6347d ago

I would take it with a huge grain of salt....considering the guy is just confusing pixels and polygons , I think its just a reharsh of what has been said before, they just write stuff as they go along...

2Negativecool6347d ago

I can't believe they put that it GT5 would have car damage and get everyone's hopes up. Such completely retarded misinformation!

Look, they've been discussing this for a while, and it will have NO damage! Of every site, anywhere, EVER, this is the only person that has stated it will contain car damage. The devs THEMSELVES have stated over and over it will not have car damage, that they would have to rework the physics engine.

GT5 having car damage would be HUGE news and every blogging site would post up. No one has stated anything about it having car damage, so this guy is talking out of his a$$.

2Negativecool6347d ago

Proof he's talking out of his a$$, the moron doesn't know the difference between a "pixel" and a "polygon."
Also, he states that the computer AI was a big selling point---Most have argued that the opponent AI needs improvement in every GT game.

I would be surprised if this twat has ever even played a GT game.

sonarus6347d ago

When did the devs say there would be no damage model. They said a damage model was in the works and there has been a lot of confusion. As far as i knw many popular news sites 1up is the one that really comes to mind asked polyphony directly and they were told damage model would make it into prologue. That is what i remember however no one has seen it in action. There was a rumor that damage would only make it to the blu ray release of the game. I am extremely skeptical about GT damage model i honestly don't think cars that look that good can have damage there has to be a compromise somewhere however i didnt think cars could look realer than real life either lol. Overall i am quite skeptical but i will keep an open mind until i see a pic or video showing a car damaged. I even remember when some french magazine interviewed them earlier this yr and they said damage would be included as well as WEATHER EFFECTS. All i want is direct confirmation or denial of all these rumors but till then these are just rumors

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6347d ago
Bonsai12146347d ago (Edited 6347d ago )

gotta disagree with the "computer AI."

however, it seems as though they've fixed this in gt5. the prologue demo had cars passing each other.

anyways, yes, those two words have enough weight on them to move millions of systems.

time out.. damage? man, i really need to read articles before i comment on them.. lol

Greysturm6347d ago

Grand turismo the only racing game worth mentioning

True 1080p
locked 60fps
Best cars modeling in a game
Damage
16 cars races
True sound
Rumble

Where are the nacie pancies that kept screaming pgr or forza were better?

Danja6347d ago

umm Forza and PGR are next gen racers..? those game looks like upscaled xbox games...!!

GT5P kills w/e..exclusive racer the 360 has...haha..wait till GT5 arrives..!!

ruibing6347d ago

They had me on damage modeling.

PimpHandHappy6347d ago

i will smoke em like i have on the demo

I cant wait for this game!!

I have been playing GT games for years

This and burnout will be my racers for a very long time

Till atleast the full version of GT5 comes out

Azures6347d ago

AI is meant to be beaten, so go online! ;)

Marceles6347d ago

"Cars in Gran Turismo 4 were composed of an average of 4000 pixels. In GT5: Prologue, cars will be composed of an average of 200,000 pixels"

Lol @ pixels...I think they mean polygons. I can't wait to see the score Famitsu gives Prologue.

Show all comments (38)
160°

Worst Business Practices In Gaming Industry

iLLGaming contributor Anikait Makkar writes about the gaming industry's current business practices, and how it affects the consumer.

Read Full Story >>
illgaming.in
desertpunk864081d ago

free to play no matter how good the game is if it is a free to play i dont play.

i want to pay full price for a full balanced experience unlocks shouldn't be earned by money but by the hard work you put in the game.

my free to play nightmares are borderlands,diablo,titanfall,w arhawk 2,halo and star wars battlefront.

SteamPowered4081d ago

If you have ever played Path of Exile, that is the best way of microtransactions ever. PoE is a great game. Its what Diablo 3 should have been and it is completely free. All the items for purchase are cosmetic and the store isnt intrusive at all. In fact, I had to actually look in the menu to find where the microtransactions are housed.
But for the most part, yes. F2P is garbage.

iceman064081d ago

I would add Warframe to that list as well. Very much like you describe. Everything that you need is offered to you in game. Things that you pay for are either cosmetic or for convenience (i.e., you are impatient). Might not be the game for you, but the F2P structure is pretty sound.

caseh4081d ago

At which point did Titanfall become free to play hmmmm...

ThatArtGuy4081d ago

He's not saying that they are, he's saying it would be horrible if they were.

caseh4081d ago

He should have said 'would be' rather than 'are' I guess.

lonelyplayer4081d ago

Hey I agree 100% with you. I hate those unbalanced pay-to-win games.

maniacmayhem4081d ago

I agree.

The whole F2P model is designed to keep the user playing and paying well past an ordinary retail price. Most devs also design features that prey on a person's gambling, need to collect or complete an objective as soon as possible type of vice.

Trust I worked at Zynga and you should read the design tricks and tactics used to squeeze every penny out of their user base.

Yes, every company has their tactics but the F2P design in most video games is so blatant and disgusting. I stay away from those games...well I try but that damn Marvel Alliance... :(

gamer20134080d ago

A great example of a game that features the blood sucking F2P model would be Warthunder.

ExCest4081d ago

The Valve f2p model is really good. You don't have to pay a dime or grind for hours to get items to boost your "skills". You just happen to want more hats so you pay money for them.

Prime1574081d ago (Edited 4081d ago )

Edit: I'm just not sure it's so simple as lumping free to play as bad....

That's pay to win which is a derivative of free to play, and which is also very common amongst AAA $60 retail games. The $60 lures you into a false sense of free.

There are games attempting many facets of the free to play model and some are pretty good, like planet side, some private servers, team fortress, DOTA and warframe WHERE you literally never (have to) spend anything - I didn't on planet side 2 with 20+ hours, and similar with warframe.

There are also some like killer instinct and warframe (KEYWORD: CROSSOVER) where it's basically a glorified demo. KI has only one/two characters, and warframe trenches you into a character you might not like in a little (but least you can build a new one several hours later).

Then there are the worst of the worst where you have to pay to win. Sometimes it's by buying upgrades to your gear like in runes of magic, or buying overly expensive increased experience in leveling grinding games like Rohan: Blood Feud.

Where I'm coming from: I had a free to play phase where I played (in no particular order but memory):

ragnarok (both subscribed before free to play, and free to play), path of exile, dragons nest, cloud nine, holic, requiem: bloodymare, runes of magic, tribes, warframe and planetside 2 (pre-ps4), blacklight, dcuo, dragon's nest, maple story, runes of magic, Farmville, clash of clans, team fortress 2 (actual, I bought it that long ago), dota, league of legends, lotr online, minecraft, wizard 101, dungeon fighter, many aria and net gear games, perfect world...

And many more that I can't remember because I don't want to.... And by played, I would say I spent more than 5+ hours (but mainly 20+ on aforementioned titles) on each of those game listed above, sometimes hundreds.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4080d ago
Jovanian 4081d ago

Worst business practices

Paying to play online (PS+, XBL)
Season passes
disc locked content
Paid DLC (DLC should be free unless it is significant enough to be an expansion)

Jubez1874081d ago

Paying to Play Online: It's a service. A TV is a product, cable is a service. A playstation is a product, PS+ is a service. How many services do you get for free? I'm sure you pay a cellphone bill as well.

Season Passes: I 100% agree on here. Never pay for anything that is not guaranteed to be coming.

Paid DLC: No one says you have to buy it. If it's cosmetics or trivial things such as Themes and Avatars there's no problem with it. You don't HAVE to buy it. It takes resources to MAKE dlc. Why would a company (video game companies are profit maximizers, btw) go and make a whole DLC questline or storyline and then give it to you for free? That brings ZERO marginal revenue to the company. I know it sounds great, and companies that do it are great. But the suits up top, yea they don't care. That's just business. Just because you bought an entre doesn't mean the dessert is going to be free. And AGAIN, you don't have to buy it or support it.

Imalwaysright4081d ago (Edited 4081d ago )

Games are NOT services. We pay full price for them and that means that we should be able to play 100% of their content with no additional cost.

crusf4081d ago

"Paid DLC" Then people complain no DLC is coming for there particular system or game.

Prime1574081d ago (Edited 4081d ago )

I agree with you mostly, but I disagree with ps+...

I bought into that in 2011 and don't regret it. It's like Sega channel, but feasible.

Maybe I just play too many games, so ps+ makes sense.. Like the payday 2, remember me, bioshock infinite, outlast, and more in the last month or two... I would have had to spend an easy few hundred on those games I wanted to play.

Jubez1874081d ago

As a business student, I have to disagree heavily with some points.

_FantasmA_4081d ago (Edited 4081d ago )

Paying to use your own internet, DLC (all of it, I'd rather have expansion packs with a ton of content), DLC coming out a week after the game's release, incomplete games with missing sections sold as DLC, pre order bonuses, short and pointless campaigns, not having server lists (like COD which insert you into random games and maps), expensive and permanent digital prices, yearly sequels with minor changes at full price, lack of challenging AI, lack of originality, and most of Micro$ofts "business practices." This may sound like a hateful statement, but I blame M$ for bringing most of these things to consoles. I remember when there free and inexpensive map packs on Live in the early years of 2006 and 2007, then they started pinching pennies.

MaxwellBuddha4081d ago

Who else here has been gaming long enough to remember when paying $50 got you the WHOLE game? No left-out content sold as DLC, disc-locked content, season passes, outfits, avatars, etc.

Excuse me, I need to go have a cry at what has happened to my beloved hobby.

Derekvinyard134081d ago

Amen brother, plus there wasn't as much bugs as there was today. Nearly 80% of games have patches

Vegetarianshark4081d ago (Edited 4081d ago )

Ea happened,Capcom happened these giant shameless corporations has bastardized the gaming industry with their BS money-grabbing tactics and ruined so many amazing games (Battlefield,Resident evil and many more).Very sad indeed.

Show all comments (24)
70°

Grand Turismo 5 2.08 Update to be released on September 25

TechPrezz: The Grand Turismo 5 update 2.08 is set to be released and coming with a trio of new DLCs and will be launched on coming Tuesday

Read Full Story >>
techprezz.com
NastyLeftHook04601d ago

The new cars include the Nissan GT-R N24 GT Academy ’12, the Subaru BRZ S ’12 and the Honda weider HSV-010 (SUPER GT) ’11, with a cost of $0.99 for each of them. The update also include some enhancements apart from the fix to reported bugs.

With this update, you will be bale to select “Disable collisions” in the [Event Settings] of online races and the clutch pedal response while using the steering wheel controllers “G25 Racing Wheel”, “G27 Racing Wheel”, “T500RS” and “TH8RS” has been adjusted. The ID’s are now shown above cars when watching online races. There are also some other improvements. The Grand Turismo 5 2.08 is coming as free downloadable update.

that's why i love the real driving simulator.

dantesparda4600d ago

Wow updates for this game are still coming. i wish all companies were like this

krisq4600d ago (Edited 4600d ago )

Grand?? Reminds me of people saying Soul Caliber.

black9114600d ago

Now just imagine GT6!!!!!!!

40°

Top 10 Driving Games for PS3

Chillopedia.com | PlayStation 3 is the hot favourite console in the console gaming community. Game developers know this and they try to make the best out of it by introducing addictive and interesting games now and then. We have compiled a list of top 10 driving games for PS3.

Read Full Story >>
chillopedia.com