DICE has revealed the reason behind why there is no "COMMANDER" in their upcoming shooter "Battlefield 3".
Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign
Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.
Halo veteran Marcus Lehto's studio, Ridgeline, will now be joined by DICE on the project.
Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.
hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D
You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.
Replies(1)
Ok, now I understand. But it's the players choice whiter or not he wants to become the commander or not. And if a player reaches a high rank and wants to lead, he should be obligated to command the team.
ok then what, back to camping, glad its out
that's better
i always hate commanders
I loved Commando. I think its a shame that it isn't in the game. I'm sure DICE could come up with a way to alleviate all the problems associated with it.
Eh, I've played Commander several times and I was never really that high ranked. It was a great way of playing the game. Although it would have been great if they would have changed the position a little bit, but I thought it was a great way of commanding and organizing a team having one clear leader. Loved to be able to prioritize support to different squads, give commands and being able to zoom in so you can actually see the action.