340°

IGN.com: E3 2011: Uncharted 3 Beta Blowout

IGN.com: It's been a little more than a month since developer Naughty Dog broke the news about an Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception beta, but even then, all the team gave us was a set of dates. Today, Naughty Dog is giving us the whole, wonderful enchilada.

FanOfGaming5135d ago

I hope they balance power weapons because the noobs will lure veteran players away if they are over used. Other than that, I see the multiplayer being very deep and competitive. Hopefully Uncharted 3 can be thee competitive shooter on PS3. Most other games seemed to have failed (Killzone 3, Socom 4).

The last real competitive shooter for me on PS3 was Killzone 2, before valor boosting killed the clan system.

cyborg69715135d ago (Edited 5135d ago )

Klz3 was crap compared to Klz2. They noobed it out way too much.

death2smoochie5135d ago

They noob it somewhat to please the COD crowd.

OneSneakyMofo5135d ago (Edited 5135d ago )

Uncharted 3,
come to me.

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, delicious.

Edit: I just noticed they pushed the beta date back. It was suppose to release on June 7th with inFamous 2 (I guess the PS store being down is to blame). This makes me a sad panda. :(

Storm235135d ago

I am so excited for this game, as well as so many others this year. Hopefully I have the money and time to enjoy them all. Great to be a gamer.

Not sure I want to participate in the beta though. I always like to complete single player before I hop into MP in games...especially when the Uncharted series has almost unmatched SP. But I have faith in all you beta testers and Naughty Dog.

Dart895135d ago

Man sux the beta is short wish it would last until October so this would give time for players to find glitches and stuff.

Talking about enchiladas i'm eating some right now:D.

femshep5135d ago (Edited 5135d ago )

wait if it starts at the end of next month for ps+ members dose that mean we all get in since the ps store isnt up yet so the 30 days would run over that date?

Solidus187-SCMilk5135d ago

I loved the multiplayer of U2 before they changed it for the newbs after 5 months, then I stopped playing pretty much.

Im really excited about this beta, I hope everyone gets it since we should all have our free month of PS+. But I think I read somewhere that it starts for everyone 1 week later anyways so everyone will eventually get a chance I think.

I hope my free PS+ gets me access early tho because Im excited to try this out.

But ND, no matter how it turns out, PLEASE dont drastically change it after 5 months. Let the FEW complainers on your fourms adapt to the game you put out, or go back to COD. Let the people who actually like the game you put out play it and be happy, dont cater to noobs who cant aim.

jack_burt0n5135d ago

Dont hold your breath, so many people asked for a simple old style playlist to have the muliplayer from how the game launched and they did not give a crap at all, I have never seen a company blank so many fans.

Solidus187-SCMilk5135d ago

It was weird how they never said anything or did anything for the hundreds of people on their website asking for an old playlist, but listened to the few who couldn't aim or thought nades were too powerful.

I saw people complaining about the "inconsistency" of the nades, so they made them consistently useless I guess.

I actually went to the site and commented starting after the changes. Obviously there were far more people who didnt like the new changes then were complaining about the original game. I went and looked at stories from before the update and they all had less then 100 comments with a few complainers, and then after the update there were hundreds of comments on each story with alot of people not liking the changes and alot of them wanted a playlist with the old version.

I dont see why they changed weapons, damage and nades when just a handful of people complain, but wont even add a playlist for the hundreds of commenters who didnt like the changes.

I just hope that whatever the game is like, they dont change it drastically after 5 months. I think they lost a large part of their players with that update, at least I know that I barley played as much after that.

Im looking forward to the beta for U3, I was addicted to the U2 beta.

5135d ago Replies(1)
EliteAssass1n5135d ago

Are you fucking serious? There's a radar now? In love with CoD Naughty Dog?

FAGOL5135d ago

What's wrong with that? Everyone complains about CoD but some features are good. In fact alot of developers are too scared to implement things from CoD games so their games are unique. But at the end of the day they are just hurting themselves. Look at Medal of Honor. Alot of things were left out because it would be to similar to CoD. It just became a stripped down version of a CoD game.

I don't think devs should clone CoD but they can learn a lesson from it. Some things are good but alot of things are bad in the most recent CoD games.

metsgaming5135d ago

WAIT WHAT? Where did it say there was radar ??

MidnytRain5135d ago

In that one part you were supposed to read, lol. Under "Booster Slot 1 Options":

Come Here -See the opponent that killed you on your radar until he or she dies.

metsgaming5135d ago

oh yea i knew there was a booster radar bs i thought he meant for everyone. Still lame there should be no seeing the enemy it ruins the game.

EliteAssass1n5135d ago

@metsb it says "See the opponent that killed you on YOUR radar until he or she dies". Sounds like everybody is getting a radar a la CoD. And it looks like its going to be U3's SA.

heyitsmichelle5132d ago

I'm actually excited for this radar. I have been wanting this feature since the beginning.

Show all comments (34)
50°

Uncharted Cast Doesn’t Take the Games’ Success For Granted at MCM Comic-Con

During MCM Comic Con London X EGX, CGM got the chance to be part of a press group interview with the stars of the Uncharted titles, namely the legendary Nolan North, who played protagonist Nathan Drake, Emily Rose, who portrayed Elena Fisher and Richard McGonagle, who took on the role of Victor ‘Sully’ Sullivan,

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos1325d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC1325d ago (Edited 1325d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop1325d ago (Edited 1325d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC1320d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid6381325d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance1325d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer1325d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger1324d ago (Edited 1324d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma3131325d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid6381325d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
1327d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar1326d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans1326d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar1326d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood1326d ago (Edited 1326d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans1325d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon1326d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans1326d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion1326d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf1326d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad1326d ago (Edited 1326d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)