170°

Starhawk has space environments, no PS Move support

TVGB: "Developer Lightbox's president Dylan Jobe has outed a few more details about Starhawk in his responses to fans on the PS Blog."

Read Full Story >>
thatvideogameblog.com
slinky1234564725d ago

Aww man I thot it would at least have Move support...Oh well, gonna be amazing anyway.

Mc Fadge4725d ago

Out of curiosity, how would you picture Move to work in this game? Sure, the third person shooter elements could work, but vehicle combat is a large part of Starhawk, and doing that with one analogue stick is fairly limiting.

tehpees34725d ago

I agree move just wasn't invented for every game and some games should be left out. its fine with a normal controller

Ju4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

Why wouldn't it work? I mean, be creative. If anything, Move has a bit less buttons which needs to be compensated with gestures (R1/2) - but it also has the "M" and trigger instead. Flying could work quite well with the Move, especially with the NavCon. And 3rd person we don't need to discuss. See Socom4. I have a hard time switching back to DS3. Only if I really must. So, obviously, I want all games to support it (like KZ3/Socom4).

guigsy4725d ago

Will it have SIXAXIS support like Warhawk? Or is that function officially dead and buried?

colonel1794725d ago

Officially dead and buried. Thank LAIR for that.

I don't understand why everybody hated on sixaxis after LAIR's failure. I know it was the first game to showcase the feature, and failed to do so, but it was also the first, so they could have done better games with better sixaxis. It was just that both fans, and developers gave up on the sixaxis really fast.

I love playing motorstorm games with sixaxis, actually, I can't even win a race without it. I used sixaxis on Warhawk, and hated analog sticks. I think it is (was) a pretty awesome feature that worked way better than the Wii-mote.

I also see the PS Move going the same direction. Almost a year since is out, and there hasn't been that much of support for it. There hasn't been any "good" games that are exclusive to move. I am waiting for Sorcery, but other than that, I don't think there are many.

marinelife94725d ago

I LOVE the Move with Socom and Killzone 3. I will never go back to DS3 unless the developer refuses to support it.

cyclonus0074725d ago

But isn't Move support is always optional in the games that weren't specifically designed for it?

RavageX4725d ago

This is stupid. Generally move support is optional. If you don't want to play with Move, WHY WOULD IT BOTHER YOU IF SOMEONE ELSE DOES?

What is wrong with this generation of gamers, seriously.

ZombieAssassin4725d ago

Can't wait for this game, I'm prolly exchange the copy of R:FOM i bought yesterday in for Warhawk to prepare for it (would keep Resistance but all anyone plays is 1 hit kill matches and that stuff is lame).

LOGICWINS4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

I just gt done playing Warhawk for a couple hours the game is very addictive because u WANT to gt better, but its a love hate game. Most of the people online have almost 4 years experience with the game..so be prepared to gt slaughtered unless ur on a team with vetarens. Im glad I tried it out, but im returning it to Gamestop tommorrow. I'd rather put that 10 bux towards Uncharted 3.

ZombieAssassin4725d ago

I have no problem with getting destroyed for a while, it was the same situation when I picked up Killzone 2...everyone who played was pretty much a Vet but after about a month or so of playing I was usually top of my team or close...good to hear it's addictive though and yes putting money toward Uncharted 3 is a smart idea.

LOGICWINS4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

Yea, if u stick with it for a month ull def gt better, but the issue I have with the game is no matter how good you are, if ur paired with people who r clueless, chances r the other team will dominate easily. For example, even though im a noob and dying frequently, i ws doing MUCH better than the majority of the team..who happen to have higher ranks than me. This just goes to show how horrid a lot of players are.

ZombieAssassin4725d ago

Ha well I guess it's comforting to hear some players are horrid at the game, seems that's how a lot of MP games are...just a few good people on your team and you'll dominate which makes me happy as I usually try to find people who are passionate about the games they play and actually play the game modes instead of treating them like TDM.

4725d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (30)
100°

Best Sci-Fi Games on the PS3

From the cosmos to crash-landing back on good old planet Earth, come read through the best sci-fi-nastically games on the PS3

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
zaanan13d ago

Not a single Reistance? Fuck this article.

mastershredder13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Starhawk over Warhawk?...... Dude, NO ONE should listen to you.

Odd choices for "best" more like you settled as these being the "best" that available to you at the time, cause a lot of these blow or were average to poor performers that ended up in bargain bin.

Missing too many great sci-fi titles here. The Void, The Resistance Series, Killzone 2 and 3, Enslaved, man.. there were so many, this is redicu-list.

FreeckyCake13d ago

Nobody should listen to you either with that attitude.

OtterX13d ago

I agree that Starhawk shouldn't be above Warhawk, however I must say that Starhawk multiplayer was incredible for its time! Many people wrote it off bc the single player was quite terrible, bc it was basically 1 huge tutorial for the multiplayer. But I can tell you never spent any significant amount of time in MP. It was doing incredibly tense base building w air, foot and land vehicle (and mech!) combat long before Fortnite was ever a thing.

I bet it would have been much better received if it had just ditched the story mode all together. So many people like yourself completely wrote it off based on reviews by reviewers that let the criticism of single player weigh heavily on their scores. I bet you didn't even play it.

Friendlygamer13d ago

The riddick games are some of the best stealth titles ever, highly underrated

YourMommySpoils13d ago

What games? All recall plating was Escape from Butcher Bay.

Friendlygamer13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

There's also the less acclaimed 'assault on dark Athena'

( also, not saying this to you specifically but there's both resistance and killzone games on the list, it's amazing how even something so simple and innocent as a game list can be turned into misinformed vitriol here lol )

jznrpg13d ago

Glad to see Resonance of Fate. Enslaved was pretty good too. I’m sure there are others nobody has listed but I’m too tired to try and think of anything

90°

Roundtable: Dead Game Franchises We Miss

With every big game now belonging to a big intellectual property, there are those that have become redundant. Here are the series' we miss.

RPGer1090d ago

I miss Dark Cloud I mean damn, Dark Cloud 2 is one of the best Action RPG game ever made. The game have: Rich Worlds, different setting, tons of contents, vareity in gameplay like never before (and even after), best buliding mechanics, crafting system like no one did and finally impressive graphics.

Most underrated game ever. It deserved the popularity and sales of Zelda and Final Fantasy. ut unfortunately, Level-5 and Sony didn't advertise it at all.

titans99991090d ago

My franchises I wish would make a come back, are Battlefront by pandemic studios - galactic conquest was the best, mercenaries 1 and 2, and prototype 1 and 2...great games!

50°

Pure Reminiscing: Starhawk

Pure PlayStation: Pure Reminiscing is a brand new feature from our very own Kyle Durant. It’s… different. Think of it like a mini-novel full of Kyle’s most weird and wonderful musings about games of yesteryear. If nothing else, at least it’s long enough to give you something to do on your journey to work in the morning….

Read Full Story >>
pureplaystation.com