Approvals 11/3 ▼
rajman (1) - 4756d ago Cancel
Viatrophy (2) - 4756d ago Cancel
daleculp (1) - 4756d ago Cancel
retrovertigo (2) - 4756d ago Cancel
CrzyFooL (2) - 4756d ago Cancel
units (2) - 4756d ago Cancel
Emerge (1) - 4756d ago Cancel
1080°

Sony sued for PlayStation Network data breach

Like clockwork, the first lawsuit resulting from the security breach of the personal data of more than 75 million Sony PlayStation Network customers has been filed.

The suit was filed today on behalf of Kristopher Johns, 36, of Birmingham, Ala., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Johns accuses Sony of not taking "reasonable care to protect, encrypt, and secure the private and sensitive data of its users."

Read Full Story >>
news.cnet.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong source
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20057921-260.html
TheBeast4756d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(1)
✔ Fixed
Wrong source
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20057921-260.html
cyborg4756d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(2)
+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Failed to Approved
JamieReleases4756d ago
Changed from Approved to Failed
JamieReleases4756d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4756d ago
averyzoe4756d ago

Oh, definitely. I was honestly surprised there haven't been more filed already.

Soldierone4756d ago

There will be. People use our court system to the fullest of their ability. They will sue each other for breathing air if they have the money to do so.

Sony is an easy target right now, more people will follow trying to make a quick buck.

news4me4756d ago

I'm sick of childish people feeling "entitled" to something. Obviously they are trying to protect their consumers. This is ridiculous.

Eamon4756d ago

A lawsuit is justified only if Sony didn't fulfil the legal requirements in protecting user's private data.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there's now an investigation by ICO in UK to see if Sony did or did not fulfil these requirements.

Anyhow, all of what's happening at the moment is definitely not good for Sony.

gamingdroid4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

Sony sort of deserved a lawsuit for negligence.

"Birmingham, Alabama resident Kristopher Johns has filed a lawsuit against Sony for failing to “protect, encrypt, and secure the private and sensitive data of its users.”"

I said it before and I'm saying it now, standard practice (and essentially common sense now a days) tell you to hash the password with a salt. If you have to have the original password stored, then encrypt the password with private-public key-pair and guard that private key with your life. That said, there is no reason Sony should keep the original password. NONE!

That is web programming 101! If it was hashed or the private key was kept private, your password wouldn't be in the hands of hackers right now.

In this case, Sony was negligent, more than 70 millions of peoples information and needs to be sued to send a message to ACT RESPONSIBLY!

TheDeadMetalhead4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

This guy doesn't really stand a chance in court, does he?

Christopher4756d ago

***I said it before and I'm saying it now, standard practice (and essentially common sense now a days) tell you to hash the password with a salt. If you have to have the original password stored, then encrypt the password with private-public key-pair and guard that private key with your life. That said, there is no reason Sony should keep the original password. NONE! ***

And there is no proof that Sony has done any of this... Only online ranting and speculation.

goalweiser4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

@gamingdroid

You are hilarious.

YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DATA! Not Sony.

YOU VOLUNTEERED YOUR INFO. Sony did not steal it from you.

YOU USED SONY'S FREE SERVICE. Now you and every jackal looking to point a finger can get lost. Go to Xbox Live, pay your fee, and then wait for somebody to bring down that network.

Nobody is safe online. Anybody could hack into your computer right now regardless of your protections and who are you going to blame? It's your ISP's fault. It's the computer manufacturer's fault. It's Norton's fault too because they failed to block all the viruses like they said.

WAKE UP. You have the power to prevent all this. Don't use PSN. Don't use your computer. Don't go online at all.

It's too bad Sony can't counter-sue for ignorance because I would line every one of you up and make you sure you never bought a new Sony product again.

For geez sake, hackers broke into the Pentagon, banks, and other major corporations. You think Sony or Microsoft for that matter could prevent it?

Seriously...wake up.

Anon19744756d ago

Yeah, best of luck to them trying to prove that Sony didn't take reasonable measures to protect your personal information.

Typical US, sue-happy mentality. Before the facts are even known - SUE!

I think this Weird Al song adequately sums up what's going on here.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Heartnet4756d ago

yeh but i doubt they will win since in the ToS itll say sumin bout there not liable or sumin lol

and as soon as 1 fails they all fail since they can use that one case as proof that theyve not dont anything wrong

however if they lose then.. people will be sueing sony left right and centre then Psn will never be back up :(

MmaFan-Qc4756d ago Show
DelbertGrady4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

Isn't it Sonys responsibility to keep PSN safe and secure?

A network with 75 million users should have security that matches its size and complexity. I'm sure there are best practises for that.

-Alpha4756d ago

I was reading about how Sony didn't do some encryption or something. I have no knowledge of this whatsoever, but these lawsuits scare me (as a fan of course-- can't help but be pulled in to the "Sony is doomed" hysteria).

Thing with Sony, as far as I am reading, is that they "went in with their laces tied, but without a helmet" so to speak. I'm not sure if that's accurate, but Sony really should have taken down the PSN after the hack and worked to rebuild it then instead of waiting now.

Again, there is a whole lot of speculation in the air, it's become impossible to gather accurate information, but why didn't Sony take down PSN before the hack to reinforce their security?

It seems to me that in general, security isn't up to standard with hackers, there seems to be a serious vulnerability for so much information for even the government, NASA, etc

I_find_it_funny4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

In my opinion Sony screwed up big time with security and they will pay severly.

PSN is down for a week in a few hours (dow for me since Thursday morning). It is a disaster. It was supposed to be fixed in two days, over the holidays, but holidays are gone.

Ale we have are "we have no updates" updates.

Raptura4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

Sorry, but gamingdroid is correct and goalweiser, you don't know what you're talking about.

Sony, as the corporation as it is, owes a duty of care to each and every customer who offers them their personal information, including their credit card and passwords. It's Sony's duty to keep that information within the organization and do its best to keep that information from becoming public.

Because they failed to keep the info safe, they've become negligent. Anyone affected by this has the right to sue Sony for this breach. It doesn't matter who got the information, how they got it, or why they got it. What matters to you and the case of negligence is that Sony had your information and it was made public.

sikbeta4756d ago

One thing I want to know, If it's proven that PSN was secure and stuff, the hackers, groups of whatever people that did this crap can get involved into this, or it's just Sony? then again, if the douches hide under the interwebz no one can find them, so it can go trough a bigger investigation... nah, it's just win or lose against Sony and the people who did this crap, will be clean and untouchables...

jjohan354756d ago

A few points after reading the article:

-Is ID theft that easy without your social security number (or equivalent in your country)? Sony has never asked us to submit our social security numbers.

-Why is he demanding monetary compensation? Has he lost any money? If it's possible to have identity theft without social security, I can understand wanting free credit report, but monetary compensation?? What a greedy mofo!

AyeGee4756d ago

@gamingdroid

Sony is kind of at fault though.. they should have encrypted our information from the get go, and i'm guessing they didn't. It was all in plain text, like what you see here, with no spaces.

It's a stupid lawsuit, but think of it like this. It's like a bank leaving its vault open, and then locking a glass door to keep people out. All you have to do is break the glass door.

HappyGaming4756d ago

I have 5 PSN account so can I sue them 5 times :D

jk

This seems pretty extreme...
why sue?
Just call you bank to send you a new card within a week everything will be back to normal.

The only people that should be sueing are the banks which may have to print and post about 50 million new bank cards and pins...

Kurt Russell4756d ago

I would sue if I was personally effected. If not there is no basis.

I do however feel let down and will only be using PSN shop bought cards for future purchases. My faith in their security over my details has diminished, which is only fair.

Dee_914756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

thank cgoodno
gamingdroid keeps going on about sony not encrypting the password when even the hackers chat log hinted that they were indeed encrypted

you keep talking about common sense and saying how easy it would be to encrypt the passwords

wouldnt common sense tell you that if it was that easy they would have done it ?

stop spreading lies to fuel your dumb arguement

you were blaiming sony even before the info about the cc and personal info being breached

@raptura theres no actual proof that anyone info was stolen
sony said it COULLD have been stolen they dont know if it actually was
the guy suing didnt even lose any money hes just like everybody here hes just speculating and assuming things

@ above
yea thats why i hope that the new master key rumor was true because if it wasnt for that getting stolen in the 1st place the ps3 would still be unhacked right now

and its crazy that some of the same people mad at sony for taking other os off are mad at sony now
if other os was still on this wouldve happened eventually

awi59514756d ago

the group did the hacking said sony lied and that said they stole credit card information so the fbi could arrest them. If they did really lie then sony will face another lawsuit for false arrest and lying to police.

AyeGee4756d ago Show
gamingdroid4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

"And there is no proof that Sony has done any of this... Only online ranting and speculation."

Actually, it is derived from Sony's own press release. Sony specifically said, the passwords were taken. If the password was hashed/encrypted, that information is useless and the passwords wouldn't be considered taken!

Clearly the breach is severe to the point where almost all the information stored is accessed. Even if you design your server environment correctly, the only way to breach is to hack every layer (and potentially over multiple servers). That's relatively difficult to do.

@GrandTheftZamboni:
"PCI (payment card industry) standard requires that credit card numbers aren't present in clear (readable) format on servers. There are even some credit card issuers that choose not to comply with this requirement."

That is why many large corporations don't store the data themselves, but employ a third party company to do it for them. Not only are they specialist that deals with this ongoing, but it's easy to point the finger at them too when sh!t hit's the fan!

Anarki4756d ago

This will not work. Their eula states they're not liable for loss of data.

GrandTheftZamboni4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

PCI (payment card industry) standard requires that credit card numbers aren't present in clear (readable) format on servers. There are even some credit card issuers that choose not to comply with this requirement.

I don't think there is a requirement by this standard to hide other data, such as name, address etc.

But, the US has some crafty lawyers that can sue gun manufacturers for not preventing a kid from taking dad's gun and shooting a brother (true case).

LastDance4756d ago Show
nveenio4756d ago

He's not going to win because he filed the lawsuit without cause. Before you disagree, you should know that he has no idea how Sony transmits that information. If they were meeting PCI compliance, then this dude is SOL.

ABizzel14756d ago

It's truly an unfortunate situation. I don't see him having a case, yes there was a breach, and his and everyone else information may be available, but from what we've seen so far Sony has done everything they can to prevent this threat, that's including the GeoHotz case, which now shows proof of why Sony wanted to keep hackers away.

I can't see him or anyone else for that matter winning a case in court, they need to thoroughly read the Terms of agreement, and make sure that Sony didn't violate the terms themselves, to make sure they're accountable for the corruption. And they also need to make sure they didn't agree to anything preventing them from suing Sony for such an event.

If they did agree then it could make the battle that much longer and harder to win. I completely understand why so many people are upset and worried, but the chance of someone stealing your identity is literally 1 in 70,000,000.

It's a completely unfortunate situation, and if anyone needs to be sued it's the people responsible for the hack, and the individual(s) who decided to use one code for everything PS3 related.

baodeus4756d ago

Nonetheless, this situation is pretty serious. Sony could have handle it a little bit better to lessen these catastrophe.

@goalweiser

1. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DATA! Not Sony
- So u are saying that i should give Sony all the informations as required for transaction or purchase on PSN (Sony ask for these informations), but they have no responsibility at all in securing those informations? It is like going to the bank where they have your money, important personnel info, but they don't have to secure those informations so if those information leaks, it is your responsibility. Why the fuck do i go to a bank for? What the fuck are u thinking?

2. You volunteer your information:
- so how else can i purchase anything online with CC for example, when Sony required those informations in order for me to do so on PSN?

3. YOU USED SONY'S FREE SERVICE
- Free as in you have a psn user name and password to let u in on psn for games. Like on n4g for blogging. But your personnel informations aren't part of that when u purchase something on psn. So u are saying because it is free, they don't have to secure your personnal information and can give it out for free as well? Again, what the fuck are u thinking.

4. WAKE UP. You have the power to prevent all this. Don't use PSN. Don't use your computer. Don't go online at all.
- then why the fuck do i need to buy a ps3 for?

I can't believe u got 41 agrees either.

I really think u need to wake the fuck up seriously before telling others.

I don't know what make me more angry, Sony negligence and hackers, or stupid comments like these on n4G?

KDubyah4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

Are you kidding or what? I did not see no sarcasm tag, so .. I guess not.
Sony is responsible for your data if it is stored on their servers.
Once it is on their servers, if it's stolen, it's definitely their fault.

If we go by your statement, then here is a little example for you.
It's like you giving me your car, to have it stored in my garage ..
A thief decides to walk in my garage and take your car, who's fault?
You would think mine, huh? Cause it's in my house, my garage. Right?
But, no no, by what you say, you're responsible for what happens to the car.
So, it's not my fault it was taken, I shouldn't need to protect it, right?

Wrong. You see how stupid that sounded?
Sony Servers, Sony's Responsibility..

XRider4756d ago

Before you guys jump to defend (too late) remember personal credit card info was leaked. It's Sony's job to secure that info. If this was MS or Nintendo it would be the same.

Lord_Doggington4756d ago

Kdub!

Are you Kdub from the podcast? what the hell are you doing in the comments section of an article?

lol

zag4756d ago

I wonder if that case is from Anon, After all they are looking after Sony's customers lives.

morganfell4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

"...i'm guessing they didn't."

And there is the problem. Everyone from journalists, pretend journalists, to gamers are taking a guess and running with it as fact. Above me I see several people state they are not sure of the truth...but then they turn around in the same post and state Sony is to blame. Draw your own conclusions about such convoluted reasoning.

Xrider, you are acting in a typical fashion. There is zero proof CC info was leaked. We have stories posted on N4G where an 'anonymous' person states he lost 200 dollars to hackers. No name and only 200 dollars. Yes that sounds believable.

killer88snake4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

@KDubyah
It's like you giving me your car, to have it stored in my garage ..
A thief decides to walk in my garage and take your car, who's fault?

Not just that. You left the garage door open, and the car-keys inside the car as well.

Saladfax4755d ago

Something very important to note that a few people have brought up:

It does not matter what Sony's EULA states if negligence can be proven on their part. Agreements are always two-sided, and it may not be directly alluded to in the EULA itself, but Sony can still be liable in spite of the agreement.

Think of it like a skiing trip. You sign a waver saying you won't sue if injured or whatever during the course of the trip. However, if your instructor/guide was drunk or the equipment could be proven to be unsafe or substandard, they weren't providing the promised service.

+ Show (35) more repliesLast reply 4755d ago
OC_MurphysLaw4756d ago

more will follow and most likely this will go Federal and all will get lumped into one class action lawsuit.

tawak4756d ago

"more will follow" - yes, "easy money"

MRMagoo1234756d ago

but they wont win all sony has to do is prove they took security measures like encrypting and thats that and it would also seem the logs say they where encrypted.

IcarusOne4756d ago

MRMagoo, you are incorrect.

A large part of his suit pertains to Sony's severely delayed response in informing consumers about the breach. It is immaterial whether or not Sony is compliance with industry security measures. The data was stolen nonetheless, and Sony sat on that precious gem instead of letting us know. And that could easily make them liable for damages.

TurismoGTR4756d ago

Is this a NIGHTMARE???????? Can we please just get pass this and get back to gaming?

ERMAC_4756d ago

In time. When this site is done spamming they same articles over and over you can sell T-shirts saying "I was there...at the PSN outage."

Could make up for those millions of dollars these hackers will steal :B

Larry L4756d ago

Look at all the disagrees people get with level headed comments like yours and all the agrees posts negative towards Sony gets on articles like these.

Funny, fanboys all over the interwebz call N4G a site full of nothing buy PS3 fanboys. Looks quite the opposite to me. And they all just seem to click the disagree button, not make any decent arguments.

The fact is, this site has fanboys of all kinds. And depending on what kind of headlines are making the gaming news, decides on which fanboys come out of the woodwork. When there's possitive PS3 news, PS3 fanboys are the ones commenting all the time. When it's negative PS3 news like this PSN dealie, the 360 fanboys are the ones that come out in droves.

Muerte24944756d ago

Unfortunately, no my friend. This isn't any different from a crackhead slipping on a wet floor, even though there is a sing there. I already know how this is going to end. Sony cannot be held liable for this simply because it was a external attack. It's like trying to sue the U.S. government because a terrorist stole your information. Pandora is going through something similar right now. But the difference is Pandora, themselves, were leaking people information. This is a known risk you take anytime you put your credit card information online.

Clarence4756d ago

I agree. All I can say is blame the hackers. When the hackers get caught idiots send them money to help with court fees and cheer them on for cracking Sony security. Now that your information may have been stolen, people are mad at Sony.

R0me4756d ago

Nono, right now there is something different going on. Normally I am pro Sony, but I also study law and when there will be proof that Sony didnt save our information good enough, common sense starts the fight against fanboy. Seriously some comments are pathetic: Like dont use psn etc.

They must obey the law, even ICO is nervous and starts proving. They must protect our data with a good system that is what counts. If they protected good enough and still all information got leaked, its alright.

If they didnt protect good, but swear the new psn will have good security and show facts. I will trust them again.

We should wait until we get facts of how they treated our data, only then i will judge.

HappyGaming4756d ago

75 million bored PSN users with no network have jumped on N4G just let us spam we will be out as soon as PSN is fixed :P

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4756d ago
darx4756d ago

They will all get lumped into one class action lawsuit.

JLeVRT4756d ago

ppl are too lawsuit trigger happy...

diatom4756d ago

Idiot will need show damages to file a civil case or he is going to be writing a check to Sony's lawyers for wasting their time.

Whats with all the BS stories from this website?

cyborg69714756d ago Show
Max_Dissatisfaction4756d ago

Its not serious, it will blow over. - what every SONY fan has been saying since ps3 was hacked last year

IcarusOne4756d ago

So if it hasn't blown over since last year - in fact the story keeps getting bigger; for example, npr wasn't covering it before, now they are. So if it hasn't blown over yet, at what point does it become serious?

This is the biggest online outage in the history of online. This is the biggest hack in the history of hacks (77 million users). Sony's stock price has already dropped 3 points and it's going to drop more before this is over. And this will end up costing them millions of dollars to fix.

So I'll ask again: when does it become serious?

nsnsmj4756d ago

Unfortunately, yep.

On a slightly unrelated note, I happen to live in Bham, AL. This is quite amusing to me that the first person to sue (apparently) is from here.

Strikepackage Bravo4756d ago

I think they may have a strong case here. Problem is Sony is trying to keep up with a for pay service like XBL without the income of a service like XBL.

Sony is forced to cut costs and do things on the cheap, including things like not having enough layers of security.

MRMagoo1234756d ago

lol the case will be a win for sony i can guarantee it

Raiden4756d ago

lol, I agree Sony is missing out on a 2.3billion income a year because that is what MS makes on it's XBL. So having a dedicated team on call 24/7 is important. Sony have to cut cost because they are not receiving this kind of income. You can't just rely on the system to autodetect hacking you need to have a team on monitoring your servers too. Good luck to all my friends and foes on PS3 i hope your network returns soon. back to my XBL

Lykon4756d ago

ughhh grabbing litigation mania is ugly, desperate and greedy

trancefreak4756d ago

This is serious I canceled my bank card last night and my bank provider was aware of the situation. They said they were receiving 100s of phone inquires already.

4Sh0w4756d ago

Oh come on! Sony cannot prevent world hunger either. Truth is that no infastructure is 100% secure once targeted by a group with the right talent and alot of determination. Hey maybe there was more Sony could have done to beef up their security before this but with so much sensitive info already leaked on the internet, I believe it was just a matter of time, no matter what security was in place. Sonys biggest miscalculation was under estimating the impact their aggressive pursuit of certain hackers would cause within that community but surely they have the right to protect the future of their product and services. As usual sonys PR folks havent exactly done them any favors in this whole mess. Lets put all our differences aside as gamers Sony needs our support, DO NOT LET THE HACKERS WIN, play some SP/offline games, if you have a 360/wii revisit a old favorite, go to the gym, but most of all be patient.

Jazz41084756d ago

This could haunt sony as much as rrod if not worse if these accusations of account fraud are true. All in all a uncomprised network and a reliable machine are important things as these both only hurt us gamers and tarnish sony and ms reputation.

hiredhelp4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

There's no evidence he had lost money. Unbelievable f@ck u John you not a Sony supporter or even seem upset for what Sony going threw but only to see how much your pockets can be filled. Well hope it don't go on another Sony game cos I for one wouldn't want you on my list.. If not bad enough they lost homes families in the quake Sony donating a lot money to them. now Sony gets this crap to handle too with geohotz now anon. Now money leechers.

Vherostar4756d ago

Why am I not surprised this is from the US they will sue for ANYTHING money grabbing sods.

Scary694756d ago

Of course it had to be a hillbilly who has nothing better to do and wasting the courts time. This case will be thrown, people are just idiots.

kikizoo4755d ago

It's a national sport in america$$$, stupid cupid people.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 4755d ago
ZBlacktt4756d ago ShowReplies(3)
HeretoSpeakTheTruth4756d ago

WoW it now has begin 1. it wasnt Sonys fault PSN wont down the hackers where harming it if sony didnt shut it down it could of getten worse trust me

2. i know sony should of said something sooner it would have help alot of gamers who had there credit card information address and everything else stolen but sueing them isnt the answer to it

3. Sony has enough Problems at the moment like

Sony stocks fall rapidly after PSN security breach

Getting PSN back Online (is sueing them really going to get anything Fixed)

OC_MurphysLaw4756d ago

The lawsuit has nothing to do with PSN down time, and has no care about what Sony does in terms of getting PSN back up and running.

These suits will all be about Sony failing to protect sensitive information that they were entrusted with. It was Sony's responsibility to ensure that safety... the true question will be was it "forseeable that what Sony had in place for security was not good enough and they should have done more". If that is proven... then Sony will be on the hook most assuredly.

Clarence4756d ago

Tell me what security is good enough if the pentagon can get hacked? Wikileaks proved that anything can be hacked. There is always someone out there who can cracked the security.

OC_MurphysLaw4756d ago

@Clarence I agree, anything can be hacked, broken into, stolen, etc... Nothing is full proof in the world.

That all said, companies that deal in personal information like this have a responsibility to provide an adequate level of security in proportion to the information they are storing, etc...

I truly don't know if Sony had provided an adequate level of security or not. I also am not the judge or jury on this. But this is the question though that will be argued by both sides. That is all I was trying to clarify.

mrv3214756d ago

I can pretty much sue the entire world then, NO ONE WILL EVER USE ENOUGH security. XBL was hacked, the US government, the british government, the UN, everybody gets hacked. Sony had enough security before they where hacked because it worked. Now that people have worked around it then it needs to be improved.

Let's say you own a house, you have some important stuff inside, you in this example are Sony, you believe you have enough protection, Alarms etc, I break into your house. Now who is in the wrong here me for breaking in or you for not enough security? So you go and claim insurance, they deny it because 'Not enouh security' so a couple months down the line with little money left, I decide to sue you... you did not provide enough security and thus your charges against me where damaging. That's effectively what the lawsuit is.

OC_MurphysLaw4756d ago

@mrv321 Your example is so far off base its laughable.

to quote you: "Let's say you own a house, you have some important stuff inside, you in this example are Sony, you believe you have enough protection, Alarms etc, I break into your house. Now who is in the wrong here me for breaking in or you for not enough security? So you go and claim insurance, they deny it because 'Not enouh security' so a couple months down the line with little money left, I decide to sue you... you did not provide enough security and thus your charges against me where damaging. That's effectively what the lawsuit is."

Now I am going to use your example idea but put it in proper context to this situation.

You own a house, you have told all your neighbors they can buy stuff from you at your house at special prices but to do so they need to give you their info and accounts upfront. ( you in this example are Sony) You believe you have enough protection, Alarms etc...

I break into your house and steal all the info of your neighbors. As it turns out the protection and alarms you thought was enough of turned out to be very faulty. You rushed to make it all and actually forgot to wire the alarms up and so breaching your security was rather easy for me.

Now who is in the wrong here me for breaking in or you for not enough security? In reality I certainly am in the wrong as I broke the law by stealing. However, you also are in the wrong for mis-leading your neighbors into thinking you had created good security. They placed information with you under false pretences that you would safe guard it.

As for the insurance...I don't understand where you are going with that. Makes no sense in this situation. The only thing I can think of is you are trying to equate that out to "a neighbor" filing a claim with their bank to recover stolen money and getting it back but still suing you. Guess what, they can still sue you for damages. Damages are not just monetary. While it may seem trivial having to cancel cards, get re-imbursement ...all that time wasted...all damages.

This is why big corporations can and should be sued when they are negligent. The only thing these giant companies understand is money folks. If you hit them hard enough in the pocket book they will notice, they will make changes and most likely not make the same mistake again.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4756d ago
theonlylolking4756d ago

It is sony's and the hacker's fault for this. Your body has a immune system just like sony has a security. When a virus beats the crap out of your protection your body has failed but the virus caused it. Just like sony's security failed but the hackers caused it.

FFXI1014756d ago

Why does everyone who accuse Sony fail to do their job assume that SONY are "INVISIBLE" and "UNTOUCHABLE"

I'm no expert on this but if hacker can hack into your pc and mine or a bank or even goverment's network why would you think that Sony's network would be 100% safe?

I said it in other article that I think Sony's only fault was they didn't talk to us soon enough. Then again, if you read their blog is not hard to understand why.

Think as a police investigation, now if the police did not have enough evidence to support their theory would they just go to the press and say they found out who the suspect is and what were the motivation for this crime and how did the suspect do it?

I'm sure Sony is doing whatever they can to solve this to prevent further damage and I'm sure there will be an explanation from them.

Jazz41084756d ago

2mrv321...please provide me alink where xbox live has been hacked. Don't make thinks up to make sony look better. The system has its share of piracy but live has never been hacked.

smoothdude4756d ago

Sony is being very stupid about our confidential information being compromised. While it is not Sony's fault that PSN was hacked, it still remains their responsibility for whatever happens. Thus the class action lawsuits which will follow. Anyone could see this coming...maybe this is why Sony is being quiet on the whole issue.

SnotyTheRocket4756d ago

Well, yeah it's Sonys responsibility to clean the mess up, but no one is giving them a f***ing chance to! " OMG WTFBBQ SONY U LETZ TEH HAXORZ IN I SUE U!" Give them a god damn chance to fix it! Maybe it's not as bad as we/they think.

FFXI1014756d ago

Personally I think this law suit is just people taking adventage of this situation and wanna gain something for themselves.

Vherostar4756d ago

Exactly hackers can hack anything! Nothing is un- hackable that is a FACT.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4756d ago
ziggurcat4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

*facepalm*

*sigh*

even after sony saying that there is no evidence that CC info was taken, people are still ridiculously litigious...

disagrees: really? because you can't really sue for damages that you haven't accrued. furthermore, you can't really sue for damages based on the possibility that information *might* have been taken. there's zero definitive proof so far that anything has been taken. you also can't sue because sony got hacked. if that were true then i could sue you for having your home broken into even though you've locked all of your windows and doors because you should have known better than to allow someone to break into your house.

montyburns0004756d ago

"i could sue you for having your home broken into even though you've locked all of your windows and doors because you should have known better than to allow someone to break into your house."

ridiculous analogy, Sony has been trusted with our personal information.

for that comparison to actually work I would have to provide a service for you and have it stolen for you to "SUE" me. instead you pulled an arbitrary example out of your ass to try and justify Sonys ignorance on the matter.

WitWolfy4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

God some of these 12 year old kids are just too pro fanboy to admit Sony makes mistakes too!

Seriously we get it you LOVE Sony, but let the people complain that want to complain. Like you dont complan when certain FW updates brick your console.. Hypocrites

For all we know the oukes that did this probably did micro transactions on every bodies CCaccounts just to make something out of this. and ended up making millions if not more, just to see if they could get away with it... See where im going with this?

Im sure you'd be pissed to know if some hacker got rich off stealing a dollar by you just for shits and giggles

xYLeinen4756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

Lawsuit.

This is silly. No matter where in the world, no matter what software, no matter what system, it will NEVER be 110% secure.

Anyone with a little common sense get this.

branchedout4756d ago

Yes, but anyone who's taken a Risk Management class knows that by law, Sony has to provide adequate protection. If the attackers used some completely powerful program that's amazing, then Sony couldn't have possibly protected against it.

But, if Sony made a slip-up somewhere, say transmitting some data in plaintext, then Sony may have a hard time winning this one.

Investigations will have to go on to determine if their security was adequate.

stuna14756d ago (Edited 4756d ago )

@branchedout
But who are we to say what is too little protection?
It's a damn shame how we in our ignorance, have allowed this whole scenario be proliferated throughout the media, fanboy sites, uninformed guesstimaters and so forth! Really we should be ashamed of ourselves, for allowing these fear-monger to have control over this situation, by making us second guess our decision of who we've allowed into our circle of trust. Which by the way could be anyone, who we've allowed access to personal or, private information ex. Banks, Grocery stores, even family members.
People are so quick to point fingers and assign blame to who they percieve to be the guilty party, but how many have played a part in rectifying this this situation? And before you answer, "YES" we all can play a part! Even if it's just to try to reassure the masses, that this too shall pass, and things will work out.

@branchedout that's what I'm saying. How do we know that sony hasn't followed those guidelines, and used the necessary per-cautions necessary to avert a even bigger fallout, than what they're experiencing now? Given the opportunity if present, I've found that most will take avantage of a bad situation, for their own gain! Even if they know it is wrong, and this is one such case.

branchedout4756d ago

@stuna1

There's forms and worksheets that say what is too little protection. Some of which I listed above. There -is- a definitive guide.

This is business as usual. But the information's not common, so the average person doesn't know about it.

Show all comments (331)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community9d ago
Profchaos10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers9d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken9d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g9d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing9d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H99d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola9d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn6699d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle9d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community10d ago
jznrpg10d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos10d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola10d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community30d ago
ChasterMies30d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken30d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga30d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken30d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6430d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long30d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197230d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic30d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 30d ago
DivineHand12530d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91330d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer30d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91329d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit29d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 29d ago
Christopher30d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6929d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit29d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher30d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken30d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197230d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic30d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2330d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218330d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder30d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts30d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)