Here's another huge graphics comparison for Crysis 2. Shots are from the singleplayer campaign and it's PC vs. Xbox 360 and of course PS3. PC wins, 360 looses. No question.
Light levels are over saturated and the dark areas hide texture detail on the 360 version. if not for the slightly higher rez textures, the 360 would be total garbage. And when you add the screen tear to that list, it's just a big bowl of yuck.
A pretty game like Crysis 2 you want to see it's visuals and not have anything ruin the experience... you definitely won't get that with the 360 version.
They're the same. Good god. There's some benefits and drawbacks in both versions, both are so hardly noticeable that anybody who just buys one version of the game is never going to have to worry about whether they made the wrong decision.
Well the point of contention is, C2 is the best looking game on consoles(not only does ign say that but cvg is saying it is best looking game as well) , and it runs 3fps faster on the xbox.
Having said that, ~sometimes~ when you engage stealth mode while in direct veiw of enemies, it breaks their ai, and they keep walking towards where you were and if they get hooked on the landscape they are easy to walk up to and kill... Getting in their cone of vision fixes them and they run around and try to kill you again. But if they are pointed at a wall...
But anyhow, there it is, and that is why all the butt hurt crying...
EDIT: learn to read, but not only does ign say that it is best looking game, but so does CVG.
Sorry but 1 editor from IGN won't change the fact that Crysis 2 is NOT the best looking game on consoles. KZ3 runs at a higher resolution and a very stable 30 fps with NO screen tear while having plenty of chaos in the background. I can't wait for Digital Foundry to do their analysis and shut you idiots up.
One guy on N4G said he was buying the 360 version and he got 40 disagrees, this place is a hive of PS3 fanboy tools who are brainwashed. When Lens of Truth and Digital Foundry confirm the 360 version runs better you will still not accept it because you are fanboys and your opinions are invalid and have no credibility.
Comparison articles are pretty useless. You have to take these sites at face value and all of them have bias regardless of which format they prefer. These games almost never look on my displays the way they do in these articles.
Crysis 2 comparisons are in extreme over drive. I have never seen this many over one title and I don't understand why. All versions have their pros and cons. In the end choose for yourself. I, like always, will let my own 2 eyes make the decision and not some lame site looking for traffic.
WTH!? http://www.pcgames.de/scree... Is that vertical tearing in the PC screengrab? I can actually see vertical lines in the ripples.
Something is really wrong with their screen capture. Or is that supposed to be some kind of on-HUD water effect? Either way it's messed up. Will once again wait for the DF comparison
Yeah, the more I look at it, the more it looks lke some water effect. But something is jut wrong with it, it doesn't look like similar effects in other games but like there is something tearing the image.
"Die schlechteste Optik ist erneut auf der Xbox 360 zu finden."
once again the 360 version delivers the worst graphical experience.
I didn't know that...
lol at PS3 fanboys so bitter that the 360 version has a consitently better framerate throughout the game . PS3 version is last, fact.
For the curious PC gamers I've got plenty of screens here http://steamcommunity.com/i...
Might spoil places so at our own risk :)
edit : maxed out (extreme)
Honestly so many comparisons of this game now, can't we all just be friends and say the game looks equal on consoles?
nowgamer Comparison Better and it's showing ps3 version is best u can go to the site and make sure u download all images and see the truth ! F*** ign