400°

Another Crysis 2 Console Comparison

@XG247:

Over the last couple of weeks there has been much talk about the graphical differences between the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions of Crytek’s upcoming futuristic shooter: Crysis 2.

Well now, to settle the arguement as to which is the prettier edition, Crytek themselves have now commented on this, challenging you to spot the difference for yourself!

Executive Producer of the game Nathan Camarillo had this to say on the somewhat thorny issue…

I’ve gone on the record saying that if you stick PS3 and 360 side by side I would challenge anyone to find any meaningful difference. I don’t see it at all.

DelbertGrady5185d ago

It wouldn't hurt with a slightly more in-depth and professional comparison for once.

fredfenster5185d ago

Yea but do it with retail copies, then it can finally be done with.

Istanbull5185d ago Show
nveenio5185d ago

The images on the article are like 320p...how are we supposed to judge by those images? Secondly, that's an interior shot. An interior like that wouldn't require as many resources, so each version will be more similar to the other.

This smells like an article riding the coat tails of the controversy...

MaxXAttaxX5185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

The PS3 version resembles the PC version a lot more closely than the 360.

PC and PS3 are very similar in contrast levels, details and lighting:
Exhibit A: http://www.videogameszone.d...
Exhibit B: http://www.videogameszone.d...
You'll notice that the 360 version is overly dark in shaded areas, hiding detail, and overly bright on certain light areas.
And I'm not just talking about Crysis 2.

Over-saturation and dark contrast ≠ better graphics. They're not really good visual attributes. But many people tend to not understand this when comparing.

trancefreak5185d ago

I played the pc demo and It does not look washed out like that. Im guessing the ps3 final retail will not be washed out either.

The ps3 in those pics looks lower res and blurred but resembles the screen of the pc pic quite close.

the xbox version has maximum vibrancy which is cool: I like dynamic false colors but those pics are not what Ive seen on my monitor.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5185d ago
jriquelme_paraguay5185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

i dont know why people care about this comparisons.
I own a PS3, and the Demo look terrible.
Crytek drop the ball with this game...
The PC version is mediocre, and console version too.
Why they just not make a PC version (full sand box)... and a different version completly for consoles.
I was sooo hyped about this game. And now im SAAAD

LNDCalling5185d ago

Whilst I agree.. I maybe set my expectations too low.. the PS3 demo actually looks better than I thought it would..

That's not to say its what Crytek boasted of.. or even close.. but just better than the atrocity I imagined!.. On all platforms, PC included, I feel its a drop in quality.. Cross platform parity isn't realistically achievable in the way Crytek imagined because each platform has its own strengths that need to be fully utilised.. in this 'Crysis 2' they haven't achieved that! :/

trancefreak5185d ago

jriquelme_paraguay Im going to agree here with you until the final game is released to assume final judgment.

Another thing for us gamers pc gamers is hoping for a top quality game that crytek promised.

I mean the game was delayed 6mos! Im going to say it was never intended to be released last September.

The impression everyone one received from crytek was this: Creat game(ENgine and Tools) with new cryengine 3 on PC allowing instant access to console counterparts basically allowing the devs to make all 3 games at once. I don't totally beilve this to be true anymore.

The devs have different teams wich is obvious but the end result was this super graphical engine that would scale all 3 platforms using the sandbox editor aka cryengine 3.

Now the next question comes to mind. If crytek cant produce what they promised why would studios jump on board to purchase and license their tools to make games. Im sure this will be analyzed by other devs who are either waiting to jump on board ce3 or were waiting to see what the engine can do.

In theroy which is opiniated I am no way a tech analsist or a game development guru. All I know Is what I can see and here from the devs promises and statments which were this.

A next gen game engine running on todays platforms. A engine which can be raised in fidelity in the future when hardware can utilize it and In the short an engine which would be be better than ce2 and more less sytem intensive. Meaning you can run those great graphics and all with less hardware specs.

What ive seen is this: a pc exclusive game go consolfied catering to the xbox 360. Hidden away a ps3 version which was suppose to excel and be better than any other multiplat engine according to cevat yerli. And a pc game with a hyped fanbase getting a piss poor dx9 game which is why it was never really shown off in its higher dx 10/11 versions.

Rumor states that crytek will patch the direct x 10/11 later lol. OK so I should play the game again just because its not there. Or maybe it will be sold as downloadable content hehe.

With all that being said I know its a rant but we'll find out next week.

moparful995185d ago

See with all of these inconsistencies in statements, graphics, actual gamplay etc its not surprising that there is so much misinformation being thrown around as though its truth... People have forgotten that at the end of the day you have to develop your OWN opinion based on all of the evidence.. Not "well site A says that crysis 2 runs like a turd on a hot day for the ps3! OMG quick tell the world of this atrocity!!!" Seriously guys most of us are adults and should be capable of weeding through misinformation and form educated opinions and be subjective about it.. This is stuff they teach in middle school! Let's all step back... Now take a huge deep breath... Now relax! It will be ok I promise.... Jeez.

milohighclub5185d ago

Id like to see a black ops vs crysis vs killzone comparison.

ABritishGeek5185d ago

To be perfectly honest, I can't see much of a difference at all other than (at risk of upsetting PS3 users), in motion the demo does look a little more "washed out".

a_bro5185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

you're not upsetting PS3 users, its a fact that the game looks like crap on PS3. Crytek should blame themeselves for talking up crap.

its obvious that they didnt take advantage of the console's cell processor.

moparful995185d ago

Mr west isn't upsetting anyone except fanboys like yourself because the way you describe it is far from the truth.. The DEMO runs great on the ps3 aside from minor graphical inconsistencies.. But of course your naivity wont let you think subjectively so maybe you should refrain from participating in these debates....

a_bro5185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

"The DEMO runs great on the ps3 aside from minor graphical inconsistencies.."

yea, tell that to the people here that has played it. face it, the PS3 version sucks and crytek should be embarrassed after talking so much crap about how good the PS3 version was going to be.

playing it on PS3 confirmed that my fears were coming to fruition with this game,and this is nothing to do with fanboyism. the PS3 is my primary platform of choice, and crytek blew it with this.

MGRogue20175185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

I'm waiting for DigitalFoundry's "face-off" article.. lol, I know I'm not the only one either

Anyway, If you only have PS3 & Xbox 360, Get the Xbox 360 version.. Or build yourself a gaming PC & get the PC version.

If you have a very high-spec PC, PS3 & Xbox 360.. Get the PC version.

If you only have a PS3, buy a cheap Xbox 360 & get the Xbox 360 version.. Or build yourself a gaming PC & get the PC version.

Thats how things are right now if you want the best possible experience out of Crysis 2.

Ignore the disagrees...

nickjkl5185d ago

360 version isnt the best version as far as we know though

since with the recent release of ps3 demo we have seen that it has a higher grade of anistrophic filtering

MGRogue20175185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

Yeah, maybe.. But nobody on this site can tell for sure..

We will just have to continue waiting for DigitalFoundry's "face-off" article, it will reveal ALL differences between 360/PS3 version.. for better or for worse.

There is going to be alot of gamers who wont like the results, I can tell you that much..

nickjkl5185d ago

nope

http://i55.tinypic.com/jb7d...

bricks dont have shadows and the brick wall further in is blurry

assmonkey5185d ago (Edited 5185d ago )

Do work for DigitalFoundry or something? all I ever see is you talking about them.

peeps5185d ago

Why are the images so small...

pcz5185d ago

they are holding different guns

:D

Show all comments (35)
100°

The Crysis Trilogy Joins EA Access Vault

Featuring the complete nanosuit experience, The Crysis Trilogy has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
Games1st1782d ago (Edited 1782d ago )

Just in time for those that got the month trial.

DrDeath1782d ago

Wait? There is more than one? lol

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster2166d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada072166d ago (Edited 2166d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X142166d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase2165d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted2166d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster2166d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack2165d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH2161d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.

80°

13 Awesome Games Set In Real Places

Jum Jum from Unleashthegamer writes: We gathered the best real setting games we could think of if you’re looking for something in a familiar location to soothe your thirst for real-world games.

Read Full Story >>
unleashthegamer.com