470°

Naughty Dog on Uncharted 3: The new engine is an evolution of the first graphics engine

4News.it: It was not created from scratch!

Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception has delighted all, a community of players and staff to the press. Some have argued that the new graphics engine was built from scratch.

We as 4News.it asked Naughty Dog whether the new at Naughty Dog Engine 3 graphics engine is completely new. The develpment team she told us on twitter: "The engine for UNCHARTED: Drake's Fortune was the foundation for our subsequent games - we've just been evolving the engine"

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.it
MGRogue20175267d ago (Edited 5267d ago )

That is good news.. Everyone loves the Uncharted 2 engine, there is hardly anything wrong with it.

"If it aint broke, Dont fix it"

I think Guerrilla Games is doing the same with their engine for Killzone 3 also.. just improving, which is good.

LORD-PHOENIX5267d ago

they just keep tweaking it...it gave us u2 now the tweaking will give us u3

ND should licence out this engine,imagine gears 4 using this engine,that would be sick

BryanBegins5267d ago

I agree! Sony should license it to third-party developers, then they could easily make incredibly good looking games and focus on the gameplay instead.

Kudo to Naughty dog though, they got both (engine AND gameplay) so right.

Stuart57565267d ago

ND Engine is designed to only work with PS3, that engine couldn't be used to make Gears 4. It could be used to make Infamous 3 though. Not that Sucker Punch hasn't got a good engine, just trying to prove my point. Watch the ND PSN move 'Mastering The Cell'.

aCasualGamer5267d ago

Look at the Uncharted 3 demo on Jimmy Fallon and you'll see how much it has improved. The amount of stuff and effects during the demo is mindboggling, especially the fire and the animations of the fire.

The animations were just beyond anything UC2 had. Especially when he was stuck in the stairs, at that moment, look carefully on the enemy AI. The Animations are truly CG like.

AKS5267d ago

I'm pretty sure Epic would have a major problem with the idea with Gears 4 using any engine than the Unreal Engine.

SuperM5267d ago (Edited 5267d ago )

No, Sucker Punch could not use ND engine to make infamous 3. And Sucker Punch does have a very good engine running for infamous 2. The Uncharted engine is not designed for open world settings like in infamous. Especially not big crowded cities with tons of structures, pedestrians and traffic. Its to much stuff to handle and at the same time keep the same visual fidelity. For something like that you need a different engine, and that is just what Sucker Punch has made

nveenio5267d ago

It couldn't be used for inFamous 3 because it's not an open-world engine. Those two approaches to gameplay require a completely different approach to the foundation of the engine.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5267d ago
Organization XII5267d ago

if the ps3 can pull cgi like cars in GT5 at 60fps in 1080p, then I wouldnt be shocked if we had movie like quality graphics in U3..buahahaha where are teh Extreme 360 mind shocking graphics??

jhoang5267d ago

But the ps3 doesnt actually do GT5 at 1080p, its horizontally upscaled
source: http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...
on topic i think the upgrade will be similar to KZ3, not that big from UC to UC2 but an upgrade scale/enviroment wise.

jammydude5267d ago

@ jhoand
yup, GT5 is running at 1440*1080 with 2xAA
1080p actually only represents the number of horizontal lines of pixels, which is a common misconception when people say "GT5 is not 1080p..." For example, these are all 1080p resolutions:
320*1080
1280*1080
etc.

Haro5267d ago

And yet it looks better than ANY other racing game out on ANY platform. Organization XII's original point (while over the top) is still valid :P

turgore5267d ago

yeah because this is sooo photorealistic... http://image.bayimg.com/aaa...

saoco5267d ago

why don't you put a picture of a premium car?

Marceles5267d ago (Edited 5267d ago )

@turgore

That's a car imported from the PSP version of GT

JBaby3435267d ago (Edited 5267d ago )

Mission Accomplished fellas. That should take care of the haters trying to nitpick GT5.

@Turgore: Care to embarrass yourself further?

On Topic: I simply cannot wait for UC3. The first 2 games were both epic and the demo on Jimmy Fallon looks even better than the previous two games eventhough it's still a year away.

visualb5267d ago

turgore

what an idiotic statement

thats not any reflection of the engine, its the car model that sucks

ingame model =/= engine

my god trolls get dumber as days go by...hopefully one day they'll get so dumb they accidentally kill themselves simultaneously.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5267d ago
SnakeMustDie5267d ago

Cannot wait to get my hands on the game. 2011 can't come any faster

disturbing_flame5267d ago

I think Naughty Dogs should have worked on Uncharted 3 right after the release of uncharted 2, not making DLCs for months and giving interviews.
Now when we see them in their last video, the backdoor film, they seem totaly terrorized by the pression they have.
I wish for them they are working very hard on their game, because as they see journalists can now crush them as they did with GT5.
Hope UC3 will be awesome.

LORD-PHOENIX5267d ago (Edited 5267d ago )

^erm they did,if you watch the interview they have been working on u3 for over ONE YEAR... ND are a big team they can have a team working on DLC also thats what successful studios who care about their fans do,they dont suddenly come to a standstill because they make DLC..

i appreciate devs who continue to support their games after it hit retail shelves

disturbing_flame5267d ago

Yes i appreciate too, but it seems to me that now they have UC3 in front of their eyes they feel it's maybe not the same gap that separate UC1 and UC2 that they have reproduced with this game and that totaly terrorized them.

it's just an impression, but i was thinking that maybe the investissment on UC3 was not the same as the one they did on UC2, they look like disappointed when they talk about it, i don't know if it's right but i don't feel they are as pround as they were with UC2.

We"ll see in few month i presume.
Hope anyway the game will awesome.

LORD-PHOENIX5267d ago

the gap between u1 and u2 was 2 years

the gap between u2and u3 will also be 2 years

Ju5267d ago

Gap not big enough. Lol. You guys know that technology (in a fixed environmemt = console) will level out at some point and improving gets harder over time. I would very surprised if the gap between uc2 & 3 would be as big as before. Even pushing it again is already an achievement.

bageara5267d ago

not sure how you come to that conclusion

disturbing_flame5267d ago

No, it's not a conclusion, just an impression.
How can i make a conclusion from 3 minutes of a game nobody have seen yet ?

@ LORD-PHOENIX :
Yes but i feel more changements from UC1 to UC2
That from UC 2 to UC 3.
Some may say it's because they reach an icredible level of greatness with UC2 that it's hard to get beyond, i think it's true, but i wonder if they work as hard on UC3 than they did on UC2.
Expectations...

KingZFlipper5267d ago

I seriously can't wait for this game !

theballa1130925267d ago

Oh wow thats great. Can't wait to see what it looks like!

Show all comments (44)
50°

Uncharted Cast Doesn’t Take the Games’ Success For Granted at MCM Comic-Con

During MCM Comic Con London X EGX, CGM got the chance to be part of a press group interview with the stars of the Uncharted titles, namely the legendary Nolan North, who played protagonist Nathan Drake, Emily Rose, who portrayed Elena Fisher and Richard McGonagle, who took on the role of Victor ‘Sully’ Sullivan,

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos1290d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC1290d ago (Edited 1290d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop1290d ago (Edited 1290d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC1285d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid6381290d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance1290d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer1290d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger1290d ago (Edited 1290d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma3131290d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid6381290d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
1292d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar1291d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans1291d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar1291d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood1291d ago (Edited 1291d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans1291d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon1291d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans1291d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion1291d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf1291d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad1291d ago (Edited 1291d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)