Yes, another David Jaffe interview, but this time from the famous IGN.
PS3? I thought it was PS2.
I hope he makes big epic games and not just focus on small downloadable games. :( Phantom, I know, but I just hope he would make a big epic game but they want to start small. Its not a bad thing but I hope he can truly make unique IPs.
from the GT interview...he said he is not going to make games that big....the biggest games he will make will be like Twisted Metal Black....and for smallest will be like Calling All Cars
' ' IGN: We know that you have a deal for three Sony-exclusive titles, but does that mean you can only work with Sony, or are you free to work on other platforms for other games? Jaffe: We are exclusive with Sony for console and handheld. And we hope to be exclusive with Sony in those spaces for many years to come. We have great friends within the halls of Sony and look forward to continuing a partnership that has lasted over 13 years. ' ' See he is not going anywhere ok anti-Sony force get it right already. @n4g.com ' ' God of War: Chains of Olympus - (PS2) ' ' This is not for PS2 WTF? its a PSP only tittle.
dont ask me...it was already there when I linked
I like Jafe and I am looking forward to see his games.
The must play PSP Games every gamer will enjoy.
My son and I played a ton of Monster Hunter on PSP
Cultured Vultures: Let’s delve into Kratos’ long and rampageous history and find out which games are worth the hype and which are better left buried under the weight of Kratos’s might.
Both requels over 2 and 3? Clowns. Those are two of the most boring games I've ever played.
GoW 3 was amazing, but I personally hated just one thing. (This is on me alone, because I was dumb, lol.) I hated that you couldn't skip cutscenes on repeat playthroughs. I had to go back through the game a third time because I missed one trophy accidentally on my way to the platinum... The cutscenes were great the first go round, even the second... But the third was pretty agonizing. Haven't played Ragnarok, but I still think GoW 4 is a wonderful game in its own right. Not sure how I would stack them up against each other honestly.
I don't consider the reboot part of the original series. The original series were high-skill games with combos and rewards for mixing things up.
High skill? When?
lol square, square and triangle is the only combo you needed. I have played all of them on the hardest difficulties...
Maybe I’m just old school but I just couldn’t get into the last two. Maybe it’s the slower action and more story telling but the original trilogy was by far my favorite.
It's not that youre old school. They're different genres
Me either, at all. It's just yap yap yap. They try to be a RPG's instead of being action games like they used to be.
I'd put the two psp games over 3 in terms of story any day. But not over 2.
My favorite was part 2 and I think Ragnarok is better that 2018.
The newer games are better imo.
There is no worst. Except for Ascension, only cause I didn't play it lol. They are all masterpieces. 1,2,3, 2018 and Ragnarok. 1 of, if not the greatest video game franchise...besides MetalGear.
Oh wow, I actually forgot that Ascension even existed... I never played it either.
I like ascension. It was different and some interesting combat additions.
If you didnt play it, how could you call it the worst? Its not as bad as the media portrayed it. Honestly the worst are those flash games. they arent even considered true GoW games but in name only. At least Ascension is a real GoW game.
Not saying it's a terrible game. Just mean it's at the bottom of my list. I played a little bit of it. Jus to me, compared to the other main games, it's last.
Ascension is the only GOW game I never finished. Hated it.
Can't agree, older games do so much more than the last two. More weapons, magic abilities, enemies are more varied, level design is also more aesthetically pleasing, and agree with those who say that they shouldn't have removed jumping. Was a time I'd agree, but those old games are so so much better, that they really should've looked into bringing into the reboot/sequels.
If a game is good then a game is good. Doesn't matter what came before or what comes after.
Of course it matters. If not for what what came before there wouldn't be an after. And if something is great before then you strive to make it just as good if not better, after. I personally don't think there's a fair way to judge the new with the old because the newer games are still essentially a reboot, and went a way different direction. But I still believe the old games did it better. I'm probably bias though since I've been going back to old games and have been finding that they lack all the annoying aspects that devs have shoehorned into new games to fluff out game time.