460°

Major Nelson To Personally Deliver Xbox 360 Dev Kit To Insomniac

Today is a big day for gamers the world over, but especially Xbox 360 owners who’ve been wanting to play a game from legendary developers Insomniac Games, but couldn’t because they don’t own a PS3. Well now things have changed, drastically and thanks to new deal between Insomniac and EA Partners, they’ll now be able to experience Insomniac’s new effort on the Xbox 360.

Read Full Story >>
gamesthirst.com
dangert125143d ago

know there taking the micky i would inprint ps3 on the so they feel at home and a lil joke lol

darkmurder5143d ago ShowReplies(5)
JOLLY15143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Major Nelson is the community manager for the Xbox.

*oops* that got posted in a weird spot...

ShinMaster5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Oh ok, now I know.

But as community manager, he can't really "personally deliver Xbox 360 dev kit".
He's obviously just trying to be funny there.

Blaze9295143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

He should instead deliver one to Bungie:

http://twitpic.com/1g1u97

Elven65143d ago

Major Nelson isn't a community manager, Larry Hyrb (his real name) is Director of Programming on Xbox Live.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

sikbeta5143d ago

lol Good for Insomniac, they're like *stars* now, well they delivers Great Games for Playstation and they're great Devs, hope the new IP is as Good as usual...

Lou-Cipher5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

I wonder if he will also deliver a PS3 Dev Kit to Bungie. :)

IdleLeeSiuLung5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Major Nelson tweeted about sending an Xbox dev kit your way. I'm assuming you've had them for longer. How long have you actively worked on the Xbox 360 title?

Ted: Not gonna talk about time frames, but if anyone wants to send us dev kits, that's cool! We have no problem with that. (laughs)

source: http://www.joystiq.com/2010...

To the haters above, this has nothing to do with Bungie... Why bring them in unless you can't resist being a fanboy?!

OGharryjoysticks5143d ago

I'm not a fanboy, but the first thing that came to mind was Sony didn't bend over and spread em when Bungie went multi. To me it just looks like Sony showed more class.

soljah5143d ago

guys a couple things u have to consider in this deal

1 insomniac has been with Sony for 16 years. i am sure if Sony had wanted to they could have brought them in as a 1st party studio like a naughty dog or zipper,etc. but Sony hasn't
2 insomniacs relationship with Sony by all accounts is good. i am sure that Sony knows what they are working on and if they wanted could have struck a deal for the game if Sony thought it was worth the money.
3 this might be the best thing for both Sony and insomniac games.

huzzaahh5143d ago

Sony tried to buy Insomniac, but they wanted to stay independent so that they could be flexible with their games.

DA_SHREDDER5143d ago

Major Nelson dropping off a dev kit to Insomniac just made me sick to my stomach. How could you Insomniac? Im done with you for going to the enemy.

dgroundwater5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

I have no idea what it's like to live in your fantasy land of black and white. The gaming corporations are not "good" and "evil". There is money to be made by Insomniac, simple as that. Don't you want your favorite dev to go on to bigger and better things?

DA_SHREDDER5143d ago Show
Shang-Long5143d ago

Oh my it's not that big of a deal! If Sony is cool with it I'm cool
with it.

Andronix5143d ago

Ha ha ha! Now I see this man has a sense of humour and I like it. A bit of cheeky one-upmanship.

But seriously though, I loved Resistance 1, but R2 didn't work for me. Playing the Halo Reach beta, I can't wait for the full game. I know Bungie with the Halo franchise, have delivered what is one of the best multiplayer FPS gaming experiences ever. Somehow, I get the feeling that Jack Tretton is happier about this than Major Nelson.

Imperator5143d ago

This is actually good. Insomniac will get more exposure which will in turn give more exposure to the PS3 exclusive IPs. This could very well boost Ps3 sales as people on the 360 who like Insomniac may buy a PS3 to play the full catalog.

Inside_out5143d ago

Like XBL...dislike Herbert Nelson...now he does game " how too's "...yeah...exactly....is he related to Gates or something...

IaMs125142d ago

Remeber Bungie went multiplate too. I just see this being the same situation, any of the current IPs out for the consoles are owned by MS/Sony, but any new ones seem to being going to both

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5142d ago
NYC_Gamer5143d ago

hope 360 gamers enjoy what insomniac has to offer...

playstation_clan5143d ago ShowReplies(2)
littletad5143d ago

They are my favorite developers.

Codeman4205143d ago

Um 360 owners that reall really wanted to play Insomniac games probably owen a PS3 and or PS2. and Insomniac will probably make the game with the PS3 as the lead SKU which will make the 360's port inferior to the PS3. the days where the PS3 recieved bad ports is coming closer to an end and the 360 is taking its spot.

crapgamer5143d ago

Um like Red Dead Redemption and GTA4? lol Get outta here!

sikbeta5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Um like Final Fantasy 13 for xbox 360? lol 576p!

Enogh! Enjoy The Multiplat Insomniac Game no matter what Platform...

IdleLeeSiuLung5143d ago

What does that prove? That no matter what system, a bad port is a bad port! Duh!!!

Fanboys!

Kahvipannu5143d ago

Well, I would like to play theyr games, and I don't have a PS3. It's not that I can't afford it or anything, but I just don't see point buying another console, which gamebase is 90% the same. That doesn't mean I don't want do play some PS3 games, for example Ratchet & Clank.

For the rest, that just don't make sense in any angle.

Bodyboarder_VGamer5143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Wow these people really like to rub it in your face!

harrisk9545143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

The Microsoft Xbox division acts like little kids -- completely immature. I mean, come on with a story like this! Major Nelson needs to personally deliver the development kit? To garner more press? To make it seem as if Insomniac is somehow now an exclusive MS developer??

Sony did not act like this when Bungie signed the deal with Activision. There was no such behavior. Jack Tretton didn't personally deliver the PS3 development kit and announce it to the press to make it seem like it was a bigger deal than it actually was. Sony's response to the Bungie move was measured and professional. Sony's response to Insomniac's deal with EA was also measured and professional.

It is HUGE news that Insomniac has contracted with EA to do a multiplatform title... but it is only ONE game! The way MS is acting, it is like Insomniac has abandoned Sony. In actuality, the Bungie loss to MS is much bigger because while Insomniac will continue to make exclusives for Sony, Bungie is done with Halo and done with exclusives to the Xbox.

Capdastaro5143d ago

harrisk954 - To be honest...

It really sounds like you're butthurt.

You're just as immature to make a wall of text about some guy making a Tweet...

Monkey5215143d ago

Kevin Butler should have personally delivered the PS3 dev kits to Bungie. That would be absolutely amazing.

Hank Hill5143d ago

Notice how when Bungie went multi plat Sony was just like "cool". But when Insomniac goes multi plat Microsoft are so excited that they can't stop talking about it and Major Nelson wants to personally deliver the dev kit.

Codeman4205143d ago

just like when FF13 went multiplatform. and what did they get an inferior version of the game. though i havent beaten it yet ive heard mixed reviews of it. but anyways it wasnt the best version of the game.

PirateThom5143d ago Show
niceguywii605143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

“Congrats to Bungie. Marrying their creative minds and incredible talent to the power of PS3 will be like giving PS3 fans Halo on steroids.”

This is a simple cool? Not only was Sony rubbing it in people's faces but it was also a stealth slam on the 360 and their Halo IP.

Final Fantasy Versus is next. If I were Sony I would be revealing even more of their heavy guns before E3 as they been doing, so people remember Sony will be at E3.

Cold 20005143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

Yeah they were really cool... http://n4g.com/news/515334/...

Very "selective" memory to say the least.

harrisk9545143d ago (Edited 5143d ago )

You are SOOOO right... see my post above. It is embarrassing the way the MS Xbox division acts.

Halochampian5143d ago

is the people that have to comment on it and let it get to you.

So what if microsoft is happy to have a good developer's game on their system.

Look how happy Sony was?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5143d ago
Show all comments (91)
120°

Report: Marvel's Spider-Man 2 Villain DLC Spotted in Debug Menu

Marvel's Spider-Man villain DLC potentially spotted via the debug menu that surfaced from the New Game+ title update released recently.

60°

Video Game Leaks Suck For Everyone, Gamers Included

Ahmed from eXputer writes "Video game leaks have become a major cause of concern for Triple-A studios, as they're becoming increasingly malicious and dangerous."

240°

Adding First-Party Games to PS Plus Negatively Impacts Sales, Sony Data Confirms

In a leaked Sony Interactive Entertainment presentation, the company declares that including first-party games on PS Plus has had a “big” effect on “traditional sales.” As an example, the company mentioned that Horizon Forbidden West‘s sales “flat-lined” immediately after being added to PS Plus.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
XiNatsuDragnel183d ago

That's smart Sony knows what's up with that.

Reaper22_181d ago

They are just stating the obvious. Of course a game is not gonna sell as much when gamers can get it for a fraction of the cost because of subscription service. On the other hand, a subscription service can extend the life of a game by making it available to gamers who want to play it but not necessarily willing to pay full price.

What works for Microsoft doesn't necessarily have to work for Sony and vice-versa. I'm glad we have some variety. Personally, I don't want 2 consoles who are doing the exact same thing.

Crows90181d ago

Price cuts do the same thing your describing. Subscriptions aren't bringing anything new to the table.

Crows90181d ago

It's not that smart. In fact...it's not smart at all. A dumbass could figure that out. If you give a game for free or for peanuts...why would anyone pay a lot for it instead?

It's like if you had the whopper menu at 7.99 and then the whopper menu at 1.99
Same damn whopper! What item you think most will choose?

The only ones that will choose 7.99 option are those oblivious to the 1.99 option.

Hedstrom181d ago (Edited 181d ago )

Yea! And to make more money if you are selling the 1.99 whooper you will have to lower the quality and make the ingredients as cheap as possible and take away the sallad and cheese. But you could pay extra to get that.

proudly_X182d ago

Clank was profitable after all

DarkZane182d ago

Would have been a lot worst if it was on PS Plus day one.

FIELDMARSHALL_P181d ago

How much does Sony or Xbox pay the devolpers to put the games on the services? Do they take that into account for profit, I don't know just asking. If we pay for online giving out some games is cool either platform. The companies must think it helps in some sort of capacity for accepting the deal I would think.

purple101182d ago

Oh dam
I even commented on someone who said it wasn’t.

Load of hallabaloo on the site indeed

REDGUM182d ago

To add to you're point, this is what I don't understand about the MS subscription service. If you're getting all the day one released games for next to nothing by using thier service how on earth are the developers supposed to make enough money back to create their next game/s?
Myself, and I might be of the few, but I prefer to purchase a game from a store or digital store at the recommended price, or wait for a discount if not completely sold on what I've seen of a game so far and get what I paid for than pay monthly, yearly etc subscription & get everything while the games themselves become less in all aspects due to less funds/resources. (Not sure if I've explained that properly or not)
If every company goes down the subscription based path in the future I see gaming overall dying to some degree for the non diehards I mean. Putting up older games etc that are inc in the service fees I agree with but not day one releases. Again, just an opinion.

Hedstrom181d ago

@REDGUM
You lower the quality of the games to make the process of making them as cheap as possible. You make them like f2p games with season passes and microtransactions. And over time you will make subscription more and more expensive.

BlackCountryBob182d ago

Also really interesting to see through to one of the sites they link to (Resetera) that the 2 cross gen titles in Miles Morales and Ghosts of Tsushima sold over 40% each of their first year in year 2, almost double what even the best performing games like GOW 2018 and Spider-Man did. Kinda seeing the cold hard numbers makes it really clear why they did cross gen games and remastered some of the later PS4 games to PS5 Directors Cuts.

Glemt182d ago

"“In year 1, Horizon Zero Dawn and Horizon Forbidden West were very comparable,” the presentation reads. “HFW was included into PS Plus at the start of Year 2. HFW saw an enormous influx of PS Plus players, but at the cost of flat-lining the game activations from retail sales.”"

So, the data shows there were fewer traditional sales, but it doesn't show us anything about how many people joined PS+? It does say there was an influx of HFW players, but it doesn't state how many of these players owned PS+ to begin with.

To conclude that it negatively sales is correct, but it doesn't mean less money is made. We cannot draw that conclusion until we know how many more people joined PS+ because of HFW.

mkis007182d ago

Well each ps plus account is only good for what? $15 per month max if they go monthly? There are a lot of reasons why even if a million new signups happened loosing out on the $60 gamesales is a worse.

Glemt181d ago

I think that's a good assumption, but that's what I was referring to. It's an assumption. If someone comes with hard data, we need the complete picture. The way it sits now we might draw the right conclusions, but we've proven nothing.

Crows90181d ago

If sales flat lines and subscriptions don't equal the same as said purchasable game then no matter how you spin it...less money is made on that game per player

TheCaptainKuchiki182d ago

MS's bet is that although it lowers traditional sales, it makes the services more appealing and millions of new people will subscribe if they see that good games are added to the service. And in the end, the subscription profit (not revenue) will outpace that of the traditional sales.

However even after 6 years they still haven't reached that point lmao

Shane Kim182d ago

Sadly it's just Netflix of gaming. They saturate the service with garbage just to keep releases on a regular basis and to keep players hooked to the service. It won't be sustainable in the long run.

Reaper22_181d ago

There are some really good games on gamepass. That's the problem with you guys who only think one way. I'm playing Remnant 2, Dead space remake, Tomb Raider, Forza, Far cry 5, Gears Judgement, Mass Effect 3 and MLB The Show. Now please tell me which one of those are garbage?
You sound like a hater or is it you are jealous at the success of Mictosoft with gamepass.

Crows90181d ago

@reaper

Far cry 5 and mass effect 3...also gears judgment was horrible

DEEHULK88178d ago

Netflix is the ONLY streaming service that is making a profit right now. In fact others are back to licensing their content to Netflix because that's a great revenue stream for them.

Crows90181d ago

Except that works for MS because most of their games barely break 1 million in sales ... They know this and try to throw shade and brag about how great subscriptions are because they were already not making much money at all.

Reaper22_181d ago

Nah, that's not true. Their games do sell. Games are getting more expensive to make and sometimes selling millions still don't make up for losses. Services like gamepass can be good for developers and the publishers. Games do sell on gamepass.

Crows90181d ago (Edited 181d ago )

@reaper

Nope. It is true. Just look at estimated sales for lots of their games across the board. Except for major titles like GTA most games barely sell on Xbox. At least back when physical was the majority...now with mostly digital maybe it has changed but their audience hasn't gotten bigger.

A few outliers but the majority barely sold.

DEEHULK88178d ago

If they didn't put their games on PC and Gamepass day 1 their games would be on the charts like the 360 days, but they don't want to do that and that's okay.

Show all comments (44)