Columnist Phil Doherty of Nukezilla takes a look at some of the assumptions that may have led EA to adopting their recent practice of adding vouchers with sales of new games that will only allow the bearer to access online play.
Today EA hosted its Investors Day, and Chief Executive Officer Andrew Wilson talked about the company's dedication to generative AI.
He's so excited to layoff more employees for FAKE STUPIDITY computer programing to replace them.
Hopefully EA takes a nosedive just like Ubisoft is currently doing. Lack of money is the only thing that can hurt them and possibly change them.
Of course it is. EA has been lazy for years. Profiting for investors and themselves without putting in the work. Having AI write code or build graphics for them just makes them even more lazy.
I'd laugh if those same investors built "executive code" and got rid of EA's CEO and board of directors and replaced them with AI.
Today Electronic Arts hosted its Investors Day and its executives shared what's next for the Battlefield franchise.
ohh god, here we go!
This is exactly why the gaming industry is failing. It's now an industry of suits "trying to find the fun".
...I'll help you out a little, If you're trying to find it, then it's not fun and neither are you. move on!
Honestly, get them to sit down and play Bad Company 2 together.
If they can't see why that had the magic, they shouldn't be game developers.
The CEO of EA has iterated his massive ambitions about the next Battlefield entry in the new Q1 2025 financial results.
It ain't Bad Company 3 ... so stop false-promising ... but make it current-gen only plz ... it'll be 2025 ffs
More intentionally released broken games with micro-trash-actions, and of course fake apologies written by ChatGPT instead of doing it yourself because you don't give a crap if you sell people garbage for their hard earned money.
Ass.
Isn't that the whole point of having a "series" of games? Isn't the follow-up supposed to be inherently better or "more ambitious" than the previous entries? Unfortunately, this has not been the case for Battlefield in quite some time. I've still never even redeemed the free BF 2042 code I got a year and a half ago lol. Such a shame, used to be one of my favorite shooters back in the day.
An interesting point about how games companies will make more money from shafting gamers, sadly.
They already hiked prices; and now want to rip us for trying to save money?
I hope none of you support companies that do this in the future; otherwise it tells them that they can rip our balls off at any point and we'll still keep buying them.
I look at it this way if I sell a game say like fifa 9 then put that money toward fifa 10 do they lose money?....most gamers sell there games when they complete it then use the money for new release games.... its a balance the money still ends up in there pockets... I think its a bad move and will make some gamers think twise in buying ea games.....who trade there games like I mentioned
This is worrying because whereas you can't fight piracy, (DRM essentially doesn't work, people will always find ways through it) you can very easily use these measures to prevent pre-owned sales. Especially if stores are with them.
I think this is awesome. I love the people who buy the game new. 60 may be a lot for certain games, which is why you don't buy every game. Online adds replay value to any game, thus buying new shouldn't be an issue. Buy the single player games with no online used.
plus it just seems like everyone is cheap. 60 bucks isn't that much money, and yeah it may be a lot more to some than others, but if you can't afford it you can't afford it. Why does everyone have this sense of entitlement like you deserve things for free or like it's your right to play any game you want.
wake up. This is the real world. If you can't afford something you go without it. Not everyone can have iphones and mac books and bmw's and a summer home in miami. Same is true for video games...not everyone can afford to play.