Zipper Interactive has its latest SCEA-published shooter out the door, but there's still more work to be done. So, while 256-player battles are a major feat, there were too many FPS fundamentals cut out for the developer to rest on its laurels. Here are the top ten things Gaming Target would like to see in DLC or a MAG 2, even if that means waiting until an eventual PS4.
Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?
Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).
This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.
3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.
I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.
MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.
Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.
@Teflon
That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter
It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again
I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.
I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.
Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.
This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.
Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.
From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.
I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.
PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.
Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.
Amazing game, ahead of its time. It just launched when pretty much most people were playing COD on a 360. Back in the day where everyone was convinced was a better console than a PS3, mental.
Personally i only played as RAVEN, as i thought they had the best looking kit/characters that i would more on screen.
I used to love the sirens in that game.
Well MAG focused on highest player count but games like battlefield bad company 2 and cod an Halo 3 focused on having great gameplay which is why Mag was never able to compete with those games.
Those games are remembered as legendary while mag is not even in the discussion of great games from last gen.
Quality over quantity every damn time.
MAG wasn't able to compete with those games (in sales) because Sony had no clue how to market first-party exclusives during much of the PS3 era (indeed, they still haven't figured out how to market a multiplayer FPS). Much of what should have been the target audience have probably still never heard of it.
I do agree with the quality over quantity sentiment, in the sense that just because the casual COD/Madden/GTA crowd never knew about it and doesn't look back on it fondly, doesn't mean that the more aware people can't look back and recognize that MAG was far superior in quality to many games that sold far more copies.
Mag had far better gameplay, and offered a way for people who weren't great shooter players to still feel like they mattered. I remember having so many teammates that couldn't get a positive K/D to save their lives who would just follow us around with med kits and repair kits and keep us alive.
The community was the best I've ever seen. Everyone wanted to be in clans and group up and chat and work as a team. Lone gunners didn't get far in MAG. I was a part of so many fun clans on all 3 factions. Great people, and even the 13yo's were less abrasive than other games because the game just naturally flowed towards teamwork being the best way to experience it.
MAG was hopelessly flawed with unbalanced maps and a general favoritism towards the Sver faction. Anyone who doesn't mention that simple and undeniable fact either never played MAG, or they were playing Sver.
It was also a total illusion and never had all the players it claimed in any one match. It was just a bunch of relatively normal player count matches that either won or lost and advanced like a tournament ladder with the numbers of wins and losses going towards or against your chosen faction's score in the "Shadow War". There was never a time or game where you could have run around and seen even a quarter of the claimed "256 players". These are the facts and are easily researched from articles and reveiws of the time period. I simply do not understand the memories of experiences some of these people are claiming to have as most are completely impossible in this game.
@elwenil
The Sver being OP was not near as big a thing as people made it out. Their guns were slightly better, but that was where it ended. If they ever made a new game I'm pretty sure they would just make all the weapons identical between the factions.
As for never being a full game. I spent 1700hrs in MAG between about a dozen accounts on all factions, and in many of the biggest clans Including one of my favorite, Pink Fluffy Bunnies on Raven. You could drive to other areas, even though most weren't organized enough for that tactic, but I remember many games where we would take that mobile respawn vehicle to the other end of the map and help teammates that were getting their butts handed to them. Best game ever made.
Unfortunately it'll never happen, the studio's been shut down and the sales were poor giving Sony no reason to explore that ip again
I remember some good matches in MAG it surprisingly worked and was a great game. Next gen will have the grunt to run it very well would make a brilliant online only multiplayer game.
SVer
I don't understand how this game didn't catch on. I feel like it should have been huge, and wonder what it might have become it Zipper didn't go under.
The game needed a stronger marketing push and would have benefitted greatly from being offered as a PS+ game.
The game relied on numbers of players due to the high player count and it was frustrating to join a game and wait 5 mins for it to fill up enough
Fantastic game though once you got the numbers and people worked as a team
@ shaggy
I think it was actually much more kind to new players. I was in the beta and already had a clan before the game launched, and the clan I was in as well as most other clans were very open to picking up newbies and showing them the best way. I can remember PRO being best at that, every match that they had the general position (forget what it was called, but the guy who could talk to everyone on the team) would do a little advertisement for their clan and tell anyone who wanted an invite to message them.
We would give pointers on how to get XP by getting the healing and reviving skills and tell them just keep spraying it at teammates. Some never progressed at shooting but still found fun being medics.
This game is amazing and a sad loss team mates actually meant something in this game and I still have a nightmare about them bunkers
This game definitely doesn't need a sequel. One of two reasons why Zipper was closed down this game and Soflop 5.
Keep the down votes coming. I had MAG and it was a campfest and I hated those S.V.E.R p#####.
IT was easy mode on every S.V.E.R map.
Then you didn’t play it enough, each faction was able to defend any map! SVer seemed easy because of communication! Valor and Raven barely had any.
Its main selling point is no longer a selling point games like cod have ground war and battlefield have similar modes where a large number of players can battle on a single map but it should be acknowledged how far ahead of its time this was however it doesn't need a sequel
I've stated at least a couple of times that this game was ahead of it's time. The features of this game set it a part from other shooters. The leadership structure and the special abilities set aside for them made having higher ranks more rewarding (as long as you knew how to strategically deploy those resources). Capping points meant something (radar sites keeping air defenses intact, Comms centers opening up squad/company leader options, etc). Multiple platoons spawning at different parts of the map closing in and taking over opponents base. High player count of course. Framerates were crap, character models were ok. Upcoming new gen hardware would make this IP sing!
MAG might be the last game that got me extremely excited while I waited for it to release.
I loved MAG love to see it return you had to play as a true team too win good old days . Sone of the large battles were just insane so much fun
MAG was supposed to be it! Fans cried for SOCOM, Zipper dropped support of MAG and it cost them. Only if they would’ve put SOCOM on the title with, it could have caught on
I took MAG out for a couple spins. It was interesting and I did appreciate the tech aspect of it, but I was all about the Warhawk that gen.
If you could play Warhawk with bots like the PS2-era Battlefront games (as in full multiplayer style matches, not a dumbed down mode), I don't think I ever would have stopped playing.
If you played mag you know this was an amazing game. I was probably easily top 5 players in the game with a game in dom attacking svers map lone gunning assault going 105/22 while being the reason they lost. On that note fuck the bunnies,the flock,svers all together and no one cared about valor.
Lol, To be even top 100 you would have to be able to get those numbers in sabotage, let alone top 5.
I was nowhere near top 5 but I'd say towards the end I was at least top 500 and managed a 150kill game once and a 100kill game in sabotage once. Also I was a bunny :D as well as many other clans including
SVER/ W@R, BHD, PRO, 3C (after their best players started to leave but still) and ~^~ (pink fluffy bunnies) on Raven. Was in a few Valor clans but like you said no one cared about them and I seldom stayed on Valor long except helping others get to max level.
Only way you hit 100 in sabotage is if you were cheating. It was a 15 min game type and Noone getting red lined that hard would stay. Then again most of the bunnies were trash so I don't believe you an I was in the game from the first demo to even sabotage barely getting players.
Cheating, or being that good. As I said I only managed it once but I saw a lot of 3C guys do it on a regular basis and I always considered them the best of the best in the game. As far as barely getting players. I never had a problem, the only problem I had was getting players TOGETHER. They only allowed for a group of like 8 or something and we found some workaround eventually where everyone had to get an invite before anyone joined, but it was a pain in the butt because you had to verbally say if you were there or not because people wouldn't be on the list.
As for proving my skill, tried finding myself in youtube videos but couldn't find any from the 10 or so I skimmed. I had 2 pictures of end of match screens and I put one as my profile pic of me going 37 and 0, but sadly the leaderboard that actually ranked everyone has long since gone down, I forget the guys name who made it, something like tic2000 or something similar. But back then I had gotten an account to a 3.5kd under the name Scrubn_BUBBLS
This plus Warhawk or socom. Sony has a pretty good share of military shooters and they let them slip.
Sony could literally remake these games using new engines and give it to Blue Point. Make a M.A.G. (Military Action Game) Collection of Socom, MAG, and Warhawk.
It's insane to think that Sony was just clueless as to what they had with Socom. If they had been more forward-thinking with cultivating a first party brand (like they ultimately did later in the PS3 era), Socom could still be one of the major multiplayer titles today.
Valor ftw I really liked this game. They need to remaster it on ps5 first then a mag 2. I still remember this trailer was great.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Man I used to sit at work watching this over and over, waiting to get off to play MAG! Greatest war atmosphere ever made in a game! SVER hockey masks and duct taped gun!!! Unmatched Game
I enjoyed Mag ,Resistance , Warhawk and Killzone 2 i got ylod the week Grand Turismo came out , those games were great i would play any again but with the singleplayer focus this gen i did not get a Playstation as i have a big pile of shame on pc and xbox. I was truly impressed with the bottleneck death in Resistance and the scale of Mag its a true shame these games were shutdown .
Dude I still have a giant MAG advertisement poster on my wall in my house.. I loved this game and I'm not a console fan at all I play on PC but this game was just fantastic.. I miss it so much.
Finally someone talks about this game. I absolutely loved that game. Spent over 2000 hours on it
I don't care what nobody says. Mag was an awful game. The sound and graphics were way short of where every other shooter was at that time.
MAG was garbage. i was super excited when i heard about it. i played the beta through ps+, and that was pretty much enough for me. i did rent it once awhile after it released ,but that only made me dislike it more.
Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."
I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.
Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.
How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.
Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."
Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.
Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.
And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.
Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.
I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.
It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.
It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.
that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.
Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....
I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...
"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"
HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.
I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.
'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.
It was released years later.
Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?
"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"
Yes, Planetside 1.
MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.
Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently
Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane
Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.
The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.
Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.
It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...
We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.
I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....
Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.
What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.
The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P
Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?
If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?
Ohh i did play it, i WISH Sony kept making massive multiplayer games like this, Resistance 1 & 2, and warhawk
PS3 had the best multiplayer games in that generation. Even though the psn wasn't up to par with live at that time. But psn was free then.
Only someone who didn't play Halo and Gears of war would say that. I've always had Sony and Microsoft consoles and there's nothing that topped those 2 on ps3 in the multiplayer space, just like how PS dominates in single player. I'm sure I'll get stormed with baseless disagrees from people who never owned an Xbox.
SVER 4 LYFE. One of my favorite moments was when they made all the maps neutral and suddenly all the excuses about SVER being OP disappeared and I played on all three factions.
Sver was op because they used their mics. Raven and Valor caught on at the end. That was the difference. I played on all 3 factions at the same time.
Ahead of its time for real for real, that was one of the first adaptations of battle royale and it was not intended to technically be that way....it was a really fun game.
Man, I've had one of the best Co-operation experiences ever in a online game with randoms. We got 16 or maybe it was 32 guys to all surround a objective because the other teams were waiting on us to finish so they could continue and they started coming over. But we weren't in sync so one fo the guys who can talk to multiple squads came on and said we needed to hold back and do a sync attack. Told everone lay down at the top of a hill from my squad, and everyone else had specific spots too. Think about 16 of us were laying up top watching the other teams guys while they were holding down the objective. Dude was like on 3. Everyone spam all throwables then wait til he says now than everyone push and kill, don't worry about the objective until they're wiped.
Everyone actually listened and the attack was flawless. No one on out side dropped in the rush lol. To this day I loved that experience and it's one of my favourite shooter experiences lol. Such a underrated game. I would be on that if they made a new one. Just don't force new players to play the 52 or whatever player matches first. The matches last too long to force them for so long
I LOVED commanding and the fact that you had to give orders and come up with a strategy to 50+ people, commanding air-strikes, etc. all while having boots on the ground and being in the fight yourself. Nothing has ever compared to it.
One of my fav shooters, Valor ftw. I remember in the beginning, I was sniping with the M60 machine gun getting headshots across the map lol. If any game gets remastered it should be this.
Fantastic game. Communication was always good in this game, since you could actually have your squad leader working with other squad leaders to accomplish tasks. Commanders dishing out new orders as needed. Remake would be sweet.
MAG will always hold a special place in my heart for a game that I loved. Met some amazing friends on Valor that im still friends with to this day. Played it when I was going through a rough patch in College and it helped keep me sane.
The community in the later months after all the stupid casuals left was awesome(was after the LMG and hipfire nerf, 1.03 or 1.05 patch i believe?) What remained was a hardcore fan base who loved the game and mostly loved the teamwork.. Also the trash talking towards SVER and Raven clans was so much fun. Nowadays all MAG fans get along so well, but back then.. if they weren't part of your PMC then it was all trash talk between us. It was all fun trash talk though, I never remember anyone actually personally attacking someone on a deep personal level.
I loved the way they did PMCs to split the community. And the way they designed the communities made it so certain personalities would choose one PMC over the others, so the people you met would most likely be like you.
Valor naturally attracted a lot of Americans and those from North America, military vets, hillbillies, oh and many Texans for some reason xD
SVER naturally attracted Russians and others from Asia, kids who were rebellious/anarchist in nature, fans of the AK guns
Raven naturally attracted a lot of Europeans, I remember tons of French and German clans, those who loved future tech, also not sure why but I remember they had unusual high number of squeaker kids than the other two
I wasn’t a fan of it. It didn’t play very well and the graphics are terrible. Good concept but the PS3 couldn’t do the game justice. I’m not opposed to a new Mag however.
One thing I wish it had was faster respawns. I hate modes that benefit campers. One of the reasons I hate the one life gimmick of battle royale. I like to stay in the action, snipers be damned. That being said, the 256 player count would appeal to the BR crowd.
I felt like it was unfocused and too easy to lose without feeling like you made an impact. Killzone 2, on the other hand, was one of my favorite multiplayer experiences.
MAG sucked that is why no one played it. I owned a PS3 and actually bought that turd of a game. It sucked.
I was a beast in this game,use to slip behind enemy lines blow up the AA gun,next thing you know we HALO jumping into The battle.
I recall being super hyped for this game and upon playing it being disappointed. Not initially, but it did get old after a while. There were better shooters even back in 2009.
Well I played it; and no, it wasn't very good. Perhaps it seemed good if you had limited exposure to online FPS games prior to its release (which perhaps was the case with many PS only gamers at the time), but the shooting was very bland and there seemed to be balance issues with regards factions at the start. There were better shooters before it and many more after it, I'm afraid.
MAG was an awesome game that was killed by the industry and it's competitors …
COD is no where near the level MAG was when released, I loved that game …
Plus it had huge player numbers, quick respawn times … it was just GREAT, plain and simple
Awesome game. I played the heck out of it. I remember subscribing to Qore to get the beta.
Holy crap that's right! hahaha RIP MAG, RIP Qore. I forgot why I even had Qore in the first place! lol The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as I could and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P
I mean... I played it, and it wasn't very good. Neat ideas in there, but ultimately felt half baked.
Defentily my favourite online game of the ps3 gen. Shutting down zipper interactive was a bad move, what they could have done with mag on ps4 would of been awsome. How well at least we have pub g and fornight 🤮
I had this game along with the expansions.. To me it was boring unfortunately. I'm not big on MP anyways.
I'm actually very happy to see this being talked about. Totally ahead of its time and likely never to be again duplicated with a totally unique incentive to keep playing, yup, promotion and ranking up with a purpose that requires some serious communication to succeed. Playing this game and then watching people play Gears of War or Call of Duty on Xbox Live really showed me the difference in online communities and how awful an online experience Xbox Live was. Xbox Live was annoying trashtalk in the Xbox community but MAG showed me the PS community were instead about working with you to help get better at the game, like hanging out with the cool kids in school but Live was like the annoying kids trying to pick on you. And yes, MAG gamers used a headset, contrary to popular belief because if you wanted to get good, and win, you had to communicate well with your squadmates and hope your platoon leaders knew what they weredoing and calling the right shots. Ah Zipper, to bad you and Evolution were shut down...
It was hard to own a PS3 and not hear about this game. It was plastered all over the PS Store for well over a year, and often came up on the front page of the store. Sony had it on their blog, and I got emails about it sometimes.
It had a pretty decent player base as I recall, but I never played it that much. Just not into MP games, but those who played it seemed to really like it. I had fun with it when I did play it, but it ultimately didn't suit my tastes in gaming.
There is a reason it was not revisited with a sequel... it really was not a good game.
Did you actually play it (for any decent length of time) or are you just trolling here. It had it's issues like any game but it was fantastic and a unique console FPS for it's time
No it wasn't. I played it for long enough to know that it was hardly what it was advertised as and played like crap compared to other shooters in the time.
I just thought about this game a few weeks ago, wondering if there will ever be a sequel with Sony’s improved Online experience with PS5.
I played it and definitely would not consider it the greatest first person shooter
Have to agree here too but the team mechanics made up for the other aspects and it was certainly better than COD's annual rehash
The game was way ahead for its time. It was a huge death match I remember some good times on it. Team Severn
this was an incredibly fun shooter. it took a while before it clicked with me. What remained was an expensive drink coaster..
I played the heck out of MAG, one of the best games of that generation. If Sony made a MAG 2 for PS5 it would be EPIC. I had an INSANE amount of playtime in the original and I was very, very sad when it was shut down. MAG was awesome and no one can tell me otherwise. You cannot beat the feeling of parachuting down into enemy territory and taking out an entire squad to take their post while 4 other squads are rushing at you to take it back. Looking at your radar and bravely facing 20-40 enemies only to take them ALL out is a feeling unmatched in any game so far. Sony should also buy the BLACK franchise and make BLACK 2. Sony should also make WARHAWK 2 as well. Sony should also make a KILLZONE COLLECTION kind of like Master Chief Collection with all the multiplayers brought back in HD.
"Greatest" and Mag do not belong in the same sentence lol. the game was below average at best. most of the time it was just a chaotic unbalanced mess.
Sony should have remastered this. Along with Warcraft from the PS3 era. Heck there are so many remasters they should have done. For whatever reason they decided not to. Shame.
This was one of those games where even though my PS3 owning friends didn't have it...Myself owning an Xbox 360 and not having the money for a PS3....made me very jealous
MAG 2 wont come out unless they are going to add in even more players.
I think this would make nice DLC:
-An all out war between all 3 PMCs. It would be interesting to see if PMCs would ever double team one group.
I would love to see that happen, BC2 is doing it in a way too.
I want this game to add a bunch of weapons and items.but to unlock these weapons you got to spend your exp.and imagine a zombie mode 10 dudes start out as zombies no weapons instead of the knife you jump forward and bite.every one bit turns and you only get 1 life.
This comment make me think those guys didnt play MAG for more than one hour.
"Really, Zipper, anything that gets MAG away from the “simply protect or defend this objective” would be greatly appreciated."
hahahahahahaha. Above comment is hilarious.
I reckon however, I was expecting a stronger backstory and more persistent elements. More maps are always expected, nothing to write home.
lol a Snow Map and already know how it would look.Zipper make this happen Valor and S.V.E.R. will get their ass kicked even more but on my map lmao.
MAG 2 will probably come in late 2011.And I hope they keep tha 256 players no need for more players.Add SP,better graphics,new modes,more weapons I would really like to use tha xm8 on Raven.
Join as a Noob
Leave as a Soldier
or
Join as a Noob
Leave as a Owned Noob
u pick............