230°
10.0

MAG Review - PlayStation LifeStyle

PSLS Key points:

An incredibly "massive" experience, highly rewarding and tactical.

Less then spectacular graphics with immersive audio.

Can be very frustrating when your team is unorganized.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
tatotiburon5352d ago

wow nice re...oh sorry didn't see the source

Maddens Raiders5352d ago

starts with comment #1 and ends with comment #1.1

now explain why you two are interested in MAG again...?

/fixed/

sikbeta5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

Both ([tatotiburon and kewlkat007, what a cute couple)] of you know that ME2 is out right?

Go and play that game instead of focus so much on games you [IRONICALLY] Don't care, or is that both download the game from a Bitorrent Service, play like 10 hours, get bored and come here to comment on PS3 articles

On-Topic

IT'S TOO SOON FOR A REVIEW, don't care what anyone is going to say, MAG needs to be Reviewed after unlock Domination and when that Factions get used to work and cooperate

raztad5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

LOL@tatotiburon

Guy posts in every mag review, he seems like forced to put down the game. Why is that tato?

I would take a -1 out of MAG score just because it has not SP campaign, but overall out of raw innovation, technical achievements and massive fun, MAG deserves a 9.

Jinxstar5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

I was just mentioning in another article how funny it is that bungie and ubiquitos seem to have disappeared and now tato is back and posting first in everything just like the other 2 do all the time. I wonder if when his bubs get low we might get to see bungie again? With a bunch of fresh bubs of course. Very strange that... Seems to happen a lot... Oh well.

OmarJA-N4G5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

Might get this game tomorrow. :)

Edit:

LMAO! at the disagrees, OK I'm getting this game today.

Maddens Raiders5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

that's because moneybuyseverything, we won, ubiquitous, Green Ring of Life, green, etc are currently on the way to permaban status due to account abuse and breaking the ToS. This is a FACT.

Keep an <eagle eye> out for others who may fit this profile and also look for immediate disagrees to your comments combined with simultaneous logins of "suspected" offenders so that we can help bring these offenders to justice and clean up some of the nonsense here on N4G.

When things seem out of the ordinary or highly unusual (like the incredible uptick in 360-centric accounts latley) - they usually are. Thanks.

edit 1/: notice how everyone in this thread immediately recv'd a disagree & all of a sudden my comment #1.3 had no disagrees but now has 3; however tato's and kewlkat's remained the same?
Folks this is someone/somepeople abusing the system right in our faces. It's time to put and end to it with a little thoughtful and productive housekeeping.

pimpmaster5352d ago

ROFL i saw the title and said, well these guys obviously are gonna give it a high score.. clicked and what do ya know a 5/5. i played the beta and this game is nowhere near a 5/5. on top of that you take into concideration this has no SP and no coop mode yet is still 60$. yea this game is defenetly top tier.;)

darthv725352d ago

since this is sev's site it only makes sense he would give it a perfect score. Now what does his xboxlifestyle.net site think of ME2? I am going to guess....

darx5352d ago

How long are the matches once in a 256 player match?

Bubbles_Kitty_Cat5352d ago

LMAO @ that score.

All credibility is officially lost. lol

Aquanox5352d ago

A perfect score from a perfectly biased site.

baum5352d ago

We were all waiting to read your opinion on MAG. /s

Silly gameAr5352d ago

What do you guys care about what kind of ratings MAG gets? You don't have a PS3, you're not looking to buy the game, so what the hell is your problem?

NaiNaiNai5352d ago

for all those people saying M.A.G is a AAA title.

last I checked you all said Fable II wasn't AAA, because it wasn't above a 90

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

m.a.g isn't even a close with its pathetic 77 average.

badz1495352d ago

NaiNaiNai! and the 1st thing to do is troll a PS3 game section!

tatotiburon, kitty, aquanox etc...what makes you think your opinion is more correct than other's? you guys don't even played the game for god sake, so stop spitting CRAP! it stinks!

@pimpmaster
this is the review for the full game, not the beta you played! if you haven't played the full game, you don't have the rights to justify any score for the game, period!

Tinted Eyes5352d ago

Lol sad 360 fans so interested in MAG

-Alpha5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

Despite the fact that they would criticize reviews that scored the game a 7/10.

But oh no, Playstation LifeStyle is definitely not biased like all those other sites.

But now that it gets a perfect score nobody cares about the integrity of the review. Funny.

kewlkat0075352d ago

Why would there be, that's how it goes on here. Hold the perfect ones and praised sites close to their hearts and sh!t on everything else.

PoSTedUP5352d ago

it's because they are too busy replying to the 360 fans on here talking s***.

but also, a game can't get mixed reviews? if there is one low score, they all have to be low to be credible? what is this world comming to? i laugh at the people who think like that... soooo simple minded.

-Alpha5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

Who is talking S***? Hope your not implying me. And no, that's not the reason why. Do you honestly not find it suspicious or even question a PS site giving a perfect score to a PS game? Yet, when any other reviewer gives it a lower score, people are quick to assume biases and faults?

I didn't say that a game can't get mixed reviews, but a ton of fanboys on here disagree. When they see a mixed review they bash it. They pick out the reviewers faults, blame the reviewer for playing it wrong and even accuse them of not understanding the game. Then they throw around juvenile insults like they are COD fans and even try deluding themselves. For example, Eurogamer gave it a 7/10 and at least one person said to bump the mark up two marks because it's Eurogamer.

And no, I didn't say that they all have to be low, but surely there is something wrong with the community when they can't accept the fact that somebody didn't like the game as much they did. People tore apart the mixed reviews and acted like they were worthless but they have no problem with reviews that agree with their perspective.

Dev8 ing5352d ago

Pimpmaster Mass effect 2 has no multiplayer nor co-op. What score should it get? It also is severly lacking on the replayability side of things when you compare it to other RPGs (eg Demon's Souls ~50hrs ME 2 <30 hrs).

PoSTedUP5351d ago

nothing i said was said to you directly (except the 360 fans talking s***) and i wasen't implying it to you. everything else was to the whole colume in general. it may be a coinicedence because i just seen PS3King.com web site give it an 8/10. isn't it possible for a ps3 site to think it's a great game without calling biased? and maybe an non-ps3 site to really like it also? and look another PS3 web site said it was avrage. so its called mixed reviews. the gamers agree it is a great game, so what is the problem what a site gives it as a review score with saying its not credible, who is anyone to critisze an opinion. it really makes no sense to anyone with logic.

but yeah, i only see ps3 fans talking down on bad reviews, but i also see ps3 fans agreeing with some avrage reviews, so it is all an opinion no matter what preference. i myselfe said it wasn't a AAA game maybe a good A.

+ Show (20) more repliesLast reply 5351d ago
user94220775352d ago

awesome review, a score it deserves. Can't wait for it to come out in the UK tomorrow.

40cal5352d ago

I know, I have some people on my friends list that stay over the pond, all freaking out because they have had to watch me play MAG for the past two days.

I don't think its a 10/10 kind of game though, so don't get your hopes to high. As it stands and I am only level 18, I would hit the score around a 8.7-9.4 depending on what you value as a gamer.

@ EVERYONE
The game is great, so we can all stop wasting our time arguing about it. If you like first person shooters or teamwork, or both, you really should play MAG. Hard game to review, Awesome game to play.

Pennywise5352d ago

MAG is not perfect, but it is pure fun!

D4RkNIKON5352d ago

I had a huge rant yesterday on how I didn't like MAG at all, well it is because I was only at lvl 6 and haven't gotten into a real 256 player match yet.

Now that I have reached lvl 8 (on 11 now), and have played quite a few 256 player matches, I can safely say that this game is amazing. It is so awesome being part of a huge war and working together with your squad is great. Using your mics to work together "Repair that door", "I need a medic", "They are coming in from the left" and so on. Every one with a mic that I have ran into does like to utilize it for teamwork. And best of all I haven't ran into a single immature little twat that XBL is known for ;)

Pennywise5352d ago

Nice. I read your rant and just thought you needed more time with it. I liked it from level 1, but it really does grow on you.

sikbeta5352d ago

@D4RkNIKON

That's exactly what I'm saying, the game need to be Played and Played WELL, after unlock Domination, your team Progress, your skills grow, that's the REAL way to enjoy the game and obviously to Review IT

Dev8 ing5352d ago

Nothing else plays like this. They all pretend to be about war and then you get lame skirmishes. This is all out war. It's intense and only possible with large amounts of players.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5352d ago
Karlnag35352d ago

it really is... but it certainly is NOT perfect.

Sev5352d ago

There is no such thing as a perfect score. It's impossible for a game to be perfect.

Jinxstar5352d ago

You can get 100% on a test. Doesn't make you perfect does it?

Karlnag35352d ago

No it doesn't make you perfect. It means you did that test perfectly.

And you're right, a game cannot be perfect because otherwise everybody would like it and there would be no minor annoyances. Every game has something slightly annoying and there will always be someone that dislikes a game. For example a shooter fan will probably dislike Final Fantasy games, unless they also like RPGs.

Jinxstar5352d ago (Edited 5352d ago )

"And you're right, a game cannot be perfect because otherwise everybody would like it and there would be no minor annoyances. Every game has something slightly annoying and there will always be someone that dislikes a game. For example a shooter fan will probably dislike Final Fantasy games, unless they also like RPGs."

The thing is the grader/Teacher in this case is the reviewer. Not "everyone" just the persons opinion. They give this student(MAG) 100% because to this teacher this is a perfect test grade... Sure the teacher may have had a few issues reading the students hand writing or think they were long winded a little but overall they deserve the A+. Another teacher would have looked at the handwriting and simply given it a C due to all the time that they wasted on this one person... It's all in you the grader to decide. This is just what different graders give... They really enjoy the topic of the essay or look at it from a different perspective and grade accordingly...

Your right nothing is ever "Perfect" but without something perfect to measure against there is no reason this game can't be perfect for an individual. There is no standard for "An FPS must have A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H in order to be perfect" It's all in the eye of the beholder my friend. To this reviewer the game is top notch A+ Material. Not everyone agrees and thats the joy of art and humanity.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5352d ago
callahan095352d ago

I agree that it's worth 5 out of 5. Everybody who's ever liked playing a shooter online should get this game, I truly believe that. It's in a league of it's own. So epic.

Show all comments (96)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1702d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1702d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1702d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1702d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691702d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1702d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1701d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31701d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1701d ago
Muzikguy1702d ago (Edited 1702d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021702d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1702d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021702d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1702d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1702d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1702d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1702d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1701d ago Replies(1)
1700d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1700d ago
PrinceOfAnger1702d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1702d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1702d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241702d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1701d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1702d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1827d ago (Edited 1827d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1827d ago
TheGamez1001827d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1827d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091827d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1827d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1827d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1827d ago
moomoo3191827d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1826d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1946d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1946d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571945d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1945d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721945d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001946d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1946d ago (Edited 1946d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1946d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1946d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1946d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1945d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1945d ago
Profchaos1944d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1946d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1945d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1945d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1944d ago (Edited 1944d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1944d ago (Edited 1944d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)