1060°

God Of War III 'only possible on PS3'

CVG: Sony claims gorgeous-looking title could not have been developed for any other system

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
ssipmraw5224d ago

haha halo fans were probably hoping to see his face in halo 3 all to no end

5224d ago
Sir Ken_Kutaragi5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

ONLY ON...AND ONLY POSSIBLE ON THE...
.____........___...____
.____||......||.......____||
||.........___||.......____|| 'Triple'A'Station 3' ;)

+ I played the Demos of - 'Dante's Inferno' + 'Bayonetta' + 'God Of War 3'
And 'God Of War 3' Looks 100% better than the other 2 games!!! ;-P
+ The 'God Of War 3' demo is a old demo from 'E3 2009'!!! ;-D
(i.e it will look even better in 2010 when it comes out)

Trebius5224d ago

They're all in here trying to downplay a game they'll never get to play :)

PS3 owners RENT Bayonetta, RENT Dante's Inferno, but PURCHASE GoW3, cause that's the Genre defining experience.

You fan betches can cry all you want it wont make GoW any less epic, and it wont make DI or Bayonetta any better. We all know Bayonetta and DI are good games, but they dont come close to the Story/Gameplay/Graphics of GoW3.

Keep crying fangirls.

YOU HAVE NO GAMES

So you spend time downplaying PS3 exclusives while waiting for a game to hit your systems.

Hahaha YOU HAVE NO GAMES little boys.

Convas5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Look at all these Whores, bubbling and agreeing with each other. Keep jerking each other off Fangirls. It's quite entertaining.

Open Zone: It only does Corporate Prostitutes.

xcox5224d ago

nice pictures guys
bubbles on da house!

Blu Ray35223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

If you hate the American company Microsoft,welcome to N4G and enjoy your stay lol.

Pirateogta5223d ago

Reading your posts is like listening to a crazy person yell "I'm not crazy. No, I'm NOT crazy!!!!" as they get hauled away in a straightjacket down an asylum hall.

You've never played GOW III, so you don't know if it will be better than Bayonetta. Well, at least you know it will be better than the PS3 version of Bayonetta, but that's not saying much. And Mass Effect 2 is just as much a genre-defining experience as GOW III, and that will never be on your precious PS3. Face it, 360 owners have just as many quality games as PS3 owners to play this year. Microsoft has a lot up their sleeve this year to make sure it is not a repeat of last year, which was rather lackluster if I may say so myself.

chrisulloa5223d ago

So this is what happens when you let PS3 fanboys roam free without any trolling. They are so full of themselves, I can't help but laugh.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5223d ago
The Meerkat5224d ago

Why can't Sony just play it cool for once?

They know it will be awesome, there is no need for the smack talk.

kaveti66165224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

3 things

Number One... Sony has a relatively small record of smack talk, especially considering Microsoft.

Number Two... Sony owns the IP, so yes, it could never have been made on another platform

Number Three... If Sony is referring to the visual fidelity of the game, then yeah, maybe Sony is right. But then again, maybe they're not. I wouldn't know. I'm not a mind reader, nor a hardware specialist.

morganfell5224d ago

^^^^Exactly. Sony doesn't have the equivalent of a Greenberg.

5224d ago
PirateThom5224d ago

Sony doesn't own the Haze IP.

Bungie5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

the point is that there's no proof

"only possible on PS3" ...where's the proof

the game is ps3 exclusive and will never come to 360

$ony just like to talk crap

anyway i can't wait for the game :)

5224d ago
rafaleon5224d ago

It was funny back in 2007 but now this gimmick is becoming more and more pathetic.

gaffyh5224d ago

Well until we see the game, I don't doubt them. Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 are clearly head and shoulders above anything that is available on the Xbox 360. The only people who would argue against that are people that don't have a PS3 and haven't played the games.

evrfighter5224d ago

I don't think anyone at M$ could top

"nex-gen doesn't start till we say it starts"

we won5224d ago

Is *kaveti6616* Talking about? Sony doesn't talk crap? LOL Sony is known to be the biggest sh*t talker ever. I guess on N4Gs the largely pro PS3 and people that favor Sony consoles live in a make believe world.

Sony has been saying games can only be done on PS3 since Lair. Hell before that when Sony reaches for the Sun while MSFT reaches for the Moon. 120fps. Every game in 1080p. 360 games will never match PS3 launch titles in its life. People will buy PS3with no games. People will work more jobs to get PS3. Multi player is laughable.

It's obvious Sony and fanboys know what is coming so they're trying to hype PS3 games now trying to set the tone again. It's not going to work this year too many games coming this year, that show PS3's capabilities are just what Multi platform games show and Sony's release window luck has run out.

Guido5224d ago

There is proof that games like GOWIII are only possible on the PS3. The proof is that in fewer years than the 360, the PS3 has managed to come up with games leading in graphics leaps and bounds over the 360. Even two years after launch, the PS3 had Uncharted, a game that blew all other console games away and yet we have never seen a game as pretty on the 360. In reality, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The PS3 has been around for a year less than the 360 and yet has games that are light years ahead of it in the graphics and IMHO game play departments. Graphics are undisputed and in simple terms there is no game on the 360 that compares to the exclusives available on the PS3.

Bungie5224d ago

@Guido

that's not a proof

that's an opinion

Lifendz5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Naughty Dog and Guerilla said the same and yet people still discount blu-ray and the PS3 hardware in general.

And the fact that someone needs to bring up Haze as an attempt to refute that statement is pathetic. Certain Devs are more talented than others. If your game is exclusive to the PS3, but your devs don't have the talent to exploit the system, then you can make that claim (it's only possible on PS3) but it won't mean much. Look what Epic does on 360. I think Gears is amazing. If Epic said that the game was only possible on 360 for whatever reason, then I'd take them at their word. Their the devs and I'm not.

Oh and Lair? I bet you never played Lair. Lair is effing gorgeous. And some people, me included, never had a problem with the controls.

Ju5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

It is proof and not opinion. If you come with technical details (like num polys, and some real numbers, crowd size, lightning, physics, what not) than the response usually is "but it doesn't matter, its art direction". If its clearly visibly it gets dissed as opinion. There is no doubt those are facts not just opinions. You can "come as often as you want", xguys, while some will just enjoy those games without argument.

And w/e. Why shouldn't Sony market their own strength. Are they not allowed to do that, but everybody else is or what ?

Let me quote the article (for the people commenting blindly):

"The dynamic lighting solution employed in GOW III is only feasible through the computing power provided by the Cell SPUs.

"For example, using the High Dynamic Range Lighting (HDRL) technology, the camera - when using Krato's sightline - will emulate the human retina, causing players to feel a sharp brightness when Kratos exits a dark area and enters a sunlit area, similar to how the human eye would need to adjust."

They don't just toss out words, they came up with facts
(also, read below).

kws10655224d ago

All SCE games uses a certain HDR technic called "NAO32" developed for Heavenly Sword back in 2007. This technic can't be done in 360 because EDRAM of 360 provides bottleneck.

I am not arguing that 360 games can never be as good as GOW 3, but I am sure that one GOW 3 uses can't be done in 360. Quality of graphic is not about what they use but what they show.

Of course it is not fully proved that GOW3 uses NAO32 but when they talk about HDR specifically, I can easily see what they are talking about.

Pennywise5224d ago

Bungie... you bringing up haze and lair is spam. Enough is enough. 1st party devs did not even make those games.

5224d ago
mal_tez925224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Let's stop bi+ching at and look at the facts.

-PS3 uses Blu-ray, 25 or 50GB; 360 uses DVD, 4.7 or 9GB - so if a game is bigger than 9GB than it can't be done on 360 without some size reductions (which doesn't always mean reduction in quality)

-Both systems have very different hardware, I'm no expert in which one is more powerful although currently available games show that the PS3 can produce much higher quality sound and visuals.
But, as I have stated, I am no expert, and so I don't consider this as a reason.

-PS3's have a mandatory HDD which developers can take advantage of, most 360's have a HDD but these can't be necessary for the game to run or else it would discriminate against 360 owners who don;t have a HDD

So if we hear developers saying this in the future, it is most likely due to big games that wont fit on a DVD, or games that won't run properly without a HDD. There is also the hardware limitation thing but once again, I'm no expert and am not sure about this.

gaffyh5224d ago

@evrfighter - Just like all ignorance, you take that quote out of context. First of all it was "Next gen starts with us," secondly, Sony said this because they didn't have a console out to compete with Microsoft's Xbox 360.

What did you want them to say? Xbox 360 is awesome, don't wait for a PS3?

This is nowhere near Turn 10, and pretty much everything Greenburg says.

AssassinHD5224d ago

Technically they only stated that they added features that are only possible on the PS3.

Guido5224d ago

Not as much of an opinion as it is a cumulative fact. I along with many others, many of whom are in the media agree that the best looking games are on the PS3 and that those games could not be done on the PS3. Perhaps if one person thought that it might be simply an opinion but when developers and media agree, then you have to admit it's more factual than opinion.

bacon135224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

GoW3 and MGS4 could probably be ported to the 360, but with detrimental effects in the graphics and presentation departments. The 360 just does not have the capabilities to produce the quality of graphics like UC:2, MGS4 and KZ 2 have. I should know, I have numerous exclusives for each system. So is Sony wrong in saying that GoW3 is only possible on the PS3? Yes. Would you want to play GoW3 if it were ported to the 360? Probably not.

Obelisk925224d ago

This is getting a little old.

Ok, we got it, PS3 is great. Now just release the damn game.

DaTruth5224d ago

People here obviously haven't played Lair; That game looks incredible. I wouldn't doubt that it's only possible on PS3. I didn't like the controls too and their were numerous gameplay problems in it, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the game is a technical marvel!

But GOW3 demo had me jumping out of my seat the same way UC2 truck chase had me jumping out of my seat. After playing UC2, I would have thought I would be immune to that now!

Eamon5224d ago

A lot of first party exclusives make use of the Playstation 3's unique CPU. Of course they cannot be ported because then it will be like designing the game all over again for the xbox 360.
The hardware technology for both CPU's are just that different.

If their CPUs were similar we wouldn't be hearing statements like "its only possible on so-and-so."

nycredude5224d ago

Bungie and other 360 fans. You guys really just need to bite the bullet and get a Ps3, then you will see that what Guido said is NOT an opinion it's facts. I bit the bullet and bought a 360 long ago cause there are some games I just couldn't NOT play but seriously anyone who is NOT a fanb0y and has both console can see that the quality in games are very far apart. I am not saying that 360 has no good games but compare the exclusives and it's very apparent Ps3 is head and shoulders above the competition.

That is how Sony corner the last gen and the one before, and it's how they will do it again. Natal, online, home, netflix streaming, linux, firmware, movies, music, bluray, motion control, they are all cool bells and whistle but in the end it's all about the games.

AKNAA5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

"the point is that there's no proof

"only possible on PS3" ...where's the proof "

Have you heard of this xbox 360 exclusive called "Ninja blade"?... wasn't it suppose to be a GOW/ Ninja gaiden competitor/ or Killer?? LOL! what a Joke!

that 360 exclusive can't even complete with the GOW collection! which was made last gen on the ps2, but just in HD now... so how do you expect GOW3 to run on the 360?? seriously, wake up man!

Sarevok5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Bungie this is all I have to say to you.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Perkel5224d ago

@ Bungie

Lair is graphic beast.

lvl mealstorm :

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

watch 1:46

i'm yet to see any game on x360 with so many things on screen

i agree with haze part. Sometimes it look good but sometime it look like sh-t

Budg3tG4m3r5224d ago

Sony has done this before and its come back at them. if Sony hasn't learned from that mistake it's because they don't want to. Fanboys will eat this up but my advice to you all is to stay away from this. Remember when it was said Killzone 2 couldn't be done on the 360? Yah and remember when that has been proven wrong? MS and Sony should learn to shut it sometimes.

5224d ago
edgeofblade5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

"Sony has a relatively small record of smack talk, especially considering Microsoft. "

Are you kidding? This is very much a pot/kettle situation. Both Microsoft and Sony are just as guilty of the charge, and you know it. Or maybe not. Maybe some people have selective memory. If someone said Alan Wake can only be done on PS3, wouldn't you take that as a jab at Sony? What do you think Sony is doing RIGHT NOW?

@All the Lair C**ks**king: That's right. The market agrees with you on how important graphics is. Even lousy, gimmicky, horrid control can be overcome with awesome graphics. </sarcasm>

Jinxstar5224d ago

Just as an FYI lairs controls have been fixed so you can play with sticks instead of sixAxis now

DaTruth5224d ago

I never said Lair is a good game! Maybe one person here said that. I'm sure given the millions of gamers, it was likely one or two people would like it. I said it is a technical masterpiece.

This is a debate about technical boundries and how the 360 cannot touch the PS3. Lair is included in that!

darthv725224d ago

not entirely true. The 360 has a better shot of emulating the ps3 cpu than the other way around. There have been many games developed with the ps3 as the lead and then ported to the 360 with ease. You can't say the same about games with 360 as lead and then ported to the ps3.

Not sure if it is the fact the 360 has 3 cpu cores each capable of 2 processes at once for an effective total of 6 processes simultaneous or if it is the combined memory structure that can switch on the fly between game data and graphical data.

Point is, both are real power houses in the hands of those that know how to use them. Right now that ball is in sony's court because MS doesnt have any dedicated 1st party engines strictly for the 360. Games for the 360 MS would like to also be available for windows so there in lies a restriction the ps3 does not have to take on.

The dedicated engines and 1st party devs for sony really only have one platform to concentrate their efforts on. Thus the quality in the finished product does not have to suffer. That and the bluray format really opens the ps3 up to not having to use compression for both audio and textures.

Pretty much any game could be made for any other platform within the design restrictions. Case in point. Street fighter 2 was released for the 8bit pc engine in JP and was nearly arcade perfect. The snes version obviously had more power behind it but the fact they could take a big game like that (at the time) and port it down to a lesser system and still come away with 90% quality is a testament to the programmers. Not the hardware.

HighDefinition5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

The last part of the GOW3 demo has nothing even remotely close to it on the 360. Visually that is the best looking part I`ve seen in a game this gen.

So, yeah, no need to be sour, this can ONLY BE DONE on the PS3. Which alot of people said would happen, so don`t be shocked.

The 360 doesn`t even have anything the looks as good as LAIR for christ sake.

BTW, I own a 360 it`s a good system, It just can`t do what the PS3 can do.

Period.

BigPenguin5224d ago

I never really had any trouble with lair controls at all. People kept saying they had trouble with the accelerate and the 180, and yes, they were hard to do, until I realized that I had been doing it incorrectly. It would say to jerk up or down, and when I did it, it would only work about 1/3rd of the time. Then I realized that the way I was doing it was wrong, I had been raising(or dropping) my arms keeping my wrists locked(so if I had been carrying a plate of food, it would have been tossed all over me or slid off onto the floor).

The correct way to do it was to raise the control up while keeping it at the same tilt it had been at(as though you were picking up or lowering a tray of food, so that you changed its height from the ground, but you still kept it flat).

Once I started doing it correctly I never had a problem again, and the game was super fun. And I will still go so far as to say it is one of the most hectic games there is, just from the sheer amount of things on the screen at once. My one real complaint is when the hell are game developers going to stop using red to signify enemy's, 10% of the population are r/g color blind, and it makes things far harder then it needs to be.

creatchee5224d ago

Graphics make a game great as much as sales do (in case you're unenlightened, that means not at all). GOWIII will be great because it is fun, well-designed, and epic. The graphics are the cherry on top of the sundae.

But if it didn't have such great graphics, it would still be a great game. Same as any game. Great games are great regardless of graphics, sales, the console that they are on, or what people on the internet say.

As to the only being possible on PS3? It probably *could* be done on the 360, but there would be some differences, such as it being on multiple discs (depending on the length of the game), probably some lighting differences/activity on screen lessening, and so on. However, it would still be a great game (and the same game for the most part, just not on the scale as it would be on its native console).

AAACE55224d ago

... No Sh*t! I hate when they state the obvious.

dkgshiz5224d ago

Like Microsoft never smack talks Sony?! There the biggest show boaters of all time.

SilentNegotiator5224d ago

The PS3 has a unique structure and they make it known that it allows for unique, well put together games and techniques.

What was that "We won"? Can't hear you over you not having bubbles.

thesummerofgeorge5224d ago

If the quality of the games themselves aren't proof, then what is? If you have a different opinion, then what is it? Which game for the 360 or wii looks better than U2? KZ2?? MGS4??? The list goes on. You just sit there and deny just to deny. If you believe so strongly that the best looking games are on the 360, where's YOUR proof? Cause MS talks about having the best games, while Sony is making the best games. Obviously more is possible on a system using bluray than one using DVD, and that's only one aspect of what gives the PS3 an advantage. Bungie, I don't even know why i bother, you clearly don't care about facts, you'll never remove your lips from MS' proverbial @ss.

pixelsword5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

There is no proof, that is true, so no one can say that it isn't possible; but I say two things:

1. I believe that it is possible, if people really dig into the 360's processor instead of using default libraries and merely upgrading the graphics (Valve, I'm looking at you to stop that the most).

Here's the reason why people say the 360 isn't powerful:

2. Seeing that the 360 is supposed to be more powerful, easier to program for, and out earlier, the 360 should be leading instead of trailing in terms of innovation, graphical quality, and size and scope of the boards. Having better looking multiplatform games sometimes aren't really making a point since no multiplatform game that exists look as good at PS3 exclusives.

Therefore, the onus isn't on PS3 or 360 fans to prove that 360 games can do this or that: that's Microsoft's job.

Alan Wake and Splinter Cell: Conviction will show the 2010, no excuses power of the 360... and when that comes out, one way or the other it will end the debate as they're both exclusives and will be rigorously compared to other games and the results will end the debate for now (I think).

Guido5224d ago

"Remember when it was said Killzone 2 couldn't be done on the 360? Yah and remember when that has been proven wrong? MS and Sony should learn to shut it sometimes."

Nothing, and I mean NOTHING on the 360 even compares to what is seen in Killzone 2. Show me a game where there are 350 light sources shown all at once at any given time in any 360 game. Here's a hint, there is none. The rendering in Killzone 2 is amazing and the graphics in that game trump everything to date on the 360. And Killzone 2 is nearly a year old already.

bpac1234567895224d ago

I honestly don't even care whether it can be done on the 360 or not, because the fact is it won't be done on the 360. Also until the 360 can match games like uncharted 2 or killzone than i don't want to argue which system has the better graphics. it's boring there's no competition anymore maybe when halo reach, splinter cell, alan wake, and mass effect come out than we can continue these graphic debates, But until then lets just drop it.

TheTwelve5224d ago

They don't need to "play it cool". They want to make money and so they have every right to speak the truth about their hardware and software. They can't afford to "play it cool", son.

12

Jamegohanssj55224d ago

Lair had some pretty amazing graphics, but the glitches were horrid and the controls after the patch was still kind of a drag, but I got through it.

TGSI

ico925224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

i dont think sony have ever bad mouthed another company but gow is a 1st party exclusive so yeah its only possible on the ps3

Karum5224d ago

If you think this is smack talk then you are an extremely sensitive person. I hope nobody ever tells you your hair looks bad in case you think it an act of such evil that person should be harmed for such a remark.

Ok now obviously the above is sarcasm but surely you can't think the quote from the girl at Sony comes into the smack talk bracket?

5223d ago
The Happy Baby5223d ago

I'm playing it in my head as we speak.

NewZealander5223d ago

yeah i agree, ive enjoyed many ps3 exclusives, but i dont like the way sony always tags them "only possible on ps3" sonys had some big games recently, but even so they need to market there game for what it is, not what it cant be played on.

Saaking5223d ago

Until MS releases a game that looks even close to KZ2, Sony can say whatever they want. It's up to MS to prove them wrong.

Immortal3215223d ago

some say the 360 can some say the 360 can't.

the ones who say the 360 can: is because of the dvd limitation?
Lost Odyssey say hi.
did blu-ray cover their eyes or something. you guys don't won't to look at the game itself. you guys just want to look somewhere else. My only question is, what are you guys talking about, that it can?

8thnightvolley5223d ago

u cant argue with sony its their IP and its only possible on ps3... so technically they are right.. coz u aint gonna see gow3 on 360..

Immortal3215222d ago

it's only possible on the wii, with their exclusive, with all that motion stuff.

+ Show (53) more repliesLast reply 5222d ago
nogolis5224d ago

Yeah, just like Infamous could only be done on the Ps3. We see how shoddy it looks at times. Don't get me wrong, addicting and fun game with some neat elements, marred only by the true expansion of your character, but the game could've been done on the Ps2 in all honesty.

MAG, another game said only to be capable on the Ps3. Right. Looks like junk ass Monkey trash.

There are others too. I think GOW 3 is only on Ps3 because Sony owns it. I think that the game they wanted to make is only on Ps3. Not the game they could've made.

Don't get me wrong, love Sony. Love their games. Will buy GOW3 day 1, but it doesn't look that head and shoulders above the competition to me.

ssipmraw5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

weve only seen footage and have played gameplay of a build from a year ago, so expect big things

lol disagrees?

garos825224d ago

you little idiot. infamous on the ps2? dont make me laugh. that game looked gorgeous on a HD tv. do you know what a HDTV is?

and regarding MAG? it looks like a monkeys arse that is pushing boundaries like never before. 256 players. do you understand this little concept? 256 ONLINE players. look up Most online console plahyers at the same time and tell me what the second largest is doing? it doesnt seem like pushing boundaries to me. Having said that i probably wont be buying mag (at least not day 1, im not a big FPS fan) however im extremely happy with the lengths ps3 is going to push boundaries with killer titles coming out that truly are next gen.

on Topic

GOWIII is gonna kick ass. i cant wait to see more footage of this title. if it runs in 1080p Native and 60fps consistently with those awesome graphics N gai was talking about then i have no doubt that it will only be possible on ps3

Ju5224d ago

What's wrong with MAG's visuals? It certainly looks better the CoD4/6 (and uses hi res textures than that all over the place). Nobody complains about CoD last gen visuals.

gaffyh5224d ago

@nogolis - inFAMOUS, whilst it didn't look too great graphically, it still was better than a PS2 game. But, if you didn't already know, inFAMOUS was originally being made for PS2, and then they began to port it halfway through development for PS3.

So, although it is not graphically amazing, it still is one of the best games I've played this gen.

Jamescagney5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

There is no way infamous could have been done on a ps2. You come out with some crap, but that's a grade A turd right there.

bjornbear5224d ago

YOU PICK INFAMOUS?

well visually no...BUT if you consider the amount of things that are happening ON SCREEN AT THE SAME TIME, maybe it is only possible on PS3.

how about...U2? only possible on PS3 don't you think? =P Pick a more solid example next time

Oh and @ everyone:

Yeah its $ony

and its Micro$oft

because both make money, good job =P

edgeofblade5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Funny how Infamous was one of my top games of 2009. Not because of graphics, but because of the appealing flow and design of the game. I actually had fun playing it.

And it had jack sh*t to do with the "technical achievements". Honestly, I'm thinking people are losing touch with what a good game is.

DaTruth5224d ago

Infamous made GTA4 and Prototype look like PS2 games!

There, I fixed your comment!

mfwahwah5224d ago

@nogolis

Why don't you just cut to the chase and say "I hate video games on SONY consoles because they're on SONY consoles." I hate the 360 but I don't talk trash about the games (they're like the innocent children in this fanboy war, imo)

nogolis5224d ago

You all are absurd. I said I loved Infamous and you all disagree in droves. Hell, another guy said the same thing I said and he got 10 agrees for it. He said the game didn't have good graphics, which it doesn't, and that the game was just fun. That's how I feel about it. Why the bias on this site? Hell, one person even said it was being made for PS2 and then ported over and you all agree, right after you tell me that it couldn't be done on Ps2. What's wrong with you all? Bias army of loyalist.

ico925224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

infamous isnt exactly the best looking ps3 game but to say it could be done on the ps2 is absurd, for an open world the ammount of enemies you will see on the screen with all the explosions and the framerate doesnt even take a hit, also the sewer missions look really good when cole lights his path, the shadows and lighting look really cool. I agree with garos play the game in HD and it looks really good, i mean its one of the few games i've played this gen where it looks MUCH better in HD

nogolis5223d ago

Are you all really like this? I play on a 1080p 128hrtz 52in Sony Bravia. I play it in the best quality you can get almost. The game doesn't look "THAT" good. It's passable. It's about on par with Saints Row 2. The thing is, it's a 720P game, that doesn't boot in 1080P at all or even 1080I and the textures are low rez and to display them on such a big screen, like I am use to, is a huge problem. I think developers need to take this into consideration when they make their games. They have to compensate for bigger screens.

nycredude5223d ago

nogolis

Dude seriously you might have a nice tv but I think you shouldn't have bought it off the truck cause clearly you got a defective one or a fake. Infamous looks way better than saints row and pretty much most open world games and to say it could be done on the Ps2 shows how retarded you are. Name me an open world game on the Ps2 that looks remotely as good as infamous. Remember it has been 10 years the Ps2 has been out so if it WAS possible (which is laughable) it would have been done.

All you haters have one thing in common which is you guys talk bullcrap with no proof or logic and expect everyone here to just believe you like what you say is true. Give me a break. More than a million people bought infamous and I am pretty sure we aren't all that dumb. Sure infamous isn't the prettiest game out there but for an open world game with as much stuff going on at the same tiem on screen it looks great. It certainly has less glitches and pop-in than Assassins Creed 2 and it has no screen tear.

Saaking5223d ago

When MS says something is only possible on the 360, it's just silly since Sony clearly has MUCH better looking games than MS. Until MS proves otherwise, this statement is true.

SaberEdge5223d ago

No, Saaking, that is only your opinion.

I have both consoles and a lot of games you fanatics claim can't be done on the 360 don't look that good to me. Infamous is a great game, but get real. If you actually have both consoles there is no way you can tell me that Infamous looks that good. I thought it looked average. There are lots of better looking games.

Dev8 ing5223d ago

You can't compare an open world game's graphics to a game that isn't. It's apples to oranges. Compare infamous graphics to GTA, saints, prototype and when it's out crackdown 2. Of open world games it is the best one out right now.

Jinxstar5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

Please link somewhere sony said "infamous only possible on PS3". I dont think they did...

I know a few guys from SP said it( http://www.thegameraccess.c... ) and who is to say the dev's are liars? Are you a game programmer? It may be the physics and not the graphics or the scale or disc size or any other number of reasons...

nogolis5223d ago

@nycredude

Dude, people here have already said that the game "WAS" in development for the Ps2. I didn't say that. They did. I didn't know it was being made for the Ps2, I simply said it looks like it could have been done on the Ps2. GTASA is proof of that. Graphically taking a hit, but at all otherwise, yes. It could have been done. Sorry. Go back and read what your fellow PS3 lovers are saying before you come at me with Alligations.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 5223d ago
Omega45224d ago

Seams like this is all Sony can say these days to hype up their games. The same thing was said with U1/U2, MGS4,HR,K2 and probably more.

The thing is how would they know whether its not possible on other consoles when they haven't even tried?

PirateThom5224d ago

Why would Sony developers waste their time developing on a console they'll never release a game on? That's silly.

"'Only on PS3' means 'only possible on PS3'" or else there would be a game graphically on par with Uncharted 2 or Killzone 2 on 360, but there's not.

Omega45224d ago

Well if they can't back up their comments they shouldn't say them. At least if MS said it it would be more believable cause multiplaform games look better on the 360 than the PS3. So when a game is ACTUALLY made on BOTH platforms the 360 outperforms the PS3.

Oh and Halo: Reach says hello :)

PirateThom5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

And Uncharted 2 and Killzone blow every other game away, so keep lording up multiplatform games that still don't match PS3 exclusives, it just makes the point all the more valid.

Ha, Halo: Reach hasn't even been seen in-game yet.

Bungie5224d ago

Agree with Omega4

what do you think $ony will say

our exclusive only for ps3 wow that's new

what's next MAG only possible on PSN

PirateThom5224d ago

Well, why is the 360 locked to such low numbers?

Why was the PS3 able to do 40 players online at launch while the 360's MMOFPS was cancelled?

green5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

frontlines fuel of war is 54 players.

@ pirate thom: you are so wrong. L4D and Forza3 also use dedicated servers.

notsonice5224d ago

Because the halo series is always about great visuals.

Try again...

PirateThom5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Yep, if using the, shock, dedicated servers. It's only 16 players using the normal process, like every other 360 game

@green - then why is Forza 3 locked to 8 players? (Oh yeah, there's only 8 cars per track). Also, have they fixed that glitch yet where you can't use in car view online?

Omega45224d ago

"Well, why is the 360 locked to such low numbers?"
Maybe because the devs dont want to make a chaotic game with no depth? Its nothing to do with technical limitations, unlike Killzone 2 which couldnt handle split screen because the PS3 isnt powerful enough.

But i bet you forgot about that eh

Mr_Bun5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Looks like PirateThom already has Omega and Bungie in check...nothing more to see here

Jeromejones5224d ago

It doesnt matter if that Halo Reach trailer was ingame or not. It was nothing spectacular tbh and did not suprass some current ps3 exclusives or some upcoming ones

PirateThom5224d ago

Hey, Omega, are you seriously questioning the most graphically advanced FPS on consoles?

Funny stuff.

Simon_Brezhnev5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

i thought by 2010 360 fanboys would quit bragging about multiplatforms and brag more about exclusives

edit:
@green

u say feature whores but all you do is brag about forza 3 features

green5224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

Maybe because that is what the devs want to reduce chances of a race turning into Forza: destruction derby 3. Also how many racing games do you know with more players run at 60fps, have super-realistic physics, load and render customized paintjobs, tunes and builds for each player and look as good as Forza 3 does.

To be honest, what have you gained from running with more than 10 or so players in a racing game. I think some people are just feature whores. They just like to be able to say they can do something, when in reality, its not really something that is important.

8 players is just fine.

EDIT: Were on earth did you hear that you cant use in car view in mulitiplayer vecause of a glitch?Been using it since oct 24th with out a single issue.

5224d ago
OmarJA-N4G5224d ago

Bungie is using his other accounts to give agrees & disagrees, how sad... :)

Damn PirateThom easy on the fanboys. ;)

Motion5224d ago

That really is sarcasm right?

Or are you truly unaware of a little game coming out called GT5

green5224d ago

yes i have heard of GT5 and will be buying it whenever it comes out but i have not heard anything about GT5 having a 240fps physics engine,custom paintjobs and individual tunes and builds for each car.Please enlighten me of these specs if i am wrong.

Cyrax_875224d ago

I'm sure he's talking from a technical POV. All you did was list features.

terrorofdeath5224d ago

you are going to have to eat your words when GT5 comes out.

Pennywise5224d ago

Seems like you are busting at the seams. Show me one game one the 360 that compares to the graphics of kz2, uc2, heh... UC1.

Ju5224d ago

green omega bungie. Are you one ? Like "resistance is futile" kind of personality ? Is that just pure denial or are you really interested in a conversation ? Because those arguments you bring up should be spoken in a comedy club, not in a discussion. That's like you guys try to actually diss numbers (or bend facts). I can only think its an attempt to be funny, everything else would just be sad.

mrv3215224d ago (Edited 5224d ago )

'Seams like this is all Sony can say these days to hype up their games. The same thing was said with U1/U2, MGS4,HR,K2 and probably more.'

And guess what Sony have yet been proven wrong.

Name me a better looking game than Heavy Rain that runs on 360? Go on?

Didn't Turn10 say Forza was the most definitive racing game this generation? Last I checked GT5 is being released this generation

Gears 2 was on the same level as Uncharted 1 graphics wise... and art style Uncharted 1 BLEW IT AWAY(in my opinion). And I highly Halo Reach will look as good as Killzone 2, I've seen the Halo: Reach in-game trailer and I can honestly say thus far Killzone 2 killzowned it.

Do you see what I'm getting at? Sony are saying this because they have yet to be proven wrong.

EDIT: Regarding the Multiplatform games look better. Erm MW2 doesn't. Infact 99% games of 2009 looked the same on both platforms. And regardless they are blown away by Uncharted 1, Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, GT5 and Heavy Rain. Untill you show me a game which looks better than Killzone 2 in-game and not some CGI/Post effects I will continue to say so. It's like physics where physics is not about saying what's right but about saying ANYTHING untill someone proves it's wrong then you say something new.

bjornbear5224d ago

its because it can only be done on PS3.

what are you all whining about, I thought none of you cared about GOWIII anyway =P

wicko5224d ago

Omega64, you really think multiplatform games look better on the 360 because the 360 is more capable? It has everything to do with budget and time contraints. New hardware (ps3) takes more time and money to develop for since it requires new methods. Companies aren't willing to do that, so 360 multiplatform games end up looking better.

Oner5224d ago

@ Bungie "KZ2 don't even have any kind of Co op,4 players split screen..."

If Killzone 2 ran at sub hd resolutions like most Xbox 360 games than it would have been able to do that easily.

Perkel5224d ago

@ Bungie

"don't want to hurt some feelings but KZ2 is not more advanced than
Halo 3 "

dude just stop.. you are emberasing yourself. Even Reistance 1 look better than halo 3 and it have 2 players campain and 4 player split multi and 32 players online...

kz2 is on astonishing lvl with deffered rendering

bacon135224d ago

Gamers like Bungie make me hate my 360 more and more everyday. If you have both systems, its obvious that the PS3 has better graphics. If only I could use my 360 controller for PS3 gaming, I would have no complaints.

+ Show (25) more repliesLast reply 5224d ago
MetalGearRising5224d ago

Sure it can't be done Sony and this is coming from Sony not the Game Developer poor Sony trying desperately to make some hype for this underwhelming game which even Dante's Inferno over shadows GOW3 in graphics and game play. And let's not forget Bayonetta in game play.

ssipmraw5224d ago

well atleast sony has an exclusive hack and slash game unlike microsoft
remember when they tried to gain excluisve rights to ninja gaiden II?
FAIL
as for dantes inferno, dont make us laugh you look bad enough as it is already, the animated cutscenes look like something out of zelda for the phillips cdi. as for bayonetta, well theres nothing to really hate about it except the lame story

ps12&3lover5224d ago

lmao did you say it overshadows gow3 in graphics and game play..wow you fangirls are starting the new year off strong..

you either just want to try and piss off ps3 gamers or you in serious denial cause you dont even believe that..gow3 makes dante look like gameboy

Bungie5224d ago

what do you want $ony to say

our console is last place please buy it

PSN is not that good but it's free

we got alot of game but they're all inferior on our console

PlayStation X5224d ago

delusional

360 has no games lol

5224d ago
SaberEdge5223d ago

360 has a ton of games. You fanboys are so funny.

Narutone665223d ago

MS got tons of game but you 360 fanboys don't buy those games. That 's why more than 95% of your games are considered flop by your standard.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5223d ago
Show all comments (332)
70°

The Best Video Game Opening Levels In Gaming History

The Opening Levels that hooked gamers from the outset.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
240°

Ranking Every God of War Game From Worst to Best

Cultured Vultures: Let’s delve into Kratos’ long and rampageous history and find out which games are worth the hype and which are better left buried under the weight of Kratos’s might.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JL2930170d ago

Both requels over 2 and 3? Clowns. Those are two of the most boring games I've ever played.

Snookies12170d ago

GoW 3 was amazing, but I personally hated just one thing. (This is on me alone, because I was dumb, lol.) I hated that you couldn't skip cutscenes on repeat playthroughs. I had to go back through the game a third time because I missed one trophy accidentally on my way to the platinum... The cutscenes were great the first go round, even the second... But the third was pretty agonizing.

Haven't played Ragnarok, but I still think GoW 4 is a wonderful game in its own right. Not sure how I would stack them up against each other honestly.

Monstieur170d ago (Edited 170d ago )

I don't consider the reboot part of the original series. The original series were high-skill games with combos and rewards for mixing things up.

solideagle169d ago

lol square, square and triangle is the only combo you needed. I have played all of them on the hardest difficulties...

Golfcoachh170d ago

Maybe I’m just old school but I just couldn’t get into the last two. Maybe it’s the slower action and more story telling but the original trilogy was by far my favorite.

Crows90170d ago

It's not that youre old school. They're different genres

JL2930169d ago (Edited 169d ago )

Me either, at all. It's just yap yap yap. They try to be a RPG's instead of being action games like they used to be.

Fluke_Skywalker170d ago

I'd put the two psp games over 3 in terms of story any day. But not over 2.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 169d ago
TheEnigma313170d ago (Edited 170d ago )

My favorite was part 2 and I think Ragnarok is better that 2018.

Shane Kim170d ago

The newer games are better imo.

ravens52170d ago

There is no worst. Except for Ascension, only cause I didn't play it lol. They are all masterpieces. 1,2,3, 2018 and Ragnarok. 1 of, if not the greatest video game franchise...besides MetalGear.

Snookies12170d ago

Oh wow, I actually forgot that Ascension even existed... I never played it either.

Crows90170d ago

I like ascension. It was different and some interesting combat additions.

darthv72170d ago

If you didnt play it, how could you call it the worst? Its not as bad as the media portrayed it. Honestly the worst are those flash games. they arent even considered true GoW games but in name only. At least Ascension is a real GoW game.

ravens52170d ago

Not saying it's a terrible game. Just mean it's at the bottom of my list. I played a little bit of it. Jus to me, compared to the other main games, it's last.

Fluke_Skywalker170d ago

Ascension is the only GOW game I never finished. Hated it.

Inverno170d ago

Can't agree, older games do so much more than the last two. More weapons, magic abilities, enemies are more varied, level design is also more aesthetically pleasing, and agree with those who say that they shouldn't have removed jumping. Was a time I'd agree, but those old games are so so much better, that they really should've looked into bringing into the reboot/sequels.

Crows90170d ago (Edited 170d ago )

If a game is good then a game is good. Doesn't matter what came before or what comes after.

Inverno170d ago

Of course it matters. If not for what what came before there wouldn't be an after. And if something is great before then you strive to make it just as good if not better, after. I personally don't think there's a fair way to judge the new with the old because the newer games are still essentially a reboot, and went a way different direction. But I still believe the old games did it better. I'm probably bias though since I've been going back to old games and have been finding that they lack all the annoying aspects that devs have shoehorned into new games to fluff out game time.

Crows90169d ago

@Inverno

Im not talking about the passage of time here. Im talking about individual pieces of software. If a game is good then it is good. Thats not a controversial statement. You can compare good with good...sure. But you still end up with good. Now if there is a bad game in the mix and you compare you do end up with some differentials between them...makes sense to compare and see where it went wrong.

But theyre different genres and styles which were individually executed very well.

And no. The new games are not a reboot. Theyre a new direction but simply a continuation.
Tomb raider was a reboot.

Inverno169d ago

The new games are definitely a reboot, and a continuation, it can be both which it is. And a good game might be good, but my point is that if there are things done better before it then there's plenty of room for critiquing and trying to make whatever comes after better rather than just good.

Show all comments (31)
170°

God of War 3 Remastered Has Sold 4 Million Copies To Date

God of War 3 Remaster has sold 4 million copies since its inception, making the franchise PlayStation's most profitable gamer merch brand.

purple101331d ago

Haha I still remember my brother playing the opening scene on ps3!!!

Yeh he had to put the controller down his heart was beating too fast trying to get past first 10 minutes. He said "it's too much". Best thing I've ever seen in gaming. Haha

robtion331d ago

A great game from an era before things went politically correct and gaming turned serious/'mature'.

It certainly wasn't concerned about upsetting or offending anyone and was more fun because of it.

The boss battles and set pieces still top most games released today.

SullysCigar331d ago

This game was absurdly good for it's time. The very definition of 'epic'.

robtion331d ago

Yes. The graphics were just ridiculous compared to most other games on the market at the time.

masterfox331d ago

I wished Ascension had the same treatment.

Heavenly King331d ago

Ascension SP had some things better than GOW3, and also some things worst than GOW3. But in general it was a really good game, for me it also deserves a REMASTER. The problem per se with the game is that most people were satisfied on how GOWIII ended, so Kratos got his revenge, so in order to rise the interest in the game how have to make it MORE EPIC is that the game did not had the epicness of fighting huge bosses (I guess due to technical difficulties,the game had actually a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding that is my guess), but it compensated with having in general a more complex combat system, and an amazing soundtrack. but in general the game needed to be more epic than GOWIII somehow, and that did not happened, after GOWIII people had expectations through the roof. They should have waited and release it for PS4 so the vision of the game is not compromised.

My list of good and bad compared to GOWIII

GOOD: THE COMBAT
The combat was more elaborated, which allows you to be more immersed in the fights. Also every enemy was more resistant, even those that you could usually kill in 2-3 attacks in previous games. THE LAST BOSS is so damn epic!!!, but there is only one moment like this in the whole game.

GOOD: LESS QTEs
I love the fact that "cicle" in the new enemies (killing animations) are not QTEs, in Ascension they are mini-games on their own, depending on the enemy, making it more engaging. You had to dodge and hit when the window was open in order to eventually do the killing blow.

GOOD: The Soundtrack
it has the orginal trilogy musics, but with a new perspective since the game had a new composer. The ST was amazing also the new music written specifically for this game were badass

GOOD: The puzzles actually require you to think.

BAD: There are bad camera angles during the game, like zooming way too out of vista, and then swarming you with "light units" that like I said before had better AI and did not die of 2 attacks. those parts a few, but are a mess.

BAD: EMPTY ARENAS
Other thing that really annoyed me is that when you fight a sub-boss/heavy unit in a big arena; that ARENA WAS EMPTY, it was just you and against the medusa, or against the manticore. They should have zoom in into the action to avoid noticing the void scenario. I guess emptiness was because of the game having a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding. My guess is that it was not possible technically, since in most of those cases you had huge vistas or intricate scenarios that needed to be rendered. The fact that the cerberus is smaller in this game disappointed me.

BAD: Only one BADASS EPIC moment, the others moments of the game were great but, they needed to set the bar even higher than GOWIII and they failed miserably.

BAD: The graphics did not improved much. I was GOWIII with more colors, and that's it.

So 4 good things against 4 bad ones. The problem is those 2 last BAD aspects are actually why the game was received so poorly. Everyone expects the next game to have a really BIG improvement in all aspects in contrast to the previous one, and that was not the case in ascension. And also GOW is the definition of EPIC, and that was not there neither. The jump on every aspect from GOWI to GOWII was huge being on the same console, and the jump from GOWII to GOWIII was humongous (obviously because a more powerful console). While the jump from GOWIII to Ascension is too little, and people expected more.

On it's own is a good game; but is not sufficient when GOWIII was released before it.

CrimsonWing69331d ago

I know this is unpopular opinion, but I prefer these over the new ones. I’m not saying the new ones are bad or anything, but they sort of get boring to me, whereas the older games were like non-stop roller coaster rides.

ChiefofLoliPolice331d ago

I love the new ones but I understand what you mean. The older ones had more action and was more arcady like.

MIDGETonSTILTS17331d ago

Ragnarok was not BIG at all… GoW1 had larger set pieces, and it was on ps2.

GoW 2018 had big moments in its own way…. Ragnarok abandoned these aspects though

robtion331d ago

I agree. It was just less serious and more fun.

victorMaje331d ago

One of my all time favourites.

Show all comments (16)