Uncharted 2: Among Thieves passes for an action adventure but it really belongs to the tradition of Romance. This was the tradition of chivalry and heroism, where men protected the helpless and save spirited women from overwhelming threat. Building on the ribald traditions of Chaucer and Cervantes, the serial Romance of the 30's and 40's combined punchy satire with genre convention. It's from this randy fusion that Uncharted 2 emerges, homage to an homage of a satire of a nearly dead genre.
Chris, Joseph, and Josh celebrate Active Quest’s 100th episode by discussing their favorite games of all time.
Nevada Dru from Bits & Pieces revisits Uncharted 2: Among Thieves to see if this legendary game has stood the test of time.
Currently playing Drakes Fortune on crushing, next will be to replay Among Thieves, but I'm sure it still holds up today.
I thought the originals were good, but not great. I understand that puts me in the minority here. That said, Uncharted 4 was freaking fantastic.
I think Uncharted 2 is a lot like AC2. Both games took the idea and basically improved it in every single way.
Cultured Vultures: What's your favourite moment from the Uncharted franchise? Here are 15 that got our blood pumping.
The entire final chapter of The Lost Legacy is the best setpiece in the series and it wasn't even mentioned.
Again, why do people see fit to nitpick at these things while leaving other games to their accord?
Some of the points brought up un the article:
1.)"Repetition of gunplay"
2.)Disconnect between cutscenes and gameplay
It's a given that not everyone is going to like Uncharted 2 but to justify that dislike by pointing out things that don't seem to be issues with other games is a bit contradictory.
Not my loss, I play to simply experience and too much thinking ruins the whole thing. I love Uncharted 2 and any douche who disses it for the most idiotic reasons is complete failure as a gamer in my honest opinion. These people try really hard to discredit this game which unfortunately backfires and discredits themselves in the end. Im not gonna give this moron a hit and im just gonna enjoy my gaming life.
I think the rest of you are viewing this criticism in the wrong light. I would argue that this piece is written not to criticize the game, I think it is simply aimed at the flaws gaming still has as a storytelling device. He acknowledges that the game does things better if not the best of the many of the new generation of games. Because of this I think he is insinuating that "the best", has a responsibility to move things forward. Since Naughty Dog has clearly mastered what it means to make a game in the old manner of game/storytelling, the author clearly thinks that it is their responsibility as the most capable and qualified to push into new ground with the next installment. The pieces are there, ND just has to manipulate them to make an even more astounding and affecting game in the future.