Have Intel got off lightly over their anti-trust case with its rival? Is this the beginning of something special for the future of CPU's? Who knows, we can only hope. Intel has had a strangle-hold on the market for too long now and has forced AMD and consumers to lose value, for their own gain. Does a leopard change it's spots? Read on to find out more...
Gematsu writes: "Cooperative third-person shooter Helldivers II has sold 12 million units as of May 5, publisher Sony Interactive Entertainment and developer Arrowhead Game Studios announced."
And well-deserved. I'm having a ball of a time so far. Just need to change out my heavy armour, it's a murder on my stamina and sprinting.
Prepare for an unforgettable gaming experience in Big Helmet Heroes. Master 4 distinct combat styles and wield whimsical weapons in this epic action-adventure game.
Players looking forward to exploring the new content can now enjoy a preview of what to expect.
ahaha, suck **** intel, you really had it coming, dell made 30% of their profits annuals from intel prior to 2006 from payouts from intel so them wouldn't use amd processors...
Hopefully now this will level the field, and as amd also owns ati, maybe this could fund some better R&D for them too
Better performing, lower price cpu's and gpu's due to more competition?, Hell MF yes!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
AMD = only loses money
Intel = making money
AMD(ATI)
Intel(GeForce)
Ofcause Intel is better
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
In February 1982, AMD signed a contract with Intel, becoming a licensed second-source manufacturer of 8086 and 8088 processors. IBM wanted to use the Intel 8088 in its IBM PC, but IBM's policy at the time was to require at least two sources for its chips. AMD later produced the Am286 under the same arrangement, but Intel canceled the agreement in 1986 and refused to convey technical details of the i386 part. AMD challenged Intel's decision to cancel the agreement and won in arbitration, but Intel disputed this decision. A long legal dispute followed, ending in 1994 when the Supreme Court of California sided with AMD. Subsequent legal disputes centered on whether AMD had legal rights to use derivatives of Intel's microcode. In the face of uncertainty, AMD was forced to develop "clean room" versions of Intel code.
In 1991, AMD released the Am386, its clone of the Intel 386 processor. It took less than a year for the company to sell a million units. Later, the Am486 was used by a number of large original equipment manufacturers, including Compaq, and proved popular. Another Am486-based product, the Am5x86, continued AMD's success as a low-price alternative. However, as product cycles shortened in the PC industry, the process of reverse engineering Intel's products became an ever less viable strategy for AMD.
No intel just figured out that amd is superior when it comes to better cpu's at half the cost.
"AMD = only loses money
Intel = making money
AMD(ATI)
Intel(GeForce)
Ofcause Intel is better"
What kind of a reject is this guy? amd is cheap and wayy better pentium was intels best product.