160°

Permanent Death in Far Cry 2

Popmatters writes:

"Ben Abraham over at SLRC started an experiment with Far Cry 2 that has since been picked up and repeated by other bloggers. The experiment: Play Far Cry 2 on normal difficulty and stop when you die. You only have one life. Death is permanent.

Ben's posts, and those by others who have taken up the experiment, read like a normal game of Far Cry 2. The introduction and the tutorial always play out the same, and while everyone's first mission is different, what happens to them isn't all that different than what happened to me when I played the game: They get in a shootout and kill a lot of people. That's essentially every mission in Far Cry 2. So what makes this experiment so interesting?"

Read Full Story >>
popmatters.com
Pandamobile5774d ago

Far Cry 2 is a pretty cool game for a while.

I stopped played because I died of malaria...

OtherWhiteMeat5774d ago

The only thing worse then malaria in Farcry 2 is being a vampire in Oblivion.Both sucked.

Rifle-Man5774d ago

Y'know what's even worse than being a vampire in Oblivion? Being a vampire in Oblivion: Game of the Year Edition for PS3 and spending a whole evening asking around about how to cure vampirism, gathering the necessary ingredients, finding the house of the woman who can make a cure, running into a bug that doesn't let you give an ingredient to the woman, researching how to fix the bug on the internet, driving to Blockbuster to rent the regular edition of Oblivion, loading up the GOTY save in the regular edition, get cured, take the game back to Blockbuster, load up the GOTY edition again and enjoy the sunlight.

Nitrowolf25774d ago

that is unless of course u somehow become vampire again

Poopface the 2nd5774d ago

if thats the case, it would be like a lot of older games where you have limited lives or continues. Like the games that didnt have saves.

This idea was a huge part of games back in the day, so its interesting to see it applied to modern games.

however, it isnt an original idea at all. Probably the best example of this is the "hardcore" characters in Diablo 2. Once you die you loose your character and any loot you got. I never made a hardcore char, but im sure people were really upset when they died and lost their characters.

zagibu5773d ago

Yeah, Hardcore Diablo had (and still has) quite the following. They even introduced new rules on top of the "hardcore" game mode to make it even harder, called Iron Man. IIRC, you weren't allowed to trade in this "mode", nor talk to anyone in town except when it was required to advance in a quest.

Also, Diablo Hardcore PVP was pretty intense. Two enter, one leaves.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5773d ago
skip2mylou5774d ago

i died because i drowned how the fuk did i drown when i was still walking through the water

zagibu5773d ago

Maybe because your character was an a$$face?

Rifle-Man5774d ago

I would try this, but I already know how I'd die: I'd set the grass on fire with the blowback from my rocket launcher, which would in turn set my jeep on fire, which would in turn blow up and kill my sorry ass.

ironwolf7775774d ago

They take this stuff waaay too seriously.
Playing a game with one life doesn't need to become some existential
wank fest.

FantasyStar5774d ago

I think it's all about the pressure now. Knowing that you only have one life will definitely make you think twice about some firefights and raiding on guard posts for fun. I think I might want to attempt this challenge.

Nihilism5774d ago

yeah it just sounds like pseudophilosophy b.s to me, we get it, 1 life, if you die you die, there was no need for that article.......oh i mean, what a deep concept, a tale of life and death...heroism, and s&m

Poopface the 2nd5774d ago

seems interesting, but its been done before with much worse consequences(diablo 2) and back in the day most games had limited lives as opposed to saves anyways. Alot of people already know the feeling of having to start a game over if they die.

Nitrowolf25774d ago

so if u die u die? no continuing from the point you saved?

poindat5774d ago (Edited 5774d ago )

Wow... I hope you're kidding. When people say, "there is no such thing as a bad question," they were lying.

To answer your question, nope, no continuing on. That was sort of the whole point of this essay and experiment...

Show all comments (23)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox799d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88797d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai798d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle797d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy796d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE796d ago (Edited 796d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan844d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya844d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled844d ago (Edited 844d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney844d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled844d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist843d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin844d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled844d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE844d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi844d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE844d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10966d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17966d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10966d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop965d ago (Edited 965d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics966d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos966d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt966d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10965d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt965d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 965d ago
MajorLazer966d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran966d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz966d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof966d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)