Check out these new high-res screenshots of MotorStorm. Though not quite as detailed as last years target trailer, I must say the game looks very impressive.
I wouldn't go as far and say it looks like a PS2 game. Sometimes still pics never do a game justice. I'll wait till I see this game near completion before judging it.
That is some seriously uninspiring footage, even for stills. I don't care if someone says that is 30-40% done or not, THAT is crap-tacular looking for a next-gen game. Sony was the ones to put out the concept videos and now they are the ones that need to deliver that level of quality before many people will even consider shelling out the cash for the system (hopeless fanboys excepted).
I hope GOR has cool physics,I heard that you got to keep you're vehicel in tact while racing cross country. And it looks fun too, and it will have many cars ect.
The game looks okay, albeit a little blurry? This is one of those games I think you'll miss having vibration, though. I mean, rally/offroad driving is all about the feel of it.
Y'know, i know hte graphics are gonna be wicked, but i really just cant wait to play the actual game cos from everything i've seen, its fantastic. The physics of the tyres rutting up the ground and the the mud hardening, its mudtastic...well it IS good. I think this is one game that xbox owners would want on their system, even though they might say they dont want it, they wouldnt be complaining if they had it.
How can you say those screens are crap ? Sure theyre not the best screens ever to grace this planet, but theyre quite far from hideous. PS:Dusty - im not sure if the new feature will work fully, but meh, nice feature anyway.
Dont think you can really judge anything from those screens. Theres still lots of time for polishing. I think Motorstorm is going to be more about gameplay (which does look very cool from the videos) but it would have been nice to have visuals on par with the target video at last years E3. But then again who's to say it wont, they still have plenty of time to work on it. Cant wait to see it whens its finished. Is this still a launch game????
the Gears of war devs prob focused on the graphics first, then the went on to make the rest....while the Motorstorm devs focused on their new engine and physics and such first, and the last part is saved on graphics...
That's really big bull, because the engine and physics are also not really great. No crowd, motion and rest is also not really great. The blur is done good so it doesn't look that sh*tty...
The engine and physics of GoW are also done great. Just read all the freaking good news about the thing that was playable at E3.
No guys, since the CGI from last years E3 Sony can't deliver. Motorstorm doesn't look at all what they showed there and Killzone 2 has dissapeared at all. That's lame
yah where is killzone 2? ohh thats right. it didnt look ANYTHING like the CG from last year and it would of made E3 go even worse for sony (if thats possible)
yes they were, but the engine was already made, it is the Unreal Engine. so, GOW is 40% done, they didnt have to make an engine, and Motorstorm devs had to make a whole new engine, so when they are done with the engine that makes game compeletion go up some percent....
#25 How can you say the physics "are also not really great"???? Vehicles leaving grooves on the track that obstruct and affect the course. You'd have to admit thats pretty impressive,no?
theMart its unserious when you say the graphic and physics of the game are not good. yes of course they have not the quality of the 2005 trailer, but they have enough time to implement details such as mud on glass and so on. in my mind sound, physics, and graphic is the best i ever saw in a racing game, and i saw many. perhaps you dislike sony, but this does not mean that the game is bad. ps3 will be very very great, i cant wait !!!
This wedsite used to be for PS3 now it's for everything. Is it me or is everthing PS3 related have more lame responds than cool except for the acticles that put it down in the first place. Anyway this game looks pretty cool and I love the fact games that are only 30-40% done on nonfinal dev kits get compared to games on a system that has been out since November.
Every article that is pro-sony has like 10 lame votes and every article that is negative for sony has like 10 cool votes. 360 box fans take the time to do this stuff...why?
gears isn't finished either, but it doesn't matter. in the history of video games, and in the future of video games, there will always be a game that looks better than another. there are ps2 games that look better than some xbox games. there are xbox games that look better than other xbox games. i've seen ps1 and dreamcast games that look better than indigo prophecy. something is always going to look better than another. depends on the individual devs and how much effort they put in, and their goals for the game. some devs push graphics, some push gameplay. it's no different than movies. they are all movies, but some are great and some stink. same with music, food, ect. if a game is good, it's good. if a game is fun, it's fun. i've played a lot of games that looked like sh*t, but enjoyed playing them. any one around 30 like me probably had an atari 2600, nes, genesis, ect. i don't recall firing up to many of those games and saying "man, these graphics are awesome!", they were just fun to play.
Too bad there won't be any tactile feedback for PS3 games. The PS3 having rumble would have benefited this game much more than having motion sensing, since this game, along with many other PS3 games, probably won't even support it. Don't you think it would of be cool if the controller rumbled with a varying degree of intensity, depending on how deep the grooves in the dirt were, helping to completely immersing the player in the offroad experience? How can you call the PS3 innovating when something so basic as rumble is taken away, as if almost setting the ps3 back years in console progress. I hope noone tries to argue that rumble isn't important. Please don't. I still look forward to playing this game, though I'm disappointed that the game doesn't come close to that amazing E3 2005 video. I am the only who would love to see a full-length feature animated movie of that calibur in theaters? Maybe a movie about the Dakar Rally, it would be a great mature alternative to Disney's Cars. How cool would that be?
It would definitely need rumber to have the right feel, and it doesnt look very impreswsive at all.
Oh and to this: "30 - why... BLow - 22 Hours ago This wedsite used to be for PS3 now it's for everything. Is it me or is everthing PS3 related have more lame responds than cool except for the acticles that put it down in the first place. Anyway this game looks pretty cool and I love the fact games that are only 30-40% done on nonfinal dev kits get compared to games on a system that has been out since November."
Well it seems fine for Sony fans to bash running 360 games when they compare them to CGI doesnt it? lol
Yes, this would be a great game for rumble. All that mud, all the collisions... well at least you can tilt the controller to wave to the crowd! XD
In other news- sure, this game is only (x%) done. So is (game on the 360). This game will look better with time, but so will (game on the 360). The argument about "but PS3 games aren't done yet" is total BS, as the comparable games on 360 aren't either, and pretty much all of the 360 titles look better at their current stage of development, across the board.
I will have to see this move the joystick around thiing to move on screen but i like to move my joystick around on a normal basis and so i guess it wont help when it actually does something when i do it. I will give it a chance... But rumble is a great thing, and so i would take rumble over movement sensing.
Atleast it stills looks nice
this is just a test post
Looks like a Nintendo 64 game with dirt.
Let hope it's not buggy, don't want the ruts apearing on the side of the vehicels and such.
it will look nice, the game is only 30 to 40% complete... so they still got alot to do...