150°

Eidos Montreal's "really cool" Final Fantasy game that never was

From True Achievements: "Square Enix originally gave Eidos-Montréal — the developer of two Deus Ex games and Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy — the task of making Final Fantasy XV, former executive art director Jonathan Jacque-Belletête confirmed to TA.

This week, TrueAchievements spoke with Rogue Factor’s creative director Jonathan Jacque-Belletête at Nacon's Bigben Week about his work on the upcoming philosophical, supernatural, non-violent third-person action game Hell is Us. Speaking about his time as an art director with Eidos-Montréal, he confirmed that Square Enix — before it sold its western branch to Embracer group for $300 million — removed the Canadian team from a “really cool” Final Fantasy XV project."

Read Full Story >>
trueachievements.com
-Foxtrot722d ago

I don't know why they didn't just let someone try doing a spin off game as an experiment

smashman98722d ago (Edited 722d ago )

It’s because square as a company is currently being horribly mismanaged. How else could you justify square placing a traditionally AAA single player developer Like crystal dynamics at the helm of a major live service game?

Not to mention their repeatedly tone deaf mentions of nft and crypto.

Pedantic91722d ago

Final Fantasy is still a household name, the name itself is important enough for them to be hands-on at all times.
Could've ended up diluting the series and potentially damage the brand if not handled with utmost care.
That's not to say the last few flagship titles (FFXIII/-2/Returns, FFXV) have been great so who knows, maybe if a western development team tried we might've had something very experimental, weird, fresh and maybe even something really cool.

722d ago
CDbiggen722d ago

We did get stranger of paradise though.

80°

Epic Games Faces $1.2 Million Fine Over "Unfair Practices," Plans to Fight Back

Epic Games is facing a $1.2 million fine by the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets over "unfair practices" in the Fortnite shop.

Sciurus_vulgaris13h ago

It might be cheaper to simply pay the fine. Fighting said fine could cost millions due to court and lawyer fees. Fortnite generates well over a 100 million in each month, so Epic has plenty of cash.

franwex6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

But if they did pay it, then they are basically admitting that they did something they weren’t supposed to be doing. If they fight it, they may win and continue to have a sense of urgency for their micro transactions thus making more money long term.

4h ago
Furesis1h ago

I'd fight back too. These are kinda meaningless reasons to fine someone like really for THAT. It's like they just wanted to make money or something.

110°

The Finals Underperforms for Nexon in Q1 2024

Nexon has released its financial statement for 2024's first quarter, and it looks like FPS The Finals isn't proving the hit the studio was hoping for.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
BlackDoomAx19h ago

Too bad for the best fps there is atm...

Sgt_Slaughter12h ago

The market for games like this is too over saturated to make a dent in other established games' player counts. Trying to start all over with a whole new multiplayer meta and grinding to get better is not feasible when there's already a ton of similar games that have come out before it.

40°

The Big Inworld AI Q&A - 'Everyone in Gaming Sees the Potential of Generative AI'

Wccftech interviewed Nathan Yu from Inworld AI to discuss the dynamic NPC tech's applications to games as well as potential issues like costs.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com