920°

That Cyberpunk 2077 Review is a Lie

xboxinfinity:

After reading the title, many people will be reading these words thinking I’m talking about a certain review that scored Cyberpunk 2077, 7 out of 10.
I’m not, I’m talking about every Cyberpunk 2077 review I’ve seen so far and the reason why I won’t be reviewing the game.

Read Full Story >>
xboxinfinity.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
If first-person personal pronoun like 'I' is used, then put the description inside the quotes along with the Author's name.
RaidenBlack1613d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Do not use exclamation mark in title
MaximusPrime_1615d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
✔ Fixed
Other
Finish the description, it should not end with an ellipsis.
ziggurcat1615d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed: content
cl19831613d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1613d ago
Changed: title, content
Xbox_Oldies1615d ago
ArchangelMike1615d ago

That 90 Metacritic rating though? Oh wait... it's now sitting at 89.

Good to see some retribution.

nommers1613d ago

Opencritic has it at 84 including all the versions. All things considered looking at metacritics current 49 (ouch) of the console versions I'd say they're getting off easy with that 84.

SullysCigar1613d ago

Well right here on N4G it's sitting at 79 from 44 reviews...

They did this to themselves - a delay would have had far less impact and I doubt they'd have made a significant loss financially. They wanted money NOW and they wanted the holiday spending, so they lied. Then they lied again about refunds. Then they lied again about not knowing it was so bad on base consoles.

The initial influx of reviews were fishy as hell - even on the best PC this game has problems that should prevent it objectively from attaining a 10/10 until they are resolved.

Michiel19891613d ago

@sully i agree, as a consumer i dont really care what the reason is they brought it out now. bad managment, investors pressure or what have you. It just doesnt justify what they put out as the final product. I judge the game as it comes out, not with the promise of what it can be in 6 months or so when they actually finished the game. Combine that with their deceit and shadyness with review copies and that they couldnt only show footage CDPR gave them and not their own gameplay, its shamefull really.

I dont mind reviews giving scores without taking account for bugs in a game as long as there is just a couple bugs in a game, its basically impossible to make big open world games without having some bugs/glitches here and there. However when the game is as buggy as CP2077, that just cant be overlooked in any review and should be reflected in the score. Especially since some of them are outright gamebreaking.

VenomUK1613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

Do Metacritic and Opencritic allow updates to review scores? The stability problems will obviously have damaged the Cyberpunk 2077 scores, though in a year I’m sure the game will better match CDPR’s original vision - but is that fair?

What happened with No Man’s Sky that underdelivered (but worked) at launch and after years from major improvements has just won a Game Award.

Pretentious1612d ago

I'm just glad I finally secured a PS5 so I can play this with little issue in less than a month.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1612d ago
solideagle1613d ago

now I look at all the 10/10 even on PC version sounds fishy, as there are so many bugs even in PC version.

1613d ago
specialguest1613d ago

There's absolutely no way a game should get a 10/10 or even a 9.5 for all of the bugs

Vx_1613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

The game problem isn't just the bugs, the whole system and mechanics are crap. AI is the worst I've ever seen, the crafting is boring and useless at most, the side quests are insignificant, the character is way too overpowered and this game has major balancing issues. Oh, and btw, the game "endings" only are affected by the choices you make in the very final act. so whatever you choose throughout the whole game doesn't really matter. Trash game of the generation more like, Corona 2077.

esherwood1613d ago

The games awesome and I’m playing on Xbox. Easily the best game this generation, no idea why all you nerds are on a warpath to tear it down but it’s ridiculous

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1613d ago
Baza1613d ago

Those console reviews looking real rough.

Vandamme211613d ago

It’s actually 88 now on metacritic. This game was way too overhyped.

nommers1613d ago

On open critic now its an 82.

-Foxtrot1613d ago

See people might call it “review bombing” when it’s a game they like or a from a studio they don’t want to see criticised but it’s not all trolls and the like...it helps gamers vent

It’s rightly deserved here

Ninver1613d ago

This is a 70 game at best. Talk about falling from grace.

Mulando1612d ago

Well, after all it is a really good game if the hardware can run it fluent.

Yes, they should not have released it in that state on last gen base-consoles.

1612d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1612d ago
Father__Merrin1613d ago

Goto YouTube and search for Cyberpunk bug montages it's hilarious no way is that a finished game it's shocking ppl gave it 90's

NoLifeLoser1613d ago

Reviewers look at the name of the publisher and then give their score accordingly.

abstractel1612d ago

If I were to review it based on MY experience, it'd be a 9 or 10. I realize I'm talking into a massive down-vote like Tiqila, but I love the crap out of this game. The bugs I've run into have been not being able to pick some objects up that are near corners or NPCs and similar, minor ones like that. I have a ridiculously powered PC which plays a big part.

I do feel bad for people running this on consoles, especially last-gen PCs, and even low-mid end PCs. It comes down to your personal experience.

Refunds are being accepted so I don't really care about speculating regarding the devs decision as I find it pointless. Want to wait until it's more stable on your hardware, you can. No one is forcing you to buy or even keep the game since they are accepting refunds. I'm glad it's out because I enjoy it, I'm sorry there's a lot of people who don't.

repsahj1612d ago

... that's why it's weird that CDPR didn't let reviewers use their own footage. Why they didn't experience all of this bug? Did they play until the later parts of the game or they just play the good portion and based that review on it?

Eamon1613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

Yeh, I'd say this does deserve a solid 7/10. 1 point off for bland gameplay and 2 points off for horrendous bugs.

It seems the characters, script, story and aesthetics are highly praised while the gameplay is pretty generic for a 2020 Action-RPG game with braindead AI.

I think I'll wait till all the debugging work is done before I get this one. And considering how huge of a mess it is, that might take a year.

anast1613d ago

One thing I dislike about game reviewers is that they never say which version of the game they played, especially with sometimes up to 5 different versions of the same game.

Now on to 2077, this whole "struggling hardware" thing is getting old. They advertised it as a current gen game and it is still a current gen game; therefore they mismanaged the project by making a current gen game that can only run well on next gen hardware. It is not the fault of current gen tech or current gen gamers. This is all on them. There are no should haves or would haves. They straight up went for the money play. Now they got their money and now gamers want their game fixed. It is as simple as that.

Mr_cheese1613d ago

I honestly don't believe hardware is the issue.

GTA5 was a ps3 game and look what they achieved.

cartoonx11613d ago

GTA5 had worst performance on ps3 thn this has on ps4 tho.

Ezio20481613d ago

@cartoonx1 are you crazy? Gta5 ran fine on ps3. I completed the game without any issues and I am sure a lot of people did. They didn't get 97 meta on ps3 for nothing.

jbrock111613d ago

Just absolutely terrible optimization.

Father__Merrin1613d ago

Not only that but their minimum and recommended pc specs are laughable. No way will you get a stable game unless you have ultra high end set up

jbrock111613d ago (Edited 1613d ago )

Doesn't even matter really. If you can even manage to avoid the bugs ( virtually impossible on any platform ), the game just isn't very fun. They had a lot of good ideas but virtually everything outside of the world itself was executed terribly. Game's a 5/10 or 6/10 at best in it's current state. 7/10 if they can get out all the bugs and I played on PC at max settings with a 3090/10900k.

anast1613d ago

I'm liking the story and I am playing on base... I would give it a 6 current or lower for lying about the state of the game and easily an 8 or 9 if the game wasn't all jacked up.

Xbox_Oldies1612d ago

I agree @Anast,
Far too many reviews don't mention it or hide it in small print.

Cyberpunk has proven there can be such a massive gap in performance between the same game running on different hardware (Xbox One/Series X),
I dread to think how much PC reviews would differ between the experience of minimum specs and the 3080+ they're probably reviewed on.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1612d ago
waverider1613d ago

Its funny all the talk of scale down is easy to do.... but in reality it goes right out of the window,,, Big fat lie.

SullysCigar1613d ago

Bu..But what about the magic Xbox 'slider'??!

hadowajp1613d ago

This really doesn’t have anything to do with scaling tho.. it’s poorly optimized and the brute force of the higher end consoles can smooth some of those issues. It’s to about scaling of it was designed for the hardware that can’t scale the program. 7years and this is what we got, glad I got a refund even having next gen systems I’ll grab when it’s 30 or less for the finished game.

Silly gameAr1613d ago

Just take note of every blog or gaming site that rated Cyberpunk a 9 or above, and be wary the next time they review a game that's hyped to high heaven. Also, watch the sites that rate great games lower than it seems like they should be. You can't really trust the gaming media now in days. You're your own best critic, and your opinion should matter more than anyone else's.

mafiahajeri1613d ago

Some of these guys go to freaking behind door showings of games where they probably sit down and drink and eat and chat and get chummy with the devs and shit, so basically what im saying is dont put value to peoples opinions that much, because theres a huge chance external factors could easily make their review scores biased. Also dont bitch and moan after you get tricked into buying a game like a dog being teased by his owner dangling a bone infront of them for 8 years only for it to turn out to be a fake toy bone.

Show all comments (65)
60°

CD Projekt RED Talks Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate Edition on Nintendo Switch 2

CD Projekt RED discusses Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate Edition for Nintendo Switch 2, with Joy-Con combat, VRR support, and portable performance.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community17d ago
50°

DF Direct Weekly #210: Next-Gen Sony Handheld , Cyberpunk DLSS on Switch 2, Docked VRR In Question

Join Rich, Oliver and Alex for discussion on the latest leaks surrounding the mooted PlayStation handheld and the myste…

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community25d ago
Profchaos25d ago

I really want to know what's going on with docked vrr cause cyberpunk at 40 fps docked seems to be a choice driven by vrr

110°

Cyberpunk 2077 on Switch 2 uses DLSS confirms CD Projekt RED

The first confirmed use of Nvidia's machine learning-based upscaler is revealed - and it's in one of Switch 2's most demanding titles.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community26d ago
Changed: embed code
Sonic188126d ago

DLSS should help the Nintendo Switch 2 with longevity

Profchaos25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Based on so e of the impossible ports we saw on switch 1 I'm not worried about the hardwares longevity.

Next gen systems ps6 and next box might slow down switch 2 development but given leaks showing PlayStation releasing a new portable system around the same time as ps6 that can play ps5 games says that next gen cross gen seems to be poised to last the entire generation

And right now I'd say there isn't much that couldn't be scaled down to run on switch 2

Goodguy0126d ago

Nvidia or Nintendo need to come out and detail how dlss will work on switch 2. Like is it dlss4? Or just completely customized for the switch.

Tacoboto26d ago

I'm sure they've detailed exactly that in documentation provided to developers.

b00mFargl326d ago

It will probably be behind a $20 demo that we have to download. 😂

PRIMORDUS26d ago

I like to know as well, which version of DLSS? 2, 3, 3.5 or 4? I mean it's not that hard for Nintendo to say which version games will use.

Profchaos25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Given the specs of the system and the time the hardware was produced if I had a stab in the dark I'd say a heavily customised dlss3

Neonridr26d ago

it's GPU is based around ampere technology, which is 3 series cards tech. So some features from DLSS4 can be ported down to older cards, just not some 5 series exclusive features like multi-frame gen.

Notellin26d ago

If they did what would that be even do for you?

originaljohn22d ago

Why do you care, are you a developer?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 22d ago
26d ago
Profchaos25d ago

40fps docked is a interesting choice as it's in the vrr range but we don't have confirmation of vrr docked