Approvals 10/3 ▼
morganfell (2) - 1357d ago Cancel
antbolton89 (3) - 1357d ago Cancel
starboy11 (3) - 1357d ago Cancel
RazzerRedux (2) - 1357d ago Cancel
630°

Marvel's Avengers – PlayStation Advantage Video | PS4

Reassemble for Marvel's Avengers on PlayStation including: • Exclusive access to an original, Crystal Dynamics take on Spider-Man as a DLC character and content in 2021.
* Exclusive community challenges
* Early Access to legendary outfits

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: title, content, url
Christopher1357d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1357d ago
caddytrek1357d ago

Well PlayStation is the best place to play.

SullysCigar1357d ago (Edited 1357d ago )

Maybe you should listen to it, since you've already acknowledged it's 'right'...

S2Killinit1357d ago (Edited 1357d ago )

My right foot scores goals, your right foot gives you proper advice. We are both lucky. Although Im a little worried that your foot is where you get your best ideas.

bujasem_891356d ago

I'm just here remembering Red's words.

RpgSama1357d ago

I'll be completely honest, for me as a PlayStation user this is only reinforcing my decision that PlayStation IS the best place to play, for me it's not anti-consumer, for me and for every other playstation only user, it's pro-consumer, that's Business

gamer78041357d ago

Its pro Sony only, as a PS player you would be better off if the spiderman character came to Xbox and pc. This would open up more opportunities for spiderman as a character and make crossplayy easier to implement. For noe spiderman will be relegated to a lesser class character with lesser interactions with the rest of the marvel team stories. But you are righabout one thing. Tghatbis how Sony chooses to do business and it is their right

IRetrouk1357d ago (Edited 1357d ago )

Why are you still making stuff up? You got this info from me yesterday but seeing as you want to continue to spread lies I will keep posting the links proving you wrong.

Crossplay? No such thing planned.

https://www.shacknews.com/a...
"We love the idea of cross-platform play," Escayg told Shacknews. "It's not something that we are currently doing."

Spiderman is getting his own event that brings him into the wider Avengers world.

https://blog.playstation.co...
"When Spider-Man comes to our stable of heroes, we’ll be marking his debut with an in-game event that will introduce him to the wider world of Marvel’s Avengers."

Also if its pro sony, hows it bad for playstation gamers? How does that make sense? Its pro playstation consumer.

Sonys not the only one choosing to do business this way..
22 timed launch exclusives.....

rainslacker1356d ago

For me, I'd rather just see the practice die across the board. But since it isnt likely to, I'm just indifferent most of the time. Full games being timed exclusive is about the only one I get worked up about

RaidenBlack1357d ago

I heard in Marvel's Avengers on Nintendo you get to play as Batman.

gamer78041357d ago

perhaps in this case, but to be honest, it could have been an even better place to play had Spiderman been released on PC and Xbox. now he's relegated to a third-class character

1356d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1356d ago
1357d ago Replies(1)
Abracadabra1357d ago ShowReplies(8)
Fishy Fingers1357d ago

Nobody seemed fussed about this game until the gave us something "exclusive" to lord over.

LOGICWINS1357d ago

This. I recall that the general consensus was that this game would be ass. Now that Spiderman is exclusive, fanboys on both sides are getting emotional....over something neither of them claimed to be interested in just a few weeks ago.

zeuanimals1357d ago

They've leveraged the console warz to boost their marketing. I don't think I've ever seen that. This game could've been a flop because nobody gave a shit or talked about it. Now, it's the biggest discussion.

Ausbo1357d ago

It’s because they tied the biggest marvel superhero behind exclusivity.

If this doesn’t get called out, it will continue.

rainslacker1356d ago (Edited 1356d ago )

I'm still not interested in the game. I love SM as much as the next guy, and avengers I like well enough, but i feel absolutely nothing about the direction of this game. At no point has it impressed me.

I may try it out and change my mind, but the SM exclusivity is more a curiosity to sometimes ponder or discuss philosophical principals in relation to current trends within the game industry...which I find much more interesting than the avengers game itself.

For the record though, I'm generally against these kinds of deals. Not because of how it impacts consumers, but because I feel it's mostly just wasted money, and seeing some other similar ones that cost tens of millions of dollars, I question if it's really worth spending that much on

RazzerRedux1357d ago

Well, they say there is no such thing as bad publicity so...

Christopher1357d ago

That argument goes both ways.

NeoGamer2321356d ago

Crystal Dynamics is a pretty solid developer and they haven't really had success outside of Tomb Raider. Until recently I was ignoring this game.

It looks interesting, but I am not sure yet. From the videos I've seen the graphics and framerates appear suspect. I will wait until after it releases and make a decision from there. Although I am not impressed by the exclusivity, I will buy it if it is a good game. Platform TBD based on what is in the exclusivity and how important that is to the best experience.

1356d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1356d ago
moriarty18891357d ago

Sony is being confident and showing how valuable it is to invest in exclusive content.

Show all comments (96)
60°

It's Not Too Late For Suicide Squad To Learn From Marvel's Avengers

TheGamer writes, "It feels like live service history repeating itself right now, but it's not too late to change that."

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community73d ago
130°

I’m so ready for Suicide Squad to fill the Avengers void in my life

Marvel’s Avengers didn’t soar properly on PS5 and Xbox, but Kill the Justice League looks like it will improve on it in every way.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community91d ago
poppatron91d ago

I can’t work out if this guy is just being sarcastic

Leeroyw91d ago

This website pumps out one shill article after the other. Does not qualify as journalism.

ShwaaMan91d ago

Said the guy who just got a big check from WB.

YourMommySpoils91d ago

Does that mean it will have a thousand pointless costumes like Avengers did, not related to the game or source?

coolbeans91d ago

"Guy who's excited for Suicide Squad to fill the void left by The Avengers' closure."

Traecy91d ago

I'll be checking it out on day one of release.

Show all comments (12)
180°

Why Have Many of the Online Multiplayer Games of the Past Five Years Failed?

Here's a look at why so many online-multiplayer games from the past five years have struggled to retain players and their attention.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community193d ago
ChasterMies193d ago

Or put another way, why don’t people want to invest in an on-line storefront?

sparky77193d ago

It's simply FOMO.

Gamers always go back to their staples like COD or Fortnite. Those games have constant content and leaving them for another game means getting left behind. Why start a new game and be behind when you can stay with a game you already excel at.

Number1TailzFan193d ago (Edited 193d ago )

COD is replaced every year or almost every year, it has no time to hold a player base. 3-4 years is a good timeline for a sequel IMO if the game has enough content to begin with, maybe add a couple of free content updates a bit later after release if needed, and job done until the next game.

Soldier of Fortune 2 was one of my first few online FPS games apart from RTCW and a couple of others, and that had a couple of free patches which added in new weapons, maps and a new game mode in just a year or so. I hope the series makes a comeback, I heard MS owns it now and it has been dormant for a while.

The only sequel that came fast (just 1 year later) that impressed me with extra content over the original was L4D2, makes me wonder what happened with Valve. If they can do that in one year then what have they been doing since..

-Foxtrot193d ago (Edited 193d ago )

Because it's not about putting out a fully completed game packed with content and something that actually works

It's about putting something out broken and barebones, slowly drip feed content with a roadmap and offering tons of MTs which they hope people will buy.

I miss when you'd just get games like Killzone or Halo and they'd get a couple of DLC packs then the developers would move onto the next game. Problem is they started to be influenced by COD where future games had to have gimmicks, weapon mods, loadouts, killstreaks and other shit which just become about what you had unlocked rather than skill.

The last multiplayer game I really enjoyed was Uncharted 2s, it was literally just two boosters and everyone started with the same weapons. It was great and felt like it was more about skill but then we got Uncharted 3 and 4 where the COD influence creeped in thinking that everything had to be bigger rather than sticking to the fanbase they had.

Nitrowolf2193d ago

i agree. i used to love MP games for these titles, and be excited about the map packs and such. now it's we will release one mode and one map, and see how people take to the game. Flops? cool move on.

isarai193d ago

Even before the PS3 generation ended, I was already longing for a return to simplistic MP without all the XP, booster, perks, and ridiculous custom loadouts full of op exploitation. Like there's definitely a huge audience for that, but there's NO classic style simple MP modes anymore, I'm just asking for some

ZeekQuattro193d ago

Most people don't have the time to invest into playing multiple GAAS and stick to just one. It also doesn't help that so many games in that field only have a roadmap laid out for the first month or so. Hard to keep people invested when you don't give them a reason to stick around after the initial launch month.

excaliburps193d ago

Yep. I know what you mean. I can't play more than 1-2 live service games at a time (this includes shooters) since it's just so overwhelming.

shinoff2183193d ago (Edited 193d ago )

My theory , well online gaming just sucks, so many online games recently that if done the right way could've been dope ass single player games. One that comes to mind evil dead. What a waste of the title

Show all comments (15)