80°

Assassin's Creed Odyssey Post-Launch, Season Pass Content Plan Revealed

Assassin's Creed Odyssey is the next installment in the open world action/adventure franchise, this time looks to be set in Ancient Greece.

Read Full Story >>
worthplaying.com
Chaosdreams2051d ago

*Whistles*

Okay, I was already interested but now you have me.

-Foxtrot2051d ago

Assassins Creed III? The most boring one.

Yeah...great

It was basically "F*** Yeah pre Murica...DIE RED COATS" only for Ubisoft to then be like "We're taking this seriously and not going to get involved in the war or make Connor pick sides"... *shows trailer Connor slaughtering red coats and fighting alongside colonists"

MrSwankSinatra2051d ago

lmaoooo you still spewing the same BS, that you were spewing before the game came out i see. Anyone who's played the game knows that it was not even like that.

-Foxtrot2051d ago (Edited 2051d ago )

I've played it...I literally had to push myself through it quickly and it pretty much was

It made no sense aswell especially with the lore the previous games told us about Washington using the Apple of Eden.

Templars...Freemasonary...Fou nding Fathers...it all connects yet in this game they decided to scrap that so it didn't offend Americans being the bad guys. The red coats would have made more sense being mostly Assassins and because the templars (colonists) won the war. This would have explained why in the future during Desmonds time Templars have basically taken over and the Assassins were low in numbers, dying off...them loosing here would have been the turning point to the Assassin vs Templar war

Haytham was a much better character and he should have been the main lead for this game with his little group being the ones to try and stop the war, against the early founding fathers from using their influence to rise up the ranks over the years and dominate future America.

So you can say I'm "spewing bullshit" but the fact is I'm dissapointed because as a fan I wanted to see somethign the earlier games hinted at and which would have made more sense logically. Instead they were basically scared painting the US in a bad light would hurt game sales.

They said all away through the games release Connor would, and I'm paraphrasing, "not get involved", "Connor won't pick a side, he's totally neutral", "no one is bad", "we're not painting anyone in a bad light" or "the war is just a background conflict"

YET...the E3 trailer for example

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Connor comes in from the Colonists side, slaughters the Red coats, inspires the rest of the Colonists to fight back.

Tells a completely different story and contradicts Ubisofts bullshit PR.

Hardiman2051d ago

Cool I enjoyed III and look forward to playing it again! I'll go through BF and Rogue again before it releases.

170°

Ubisoft blames “technical error” for showing pop-up ads in Assassin’s Creed

A fullscreen pop-up ad appeared in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey for some players this week.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
Einhander1972153d ago

Technically, we wanted more money.

bradfh153d ago

Call of Duty already does this; Ubisoft and other game companies will follow suit and explore similar approaches.

Kaii153d ago

Congratulations, A technical error In displaying ads while playing.
EU consumer law needs to chew these assholes a new one.

TheColbertinator153d ago

At this point the entire EU commission must be bribed

Christopher153d ago

The big note here is the built in ad-displays during gameplay and not that they happened. Start screen, cool. Gameplay? That shouldn't ever happen.

Yi-Long152d ago (Edited 152d ago )

"Start screen, cool."

Uhm, no. Start screen very much NOT cool either. There really need to be new laws implemented banning these companies from shoving ads down out throats at every opportunity they see fit.

Crows90152d ago

For free to play which is a market of games needing monetization through different venues. In those games this stuff is fine by me. But when you pay ..20, 40 ,60, or $70 that's when it is not okay to any degree.

jznrpg152d ago

Start screen not cool either

walken7153d ago

They're testing the waters, vote with your wallets.

porkChop153d ago

That's not a technical error. An ad can't be displayed mid-game without you creating the code/tech to make that possible first.

Show all comments (24)
80°

The Best Video Games That Feature Canada

This Canada Day, explore our homeland with the best video games that have adapted or reimagined the Great White North in digital form.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
244d ago
240°

6 Worst Video Game Remasters

GF365: "Occasionally, developers try to revamp classic games and sometimes they mess it up. Here are our picks for the six worst video game remasters."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
SinisterMister354d ago

They did the OG GTA Trilogy dirty.

badz149354d ago

yup, with the amount of money they are making with GTAV, and the amount of time they've had with both the games and the hardware, what they chose to do with the Remasters was criminal!

just_looken354d ago

So true but the worst is the borderline death of the mod community thanks to the remaster and take 2 in general.

They are remastering gtaiv so now any mod for that game is under fire and soon a worse version of that game will get tossed out.

If you head to youtube there is a year later videos on the gta trilogy they now removed stuff like physics to get the game to work but its still trying to be as good as those mobile ports.

Here is one good video to watch
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Chard354d ago

I recall the remaster of IV got cancelled in order to prioritise VI and fixing the trilogy. But I'm assuming this is as good as the 'definitive' trilogy will get through official support - I wonder how much more could be done by the mod community. The original III and VC have reverse engineered ports which are probably the best current way to play them.

just_looken353d ago

@chard

Groove street is working on a unannounced project still they are going to do something for gtaiv anniversary based on a rumor.

Do not forget gta trilogy was the 3rd best selling game under the take 2 umbrella that year.

Demetrius354d ago

Ain it tho smh and they still won’t overhaul them smh I just purchased the original trilogy for my ps2 slim the cds were even still new posters in the case with the manuals lol I still play them for hours I won’t even look at gameplay of the defective edition bullsh**

Chard354d ago

are they still patching it?

just_looken354d ago

grove street stopped patching few months in and is now working on a unannounced title while a inhouse team in rockstar made the game playable so all missions can be finished and got that team got it back on steam store.

As my comment uptop states there are videos showing documentation and though it on steam the game is not near the quality of the mobile ports it came from. The ps2 era copies just destroy it overall.

Profchaos353d ago (Edited 353d ago )

Yet it still sold over 10 million. I'm guilty of buying it twice ps5 and switch. And it still crashes at the end of specific missions like the casino heist in GTA SA when playing at 30 fps or the mission in vc where you and Lance race the boat to the dealer.

Despite that it's still better than it was but could be better.

They knew these games had huge demand they should of done each game properly seven if that meant developing each title individually over a year or two rather than all three at once and or a full remake rather than a remaster with generic ue4 assets and effects slotted in

Yet despite all of this I'm extremely hopeful that after 6 drops we get a HD trilogy on modern system whatever that may be ps6 switch 3 and Xbox series next

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 353d ago
chicken_in_the_corn354d ago

I thought the GTA trilogy was great. The changes to the controls and combat made it big improvement over the originals.

just_looken354d ago

If you had a pc you would know silent patch along with a few other mods to make said controller your using and mods to make said pc to work would give you a far better experience and for way less money.

There were gta san andreas mods that blew away what grove street did.

The weapon wheel by the way was from a mod.

This video alone is a middle finger to grove street
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Number1TailzFan354d ago

Yea San Andreas had a good multiplayer mod just a short bit after it came out which was really popular.

just_looken354d ago (Edited 354d ago )

That mp mod then after there what we all battle royal now was great same with the just cause mp.

isarai353d ago

I think some improvements were cool, but overall it's a MUCH lesser experience than playing the originals. The aiming is garbage in the trilogy, and even the "classic" mode isn't done right, especially how it locks into NPCs in cars, crap has gotten me killed so many times in the remasters. And un the original GTASA you could click R3 to switch between locked in and free aim in the fly, in the remasters you have to change it in the options menu to go from locked in to free aim

autobotdan354d ago

Tales or Symphonia Remastered

gold_drake354d ago

the silent hill collection was pretty ... odd.
not because they fucked it up, but damn. some choices were made ha.

just_looken354d ago

A classic were the publisher made a billion that year but could not afford to produce another patch do too hosting fees.

cammers1995353d ago

PS3 got the final patch. 360 did not. Some say the final patch worked, some say it didn't. I honestly think it depends on console model of the PS3 and other factors. Something was really weird with how those games played. Sh2 ran fine for most, sh3 depended on PS3 model.

just_looken352d ago

@cam

Over time sony tweaked the hardware and removed some stuff off the board like the psp.

Pre 2008 games need og ps3 systems with old firmware for flawless play for instance.

IamTylerDurden1354d ago (Edited 354d ago )

AC3 but not the Prototype bundle? List immediately invalidated. And Mafia 2 and 3 deserve to be there, basically ports, but Mafia 1 was a technical remake.

The list sucks. It's why ppl with websites or media clout are not necessarily the most qualified. To put AC3 and not the Ezio Collection is dumb af. AC3 was a better upgrade than the Ezio Collection which essentially an up rez. I looked merely at the hashtags so if he clarifies in the article i apologize but read Digital Foundry. The improvement went up from Ezio to Rogue Remastered to AC3 Re. Rogue is arguably a worse remaster, there were multiple remasters of the IP that were worse but AC3 hate gets clicks.

Arkham remasters were worse no question on a technical aspect. No improvement, were they 30 frames? I enjoyed Darksiders 2 remaster but i would understand it being on a list. Weak list, i could do better off the top let alone if payed for an article, with time to think.

IamTylerDurden1354d ago

Ezio also 60, ik, basically just PC version. AC3 had real lighting tech improvements and minor gameplay tweaks as well. Not a great remaster but better than the likes of Prototype, Arkham, Darksiders 2 etc even though i love Darksiders 2. How great was Dark Souls 2 remaster? Looked like a basic 60/rez. I didn't play it though.

ZeekQuattro354d ago

Funny you mentioned the Arkham remasters. A friend of mine just a few days ago played the remasters for the first time. He asked me how it was possible for the games to look worse than they did on the PS3. What you said got a chuckle out of me because of it.

IamTylerDurden1354d ago

I take em to church. I should write articles. Arkham is on Mt Rushmore for worst remasters. I played it bc i play everything. These writers go by clicks. I spit truth. Arkham was bad bc they tried to import the newer Unreal Engine and it was a flop. Arguably a downgrade. AC3 was an upgrade. Prototype was a port. Cmon man...

Show all comments (24)