80°

Second Opinion: Valve Hates You, And Maybe You Should Hate Valve

This week's episode of Hey Poor Player's Second Opinion series weighs in not on a game, but on the recent discussion about Valve's "good guy" pro-customer persona.

Read Full Story >>
heypoorplayer.com
derkasan2530d ago

It's still a company at the end of the day.

jznrpg2530d ago

They dont hate anyone, they need to make money. Sounds like propaganda from another company

IanTH2530d ago

Yea I think hate is a bit strong. I'd say "indifferent" is a more apt descriptor. But I'm of the mind that Valve probably has earned more good will than it deserves, and that's coming from a guy who's pretty invested in Steam thanks to years of building up a huge library there.

Lockdown5552529d ago

But how have they earned that good will? By simply providing a good marketplace? By offering consistent sales better than the competition? If they haven't tried to shove it down your throat that they deserve good will but are simply getting it I don't think it's more than they deserve.

TheColbertinator2530d ago

A certain company must be behind these attacks on Valve. Pulling the puppet strings of the gaming media.

Lockdown5552529d ago

I think you're on to something. All this Valve hate is just baseless and ignorant. People are literally hating on Valve because people love steam so much and not because of anything they are doing. It doesn't make any sense.

psuedo2530d ago

The guy in the video said he hates valve, so his opinion is biased. Why wouldn't valve love everyone after making tons of money?

Lockdown5552529d ago

I really don't get all this valve hate lately. They definitely don't hate us, we're their customers and without us they would make no money. They may not care about us because at the end of the day they are a business. The funny thing is, everybody claims they've somehow gained too much good will, but how? I've never once in all my years of using steam felt like they were trying to convince me they were the "good guy". They simply provided a very user friendly market for games that have killer sales. Any good will they've earned was simply because the customers enjoyed their service. This hate is just ignorant.

90°

F1 Arcade Opens In Boston

This reminds me of Gameworks and sounds really fun. F1 Arcade (F1Arcade.com/us/), the world’s first premium F1 entertainment experience, today opened its first US location in Boston Seaport.

60°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

on_line_forever1h ago

after what we see ( 2015 - 2024 ) in dark souls 3, blood borne , sekiro , dragon's dogma 2 , rise of the Ronin combat they should really careful and bring very good combat in Witcher 4 this time

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218311h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies128h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC10h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218310h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic9h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix7h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6910h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.