320°

The Switch is the Most Exciting Thing in Gaming

The Switch is the most exciting thing in gaming because it brings something new and endless possibilities not possible on other systems

Read Full Story >>
vgculturehq.com
TheSuperiorGamer2745d ago

Really can't wait for the January 12th reveal.

bouzebbal2744d ago

i guess only the games will determine that

CaptainObvious8782744d ago

"endless possibilities not possible on other systems"

It's not even as powerful as the PS4, how the f*** is it going to do anything the other systems can't?

And if some nin fan says "It can run skyrim on the go" I'm going to loose it.

Monster_Tard2744d ago

It can run Skyrim on the go.

yeahokwhatever2744d ago (Edited 2744d ago )

its not even up to xb1 og standards. Its dead on arrival with third party multiplats. It cannot be your primary console unless you only play nintendo first party games. 3ds is a better bet to game on the go as its already established, successful, has a wide variety of first party nintendo games. Which is more than you'll get with a switch.

Maybay2745d ago

What I like about the Switch is it's portability factor (among its other variety of features). Imagine; your three friends bring over their Switch handhelds, and you (being the owner or renter of the place) get to play on the TV with your Switch being docked. Everyone has their own screen!

No more; "stop looking at my screen" cheaters in multiplayer shooters.

Ark_2744d ago

... like a LAN party - without the hassle.
I like that a lot about the Switch. It's easy couch coop and multiplayer sessions.
And a great opportunity for gaming (real life) friends to spend more time together.

MRMagoo1232744d ago

@ark

what hassle is there setting up a lan ?? it takes 20 seconds 😂

badz1492744d ago

@WeAreLegion

Shh...how dare you. This is a revolution I tell ya!

Ark_2744d ago

@MrMagoo

We used to do (small) PC LAN Partys on a regular basis. You need to unplug your stuff (PC, display, peripherals) at home, carry it over, reconnect everything and set up the LAN (which might take 20 sec. ... if you're lucky and everything works). When you are done you unplug your shit again, pack it, move it over to your house, reconnect everything.

For me that's a hassle - at least compared to carrying a tablet.

Maybay2744d ago

@WeAreLegion
There's a difference. And for you and your legions of up voters not to notice it, is strangely bizarre.

@stuna1
So you'd rather pay more of an electricity bill? There's a difference, think!

@MRMagoo123
For a gaming enthusiast (such as yourself) - I'm amazed how utterly obtuse you are about this topic.

@badz149
Never stated it was "revolutionary." Inferiority complex?

@Ark_
Well put. I don't understand why my post was counted as a "negative one."

@_-EDMIX-_
Sure (same with any handheld), though you need to understand that the Nintendo Switch is a new device with Nvidia hardware and Nintendo IP's (my jam). I never stated it was a "revolution,'' only that I'm excited for it.

@vickers500
Funny! I'm not even mad :P

WeAreLegion2744d ago

You're right. The difference is the Switch will have a smaller screen than your laptop.

And a lower resolution.

And less games.

Other than those, there are zero differences. And again...what about handhelds? Isn't that just as easy as playing Switch, if not easier? Plus... they'll fit in your pocket! The Switch won't.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2744d ago
_-EDMIX-_2744d ago

Could that not be stated about what somebody likes about the PSP 3000?...

yeahokwhatever2744d ago

or like, mobile phones. you're basically getting a tablet that plays nintendo games with a switch. you could just buy an ipad and play shit games now! why wait?

vickers5002744d ago

Good luck convincing 3 friends (let alone 1) to buy one.

SR3882744d ago

I've got about 30 people I know getting one lol poo on you!

yeahokwhatever2744d ago

Nintengoth is the census taker for japan.

ape0072745d ago

LOLOLOL!! That was a good joke

UltraNova2744d ago

Well its the authors opinion so...

On that note, If the switch is the most exciting thing in gaming right now then what's VR? Hell, gaming these days must really suck then...

Christopher2744d ago

The actual games. Hardware is freaking boring, but the games are starting to shine.

Aenea2745d ago

This author believes it's the most exciting thing in gaming at this moment but is not actually able to tell us why...

To me it's still a typical Nintendo console with the typical Nintendo games, that's a good thing tho. The only thing it's doing different is that it's a hybrid, but honestly I don't feel that it's all that exciting, at least to me it isn't.

I don't see myself go outside of the house with it, didn't do that with the DS nor with the PSP or Vita. So it's for inside use for me as well and then I rather play it on the TV. Sure, I can bring it to the bedroom where I don't have a TV and still continue gaming but I could already do that with the PS4 and Vita and hardly use that option anyways.

I don't really see the social aspects this adds either, I mean, if your friends just bring their Switches than it's like they bring their handheld consoles which is possible now already.

And the author mentions VR twice, calls PSVR last gen's tech (when talking about a Nintendo console that IS kinda funny) but seems excited for it on the Switch which then uses the Switch's display as the VR display, which is 720p..... I can't see that being any good at all if I'm honest. The screen door effect will be really noticeable.

So no, I don't really get why this author feels it's the most exciting thing in gaming. I am, however, excited for it, but just as I would for any other new console...

TheSuperiorGamer2745d ago

PSVR is last gen tech. Just play Oculus with Touch or even the Vive. It's night and day.

We can debate about graphics all we want. But that's not the end-all.

Aenea2745d ago

The motion controls are perhaps last gen tech, the VR headset is not...

stuna12744d ago (Edited 2744d ago )

Are you saying that because Nintendo and their fan can't claim first dibs on who invented it first for consoles!? Because as I see it if Nintendo were first to the table it would be touted as some extraordinary future tech. In so many way just like what the Switch will be doing as oppose to the PS3/PS4, Vita interactivty. The difference is just the Switch will consolidate the hardware which is to be expected a generation later, but it doesn't automatically nagate what the PS3/PS4, Vita did and is doing before it.

@wonderfulmonkeyman

And if you carefully read my comment you'd understand why I used the phrase "consolidate the hardware". Also as a side note, the Switch is probably useless on the TV without the docking station, the Vita or I phone/I pad don't require a docking station to operate.

wonderfulmonkeyman2744d ago (Edited 2744d ago )

Stuna, you might want to change your example.
The PS3/4/Vita connectivity requires wifi, which can fail or cause lag issues, and not all titles are compatible.
The Switch requires no wifi and all titles known so far can be played on it regardless of if it's docked or not.
Poor comparison.

2744d ago
DashArrivals2745d ago

Not even close to the most exciting thing. Hope the Switch does really well, but I'm not interested in it in the slightest. I actually think it's going to flop, when compared to PS4 and Xbox. But I honestly hope it does well, Nintendo damn well deserve it to do well. Good luck

guywazeldatatt2744d ago

What's more exciting upcoming in the future?

DragonDDark2744d ago (Edited 2744d ago )

I'd rather see what games we are playing on it. Games > hardware.
Hardware without games is a fail in my book.
So yeah, I'm excited for games not hardware.

MRMagoo1232744d ago (Edited 2744d ago )

I usually like to take a poo and read some news in the morning when I get up .....that's more exciting to me. Nintendo has turned into a gimmick maker for kids. I hope they can make a comeback I would have loved to see a really powerful console out of them in the lines of 2 times more powerful than the ps4 pro or so but /shrug they just love making gimmicks that don't sell.

StraightedgeSES2744d ago

Idk alot of people seem interested in the Switch

UltraNova2744d ago

Yeah...my cousin say's he's done with Nintendo after the Wii U and it was Switch that made it easier for him to let go(his words not mine). He will stick to his Ps4 and buy the scorpio when it comes out...

I think this is the general consensous on Nintendo's new take on consoles.

But, (yes there's a but..) I m willing to keep an open mind until January's reveal and wait a few months to see what kind of a support the Switch will have then make up my mind.

OB1Biker2744d ago (Edited 2744d ago )

I actually agree. Many for the novelty, many for the handheld (but is it the end for 3DS?), and I can see the appeal for kids not to take over the TV
I think it will sell well. IMO not the mind blowing exciting 'thing' some would have it but a clever way to respond to a particular demand from Nin.

rjason122744d ago

No way that it's gonna flop, this thing has generated more buzz (without knowing everything about it) than the Wii U has done in its entire lifetime.

_-EDMIX-_2744d ago

Lol none of us know how it's going to perform , so I don't think any of us can really say for sure whether or not it's going to flop.

rjason122744d ago

@Edmix
Nope, I know what it's gonna do, I'm using the same crystal ball everyone else using on this site!

yeahokwhatever2744d ago

The only "buzz" ive seen so far is in the form of paid hype. (Jimmy Kimmel, etc.) My facebook timeline is full of game professionals, and literally none of them are talking about the switch. Most of them were pretty hyped about the Wii U. Unless the switch is damn cheap, I really don't see it doing too great in the US.

yeahokwhatever2744d ago

why do they deserve for it to do well when it clearly sucks?

DashArrivals2744d ago

Because Nintendo have been in the gaming business for a very long time. The Wii U sucked and it deserved to fail. But if they make a good product this time, then they deserve to have it do well.

yeahokwhatever2744d ago

Is it a good product? It seems like it's not likely to have a lot of good third party support. Its pretty lacking when unplugged. I'm sure the first party nintendo games will be great, but how far does that really get you?

DashArrivals2744d ago

That's just the thing, we don't know if it's any good yet. We'll have to wait and see.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2744d ago
Show all comments (85)
60°

Multiplayer JRPG 'Soul Covenant' Coming to All Major VR Headsets Next Month

Thirdverse, the Japan-based VR studio behind Swords of Gargantua, Altair Breaker, and X8, announced that its VR multiplayer JRPG SOUL COVENANT is coming to all major headsets next month. Developed by the core team behind SOUL SACRIFICE (2013), players are thrust into a post-apocalyptic Tokyo in the franchise’s first VR expansion.

Read Full Story >>
roadtovr.com
130°

“Survival horror and VR go well together” - Producer Hints possible VR Version for the RE Series

In a very recent development, Capcom has announced that the VR mode for the “Resident Evil 4” remake is scheduled to be added on the 8th of December as an update and will support the full main story campaign, offering an unprecedented gaming experience to its users. However, RE Series fans have another reason to rejoice as there is a possibility that RE Series might get a VR Version in the future.

Read Full Story >>
espressogamers.it
Abnor_Mal203d ago

This I would welcomed, haven’t replayed any of the older games since released years ago. VR would definitely get me to replay them all again. Make it happen Capcom.

MrBaskerville203d ago

Psvr2 version of Re7 and Re2Remake would be fire.

Tacoboto203d ago

Capcom porting anything to SteamVR would be fire.

Petebloodyonion203d ago

You can already play RE 2-3-7-8 on PC via VR mods (Praydog) they offer hand-tracking movement (like PSVR2 Village) and full VR cutscenes.
THE RE7 mod is better compared to the old PSVR version due to hand tracking.
https://youtu.be/4MAu4p59Wu...

Tacoboto203d ago

Modding != Official Support

Petebloodyonion203d ago

"Modding != Official Support"
And?
You can still play it in VR and worse it shows that this is far from a complicated feat requiring a full studio with tons of money since it's been done by 1 guy working on this mod from time to time.
So basically this could have been done by Capom a long time ago.

And again You should try (it's pretty easy to install) for Res7 for It's improved even on the PSVR version of the game.

Vanfernal203d ago

Spencer Mansion in VR would be AMAZING. That is my favorite video game setting of all time.

Babadook7203d ago (Edited 203d ago )

Itchy... tasty... More RRR EEE!!

300°

VR isn't ready for a "must-play" experience

Reggis Fils-Aimé is right about VR needing "must-play" games, but the sector isn't ready to play host to that kind of cultural phenomenon.

What will it take for VR to grow beyond its niche status and become an important commercial pillar of the games industry? It's quite literally a billion dollar question – many billions, in fact.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Knushwood Butt478d ago

'What will it take for VR to grow'

More people to try it instead of making out they are not interested in it.

I wasn't an early adopter of PSVR and was pretty sceptical about it before I finally made the plunge. Got PSVR2 day one.

1Victor478d ago

Shusssssh 🤫don’t tell them psvr had a FPS multi player vr game

ApocalypseShadow478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

Knush hit it right on the head. More people to try it.

Reggie isn't entirely wrong. But he's not entirely right either. Must play games are already here and has led many to buy VR to experience these "must play" games TODAY. That must play game depends on the individual. He's looking for that one game where everyone has to play it. Gaming doesn't work that way. Maybe he's thinking of a Mario VR game. But a Mario style VR game already exists with Astrobot. It just costs a lot for many to buy in to try it. When they did get to try it, they found an amazing game filled with fun and innovation that would match any Mario game made. But the VR industry has a long road ahead. It's not on someone's time line. Not even Reggie's.

That's with anything new on the market. Cars. Cellphones. TVs. Etc. None of these things were a breakout hit overnight. People riding horses probably thought cars were a novelty. Niche. Now, cars have replaced horses. Millions are used daily. Did it take a particular horse to ride for everyone to see that cars were great to get around in? No. It was only cost and availability for everyone to try it and find their own use for it.

Cellphones were expensive at one time. A brick in your hand. Once they became cheaper, built with more practical uses, cellphones were in billions of hands. TVs were for only a few consumers. Once it was affordable for everyone to enjoy, billions bought a TV and regularly use it daily.

Consoles didn't arrive to where they are overnight. It took decades. Not everyone had a game console on my street. Just a few of us. Others had to come over to try it. Same with computers. Same damn thing. Cost and availability to try them. Now, millions upon millions use them daily.

Just because Reggie speaks doesn't mean he's right on things. Yeah. Maybe it would take console manufacturers to switch over to a product that has VR built in day one that's affordable that still plays flat games. That day isn't here yet because it would be expensive to buy and try it. But that day of affordability is coming. If Nintendo built a Switch 2 that has built in VR, the days of VR being accepted would shorten from decades to one decade or less. Same if Apple or Google built a phone with VR built in day one. Then, all the developers would have to fall in line and build VR content. VR today is on a natural growth path. It's not leaving anytime soon or dying off like 3D TV.

Raider and Einhander made great points along these lines.

Fiddlerblue477d ago (Edited 477d ago )

People might not be interested in VR for a variety of different reasons.

It might make them motion sick (it does for me), they might not like the idea of strapping a big device to their head that pretty much completely locks them out of the real world, etc.

But the biggest reason is price vs the amount of quality software. You buy a game console on the promise and trust that quality games that you enjoy are going to come to it. This is a trust built of decades of past experience between the consumers and the brand/platform. That trust and past experience vs the asking price will pretty much determine if a consumer will purchase a piece of hardware or not. VR just doesn't have that trust built up yet and the asking price is still high but these things take time. There's no "magic bullet" game that will make everyone go out and buy a headset unless there's already a sizable library of other top-notch games available that they think they will also enjoy.

There's also the distinct possibility that VR tech as it is right now is just destined to be niche and will remain so until some era when VR eyeglasses with touch activated smart glass or or something crazy like that are a possibility. The market will determine it.

XBManiac477d ago

Well... good quality VR has been very expensive for years. To play Half-Life: Alyx in good shape you needed a high end PC and HQ VR set connected to it. But, now, with Quest 2 or Pico 4 and a wireless connection to a sub 1.000$ PC you can experience the game full quality and maintaining 72/90 fps. If laptops and small format PCs continue improving at the rate AMD is going and VR wireless kits maintain their prices with better and better quality, this only can improve and go wider. Remember that consoles from this generation, PS5 and Xbox Series X are at the 500+ dollars level... 3 years after launch. Prices are not really mainstream for gaming these days and PC continues to be an unfriendly platform for many. What PlayStation is doing is one more step in the right direction, before Facebook, Apple and Valve (does Steam Deck sounds familiar?) jump some steps at once.

H9477d ago

The vast majority of people have better things to do than buy a expansive product to try something that they don't find interest in already, the job of marketing is to make it appealing to you so you make the decision without needing to be 100% sure about it and most of the times, it's that big game that pushes peoe for such decisions, buying something to see if it will be interesting or not is absurd 99% of the times

S2Killinit477d ago

I’ve already found 3 games like that just in the launch window of PSVR2.

H9477d ago

@S2Killinit power to you, most people can't say the same

Knushwood Butt477d ago (Edited 477d ago )

How can you not have interest in something you've never tried?

Do you live your life without trying anything new?

I tried a new restaurant for lunch the other day. It was somewhat hit and miss, but at least now I know, and can use that experience to make a judgement on whether I want to give it another shot or not.

H9476d ago

@Knushwoodbutt sorry it's a bit hard to understand your point since each of us Haven't tried most things out there, does that mean you are interested about everything there is in the world and never see something you haven't tried and think I don't like this sort of stuff? When i look at something i get an idea whether or not it may be to my liking, surprises exist but in if you know yourself you can be correct a lot of the times, and most importantly like I said, nobody in the whole world have time and money to do what you are saying, you are telling me to try VR to see if I am interested or not, when I say I am not interested in horizon they tell me to play it to see, FF VII Remake 2, basically every fandom of every game, and that's just gaming, go to every activity there is, I think you can see that your method of thinking is impossible, you yourself must have ignored tons of things for no reason other than not being interested or else you will not have time to even play VR

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 476d ago
kingnick477d ago

Sorry I have no interest in VR. I prefer most genres with a traditional controller and some genres with KB&M.

Many people simply don't have the money for VR and the money they do have they'd rather spend on traditional games. Other people are not obligated to follow and validate your choices.

TheEroica477d ago

No thanks. I'll game the way I choose.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 476d ago
bunt-custardly478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

The onus is on the developers themselves. Take PC VR, did you guys know there is a chap called LukeRoss who does flatscreen to VR conversions using a gamepad not motion controls. Yeh, some circles might scoff and say gamepad is not proper VR, but many others would disagree. Giving some examples you can play Elden Ring in VR, Cyberpunk 2077 even Spider-Man. These are all AAA titles that the developers decided not to invest in VR for whatever reason. Yet a single person has managed to do it.

Total madness and the reason we see these sorts of articles.

I'll tell you what guys. If they port Half-Life: Alyx to PSvR 2 then you will see a paradigm shift in attitude towards VR.

crazyCoconuts478d ago

Alyx is good, but it's still just one game. Even with the custom level creation (which is great) I wouldn't say it's going to transform the industry. It certainly didn't for PCVR.
I don't know what it will take to become mainstream. I'm pretty sure it will just don't know when and how. I think it would help if it was integrated into some of the hot flat screen social games like official Minecraft, Fortnite, Apex, COD? Dunno if you could effectively cross play VR and flat in those games but it would help imo

bunt-custardly478d ago

I think the reception of HL:Alyx is more than just "good" is has been widely regarded and credited as one of the best VR games to-date. You are right though, it is one game and perhaps I was being somewhat melodramatic.

Crows90478d ago

Only because of a lack of VR adoption. Most issues with VR stem from it's price of entry.

EvertonFC478d ago

There is loads of great VR games, not just one

JackBNimble478d ago

It's going to remain niche until they start developing AAA games or at least have an option for VR in mainstream games.

If more people are going to buy into it, then you need the software.

Knushwood Butt477d ago

GT7 and RE8 have those options.

After the Fall isn't AAA but I can't wait to dive back into it. In fact, that's what I'm going to do now.

S2Killinit477d ago (Edited 477d ago )

We already have AAA games in VR though. And they are much better than the flat versions.

derek477d ago

@bunt No it will not, ALyx has the same issue in that you can't see how great it is unless you put the headset on and try. But for anyone who actually has played on vr and enjoys it, these meta discussions are always so weird. I played gt7 vr for a solid 5 hours yesterday and it has been the best game I've played this generation because of vr.

S2Killinit477d ago (Edited 477d ago )

Horizon is on par with Half-Life Alyx

But I would love that as well.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 477d ago
Einhander1971478d ago

The ones who say they aren't bothered haven't probably played VR. If they did they would realise how amazing and immersive it is. The likes of Moss, Rez, Turismo, Thumper, Astrobot, are seriously incredible experiences you won't ever get on a TV. Dont get me wrong VR isn't the be all and end all. It's just another way of enjoying Videogaming.

RaiderNation478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

What will truly usher VR into the mainstream is all the NON gaming applications that can potentially be used with VR. Imagine the NFL offering an NFL Sunday VR ticket where you could sit virtually at the 50 yard line in every stadium! Or what about courtside in every NBA arena? Or ringside at a UFC or boxing pay per view! What about travel? Id love to virtually tour the pyramids of Giza or the Sistine Chapel! Or what about Mars? Imagine they fit the next rover we send to mars with a VR camera that anyone with a VR headset can discover whatever the rover discovers! What about classrooms being taught in VR? Or concerts? The possibilities are endless! VR gaming is cool and all but im looking way beyond that!

After10Ben478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

You bring up an excellent point. I saw some VR footage of an NBA game and it was incredible. I was right under the basket and seeing a professional basketball player's footwork in VR is nothing like watching it from the stands or the TV. Imagine watching the Super Bowl in VR? I also saw a boxing match in VR once and it was equally incredible. I personally loved the Hulu app in VR, because it gave me a peaceful, beautiful virtual living room to escape to for a few hours. After a workout, I would chill out on the virtual beach and watch movies on a giant screen--there's nothing like it. Great point RaiderNation.

EvertonFC478d ago

NASA and SpaceX are looking into VR for the first mars landing, no doubt we will have a live VR feed for the first landing.

shinoff2183477d ago

My buddy brought his vr to work one day to show the couple nba fans there that you could do the Courtside thing. It was really dope. I can't remember what headset though. The nba is always ahead of the curve compared to alot of sports leagues(in the us atleast , I can't tell you about over seas)

z2g478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

Here is my honest take having just bought a psvr2 and living with it for a little bit now and all but abandoning my Quest 2. Just my own truth and my own objective option as someone who just shelled out over $650 to get the latest and arguably best vr experience in my hands.

I regrettably agree with the article. Don’t get me wrong, VR and even specifically in my case PSVR2 Is awesome… but I’m not suddenly wishing MS would now release a headset for my Series X or thinking they are idiots for not doing so. I don’t think it will significantly disrupt or change the majority of my gaming habits. The Quest 2 didn’t either and PSVR2 is SIGNIFICANTLY better.

GT7 and Call of the Mountain are well beyond what my expectations would be in the best possible way, but beyond that, there just aren’t many must have games or mind blowing AAA game experiences (at least for a little while). there’s also the fact that most vr games and even the process of playing them just don’t flow as naturally as just plopping down, grabbing a controller and going for it. There’s work and setup involved and the gameplay is usually a bit different and sometimes more complicated (even if it is cool). There’s a mental tax there.

I am really impressed with psvr2 and it’s exceeded my expectations,but I can already tell that it’s going to be an occasional thing and not my go to thing. That’s not a knock on it, that’s just reality that will result. A majority of times I’m gonna plop down on the couch and get into some COD or GTA online or God of War or whatever the hit game at the time is. Even gran turismo (the whole reason I even got the headset), I can already tell I’m not gonna get that headset out every time I play gt7 (regardless of how amazing it is. eventually I will become numb to that experience and convenience will start to outweigh the desire of vr. I’m not gonna go thru all that to play vr Tetris because I already finished the 2 big vr hit that’s year. It’s too much, and on top of that it’s a very isolated experience most of the time. That’s just reality. At least for me.

RaiderNation478d ago

I mostly agree with you with the exception of GT7. I CANNOT go back to playing that in standard mode after experiencing playing it in VR! That IS the defacto way of playing that game for me now! I feel similarly to RE8, only that game scares the shit out me in VR and I cant play it for long periods of time because my anxiety goes through the roof! Lol.

camel_toad478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

"there’s also the fact that most vr games and even the process of playing them just don’t flow as naturally as just plopping down, grabbing a controller and going for it. There’s work and setup involved and the gameplay is usually a bit different and sometimes more complicated (even if it is cool). There’s a mental tax there."

This is exactly why my psvr1, quest and quest 2 get very little playtime from me compared to just playing regular games. It feels lazy of me because there are great vr experiences and full games but there's the "well I gotta do this and this and this to start playing". Versus sitting with a controller/keyboard mouse.

derek477d ago

@z2g, gt7 has renewed life because of vr. For me its not an either/or situation vr is decisively the way to play that game it's not even close. Reading that comment makes me doubt you even have psvr2. Vr has survived so long and will continue to grow because it offers immersive experiences that a flat screen can't get close to.

Knushwood Butt477d ago

Just came off a GT7 session. One of the end game cafe menus, Toyota WEC Hyper Car at St Croix with a 20 car grid.

Just wow.

Show all comments (72)