Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare appears to be getting a remaster, and that's great news.
FPS (First Person Shooters) have become a staple of a gamer's healthy diet. But where did it all begin?
The minimal effort of any genre is being FPV. And shooter is even less. As example COD, Skyrim, Destiny etc. They are pure casual and flat. Of course there are exception like Doom and Bioshock. But in general not as decent.
Andrew says: "The intrinsic values of COD are the following: memorable campaigns, meticulous multiplayer marathons, and lobbies populated by screaming 12-year-old kids that think puberty is the evolved form of Jigglypuff."
What makes a game eligible for such a prestigious honor as being seen as the greatest of all time? There are four criteria: the game must be widely recognized and remembered, it must exhibit longevity (remaining popular over time), it must enjoy international recognition and success, and it must have exerted significant influence on other games or the industry generally. Some historic titles that deserve credit that aren't just Mario and Sonic.
Fallout 76 should be on the list for quickest price drop, $59.99 at launch to $35 ten days later.
A remaster of a game from a franchise that never changes. Just what I always wanted...
Call of Duty started as a World War II shooter, I'd hardly say a remastering of Cod 4 is a return to the franchise roots.
Ummm.... Call of Duty and the roots are Medal of Honor...