470°

Does Project CARS look better than Driveclub?

Project CARS is a beautiful racing game, but is it on par with the game that set the bar, Driveclub?

Read Full Story >>
gamespresso.com
Walker3275d ago

no, absolutely DC looks miles better and better

Sharingan_no_Kakashi3275d ago

I mean. A horse can only be so dead.

JWiLL5523275d ago

Clickbait gaming sites: "CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!"

Dee_913275d ago (Edited 3275d ago )

last 2 games that made me drop my jaw over visuals: Last of Us & Drive Club.I think its a given that most games that come out nowadays on consoles and PC are pretty much gorgeous, but not many have those awe moments for me.My first real awe moment of last gen was coming out of the tunnels on High Speed ring in the rain on GT5. I've never seen light bloom done so elegantly in a game.GT6 didn't even nail those effects as well as gt5.My first awe moment this gen was Drive Club's weather.

Simply put, no, Drive Club looks better.imo. But i'm more of a sim racer so pCars is the better game overall to me.

badz1493275d ago

on ultra setting pc it might but as far as PS4 games go, short answer is NO.

3274d ago
NuggetsOfGod3274d ago (Edited 3274d ago )

Can't wait for the star citizen vs no mans sky graphics article.

I am not even gonna even attempt to criticize drive club lol

I rather keep my account.

Drive club is better by only a mile :)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3274d ago
KnowledgeIsPower3275d ago

It might look better, but its not better as a Game lol

BiggCMan3275d ago

Depends on what you what type of racing you want. Driveclub hooks you better because it's all about points, and being better than your friends and the community, not unlike Call of Duty for instance. It has that "just one more time" factor in it that is very addicting.

Whereas Project Cars is a slower paced simulation game, that is meant to replicate the career of a real driver. I like Driveclub better, but I am enjoying Project Cars for what it is. I think it's the best Gran Turismo game since GT4 at least, cuz that's basically what it is.

Ricegum3275d ago

I have ProjectCARS and Driveclub and Project Cars blows it out of the water. Very impressive game.

BlackPhillip6663275d ago

two different styles of racer should not compare imo

the_dark_one3274d ago (Edited 3274d ago )

opinions differ from gamer to gamer. whos to say that a game that you dont consider better then the other isnt better to some one else

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3274d ago
BoriboyShoGUN3275d ago

Driveclub has some flaws but the visuals are not it. The game is beautiful !!!!

3275d ago
XiSummershine3275d ago

The video in the article is not from the final build of Project Cars, that video is a few months old already.

But I think your statement is still right, look at this recent comparison from both games on PS4

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

twiztidditzwit3274d ago

I think project cars did the night time better. The light from the headlights is much more realistic. But overall the graphics in drive club are better. I just wish you could steal the lighting at night from Project Cars and slip em in Driveclub. Lol

Clunkyd3275d ago

There's just a lot more attention to detail on the car models in DC.

Psychotica3275d ago

Well at least I could play Project Cars when I bought it. I just went out and bought DriveClub and can't even play it, all I get is a CE-32937-4 error when trying to download a patch..

oasdada3274d ago

Ive had DC since say one and besides the online component ive never had a problem to this day.. i see people trying v hard to downplay this game..

O.t project cars in ultra looks good but not as good as DC.. just look at the foliage in both games and ud understand

Psychotica3274d ago (Edited 3274d ago )

You can lookup this error and driveclub and find others who have had the same issue. I should note i can play it without the patch but i cannot play online without it

AndrewLB3274d ago

Yeah. DriveClub with it's HD textures looks "Miles better" than a game that uses 4k textures. For those of you who might be a bit slow... that's 4x the level of detail. And before the knee-jerk response saying "That's PC! You can't compare PC to PS4!" Well that's BS since many people on this site talked about if they should get the PC or PS4 version, so it's all fair game.

And perhaps you guys didn't notice, there's a reason why all the comparisons you're seeing between Project Cars and DriveClub seem to only focus on weather effects. Of course that's because if they were to compare the textures, physics, AI, detail drop-off at distance, lighting, and shadows... Project Cars would be the clear winner.

Project Car's developers didn't spend 4 months focusing on cool looking water on the windshield because racing in the rain is something that rarely happens in professional motorsports

Mr Lahey3274d ago (Edited 3274d ago )

So project cars is 4k on ps4? Cool story bro.. It's a comparison of two ps4 games if you didn't understand that.

Forn3274d ago

Texture resolution is far from the only thing that defines visuals in a game just so you know.

Kafiota3274d ago

4k is not 4x HD. Its
around 2x actually.
Resolution is measured in height, HD 1920x1080, the value is 1080. Wich stands for the resolution measured in height.
Same for 4k, (UHD) 3840x2160, so 2160 for the height.

2160 is the exact double of 1080. Its not 4x....

Aceman183274d ago

I've a question I hear ppl go on, and on about DC gameplay being lackluster What exactly makes it lackluster to you ppl?

I mean its a driving game what exactly do you expect a driving game do? Or do you guys just find it fun to drive off road running down little creatures for pts?

I mean PC is also a driving game, and it's gameplay is simply just that driving.

I love DC for its arcade style exhilarating driving, and I know I'm going to love the SIM style driving.

As for looks this is a stupid question because one is an exclusive that focuses purely on its intended system while the other is multiplatform, and can never fully utilize the platforms it's on 100% unless it's PC.

Father__Merrin3274d ago

there is no reply to that apart from DC is a good game albiet arcade only and it being ps4 only. if it was on PC i can bet you now n4g users will be jumping up and down claiming this is great for thier sli/xfire titan 4k etc etc

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3274d ago
masterfox3275d ago

haha really ? and you know what is even funnier not even a Ultra settings on Project Cars can surpass Driveclub visuals/style/atmosphere, and to give you goosebumps PC gamers newer games will look even better. :D

PrinceOfAnger3275d ago

"and you know what is even funnier not even a Ultra settings on Project Cars can surpass Driveclub visuals"

Lol!
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Project Cars Alpha stage -- DriveClub final product

Helloween133275d ago

yeah like he said Driveclub is way better looking, and the back drops in P C are very bland almost PS2 graphics

BoriboyShoGUN3274d ago

I don't think people understand what a ultra-settings PC really is! If u think for 1 second that our beloved PS4 is pushing more than a high-end PC on Ultra-settings you might be a mindless fanboy!

ShottyGibs3274d ago (Edited 3274d ago )

Lol.. looks good .. yeah.. plays good yeah... but goosebumps..no..b#tch please, especially not at 30fps

PrinceOfAnger3275d ago (Edited 3275d ago )

can you tell the difference?.(:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

driveclub only has better Weather effect that's all.

JWiLL5523275d ago

Disagree. The reflections in Project Cars don't look quite as natural, ditto the lighting.

Driveclub's dynamic daylight cycles really lead to some spectacular looking scenes. The lighting also appears "softer" for lack of a better term, which gives it a very realistic appearance.

WellyUK3275d ago

Driveclub actually looks miles better in that video... The scenery etc all looks much better.

SpinalRemains1383275d ago

Bull.

The entire game looks better.

XiSummershine3275d ago

Maybe take a look at the full comparison video, not just the footage you stole from it to make that 30 sec vid.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Gamer19823274d ago

the Pagani footage says it all DC blows it away in terms of quality but lets be fair this is a group of industry standard game makers vs an up and coming studio who in the past have only used other peoples engines to make there game and never made there own. Not to mention exclusive vs multiplatform.

starchild3275d ago

People that say Drive club looks way better are just being fanboys. Look at their comment histories. Driveclub does look better, but not miles better. And it isn't as clean (free of jaggies) or as smooth in terms of framerate as Project Cars.

d3nworth13275d ago

That's not being a fanboy that called exaggeration. Doesn't matter if they say "way better" or " miles better" bottom line its look better.

badz1493275d ago

@starchild

did you really just go there? framerate? the framerate is the biggest culprit of Project Car's performance. they are all over the place. DC have it locked down to 30fps 99% of the time

and your comment history shows that you're an avid PS hating fanboy!

WellyUK3274d ago

It does look better and I don't even like Driveclub. Personally think its a very mediocre game. But by the video posted Driveclub looks better. Not a case of being a fan boy its a case of say what you see... which DC looks better than PC in that video.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3274d ago
Fro_xoxo3275d ago (Edited 3275d ago )

Nothing is allowed to look better than Driveclub till another Playstation exclusive racer releases.

lol. This isn't the place to ask this question.

Transistor3275d ago

Other racers are allowed to look better than Driveclub, but they just don't.

It's pretty clear that this bothers you quite a bit.

Rimeskeem3275d ago

Or there might not be a racer that looks better than DriveClub. That's also a possibility

Dee_913275d ago

This isn't the place? I guess, youtube, random Disqus comments on various sites and blogs isn't the place either.. i think the entire internet might not be the place.I think the only good place to ask this question is in your bedroom... since your opinion is the only one that matters apparently.

badz1493275d ago

@theFro

talk about being butthurt! who says they can't look better? Project Cars did it but only if going Ulta and 4k on the pc but as far as the PS4 is concerned, DC does look better.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3274d ago
Show all comments (131)
190°

60FPS on PS5: Unofficial PS5 'FPS Boost' mods are radically improving PS4 back compat

Digital Foundry : Whether it's via FPS Boost or bespoke software upgrades, backwards compatibility on the current-gen consoles delivered an unexpected delight - the ability to liberate older console games from their 30fps limits, running them at 60 frames per second or even higher. FPS Boost did the business for Xbox Series consoles on an impressive range of titles, but there was always the sense that PS5 could do more. It's a hunch that checks out as a range of frame-rate unlocks are available for PS5, covering many must-have games - the major caveat being that only exploitable consoles running on older firmwares are invited to the party.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
darthv72105d ago

you love to see new life being breathed into older titles but damn the process to get there. It should be automatic that these work for everyone... not just those who exploit their systems. Really wish Sony and MS would keep this program going officially.

Psychonaut85105d ago

Damn this sucks. I want this shit so bad, but I’m not jailbreaking my console. And frankly I shouldn’t have to. I’m not a tech person, but is it really that hard for developers to unlock the framerate? Or would that have to be a large patch?

dveio105d ago (Edited 105d ago )

"but is it really that hard for developers to unlock the framerate?"

I guess it's not.

But it has become a profitable business if you do so.

So no one would pay for only the framerate patched to being unlocked. So studios need to offer more than that.

But this would take more time, polishing and would cost more money. So they shy away, but won't unlock the framerate, either.

That's just my personal assumption. But from what I can comprehend technically, it shouldn't be difficult to unlock framerates via a patch for older games.

... if it hadn't became a business.

RaidenBlack105d ago (Edited 105d ago )

frame-rate unlock should be free ...
We've seen many devs offer free patches and updates to pretty old PC titles, even bonuses ... so why can't devs offer the frame unlock patch for free (in consultation with the platform-producers) for a title from just a generation earlier?

Einhander1972105d ago

RaidenBlack

"frame-rate unlock should be free ..."

Obviously the result of that thinking is that developers aren't even going to do it.

If they had been allowed to charge $5-10 you would see incentivized developers doing it way more often.

People just always want everything for free, but it's not free to make the patch, people have to code it then other people have to test it, and there will always be other costs involved.

If people want dollar store gaming then expect to get what you pay for.

shinoff2183104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

Raiden I might be wrong but last I thought it cost money to put patches out on consoles.

As far as me paying for it, I'm not all that interested tbh. Not enough to pay for it with older games, and newer games have been pretty decent about it for the most part.

dumahim105d ago

Sounds like the modder has to go in to make changes to unlock it on a game by game basis. "Simple" enough to do it unofficially, but to have it done officially, they need someone to go in a make that change, put out a patch and put it through certification, which I believe is not necessarily a cheap thing to do. It's questionable if going through this would then give them enough sales to make it worthwhile.

Inverno104d ago

Many games still have physics tied to framerate, i think it's cause they wouldn't want to go in and do anything extra. Then there's the 10 dollar upgrades they rather charge. The problem is that there's no compromise, cause if I could mod my PS4 and all I'd lose is online play then id jailbreak it immediately. Mods have done so much for PC games and they could do the same for consoles, but manufacturers hafto be willing to compromise.

shinoff2183104d ago

It's not to hard to do and there's youtube videos that break it down really well. ANyway most of us here arent able to break are console anyway due to being up to date on firmware from playing

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 104d ago
Chocoburger105d ago

Yep, this sucks having to require a jailbreak for something that should be standard in our industry by now. I learned my lesson when PS4 was jailbroken and I didn't keep a console on low firmware for years, but now I'm holding onto two low firmware PS5s specifically because there are features I'll be able to do that you can't do on official firmware, so this will pay off for me soon enough.

Jin_Sakai105d ago

It should be a sin to let these games sit and be stuck at 30fps.

EazyC104d ago

RDR 2 not getting a 60FPS patch for PS5 was a crime.

170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai531d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox531d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade529d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole529d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow530d ago (Edited 530d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow529d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad530d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist530d ago (Edited 530d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace529d ago (Edited 529d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad529d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim530d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter533d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.