Found on the Unofficial Diablo 3 Site Diii.net (also known as Diabloii.net to Diablo fans) have noticed something quite big going on inside the current home of the Lord of Terror; Diablo boards on Blizzard's Battle.net.
It appears that while the game has been shown to be very modern, using cool effects and being more practical than its predecessor, their infrastructure (Battle.net) is still running on the same software as in the "good old day", and what is presumed to be Diablo haters are spamming the boards with hundreds of thousands of posts.
From the classic RPG to its mobile adaptation, let's rank every Diablo game from worst to best.
Finally some love for diablo 3, I completely agree with its placing! Very nice coop on the ps3 back in the day, but solo was a good grind as well, very enjoyable.
The only thing that irked me was buying the complete or ultimate edition or whatever and suddenly introducing a dlc that's not included.
Diablo 3 > Diablo 2. I tried D2 after playing D3 many times and didn't like that nearly as much as 3.
A legendary Diablo speedrun stood for 15 years—until hackers proved it was fake after testing 2.2 billion dungeon layouts. Here’s what happened!
VideoGamer sits down with Diablo creator David Brevik to discuss his storied career from the 1980s to the modern year.
Wish these people would get a life and move out of their mothers' basements.
Man, I can't believe how this can happen to Blizzard in this day and age! =P
Aren't they supposed to be the PINNACLE of technology and quality?
Guess they need a moderator or two, can't they use some of that subscription revenue to hire some? :P
Don't feed the Trolls :P
As a comment to people reporting the thread:
DON'T USE "OTHER" AS REPORT TYPE!
- Please? =)
The thing with "Other" that most people miss is that it's never possible for the contrib to fix the problem. "Other" should only me used when a stupid contrib is "fixing" problems while not making any changes... If it indeed was SPAM (the ham, which is named that, and referred in the picture) that was the problem, then "Bad Editing" is the correct report form.
I so wish that the contrib test was harder.....