GeekParty writes: "When I watch Xenoblade Chronicles X footage, I feel like I’m having a wonderful dream. The varied landscapes are breathtaking, and the alien fauna is gorgeous. Its gargantuan monsters don’t look menacing; they have a strange, otherwordly beauty to them. Even the music makes it seem as though I’ve entered an ethereal wonderland.
And then this guy shows up and kills the mood completely."
The ill-fated Wii U sold very few units, so it is understandable if you missed out on Xenoblade Chronicles X, here are 9 reasons why you should play the Definitive Edition.
The nice thing about X is you have a Follow Ball. If you haven't played for a few days it will help you jump right back in! Fantastic game! You should at least have 5 initial hours over 2 days or so to invest. I also suggest grinding to at least level 14 before chapter 3.
It's nice that definitive edition makes level grinding easier. Quite a bit quicker than the original release.
I bought it thinking it was like the trilogy and expansion on Switch. I played it for 15 or so hours and stopped. Couldn't get into it, the gameplay was not like the previous ones, it was not what I expected.😕
Greatest RPG ever except end game makes it impossible to complete for anyone who focused on mech battles. Do not focus on mechs or you will be disappointed
Netto's Game Room explains how the Xenoblade titles are connected to each other; from Xenoblade Chronicles, to the newly released Xenoblade Chronicles X Definitive Edition, and even Xenogears and Xenosaga.
1 - 3 are connected. Idk if X is connected since I haven't beaten the epilogue in X yet. X will probably be connected.
With Chronicles finished, it's time to return to the mechs and mysteries of Mira
I never unplugged my Wii U. Still play it almost daily but a definitive edition of X would be appreciated.
It’s one of the systems I have the least games for . Though there are some really good games on it. I have systems from Atari’s , Nintendo’s, Segas , TurboGrafx 16 , PS’s etc etc so I put a few in my game storage room. I do pull it out from time to time and I have a new one in a box but won’t open that .
But I’d really like to have a Chronicles X but not on Switch whatever the next console is preferably so they can add more quality to it .
Playing X at 1080/60 would be great so waiting for the Switch successor would be ideal but it wouldn't be smart to make it a launch game. It would suck waiting til 2025 to get X definitive edition but I think that's what will happen.
I know people say Wii U has no games but I've got over 100 games for it.
I mean, when people say a system has "no games" they aren't saying the system literally had no games released on it. They're more commenting on the state of games that make the system worth owning. For many the Wii U never had a game that made the system worth owning, or if it did, it has a Switch port or successor at this point anyways so they were effectively proven correct to have never purchased a Wii U in the first place.
Yes, depending on the individual the Wii U remains worth owning for the handful of games still locked to it, but for many they'd rather just wait to see what else gets ported in the future at this point. There is exceptionally little you can only play on a Wii U these days though, especially with the eShop dead so anything that may have existed only on it is no longer of consequence to non-Wii U owners.
In all fairness, that's probably a reason they're passing on a few of the still Wii U locked games. Starfox Zero, among the reasons you may not want to port it, would need its entire control scheme reworked from the ground up. Chronicles X may not be as extreme of a case (I don't know, I've never played or watched gameplay), but often unless a game is going to sell really well, it can be hard to convince a company to do more than the basic expected remaster work. Heck, a lot of people figure the only reason we got Galaxy 1 in the 3D All Stars collection for example is because they had already done the work for the Nvidia Shield port for China, which subsequently is likely the major reason they didn't include Galaxy 2. They simply did not want to remap the game controls. It may sound silly since it sounds so simple just by the words, but you have to figure more goes into it than you're probably thinking if it's that much of a sticking point.
Yes, I agree. We definitely need to retake Xenoblade Chronicles X which btw it left us on a cliffhanger suggesting there wiull be a XCX2 .... and im up for it.
I put so many hours into X, just please ad a music volume setting was going crazy walking around base and hearing
"UH UH... YEAH!.. YEAH!...YEAHYEAHYEEEEAAAAH!..U H UH!"
I can't believe they haven't done it yet, it's the Xenoblade game I'm most excited for, I would buy it in a heart beat.
Speak for yourself, the only face that actually looks bad is the MC they are using for these trailers which is irrelevant because you can change that.
The only other face is the little girl, but she is 13 years old, not sure what people expect from a 13 year old Japanese character.
At the end of the day this is a Japanese game made by a Japanese developer who loves Japanese anime (gundam)and Japanese artsyle.
I partly agree, the environments look fantastic, but the character models leave a little to be desired, though the original Xenoblade had this problem as well. Kinda surprising considering this is the studio that did the Xenosaga games and the characters in those games never seemed out of place compared to the envrionments. That being said, I am still really looking forward to this game.
Finally someone is addressing this... the faces look horrible.. Oblivion/Demon Souls/Dark Souls bad... It's so off putting... it really hurts my eyes.. nightmarishly ugly..
What's the issue? Anime style? If that's it then get over it.
If we're talking graphics yeah it's a turd.
probably because all the processing power is being used to draw beautiful, detail-filled landscapes as far as the eye can see. if they used hundereds of polygons to make a nice face, the environment would look like shxt from a PS1 game.
of course, one could argue they could have come up with some sort of system where more detailed models for faces were used in cutscenes, but i guess this is what happens when you are making an epic game and are tied to time constraints- you have to make sacrifices and compromises.
i would take the lush, detailed environment with smooth frame rate at the cost of pretty faces, rather than beautiful faces in a sparse environment with a 20 ft draw distance, jerking with no detail.