110°
8.0

Halo: The Master Chief Collection Review | GameRevolution

GR: They say that no original work goes without borrowing from some material released prior to it and while that’s hardly a guilty plea in the court of creativity, Halo has largely failed to accelerate outside of the Jesus metaphor that started the franchise in Halo: Combat Evolved. In fact, you could even make the argument that any video game that kills the player and subsequently brings him or her back to life to face the challenge once more enters an area that can’t escape this religious parallel, instead reinforcing it literally by definition.

That’s OK. Reading the Old Testament and New Testament in high school meant discovering the Jesus metaphor in nearly everything and it hasn’t exactly weakened the faith of those that would pursue the cleansing blast of a Halo array every once in a while. All of the games collected in Halo: The Master Chief Collection rather predictably push that comparison as far as it can go without asking players to swear allegiance to an apostle in multiplayer. There is so much Halo here. In that, I can only say that this near-complete collection of Master Chief volumes proves exhaustive.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
XiYakushijuAkeginuXi3822d ago

"There is so much Halo here. In that, I can only say that this near-complete collection of Master Chief volumes proves exhaustive."

I think the problem with the low scores is that Halo revolutionized shooters when it first launched in 2001 and Halo 2 in 2004. Now, games borrow elements from Halo and therefore the awe that was experienced with Halo might not be there anymore. But there is no doubt that this is a great bundle.

XBLSkull3822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

2 of the 3 negative bullet points of his:

*Massive time sink. Pace yourself.

*I'm so f***ing tired of shooters.

Another low score over nothing truly negative about the collection.

His last negative bullet point

*Except Reach and ODST.

Neither game had Master Chief in them, and thats what this collection is about.

@ContinuePlay

4/5 (8/10) is low because metacritics for 1-4 are 97/95/94/87. All better than 4/5, and here you get them all for not the original $240 price, but $60, all graphically better and performance is better, features not included in the originals (H1 online multiplayer, etc) and a beta for H5 and a miniseries.

That is why in this case a 4/5 is a bad score. This package is worthy of a 9.5 or 10 from everyone.

ContinuePlay3822d ago

How the hell is 4/5 a low score?!

GarrusVakarian3822d ago

I agree that those points are pretty damn stupid (who the hell reviews a shooter iof they are sick and tired of them?)...but a 4/5 is in no way a "low" score. What the hell is wrong with you?

MasterCornholio3822d ago

A 4/5 is still a great score.

Please stop trolling.

knifefight3822d ago

It's a 4/5. A "low" score. Oh brother, the times we live in are sad -_-

With the bullet points, I gotta wonder, who cares? He's pretty obviously just having some fun down there. The review itself (hundreds of words, if not thousands) is where the meat is.

Ricegum3822d ago

Maybe Halo just isn't considered a "97/95/94/87" game anymore.

DonFreezer3822d ago Show
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3822d ago
aviator1893822d ago

If the reviewer is so tired of shooters, why not let someone who's a fan of shooters or better, fan of halo, review the game?
Obviously someone who has grown apathetic towards shooters isn't going to appreciate this collection to its fullest.
I don't mind the score, but those negative points in the review irk me.

Horseheadinthebed3822d ago

Polygon did the same sort of thing when they got Arthur Gies to review killzone of the ps4 ...he openly hated the other killzones and gave it a stupidly low score, But according to a lot of people that didn't matter!
Anyway this collection is getting great scores across the board,you don't have to worry about the odd 4/5 or 8/10

aviator1893822d ago

Oh, no I'm not worried at all.
My statement is in regards to the general review process.
Whether it is killzone, halo, etc., no review should by anyone who doesn't appreciate or is apathetic towards the genre of the video game under review.

ghostface93822d ago

These low scores are getting ridiculous so your telling me the last of us on ps4 which just has a res fps upgrade and the dlc added stilll got a 95. While halo the master chief collection has over a 100 maps and remade cinematics and a halo tv/movie all included with 4 games where 3 were in the mid 90's.

aviator1893822d ago

It's not the score that's bothering me with some of these reviews.
It's the negative points that they're bringing up to justify their scores.
It's as if some reviewers' (gamerevolution, metro) negative points really aren't negative points about the game. (no sprinting, not a fan of fps shooters, game has too much content so you'll have to pace yourself, jarring transitions between mp of each Halo -> each of those complaints are just ridiculously silly).

powerkiller473818d ago

this is the only site that I have ran across that gave such a low rating I have to ask my self why that is and I came to the same thing over and over the person must not like halo at all. I just pickup my copy and started playing it and at very lease should have got a 9.5 or 10.0
I may 9.0 there is just no reason to gave a game like halo the master chief collection such a low rating

140°

Five Games to Play While Waiting for Armored Core 6

The newest From Software game is just around the corner. These are five excellent games to play while waiting for Armored Core 6.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Si-Fly621d ago

Can I suggest BG3 as a 6th? It’s helping me pass the time quite well.

anast620d ago

I'm still trying to finish WotR.

DivineHand125620d ago

With the release date being just a little over a week away, it may not be a good idea to burn yourself out on mech games until then.

RavenWolfx620d ago

i want a Chromehounds sequel so bad...

raWfodog620d ago (Edited 620d ago )

Surprised that the article didn’t mention Mechwarrior 5: Mercenaries if we’re talking about mech-related games.

ZeekQuattro620d ago

It was an odd article imo. Like why are games that feature a handful of mech themed levels in there. When I think of mech games I don't think Halo and Wolfenstein no matter how fun those levels were.

Show all comments (8)
180°

Best Xbox Game Studios Franchises

These are some of the best and most popular video game franchises now owned by Xbox Game Studios and Microsoft.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Sciurus_vulgaris630d ago (Edited 630d ago )

Microsoft was involved with Halo, Gears, Forza, Ori, Flight Simulator and Fable from early development, I will give them credit for those franchises. Fallout, Elder Scrolls and Doom were established franchise before being acquired by MS.

Crows90629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

Exactly. They had nothing to do with their most popular franchises now.

Their old franchises are dwindling and pretty much non-existent.

They've had perfect dark in the chamber this whole time and haven't done squat...that tells you the kind of company they are. Fable is another franchise that's been destroyed and ignored...let's see how the new game turns out.

Profchaos628d ago

Yeah perfect dark, banjo conquer ms seems to kill more franchises then they like to admit while pretending to care about others like hexen

Sitdown629d ago

Given the article specifically says "now owned", what made you feel the need to do a break down?

thesoftware730628d ago

Sit-down,

Because it's N4G and any opportunity to shit on MS is never missed.

Rude-ro629d ago

Gears is not.
It was the same as mass effect:
Just contracted.

closed_account630d ago (Edited 630d ago )

Ah yes, feels like forever ago since Microsoft created Skyrim. So much so, I had actually forgotten they had created it and the other Elder Scrolls games! 🤔

*They really shaped my preteen years w the original Doom too!

ocelot07629d ago

Don't forget the original Elder Scrolls way back in 1994 or fallout in 1997.

Sitdown626d ago

So you don't understand the combination of "now owned"?

Crows90629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

I fully expect all these popular franchises to be killed off by Microsoft. Just a matter of time.

Unless they take a huge distance approach which pretty much means they don't ba e anything to do with the games being made ...in that case the franchises should be fine. But then...they shouldn't really get credit.

DOMination-629d ago

"I fully expect all these popular franchises to be killed off by Microsoft. Just a matter of time."

Based on what?? Microsoft usually gets stick for releasing too MANY games in their franchises, to the point where it's quite a long-running joke - one I'm sure you've partaken in before.

Pretty much all of their major IP has had releases in the last five years or have upcoming releases scheduled so I see no evidence whatsoever for this claim.

"Unless they take a huge distance approach which pretty much means they don't ba e anything to do with the games being made"

But.. They HAVE been very hands-off for a long time and have drawn lots of criticism for it?

fr0sty628d ago

See: All of Rare's games

DOMination-628d ago

I really wouldn't say that MS have let Rare franchises die. They've just had the freedom to create new IP in Sea of Thieves and Everwild. MS are currently developing a Perfect Dark game, licensed Killer Instinct out, Rare themselves released several compilations and several Banjo games as well as PDZ in the past.

I'm not sure what else you could want. They can only make one game at a time. You can't say MS let all their franchises die but also be annoyed that they allow their studios to make new IP.

Profchaos628d ago

If that's the case where my banjo or conquer sequel why didn't I get sunset overdrive 2 oh yeah not enough bro in those games

ChasterMies629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

EA is a good example of what can happen to a franchise when a larger corporation buys up studios from a smaller corporation. Quarterly earnings should never matter more than quality.

wiz7191628d ago

@Crows that is the case , Zenimax is operating independently of MS and have full creative freedom to do what they want. Zenimax games aren’t being published under XGS ,

ravens52629d ago

Soon Microsoft will be known for making Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Candy Crush, Call of Duty etc. Lmao they know what they're doing. Especially with the archiving issue the gaming industry has.

closed_account629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

Microsoft built the game industry. Microsoft invented games. Didn't you know? ;)

**What a bizzaro world we live in where the losers can become the winners overnight.

Hypertension140629d ago

@ravens52

What are those franchises you're talking about?
Activision/Blizzard only makes Call of Duty and Bethesda has Elder Scrolls and Starfield only, stop making it seen that is much more anti competitive/consumer than it actually is.......

Profchaos628d ago

Zero creative vision and the ability to bankroll it by purchasing everything that everyone else had success with even Halo wasn't technically theirs Bungie had to sell it to them to become independent

Atari6052B629d ago

You mean any studio Microsoft could acquire to flog last gen games on game pass ... What happened to HD-DVD that Microsoft pushed so hard ...

Show all comments (22)
70°

Games with the dumbest NPCs

Non-playable characters in certain games are meme material, thanks to their foolish behavior. These are the big-budget games with the dumbest NPCs.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
closed_account631d ago (Edited 631d ago )

Bethesda makes the most consistently stupid NPCs, like really bad... yet I still can't help but love playing their games. Guilty pleasure, I guess. *sigh* 😩

Flawlessmic630d ago

How did redfall not make the cut.

anast630d ago (Edited 630d ago )

Every Bethesda game and Every Halo game. This list needed to have Cyberpunk somewhere.