Approvals 11/3 ▼
gameseveryday (3) - 4042d ago Cancel
Wingsfan24 (3) - 4041d ago Cancel
anipop81 (1) - 4041d ago Cancel
Dudebro90 (1) - 4042d ago Cancel
darksky (1) - 4042d ago Cancel
neil363 (2) - 4041d ago Cancel
250°

AMD Catalyst 14.6 Beta Drivers Officially Released, Drops Support For Windows 8

AMD has officially released a new beta driver for its graphics cards. According to its release notes, this is the first driver that does not support Windows 8 (from now on, all AMD Catalyst drivers will no longer support Windows 8). This means that PC gamers will have to upgrade to Windows 8.1 in order to take advantage of newer drivers for their graphics cards.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4041d ago
rodiabloalmeida4042d ago

Linux must win. I hope SteamOS prevails. I know a lot of people who wants to jump out of windows boat. And they only don't just because the lack of gaming support. Windows 8 is the worst thing that happened in recent history regarding or not games.

Cryptcuzz4041d ago

Yeah, I had Windows 8 for a short while, I re-installed Windows 7 Ultimate shortly after.

rodiabloalmeida4041d ago (Edited 4041d ago )

Yeah. I don't support win8/8.1 as a gaming OS. I'm with Gabe Newell on this one. Windows 7 will be my last windows OS, I really hope.

Silly Mammo4041d ago

When I had my recent PC built, I "downgraded" to Windows 7, because my wife has Win 8 on here laptop and we hate it.

Immorals4041d ago

Will be interested to see how things change(or not!) when dx12 releases..

MEsoJD4041d ago

It's all about Windows 7.

Darkstares4041d ago

They are not stopping supporting Windows 8 entirely, you just have to update to 8.1

rodiabloalmeida4041d ago (Edited 4041d ago )

I know that. It doesn't mean I support win8/8.1 as a gaming OS. I'm with Gabe Newell on this one.

Volkama4041d ago

^^ This. Misleading/innaccurate headline.

1nsaint4041d ago

Dont know what everyone's problem is with windows 8.

After i upgraded from windows 7 to 8.1 i had speed inceases in FPS and recording while playing a game became a lot smoother (better FPS and no stutter)

I do think the windows 7 start bar is much better but you can just install that on windows 8 in addidtion to the new start screen

hellzsupernova4041d ago

I urn 8.1 on my gaming pc. It does not bother me to be honest, never had 7 to compare it with although I hear people prefer 7.

TI_214041d ago

Win 8.1 as an OS is actually not bad, but the homescreen is so unnecessary. It annoys the heck out of me that it pops up everytime one hits the windows button. <,<

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4041d ago
Christopher4042d ago

I really wish they had stuck to the SP1, SP2 naming methodology. Saying "No longer supports Windows 8" is so confusing to many people.

Volkama4041d ago

It is only confusing because it is innaccurate. I think if the headline was "No longer supports Windows 8.0" it would be simple enough to follow.

Unfortunately for me this does mean I need to install the service pack, which I was avoiding because it did some odd things to my profile on another PC.

Christopher4041d ago

It's inaccurate because that's how MS says it as well. Such a bad decision on their part, IMHO.

Volkama4041d ago

No, it's innaccurate because it is an innaccurate headline :)

AMD's own release notes say quite specifically that they are dropping support for 8.0

Never do they say they are dropping support for Windows 8, because that would encompass the service packs as well.

The difference in naming convention really is minor.

Skate-AK4041d ago

Wonder if it will fix the AMD problems with Watch Dogs.

WalterWJR4041d ago (Edited 4041d ago )

It helps a bit but claiming crossfire support has 90% better performance is either a complete lie or mine just runs like a turd.

karlowma4041d ago

The game crashes at the title screen if I enable crossfire. Single card runs fine though.

fluffydelusions4041d ago

I beat the game today and had no problems... 280x/i7 4770k

Grilla4041d ago (Edited 4041d ago )

Same here, haven't had any problems 7950, i7-870. I think most of the ppl having problems were running a older driver. It will run with 4gb ram to, I just make sure I don't have alot of other crap running at the same time.

incendy354041d ago

Windows 8.1 is Windows 8 haha. 8.1 is just a free upgrade, similar to what they used to call Service Packs.

Bigpappy4041d ago

LOL. You know these people did read the article and went with the inflammatory headline. This is the perfect place to get lots of people to fall for this type of attention grab. It actually got my attention too, because I was wondering why would AMD not support windows 8. Then I read the article and in the first paragraph they state clearly that you need to add the 8.1 update for the drivers to work.

Now all the little Windows haters are the first in professing the end of windows 8 and a move to Linux. Linux will never be mainstream. Steam machine has a very slim chance of success, and if the Valve developer is to be taken seriously, DX12 will pretty much bury it.

PotatoClock4041d ago

Meh. At least the windows 8 haters have based it on something tangible. Windows 8 is widely seen as being sub-par and AMD have even acknowledged this and dropped support for it.

You, however, have proved yourself to be sadder than the windows hater you despise. You've based your opinion that SteamOS will never be mainstream and the Steam machine only has a slim chance of success on nothing, unless you have the uncanny ability to see into the future. You even go as far as announcing that a currently unreleased DX12 will 'bury' it.

You can't even argue that Valve's history has determined your opinion. Valve's success with each game it has released and Steam's success completely buries that slim chance of an argument.

Why not climb down from your podium and join the rest of us waiting in reality to see if SteamOS and the Steam machine will or will not be successful?

XStation4041d ago

"This means that PC gamers will have to upgrade to Windows 8.1 in order to take advantage of newer drivers for their graphics cards."

This is from the article. I'm posting this because, i can see people saying well, "this is because windows 8 is shit." Well, guess what? It's supported on the upgraded version of Windows 8.

OC_MurphysLaw4041d ago

Yup, and being very honest assuming you had Windows 8 I don't any reason why you would stick to Windows 8 vs Windows 8.1. the upgrade was free and the changes implemented made Windows 8.1 1000 times better than 8 on PC's.

1nsaint4041d ago

so what? its free, it runs better and has more options

Show all comments (31)
260°

AMD CEO Shares Vision Behind Xbox Partnership and Next-Gen Chip Roadmap

AMD CEO Lisa Su talks about the Xbox AMD partnership, next-gen Ryzen + Radeon chips, and AI rendering tech coming to all Xbox devices.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 19h ago
Obscure_Observer1d 19h ago

AMD is really building hype around their unique partnership with Microsoft to help and build an advanced and seamless Xbox ecosystem across all Xbox consoles and devices.

I wonder what she meant by "full roadmap of gaming optimized chips" though? Seems ambitious.

Next year´s Xbox Showcase already looks promising and exciting. Here´s hoping they deliver.

InUrFoxHole1d 13h ago

They had best show 3yrs in a row. Heading for another

VenomUK1d 6h ago

Obscure_Observer said “I wonder what she meant by "full roadmap of gaming optimised chips" though? Seems ambitious.” To me, I interpret this to mean rather than having a couple of X/S products for launch and a handheld there is a longer term plan to release new products with higher specs at timed intervals. I’m speculating of course, but this could mean a spec bump every year or two, so that even if the PS6 or Steam Deck Home is released a year after ‘Xbox’ Microsoft can release an updated model that has a higher spec.

Agent7520h ago

But Microsoft forgot the games.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 2h ago

It's X3D chips for console. Everyone knows this. And it's been rumored in the PS6 forever.

Ganif1d ago

Correct.

"Sony's PlayStation 6 reportedly will feature an AMD semi-custom APU with a Zen 5 CPU and UDNA GPU, capable of 4K 120FPS and 8K 60FPS gaming. The console will include X3D cache and advanced AI upscaling technology."

https://www.tweaktown.com/n...

Obscure_Observer20h ago

"It's X3D chips for console. Everyone knows this. And it's been rumored in the PS6 forever."

I doubt that AMD´s CEO would waste her time making this huge and important partnership announcement over a tech that will be 7 years old by the those next gen consoles will be released.

Notellin20h ago

You should have just lead this comment with the fact that you have zero understanding of technology in the consoles and instead have a Toms Hardware online forum level of education.

Agent7520h ago

But Microsoft forgot the games

Obscure_Observer20h ago

@VenomUK

"I’m speculating of course, but this could mean a spec bump every year or two, so that even if the PS6 or Steam Deck Home is released a year after ‘Xbox’ Microsoft can release an updated model that has a higher spec."

Very interesting theory. Still not sure how MS would actually make it work.

KwietStorm_BLM16h ago

"I doubt that AMD´s CEO would waste her time making this huge and important partnership announcement over a tech that will be 7 years old by the those next gen consoles will be released."

How old is the tech in consoles? It's not a huge announcement. It's marketing and you know it is.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 16h ago
Fishy Fingers1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Some odd, deliberate wording, no branding, not 'Xbox consoles, Xbox handhelds' specifically, feels and sounds like they're building towards hardware that anyone can be used or licensed to/by themselves and other manufacturers.

Multiplatform software and hardware 'Xbox/AMD APU'.

Obscure_Observer1d 18h ago

I guess you missed Sarah Bond´s next generation Xbox announcement this week, were she clearly states:

"I´m thrilled to share that we´ve established a strategic multi-year partnership with AMD to co-engineer silicon across a portfolio of devices, including, *our* next generation *Xbox consoles*."

But hey, I don´t think you´re entirely wrong, maybe MS will build their own Xbox consoles while licencing other manufactures to build and sell their own Xbox branded consoles. Who knows

BeHunted1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

I think you watched the wrong video. It's below the description, or you can watch it directly on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/kprpRvsOua...

PRIMORDUS1d 18h ago Show
HyperMoused1d 18h ago

Shares vision....we provide chips for money, this deal will sell many chips, we will make lots of money...good vision

Christopher1d 18h ago

The marketing behind this is so heavy that I worry about the actual outcome. Why are they just not showing us the product, why all this talking in market speak?

Lightning771d 13h ago

Probably because the next xbox isn't ready to release yet?

The marketing and rumors seem to be heavy out of no where. The rumor was a 27 release but it maybe it could be 26 new console launch instead.

Who knows.

Eonjay1d 1h ago

There PR is alrways super heavy handed. No one is acutally buying an Xbox as is.
Also it is very early to be talking so much about a next gen console.

Obscure_Observer20h ago

There´s a lot of people interested on Xbox Next and its ability to run games from major stores like Steam.

We know that the PS6 is just around the corner as well, but so far, no news on what it might improve over the PS5 or PS5 Pro.

However, Sony already made public that their priority and actual focus is the PS6. So its not "very early" to talk about next gen when the very console manufactures are talking about it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 20h ago
Show all comments (38)
90°

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D & 9900X3D 3D V-Cache CPUs Now Available

AMD launches the Ryzen 9 9950X3D for $699 & Ryzen 9 9900X3D for $599, offering the best-in-class gaming & content creation CPU performance.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community101d ago
mkis007101d ago

X3D really turned around AMD's cpu prospects. I wont touch intel now, vs 10 years ago I wouldn't imagine going anywhere near AMD cpu's for gaming only.

ZycoFox101d ago

Zen 1 was merely "meh" IMO, it had major RAM compatibility issues, only really worked with Samsung memory from what I recall, and performance was ok at best, the 8700k launched the same year and was top dog even when Zen 2 came out. Though Zen 2 was much better.. it just lacked a bit in gaming, good all rounder chips though for other applications.

AMD are trying to upsell the 9900x3D to 9950x3D, pricing is weird (too close) and odd chip configuration.. it should be a lot cheaper. They did the same with the 9070 -> 9070XT.

Some funny choices going on at AMD..

FinalFantasyFanatic101d ago (Edited 101d ago )

Zen 1 was pretty great for what it was, considering that was the first time in a long time that AMD was actually competitve with Intel, it was also the first time you could easily get something with more than 4 cores/threads. The RAM issues was frustrating AF though, especially since Zen 1 performance relied so heavily on fast RAM.

If we ignore the price, the 990x3D and 9950X3D look pretty great provided you can actually make use of those extra cores/threads, otherwise the 9800x3D is better value.

PixelOmen100d ago

Zen1 was the beginning of the turn around and by Zen3 it was starting to become ultra competitive. X3D was really only the final nail in the coffin.

Jingsing100d ago (Edited 100d ago )

I guess the real question is how many compatibility issues will arise from their motherboard chipsets? also the selection of motherboards for AMD is more limited too. Which often limits what kind of form factor build you want. Last time around I avoided AMD due to their chipsets having horrid USB3 support with accessories. You tend not to see these kind of issues being talked about, it ends up just being games and synthetic benchmarks.

220°

Project Amethyst: AMD & Sony Collaborate on FSR 4

AMD and Sony co-develop FSR 4 upscaler under Project Amethyst, enhancing visuals and performance for future PlayStation consoles.

Read Full Story >>
techgenyz.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community104d ago
105d ago
Eonjay104d ago

Clearly there was a colab as every game used to demo the tech was a WWS game. And of course they alluded yo this as far bask as the Pro Tech deep dive.

This means that PSSR is probably a lightweight CNN version of FSR 4 which would make sense due to the Pro and PS6 being AMD cards. The biggest relevant difference in the PRO and the RDNA 4 cards being that the PC cards have 3x+ the TOPS.

They both deliver good results with FSR4 having a better denoiser.

PanicMechanic101d ago

I remember Cerny saying that whatever developments were made with PSSR for the prop, that tech would translate into and help develop FSR 4. Sony is making the right moves with AMD

Eonjay101d ago

Yes it feels like they helped them catch up with ML real fast.

Starman69104d ago

Can't believe how good God of war Ragnarok is on the pro 😳

DivineHand125104d ago

The question is, is PSSR going to be replaced by FSR4 on future playstation consoles and is the PS5 Pro FSR4 capable?

--Onilink--104d ago

Unlikely given that FSR4 is only supported by the 9000 cards.

I would expect the PS6 to use FSR4 since it is definitely superior to PSSR, not really much of a point in keeping investing separate resourced into PSSR, but who knows if both will be available on PS6

ABizzel1104d ago

FSR 5 would likely be out by then and probably a transformer model. I assume Sony will continue to use PSSR for branding purposes but it will essentially be FSR 5 with a PlayStation specifically solution.

The_Hooligan103d ago

In my opinion I think they will still use PSSR for the PS6 mainly because that was a big marketing point for the PS5 Pro and Sony probably doesn't want to abandon it. They might call it PSSR 2.0 or something and will probably use similar tech as FSR4 due to the partnership between the two companies. I doubt PS6 will use anything similar to the 9000 cards so won't have the same bells and whistles as the FSR4.

NoDamage104d ago

I was going to build a PC soon with a last gen and card but this makes me think I should wait to make sure I get the best experience in the next generation as well.

I guess I'm going to be all in on AMD which is the opposite of what I would normally lean towards.

ZycoFox104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

Value wise the 9070XT is a decent card if you don't want to pay for Nvidia ones.. That being said, make sure you're happy with the restrictions using some software, if you're happy with just gaming though AMD should be fine.

Probably best bet price wise is get the 9070XT and then upgrade next gen in a couple of years.. With Nvidia this new gen has been a bust, only the 5090 is a decent step up, even the 4090 beats the 5080 by a fair margin.

Hopefully Nvidia bounces back next gen.. though I expect refreshed 5000 cards before then, 5080 Ti / Super will probably be = to a 4090.

NoDamage103d ago

Thanks! I'll look into software restrictions. Never thought there would be issues there and it's important since I do some graphic design. I was thinking about the 9070 but will have to wait till a it's actually available to buy without the current nonsense.

Show all comments (14)